scholarly journals Gene expression profiling of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma identifies new biologic insights with potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wee J. Chng ◽  
Ellen D. Remstein ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
P. Leif Bergsagel ◽  
Julie A. Vrana ◽  
...  

Abstract We conducted comprehensive gene expression profiling (GEP) of primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (n = 33) and compared the results to GEP of other B- and T-cell lymphomas and normal lymphocytes to identify novel markers and deregulated pathways. MALT has a prominent T-cell signature and a marginal zone/memory B-cell profile. Four novel transcripts were specifically overexpressed in MALT, and 2 of these, MMP7 and SIGLEC6, were validated at the protein level. GEP also revealed distinct molecular subsets in MALT. One subset, characterized by MALT1 translocations, showed overexpression of nuclear factor-κB (NF-KB) pathway genes but also was enriched for chemokine signaling pathways. Another subset showed increased plasma cells and a prominent plasma cell gene signature. By analyzing several genes with very high (“spiked”) expression in individual cases, we identified clusters with different biologic characteristics, such as samples with MALT1 translocations having high expression of MALT1 and RARA, samples with plasmacytic differentiation having high FKBP11 expression, and samples with high RGS13 expression tending to have trisomy 3 and reactive follicles. In conclusion, MALT subgroups with distinct pathologic features defined by distinct groups of deregulated genes were identified. These genes could represent novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (14) ◽  
pp. 2543-2553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemiek Broyl ◽  
Dirk Hose ◽  
Henk Lokhorst ◽  
Yvonne de Knegt ◽  
Justine Peeters ◽  
...  

Abstract To identify molecularly defined subgroups in multiple myeloma, gene expression profiling was performed on purified CD138+ plasma cells of 320 newly diagnosed myeloma patients included in the Dutch-Belgian/German HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. Hierarchical clustering identified 10 subgroups; 6 corresponded to clusters described in the University of Arkansas for Medical Science (UAMS) classification, CD-1 (n = 13, 4.1%), CD-2 (n = 34, 1.6%), MF (n = 32, 1.0%), MS (n = 33, 1.3%), proliferation-associated genes (n = 15, 4.7%), and hyperdiploid (n = 77, 24.1%). Moreover, the UAMS low percentage of bone disease cluster was identified as a subcluster of the MF cluster (n = 15, 4.7%). One subgroup (n = 39, 12.2%) showed a myeloid signature. Three novel subgroups were defined, including a subgroup of 37 patients (11.6%) characterized by high expression of genes involved in the nuclear factor kappa light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells pathway, which include TNFAIP3 and CD40. Another subgroup of 22 patients (6.9%) was characterized by distinct overexpression of cancer testis antigens without overexpression of proliferation genes. The third novel cluster of 9 patients (2.8%) showed up-regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatases PRL-3 and PTPRZ1 as well as SOCS3. To conclude, in addition to 7 clusters described in the UAMS classification, we identified 3 novel subsets of multiple myeloma that may represent unique diagnostic entities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10030-10030
Author(s):  
Jennifer Seelisch ◽  
Matthew Zatzman ◽  
Federico Comitani ◽  
Fabio Fuligni ◽  
Ledia Brunga ◽  
...  

10030 Background: Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the only subtype of childhood ALL whose outcome has not improved over the past two decades. The most important prognosticator is the presence of rearrangements in the Mixed Lineage Leukemia gene (MLL-r), however, many patients present with high-risk clinical features but without MLL-r. We recently identified two cases of infant ALL with high-risk clinical features resembling MLL-r, but were negative for MLL-r by conventional diagnostics. RNA sequencing revealed a partial tandem duplication in MLL (MLL-PTD). We thus aimed to determine if MLL-PTD, other MLL abnormalities, or other genetic or transcriptomic features were driving this subset of high-risk infant ALL without MLL-r. Methods: We obtained 19 banked patient samples from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) infant ALL trial (AALL0631) from MLL wildtype patients as determined by FISH and cytogenetics. Utilizing deep RNA-sequencing, we manually inspected the MLL gene for MLL-PTD, while also performing automated fusion detection and gene expression profiling in search of defining features of these tumors. Results: 3 additional MLL-PTDs were identified, all in patients with infant T-cell ALL, whereas both index cases were in patients with infant B-cell ALL. Gene expression profiling analysis revealed that all five MLL-PTD infants clustered together. Eight infants (7 with B-cell ALL) were found to have Ph-like expression. Five of these 8 infants were also found to have an IKZF1/JAK2 expression profile; one of these five had a PAX5-JAK2 fusion detected. Two infants (including the one noted above) had novel PAX5 fusions, known drivers of B-cell leukemia. Additional detected fusions included TCF3-PBX1 and TCF4-ZNF384. Conclusions: MLL-PTDs were found in both B- and T-cell infant ALL. Though Ph-like ALL has been described in adolescents and young adults, we found a substantial frequency of Ph-like expression among MLL-WT infants. Further characterization of these infants is ongoing. If replicated in other infant cohorts, these two findings may help explain the poor prognosis of MLL-WT ALL when compared to children with standard risk ALL, and offer the possibility of targeted therapy for select infants.


2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brudzewsky ◽  
A. E. Pedersen ◽  
M. H. Claesson ◽  
M. Gad ◽  
N. N. Kristensen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Yuanyuan Zha ◽  
Robbert M. Spaapen ◽  
Rebecca Mathew ◽  
Kenneth Barr ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (11) ◽  
pp. 7406-7414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Appay ◽  
Andreas Bosio ◽  
Stefanie Lokan ◽  
Yvonne Wiencek ◽  
Christian Biervert ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2277-2277
Author(s):  
Daruka Mahadevan ◽  
Catherine Spier ◽  
Kimiko Della Croce ◽  
Susan Miller ◽  
Benjamin George ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: WHO classifies NHL into B (~85%) and T (~15%) cell subtypes. Of the T-cell NHL, peripheral T-cell NHL (PTCL, NOS) comprises ~6–10% with an inferior response and survival to chemotherapy compared to DLBCL. Gene Expression Profiling (GEP) of DLBCL has provided molecular signatures that define 3 subclasses with distinct survival rates. The current study analyzed transcript profiling in PTCL (NOS) and compared and contrasted it to GEP of DLBCL. Methods : Snap frozen samples of 5 patients with PTCL (NOS) and 4 patients with DLBCL were analyzed utilizing the HG-U133A 2.0 Affymetrix array (~18,400 transcripts, 22,000 probe sets) after isolating and purifying total RNA (Qiagen, RNAeasy). The control RNA samples were isolated from normal peripheral blood (PB) B-cell (AllCell, CA), normal PB T-cell (AllCell, CA) and normal lymph node (LN). Immunohisto-chemistry (IHC) confirmed tumor lineage and quantitative real time RT-PCR was performed on selected genes to validate the microarray study. The GEP data were processed and analyzed utilizing Affymetrix MAS 5.0 and GeneSpring 5.0 software. Our data were analyzed in the light of the published GEP of DLBCL (lymphochip and affymtrix) and the validated 10 prognostic genes (by IHC and real time RT-PCR). Results : Data are represented as “robust” increases or decreases of relative gene expression common to all 5 PTCL or 4 DLBCL patients respectively. The table shows the 5 most over-expressed genes in PTCL or DLBCL compared to normal T-cell (NT), B-cell (NB) and lymph node (LN). PTCL vs NT PTCL vs LN DLVCL vs NB DLBCL vs LN COL1A1 CHI3L1 CCL18 CCL18 CCL18 CCL18 VNN1 IGJ CXCL13 CCL5 UBD VNN1 IGFBP7 SH2D1A LYZ CD52 RARRES1 NKG7 CCL5 MAP4K1 Of the top 20 increases, 3 genes were common to PTCL and DLBCL when compared to normal T and B cells, while 11 were common when compared to normal LN. Comparison of genes common to normal B-cell and LN Vs DLBCL or PTCL and normal T-cell and LN Vs PTCL or DLBCL identified sets of genes that are commonly and differentially expressed in PTCL and/or DLBCL. The 4 DLBCL patients analyzed express 3 of 10 prognostic genes compared to normal B-cells and 7 of 10 prognostic genes compared to normal LN and fall into the non-germinal center subtype. Quantitative real time RT-PCR on 10 functionally distinct common over-expressed genes in the 5 PTCL (NOS) patients (Lumican, CCL18, CD14, CD54, CD106, CD163, α-PDGFR, HCK, ABCA1 and Tumor endothelial marker 6) validated the microarray data. Conclusions: GEP of PTCL (NOS) and DLBCL in combination with quantitative real time RT-PCR and IHC have identified a ‘molecular signature’ for PTCL and DLBCL based on a comparison to normal (B-cell, T-cell and LN) tissue. The categorization of the GEP based on the six hallmarks of cancer identifies a ‘tumor profile signature’ for PTCL and DLBCL and a number of novel targets for therapeutic intervention.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3264-3264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan K Van Laar ◽  
Ivan Borrelo ◽  
David Jabalayan ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Aga Zielinski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a global consensus that multiple myeloma patients with high-risk disease require additional monitoring and therapy compared to low/standard risk patients in order to maximize their chances of survival. Current diagnostic guidelines recommend FISH-based assessment of chromosomal aberrations to determine risk status (i.e. t(14;20), t(14;16), t(4;14) and/or Del17p), however, studies show FISH for MM may have a 20-30% QNS rate and is up to 15% discordant between laboratories, even when starting from isolated plasma cells. In this study we demonstrate that MyPRS gene expression profiling reproduces the key high risk translocations for MM risk stratification, in addition to having other significant advantages. Methods: Reproducibility studies show that MyPRS results are less than 1% discordant starting from isolated plasma cells and return successful results in up to 95% of cases. 270 MM patients from Johns Hopkins University (MD) and Weill Cornell Medicine (NY) had both FISH and MyPRS gene expression profiling performed between 2012 and 2016 using standard and previously published methodology, respectively. Results: Retrospective review of the matched FISH and MyPRS results showed: 25/28 (89%) patients wish FISH-identified t(4;14) were classified as MMSET (MS) subtype. 10/10 (100%) patients with t(14;16) or t(14;20) were classified as MAF-like (MF) subtype 62/67 (93%) patients with t(11;14) were assigned to the Cyclin D (1 or 2) subtype. Patients with FISH hyperdiploidy status were classified as the Hyperdiploid (HY) subtype or had multiple gains detected by the separate MyPRS Virtual Karyotype (VK) algorithm, included in MyPRS. TP53del was seen in patients with multiple molecular subtypes, predominantly Proliferation (PR) and MMSET (MS). Assessment of TP53 function by gene expression is a more clinically relevant prognostic marker than TP53del, as dysregulation of the tumor suppressor is affected by mutations as well as deletions. Analysis of the TP53 expression in the 39 patients with delTP53 showed a statistically significant difference, compared to patients without this deletion (P<0.0001). Conclusion: Gene expression profiling is a superior and more reliable method for determining an individual patients' prognostic risk status. The molecular subtypes of MM, as reported by Signal Genetics MyPRS assay, are driven by large-scale changes in gene expression caused by or closely associated with chromosomal changes, including translocations. Physicians who are managing myeloma patients and wishing to base their assessment of risk on R-ISS or mSMART Guidelines may obtain the required data points from either FISH or MyPRS, with the latter offering lower QNS rates, higher reproducibility, assessment of a larger number of cells and a substantially lower price point ($5,480 vs. $1,912; 2016 CMS data). A larger cohort study is now underway to further validate these observations. Figure GEP-based TP53 expression in patients with and without Del17p. P<0.0001 Figure. GEP-based TP53 expression in patients with and without Del17p. P<0.0001 Disclosures Van Laar: Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Borrelo:Sidney Kimmel Cancer Institute: Employment. Jabalayan:Weill Cornell Medical Center: Employment. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zielinski:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Leigh:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Brown:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Bender:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document