Citation Analysis in Breast Reconstruction Publications Between 2000 and 2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110499
Author(s):  
Rebecca Miller ◽  
Sheina Macadam ◽  
Daniel Demsey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Introduction and Purpose: Breast reconstruction is an active area of plastic surgery research. Citation analysis allows for quantitative analysis of publications, with more citations presumed to indicate greater influence. We performed citation analysis to evaluate the most cited papers on breast reconstruction between 2000 to 2010 to identify contemporary research trends. Methods: The SCI-EXPANDED database was used to identify the 50 most cited papers. Data points included authorship, publication year, publication journal, study design, level of evidence, number of surgeons/institutions, center of surgery, primary outcome assessed, implant/flap/acellular dermal matrix/fat graft, acellular dermal matrix brand and use with implants/flaps, fat graft use with implants/flaps, unilateral/bilateral, one-/two-stage, immediate/delayed, number of patients/procedures, complications. Descriptive analysis of trends was performed based on results. Results: 20% of papers were published in 2006, 16% in 2007 and 12% in both 2004/2009. 66% were published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The majority were retrospective or case series, and of Level III or IV evidence. The one Level I study was a prospective multicenter trial. 21 and 7 papers discussed procedures by single/multiple surgeons, respectively. Results from single/multiple centers were discussed in 18 and 6 papers, respectively. 30 papers discussed implant-based reconstruction, 22 papers flap-based (19 microsurgical), 15 papers acellular dermal matrix, and five papers fat grafting. The primary focus in the majority was complications or outcomes. Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates continually evolving techniques in breast reconstruction. However, there is notable lack of high quality evidence to guide surgical decision-making in the face of increasing surgical options.

Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Nguyen ◽  
Justin Williams ◽  
Albert Losken
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Prosthetic Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Prosthetic reconstruction is the most popular option for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. There are several different techniques, such as prepectoral versus subpectoral placement, and delayed versus immediate reconstruction, each with their own sets of risks and benefits. With the advent of improved implant technology, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting, prepectoral direct to implant has become an accepted and increasingly popular method of reconstruction, with similar to improved complication rates and outcomes as traditional staged tissue expander reconstruction. Prosthetic reconstruction has had some recent controversies, including breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implant illness, and many future studies are being directed towards these topics. This review contains 5 figures, and 53 references. Keywords: breast reconstruction, breast implant, acellular dermal matrix, prepectoral reconstruction, tissue expander, fat grafting, capsular contracture, immediate reconstruction, breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, breast implant illness

Ancillary considerations in breast surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 1145-1150
Author(s):  
Emily G. Clark ◽  
Melissa A. Mueller ◽  
Gregory R.D. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Oncological Safety ◽  
Acellular Dermal ◽  
Radiographic Changes ◽  
Suspicious Lesions

Debated topics and new and evolving techniques in breast surgery are discussed in this chapter. Antibiotics and the use of closed-suction drains vary among surgeons, but the existing evidence favours discontinuation of antibiotics within 24 hours in most cases, and the indications for drains are limited but include breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM). ADM is a biological tissue substitute with many applications in breast surgery. The product selected and surgical technique used are often case specific; cost and patient anatomy play major roles. Although not suitable for all patients, ADM is an asset to prosthetic breast reconstruction. In addition, ADM is useful in the correction of breast surgery complications, including malpositioning and capsular contracture. It may be combined with fat grafting to mask rippling. Fat grafting, or lipomodelling, is an evolving science with promising results. Technique is critical for good results, and is described in this chapter. Radiographic changes after fat grafting are usually discernible from suspicious lesions, and growing evidence supports the oncological safety of this procedure

Breast Reconstruction with Implants and Tissue Expanders

2019 ◽  
pp. 669-676
Author(s):  
Ruth J. Barta ◽  
Omotinuwe Adepoju ◽  
Bruce Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Tissue Expanders ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Acellular Dermal

This chapter details breast reconstruction following breast surgery. Over the past decade the number of women choosing reconstruction with tissue expanders and implants has steadily increased, while the percentage of women having autologous reconstruction has plateaued or fallen off. The authors explain the use of tissue expanders and implants and detail the advancements made in the ability to evaluate tissue in real-time intervals. Additional advances in technique, implant design, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting have improved the aesthetic results of breast reconstruction even further, and these techniques are discussed in detail. The authors address patient-specific indications and contraindications, the use of acellular dermal matrix, the assessment of the defect and perfusion, patient markings, room setup, and operative technique.

scholarly journals The Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Using Two Types of Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast-Conserving Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3430
Author(s):  
Jeongshin An ◽  
Hyungju Kwon ◽  
Woosung Lim ◽  
Byung-In Moon ◽  
Nam Sun Paik
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
The Body ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Specimen Weight ◽  
Breast Shape ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Breast reconstruction during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can improve the breast shape. This study introduces breast reconstruction in BCS with two types of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The study included 134 patients who underwent BCS due to breast cancer from February 2018 to May 2021. This study was conducted by one surgeon, and is the result of a three-year study. The patient group who underwent BCS using ADM was mainly targeted at patients with minor to severe defects after the operation. The average age of the patients was 51.8 years, and the body mass index (BMI) was 23.8 kg/m. The specimen weight was 30–120 g. The average surgical time, including reconstruction, was 100.4 min, combined with reconstruction. There were minor complications in six patients. The advantage of using ADM is that it can quickly correct the shape of the breast after conventional BCS surgery. Pellet-type ADM, rather than sheet-type, can create a breast shape similar to that before surgery. Breast reconstruction using ADM can be an easy and convenient method for making a better shape from BCS.

Minimizing Complications With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Ganske ◽  
Kapil Verma ◽  
Heather Rosen ◽  
Elof Eriksson ◽  
Yoon S. Chun
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Acellular Dermal

P105: Subpectoral and prepectoral implant based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: An audit of surgical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. e38
Author(s):  
Kirti Katherine Kabeer ◽  
Mihir Chandarana ◽  
Maria Prayle ◽  
Sadaf Jafferbhoy ◽  
Sekhar Marla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Histologic Analysis of Fetal Bovine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Gaster ◽  
Aaron J. Berger ◽  
Stefanie D. Monica ◽  
Robert T. Sweeney ◽  
Ryan Endress ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Histologic Analysis ◽  
Fetal Bovine ◽  
Acellular Dermal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document