Targeting Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Signaling in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Introduction: Retinoic acid (RA), the active metabolite of vitamin A, influences biological processes by activating the retinoic acid receptor (RAR). RARs are ligand-controlled transcription factors that function as heterodimers with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) to regulate homeostasis of cellular growth. The success of RAR modulation in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) particularly by the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has stimulated considerable interest in the development of small molecules that can modulate RAR and RXR. Recent studies have demonstrated that RA can also activate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ). In the aqueous intracellular milieu, RA is transported by the cellular retinoid-binding protein CRABP-II, or by the fatty-acid-binding protein FABP5, depending on the ratio of FABP5 to CRABP-II. In cells expressing high CRABP-II and low FABP5, RA activates the RAR, whereas in the presence of the reverse ratio, RA activates PPARβ/δ (Fig 1). These two different modes of RA delivery due to the different ratio of these two cargos leads to opposite cellular outcomes. Cells harboring high level of CRABP-II, RA is delivered to RAR leading to apoptosis, growth arrest, and anticancer activity. However, when FABP5 expression is high, RA is delivered to PPARβ/δ resulting in survival, proliferation, and tumor growth. In both cases, retinoid X receptor (RXR) is the indispensable partner of the nuclear receptor involved. Therefore, preventing FABP5 from such antagonism may be a novel therapeutic strategy for AML. Here we report the development of a therapeutic strategy based on a highly specific FABP5 inhibitor (iFABP5) (Fig 2) that will allow the delivery of RA by CRABP-II to activate tumor suppressor function of RAR and RXR. Methods: An iterative approach of design synthesis and activity were employed to select the most potent hit, iFABP5, for further experiments. Expression levels were analyzed by western blot analysis and qRT-PCR. Colony forming assays were used to analyze iFABP5 activity against AML cell lines. Flow cytometry based cell differentiation assay were performed to assess the efficacy of iFABP5 and ATRA combination treatment. Results: The analysis of TCGA data set revealed that a certain class of AML patients (pts) (Trisomy 8 AML) have low levels of CRABP-II and high levels of FABP5, presumably due to gene duplication, that in part explains the inability of ATRA to induce terminal differentiation in AML cells. To test our hypothesis, we screened AML and APL patient (pt) bone marrow cells and found that a number of AML pts bone marrow have high FABP5 and low CRABP-II protein levels while the ATRA responding APL pts has opposite ratio determined by western blotting. Therefore, low CRABP-II and high FABP5 levels in a subset of AML pts lead to the activation of pro-survival PPARβ/δ pathway that promotes proliferation and opposes the differentiation. We also analyzed AML and APL pt samples along with different AML cell lines for mRNA expression using qRT-PCR. High FABP5 levels were observed in the majority of the AML cell lines. Efficacy of novel small molecule FABP5 inhibitor as a single agent and in combination with ATRA was evaluated in HL-60 cells. The FABP5 inhibitor iFABP5 was found to increase differentiation at 72 hours as assessed by both CD11b and CD14 levels in HL-60 cells. To confirm that iFABP5 is targeting FABP5 and indirectly targeting the PPARβ/δ pathway, levels of RAR and PPARβ/δ target genes were evaluated in the absence and presence of iFABP5. Changes in the gene expression of RAR and PPARβ/δ target genes in the presence and absence of iFABP5 were also examined in shFABP5, shPPARβ/δ, and shCRABP2 versus wild type cells. Conclusion: We demonstrated that a small molecule inhibitor of FABP5 synergizes with ATRA and induces the differentiation in AML cells. High FABP5 levels (mRNA and protein) were observed in the majority of the AML cell lines. Hence, FABP5 can be a therapeutic target in AML. Utilizing virtual screening and structurally guided design, we developed a small molecule FABP5 inhibitor that induces monocytic differentiation as observed by increased CD14 surface expression as a single agent and in combination with ATRA. FABP5 is not only a strong target to treat AML pts but also an excellent approach for developing a novel therapeutic for pts where FABP5 expression and activity is high. Disclosures Maciejewski: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Carraway:Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Novel Multitarget Small-Molecule Inhibitor SRX3177 Overcomes Ibrutinib Resistance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-154253 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2262-2262

Author(s):

Dhananjaya Pal ◽

Cody C. McHale ◽

Samon Benrashid ◽

Poornima Gourabathini ◽

Krishnaiah Maddeboina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Small Molecule ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecule Inhibitor ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Ibrutinib Resistance

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive, rare, and difficult to treat subtype of non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) that accounts for about 6% of all cases. Although there is no defined standard of care for MCL treatment, some combination of chemo-immunotherapy and rituximab maintenance with or without autologous stem cell transplantation is generally employed depending on the age and fitness of the patient. Despite recent development of novel therapeutics, there is inevitable disease relapse with progressively declining efficacy and increasing frequency of resistance with single agent targeted therapy. Here, we describe the novel multitarget inhibitor SRX3177 which simultaneously hits three oncogenic targets: phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), and the epigenetic reader protein BRD4. This in silico designed, thieno-pyranone (TP) scaffold-based small molecule inhibitor orthogonally disrupt three targets within the cancer cell with one agent. Targeting the cell cycle with small molecule inhibitors represents a reasonable attempt to treat MCL, as cell cycle-associated genes like ATM, TP53, CDKN2A, CCND1 and CDK4/6 are most frequently mutated in patients. Palbociclib is a well-known single agent CDK4/6 inhibitor that has been employed in both solid and hematological malignancies. Due to its cytostatic nature, treatment with single agent palbociclib often results in the emergence of treatment-resistant clones. Therefore, a combination strategy would theoretically be more effective and can overcome the development of resistance. Moreover, prolonged G1 arrest by CDK4/6 inhibition sensitizes lymphoma cells to PI3K inhibition, suggesting a synthetic lethality relationship between these two agents. Inhibiting the chromatin reader protein BRD4 causes downregulation of target genes c-MYC and BCL2, further increasing cytotoxic capabilities. Hence, we developed SRX3177 as a potent CDK4/6/PI3K/BRD4 triple inhibitor to synergistically inhibit cell cycle progression and induce cancer cell apoptosis. SRX3177 is an ATP competitive CDK4/6 inhibitor (IC 50: CDK4 = 2.54 nM, CDK6 = 3.26 nM), PI3K inhibitor (IC 50: PI3Kα = 79.3 nM, PI3Kδ = 83.4 nM), and BRD4 inhibitor (IC 50: BD1 = 32.9 nM, BD2 = 88.8 nM). We have tested the efficacy of SRX3177 against a panel of MCL cell lines and report that SRX3177 induces a strong antiproliferative activity with maximal IC 50 0f 340 nM in JeKo-1, 29 nM in Mino cells, and 630 nM for Rec-1 cells while IC 50 values for cell lines Granta and JVM-2 were 1.3 µM and 1.5 µM, respectively. Further, we show that SRX3177 is more potent to tumor cells than the individual PI3K (BKM120), BTK (Ibrutinib), BRD4 (JQ1), and CDK4/6 (palbociclib) inhibitors, and dual PI3K/BRD4 inhibitor SF2523 (backbone for SRX3177) in JeKo-1 cells. Next, we examine the cytotoxic effect of SRX3177 in ibrutinib/palbociclib resistant primary MCL cells. Our results show that SRX3177 triggers cytotoxic response at 500 nM and 1000 nM as compared to the lack of cytotoxicity of combination Ibrutinib and palbociclib at 150 nM and 1000 nM (Fig 1). SRX3177 induces a strong apoptotic response and cell cycle arrest in JeKo-1 and Mino cells at 24hrs. Annexin V/7AAD apoptosis staining confirmed the induction of PCD by SRX3177with increase in c-PARP. Western blot analysis shows SRX3177 treatment blocks both PI3K/AKT signaling and Rb phosphorylation. Moreover, analysis by chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that SRX3177 effectively blocked BRD4 binding to both the promoter and enhancer of c-MYC (p≤0.01 and p≤0.001) and BCL2 (p≤0.05). SRX3177 also suppresses the c-MYC and BCL2 transcriptional program in both a time- and dose-dependent manner. Our findings also demonstrate a SRX3177-dependent reduction in c-MYC half-life via induction of proteasomal-mediated degradation. This degradation is associated with decreased phosphorylation of c-MYC at Ser62 and increased phosphorylation of c-MYC at Thr58 - indicative of differential regulation of c-MYC stability. Finally, we show that SRX3177 overcomes chronic ibrutinib resistance in Jeko-1 cells with a maximal IC 50 of 150 nM as compared to 64 µM with ibrutinib. Hence, the triple inhibitor SRX3177 has superior potency to ibrutinib in MCL cell lines and succeeds in overcoming ibrutinib-resistance at nanomolar doses. Taken together, our data supports the development of SRX3177 as a novel therapeutic agent for treatment of MCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martin: ADCT: Consultancy. Park: Takeda: Research Funding; G1 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Durden: SignalRx Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

The Combination Of Hypomethylating Agents and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors(HDACi) Are Synergistically Cytotoxic and Reverse The Malignant Phenotype In Preclinical Models Of T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.646.646 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 646-646 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Owen A. O'Connor ◽

Enrica Marchi ◽

Kelly Zullo ◽

Luigi Scotto ◽

Jennifer E. Amengual ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Methylation Array ◽

Simultaneous Exposure ◽

The Mean

Abstract Both HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) are known to influence global expression patterns in hematologic malignancies. Little is known about the combination of these two drug classes in lymphoid malignancies. HDACIs have marked single agent activity in the T- cell lymphomas (TCL), although the mechanism of action is not well defined. DNMTIs affect cytosine methylation of genomic DNA and have activity mainly restricted to the myeloid derived hematologic malignancies. The single agent efficacy and synergistic interaction of a panel of HDACIs (panobinostat, belinostat, romidepsin and vorinostat) and DNMTIs (decitabine (DEC), 5-azacytadine (5-AZA)) was evaluated in models of TCL. The molecular basis for the synergistic effect of HDACIs and DNMTIs was evaluated by gene expression profiling (GEP) and CpG methylation CTCL. Single agent concentration and time effect relationships were generated for 2 CTCL (HH, H9) and 2 T-ALL (P12, PF382) cell lines. Romidepsin and belinostat were the most potent HDACIs with the mean 48 hour IC50 of 8.8 nM (range 1.7-2.7 nM) and 85 nM (range 36-136 nM), respectively. Cell viability was not affected by treatment with DEC or 5-AZA at 24 and 48 hours at concentrations as high as 20 μM. Reduction in viability was first demonstrated after 72 hours of exposure to DEC, with the mean IC50 of 14.8 μM (range 0.4 μM- >20uM). Simultaneous exposure of combinations of DEC plus romidepsin or DEC plus belinostat at their IC10, IC20, and IC50 produced marked synergy in all TCL derived cell lines. Simultaneous exposure of DEC plus romidepsin demonstrated the deepest synergy at 72 hours with synergy coefficients in the range of 0.3. Cells treated with the combination of DEC plus romidepsin also demonstrated significant induction of apoptosis as evaluated by annexinV/propridium iodide via FACS analysis and an increase in acetylated histone 3 by immunoblot. The in vivo activity of the combination of DEC plus belinostat was investigated in a xenograft model of CTCL using HH, the most resistant TCL derived cell line. Mice were treated with DEC 1.5 mg/kg (day 29, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43) and/or belinostat 100 mg/kg (day 29-day 47). The combination mouse cohort demonstrated statistically significant tumor growth delay compared to DEC alone (p=0.002) and belinostat alone (p=0.001). The interaction of DEC and romidepsin was analyzed by GEP and methylation array. Interestingly, the baseline malignant phenotype seen in the CTCL cell-lines was reversed. A significant down-regulation of genes involved in biosynthetic pathways including protein and lipid synthesis, and a significant up-regulation of genes responsible for cell cycle arrest were seen. The vast majority (114/138; 92%) of genes modulated by the single agents were similarly modulated by the combination. However, the latter induced a further significant change in the transcriptome, affecting an additional 390 genes. Similarly, methylation array data was analyzed following treatment of these drugs alone and in combination. DEC induced de-methylation of 190 different gene regions corresponding to 175 genes and an additional 335 loci. Interestingly, when combined with romidepsin the number of demethylated gene regions decreased to 85 corresponding to 79 genes, 78 of which were common with DEC and 148 additional loci. The comparison of gene expression and methylation demonstrated a significant inverse relationship (R2 = 0.657) with genes found to be differentially expressed in GEP and methylation analysis. (Figure 1)Figure 1Summary of gene expression and methylation analysis.Figure 1. Summary of gene expression and methylation analysis. These data support the observation that DNMTIs in combination with HDACIs produces significant synergistic activity in models of TCL. Further evaluation of the mechanism of action with DNMTIs in combination with HDACIs is ongoing, and a clinical trial of the combination is now open. Disclosures: O'Connor: Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Hypomethylating Agents in T-cell lymphoma. Amengual:Acetylon Pharmacueticals, INC: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Epigenetic Targeting with EZH2 and HDAC Inhibitors Is Synergistic in EZH2 Deregulated Lymphomas

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.839.839 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 839-839 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jennifer Kimberly Lue ◽

Sathyen A Prabhu ◽

Yuxuan Liu ◽

Owen A. O'Connor ◽

Jennifer E Amengual

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hdac Inhibitors ◽

Lymphoma Cell ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genetics Research ◽

Transcriptional Inhibition

Abstract EZH2 is critical in a process known as the Germinal Center (GC) reaction during which B-cells undergo somatic hypermutation and isotype switching in order to develop a large antibody repertoire. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase serving as the catalytic subunit of the Polycomb Repression Complex 2 (PRC2), which is responsible for tri-methylation of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27), a mark of transcriptional repression. EZH2 recruits HDAC1/2 and DNMTs through its cofactor EED to further inhibit transcription. Mutations in EZH2 are found in 7-12% of FL and 22% of GC-DLBCL. EZH2 overexpression secondary to MYC and miRNA dysfunction has also been described. EZH2 also plays a role in T-cell differentiation and has been found in various T-cell malignancies. Histone acetyltransferases (HAT), notably CBP and p300, have also been implicated in B- and T-cell lymphomas and are mutated/deleted in 39% of GC-DLBCL and 41% of FL. Given the presence of EZH2 and HAT dysregulation in lymphoma, we evaluated the potential synergy of EZH2 and HDAC inhibitors co-treatment. Single agent activity for GSK126, an EZH2 inhibitor, and romidepsin, a pan-HDAC inhibitor, was established in a panel of lymphoma cell lines (GC-DLBCL, Non-GC DLBCL, MCL and T-Cell lymphoma, n=21). Cell lines with known EZH2 dysregulation (GC-DLBCL and ATLL) were more sensitive to EZH2 inhibitors as exhibited by lower half maximal effective concentration (EC50) after 6 day exposure (EC50 0.01-16 µM). There was no association between HAT mutation/deletion and romidepsin sensitivity. A panel of lymphoma cell lines was treated for 72 hr with GSK126 and romidepsin using concentrations represented by their EC30-50 (0.5-4.0 µM), and EC20-40 (1.0-4.0 nM), respectively. Synergy was assessed by Excess over Bliss (EOB), where EOB > 10 represents synergy. Simultaneous exposure to GSK126 and romidepsin in GC-DLBCL cell lines demonstrated potent synergy as represented by EOB > 30. Synergy was also present in ATLL cell lines (EOB 28), which are known to have EZH2 dysregulation, as well as non-GC DLBCL cell lines (EOB 47). Although these cell lines do not have EZH2 mutations, some possess relative EZH2 over-expression compared to other lymphomas. Evaluation of drug schedule using GSK126 pretreatment prior to romidepsin exposure did not impact synergy. Compared to single agent activity, the combination of GSK126 (2 µM) and romidepsin (1-4 nM) led to a more pronounced decrease in H3K27 tri-, di-, and mono-methylation and increased acetylation in 4 GC-DLBCL cell lines (OCI-LY7, Pfeiffer, SU-DHL-6, SU-DHL-10) at 24 or 48 hrs. The impact of the combination on the function of the PRC2 complex was assessed via co-immunoprecipation in these cell lines. The combination demonstrated dissociation of the PRC2 complex (EZH2, SUZ12, EED, and RbAp46/48) as compared to single agent exposure. Treatment with the combination also induced dissociation of HDAC2 and DNMT3L. In addition, we observed decreased protein expression of PRC2 complex members and increased p21/CDKN1A, which was more notable in the combination treatment as compared to single agent. This may be due to the removal of HDACs from the p21 transcriptional start site through the disruption of the PRC2 complex and direct inhibition of HDACs, thus leading to increase expression of p21. The combination also led to decreased nuclear localization of EZH2 and its cofactors. Apoptosis was confirmed by caspase 3 and PARP cleavage, and was more potently cleaved after exposure to the combination. Based on the findingthat HDAC2 dissociated from PRC2 complex after treatment with GSK126 and romidepsin, a selective HDAC1/2 inhibitor, ACY-957 (Acetylon Pharmaceuticals), was combined with GSK126 which demonstrated potent synergy in 4 GC-DLBCL cell lines (EOB 37). This data suggests that concomitant inhibition of EZH2 and HDAC is highly synergistic and leads to the dissociation of PRC2 complex. By releasing transcriptional inhibition key tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulators may be re-expressed. Potency of this epigenetic combination may be predicted by gene expression signatures for which RNA-seq libraries are currently in production. Reversing transcriptional inhibition using a combination of EZH2 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors may lead to a potent treatment option for lymphomas dependent upon EZH2 and HAT activity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures O'Connor: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Amengual:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Targeting Wnt/β-Catenin and BCL-2, Two Critical Survival Factors, Synergistically Induces Apoptosis in AML Via Rac1-Mediated MCL-1 Inhibition

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118367 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1442-1442

Author(s):

Xiangmeng Wang ◽

Po Yee Mak ◽

Wencai Ma ◽

Xiaoping Su ◽

Hong Mu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progenitor Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Critical Survival

Abstract Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates self-renewal and proliferation of AML cells and is critical in AML initiation and progression. Overexpression of β-catenin is associated with poor prognosis. We previously reported that inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by C-82, a selective inhibitor of β-catenin/CBP, exerts anti-leukemia activity and synergistically potentiates FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3-mutated AML cells and stem/progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo (Jiang X et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2018, 24:2417). BCL-2 is a critical survival factor for AML cells and stem/progenitor cells and ABT-199 (Venetoclax), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in various hematological malignancies. However, when used alone, its efficacy in AML is limited. We and others have reported that ABT-199 can induce drug resistance by upregulating MCL-1, another key survival protein for AML stem/progenitor cells (Pan R et al., Cancer Cell 2017, 32:748; Lin KH et al, Sci Rep. 2016, 6:27696). We performed RNA Microarrays in OCI-AML3 cells treated with C-82, ABT-199, or the combination and found that both C-82 and the combination downregulated multiple genes, including Rac1. It was recently reported that inhibition of Rac1 by the pharmacological Rac1 inhibitor ZINC69391 decreased MCL-1 expression in AML cell line HL-60 cells (Cabrera M et al, Oncotarget. 2017, 8:98509). We therefore hypothesized that inhibiting β-catenin by C-82 may potentiate BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-199 via downregulating Rac1/MCL-1. To investigate the effects of simultaneously targeting β-catenin and BCL-2, we treated AML cell lines and primary patient samples with C-82 and ABT-199 and found that inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling significantly enhanced the potency of ABT-199 in AML cell lines, even when AML cells were co-cultured with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The combination of C-82 and ABT-199 also synergistically killed primary AML cells (P<0.001 vs control, C-82, and ABT-199) in 10 out of 11 samples (CI=0.394±0.063, n=10). This synergy was also shown when AML cells were co-cultured with MSCs (P<0.001 vs control, C-82, and ABT-199) in all 11 samples (CI=0.390±0.065, n=11). Importantly, the combination also synergistically killed CD34+ AML stem/progenitor cells cultured alone or co-cultured with MSCs. To examine the effect of C-82 and ABT-199 combination in vivo, we generated a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model from an AML patient who had mutations in NPM1, FLT3 (FLT3-ITD), TET2, DNMT3A, and WT1 genes and a complex karyotype. The combination synergistically killed the PDX cells in vitro even under MSC co-culture conditions. After PDX cells had engrafted in NSG (NOD-SCID IL2Rgnull) mice, the mice were randomized into 4 groups (n=10/group) and treated with vehicle, C-82 (80 mg/kg, daily i.p injection), ABT-199 (100 mg/kg, daily oral gavage), or the combination for 30 days. Results showed that all treatments decreased circulating blasts (P=0.009 for C-82, P<0.0001 for ABT-199 and the combination) and that the combination was more effective than each single agent (P<0.001 vs C-82 or ABT-199) at 2 weeks of therapy. The combination also significantly decreased the leukemia burden in mouse spleens compared with controls (P=0.0046) and single agent treated groups (P=0.032 or P=0.020 vs C-82 or ABT-199, respectively) at the end of the treatment. However, the combination did not prolong survival time, likely in part due to toxicity. Dose modifications are ongoing. These results suggest that targeting Wnt/β-catenin and BCL-2, both essential for AML cell and stem cell survival, has synergistic activity via Rac1-mediated MCL-1 inhibition and could be developed into a novel combinatorial therapy for AML. Disclosures Andreeff: SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Carter:novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Activity of Carfilzomib (CFZ) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) As a Single Agent and in Novel Combinations

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141459 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 6-7

Author(s):

Mao Yu Peng ◽

Yasmin Abaza ◽

Martina Mcdermott ◽

Monica Mead ◽

Dennis J. Slamon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Synergistic Effect ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fatty Acid Synthase ◽

Single Agent ◽

Therapeutic Strategies ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees

Background:Recent advances in targeted therapy have expanded the available therapeutic optionsfor patients with AML. However, many patients still have suboptimal outcomes, particularly in the relapsed/refractory setting, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), such as bortezomib, exhibit antitumor activity in AML through inhibition of the nuclear factor κB pathway and induction of apoptosis. CFZ, a second-generation PI, has preferential preclinical activity in AML compared to bortezomib making it an agent of interest in AML therapy. Here we assessed the activity of CFZ as a single agent and in novel combinations with Ara-C and/or other agents targeting potential vulnerabilities in AML cell lines. Methods:20 AML cell lines were treated with a single dose of CFZ for 7 days, proliferation inhibition was measured using an IC50 cutoff for CFZ of 10 nM. 2 sensitive (ML2 and MV411) and 2 resistant (AML193 and NOMO1) cell lines were selected for further analysis. Apoptosis, cell cycle, and cell senescence analysis were performed after 72 hours of CFZ exposure at 10 nM. Combination assays using CFZ 10 nM and Ara-C 200 nM were performed to evaluate for potential interaction in the form of antagonism or potentiation. Proteomic analysis was performed at baseline using reverse phase protein assay (RPPA). Cell lines were aligned according to CFZ IC50. Several proteins involved in various physiological pathways exhibited a potential correlation with CFZ sensitivity. Combination treatments with CFZ and agents targeting these pathways were carried out in selected cell lines. Results:Single-agent CFZ induced apoptosis with apoptotic rates >85% in sensitive cell lines and only 10% in resistant cell lines. Similarly, CFZ resulted in G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in sensitive, but not resistant AML cell lines. Lack of difference in cellular senescence confirmed apoptosis as the major mechanism of CFZ-induced growth inhibition in AML cell lines. No antagonism was noted when CFZ was combined with Ara-C. RPPA revealed that AML cell lines with higher expression of autophagy-related proteins (Atgs) were more resistant to CFZ treatment. Combining autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or ROC-325 with CFZ produced a synergistic effect to induce apoptosis in several CFZresistant cell lines. RPPA also revealed that lower basal levels of fatty acid synthase (FASN), a key enzyme involved in lipogenesis, correlated with CFZ sensitivity and CFZ resistant lines tendedto have higher basal FASN levels. The combination of CFZ with a FASN inhibitor resulted in a significant synergistic apoptosis-inducing effect that was observed in the AML lines tested. Conclusion:CFZ demonstrated single agent activity in the nanomolar range in human AML cell lines. The addition of standard-of -care chemotherapy to CFZ did not show antagonism. Combining CFZ with agents targeting autophagy or lipid-metabolism showed synergistic effect in apoptosis. These results suggest a role for CFZ in combination therapeutic strategies for AML patients. Disclosures Mcdermott: TORL Biotherapeutics:Current equity holder in private company;1200 Pharma:Current equity holder in private company.Slamon:TORL Biotherapeutics:Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;1200 Pharma:Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis:Consultancy, Research Funding;Eli Lilly:Consultancy;Bayer:Consultancy, Research Funding;Pfizer:Consultancy, Other: stock, Research Funding;Syndax:Research Funding;Aileron:Research Funding;Genetech:Research Funding;Biomarin:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Seattle Genetics:Other: Stock;Amgen:Other: Stock.Larson:BMS, Bioline, Celgene, Juno, Janssen:Research Funding;TORL Biotherapeutics:Current equity holder in private company.

Download Full-text

Identification of a Novel Gene Expression Signature in Mantle Cell Lymphoma from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)-MCL-0208 Trial: A Focus on the B Cell Receptor Pathway

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.701.701 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 701-701

Author(s):

Riccardo Bomben ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

Michele Dal Bo ◽

Tiziana D'Agaro ◽

Alessandro Re ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Gene Expression Signature ◽

Gene Signature ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expression Signature ◽

Qrt Pcr ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Bcr Signaling

Abstract Background. The aggressive clinical behavior of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is attributed to specific genetic and molecular mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis, mainly the t(11;14)(q13;q32) traslocation and cyclin D1 (CCND1) overexpression. Nevertheless, evidence of a certain degree of clinical/biological heterogeneity has been disclosed by gene expression profile (GEP) and (immuno)genetic/immunohistochemistry studies. Aim. To use a GEP approach to identify MCL subsets with peculiar clinical/biological features in the context of MCL patients treated homogeneously with an autologous transplantation-based program. Methods. The study was based on a cohort of 42 MCL cases enrolled in the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)-MCL-0208 randomized Italian clinical trial. Purified clonal CD19+ MCL cells were obtained by high-speed cell sorting of peripheral blood MCL samples. GEP experiments were performed in 30 cases, with Agilent platform. Bioinformatics analyses were performed by Gene Springs and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) software. Gene signature validations were performed by quantitative real time PCR (QRT-PCR). Results. i)Unsupervised and supervised analyses. Unsupervised analysis by principal component analysis (PCA) was able to divide the cohort in two main subgroups named PCA1 (12 cases) and PCA2 (18 cases). Supervised analysis by segregating cases according to the PCA1 and PCA2 classification defined a gene expression signature of 710 gene (234 up-regulated) that highlighted a constitutive overexpression of genes of the BCR signaling pathway. Consistently,GSEA showed a significant enrichment of genes belonging to 3 gene sets related to BCR signaling. ii) Identification of a "PCA2-type" gene signature. By merging the list of differentially expressed genes according to supervised analysis of GEP data and the gene list related to BCR signaling according to GSEA, a group of 9 genes, all overexpressed in PCA2 cases, i.e. AKT3, BLNK, BTK, CD79B, PIK3CD, SYK, BCL2, CD72, FCGR2B, was obtained. Among these genes, a subgroup of 6 genes, i.e. AKT3, BLNK, BTK, CD79B, PIK3CD, SYK, was selected for the direct involvement in the BCR pathway, and utilized for further validations. iii) Generation of a 6-gene prediction model. The selected 6 genes were then utilized to generate a prediction model by using 20 cases as training sub-cohort and the remaining 10 cases as validation cohort. By this approach, 9/10 cases of the validation cohort were correctly assigned according to the PCA2/PCA1 classification. The model was re-tested by QRT-PCR in 24 cases used in the GEP (16 for training and 8 for validation), and again, 7/8 cases of the validation sub-cohort were correctly classified. QRT-PCR was then utilized to classify further 12 cases (7 cases defined as PCA2) not employed for GEP analysis. Overall, in the 42 cases, 23 cases were considered as PCA2 with the GEP/QRT-PCR approach. iv) Clinical/biological correlations. No association was found between the 6-gene signature and IGHV status (22/30 unmutated IGHV cases) or between the signature and the overexpression of SOX11 (17/30 cases over the median value). In addition, no association was found with the presence of the main recurrent mutations of the ATM, BIRC3, CCND1, KMTD2, NOTCH1, TP53, TRAF2, WHSC1 genes. Finally, an "ad-interim" analysis of progression free survivals (PFS) (Cortelazzo et al EHA, 2015) suggested a trend for a shorter PFS (2-years PFS 45% vs 72%, p=0.08) for cases classified as PCA2 by the GEP/QRT-PCR approach. v) 6-gene signature and sensitivity to the BCR inhibitor ibrutinib. The finding that PCA2 cases overexpressed BCR-related genes and had a more aggressive clinical course prompted us to investigate the 6-gene signature in the context of ibrutinib sensitive/resistant MCL cell lines. To do this, the proliferation rate of the MCL cell lines REC1, JEKO1, UPN1, GRANTA, JVM2, Z138 was investigated either in presence or in absence of ibrutinib 10 nanoM for 7 days. REC1, JEKO1 were selected as responsive by showing ≥80% inhibition upon ibrutinib. Of note, responsive cell lines showed higher expression levels of the 6-gene signature then the resistant counterpart, as evaluated by QRT-PCR. Conclusions. A novel 6-gene expression signature related to the BCR pathway has been found to characterize MCL cells with peculiar clinical/biological features and sensitivity to BCR inhibitors. Disclosures Luminari: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Fatty Acid Binding Protein FABP5: A Novel Therapeutic Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130475 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2553-2553

Author(s):

Metis Hasipek ◽

Yihong Guan ◽

Dale Grabowski ◽

Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski ◽

Hetty E. Carraway ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retinoic Acid ◽

Therapeutic Target ◽

Target Genes ◽

Binding Protein ◽

Single Agent ◽

Model Systems ◽

Fatty Acid Binding ◽

Genetic Ablation ◽

Crabp Ii

Introduction: Retinoic acid (RA), the active metabolite of vitamin A, influences biological processes by activating the retinoic acid receptor (RAR). RARs are ligand-controlled transcription factors that function as heterodimer with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and regulate expression of target genes affecting homeostasis of cellular differentiation and death. The success of RAR activation in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), particularly by the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has stimulated considerable interest in the development of small molecules that can modulate RAR and RXR in AML cells. RA can also activate the pro-survival peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ) in a context dependent manner. In the aqueous intracellular milieu, RA is transported by the cellular retinoid-binding protein CRABP-II, or by the fatty-acid-binding protein FABP5, depending on the ratio of FABP5 to CRABP-II and cellular levels of RA. In cells, expressing high CRABP-II and low FABP5, RA activates the RAR, whereas in the presence of the reverse ratio, RA activates PPARβ/δ. These two different modes of RA delivery leads to opposite cellular outcomes. Cells harboring high level of CRABP-II, RA is delivered to RAR leading to differentiation and growth arrest. However, FABP5 high expressing cells, RA is delivered to PPARβ/δ resulting in survival and proliferation. Therefore, preventing FABP5 from such antagonism may be a novel therapeutic strategy for AML with high FABP5. Here, we report the development of a therapeutic approach using a specific FABP5 inhibitor (iFABP5) that facilitates the delivery of RA to tumor suppressor RAR. Methods: Genetic as well as pharmacologic models in AML cell lines were used to validate the therapeutic target by decoupling PPARβ/δ and RAR/RXR pathways. Knockdown and overexpression of key regulators of these pathways were rationally used to understand pro-survival effects of FABP5 overexpression. The efficacy of small molecule pharmacophore were evaluated in vitro in cell free and cell culture model systems as well as in vivo small animal model systems as a proof of therapeutic concept. Results: We analyzed AML samples from different cohorts (Beat AML and TCGA) for the expression levels of genes involved in RAR and PPARβ/δ pathways. Most of the AML patients have upregulation of pro-survival PPARβ/δ pathway genes including FABP5 and downregulation of differentiating promoting RAR pathway genes including critical RA chaperone CRABP2. On the otherhand, ATRA sensitive APL patients and cell lines have lower expression of FABP5 compared to AML. We established FABP5 as a therapeutic target for ATRA sensitization in AML cell line THP1. Genetic ablation of FABP5 using shRNA sensitizes THP1 cells to ATRA treatment compared to scramble control cells. We used in silico approach to develop a novel small molecule iFABP5 that binds to recombinant FABP5 (Kd= 2x10-7) with a 56-fold higher affinity compared to ATRA (Kd=11x10-6 Mole) in a cell free fluorescence reporter binding assay using 8-Anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS). Efficacy of iFABP5 as a single agent and in combination with ATRA was evaluated in THP1, HL-60, K562, and OCI-AML5 cells. The effect of the combination was most pronounced in THP-1 cells. The iFABP5 synergizes with ATRA and induces the differentiation at 72 hours as assessed by both CD11b and CD14 levels. Treatment of cells with single agent iFABP5 leads to downregulation of PPARβ/δ target genes and upregulation of RAR target genes consistent with the genetic ablation of shFABP5. THP1 cells stably expressing shRNA targeting FABP5 has significant growth perturbation in a NSG mouse model compared to non-targeting shRNA. Pre-clinical in vivo evaluation of iFABP5 in combination with ATRA is ongoing as a therapeutic proof of concept. Conclusion: The lack of effective ATRA response in AML might be due to an aberrant activation of pro-survival PPARβ/δ pathway, which negatively affects ATRA-regulated gene expression and its antileukemic activity. Reprogramming of the RA delivery to RAR pathway with the addition of a small molecular inhibitor of FABP5 could potentially restore therapeutic effects of ATRA in FABP5 over expressing cases of AML subtypes. Disclosures Maciejewski: Novartis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Simultaneous Kinase Inhibition with Ibrutinib and BCL2 Inhibition with Venetoclax As a Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131288 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3950-3950

Author(s):

Christopher A. Eide ◽

Stephen E Kurtz ◽

Andy Kaempf ◽

Nicola Long ◽

Jessica Leonard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Mononuclear Cells ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: In patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), patient outcomes vary considerably by patient age group, specific genetic subtypes, and treatment regimen. Large-scale sequencing efforts have uncovered a spectrum of mutations and gene fusions in ALL, suggesting that combinations of agents will be required to treat these diseases effectively. Previous preclinical studies have shown efficacy of the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax alone or in combination in ALL cells (Chonghaile et al., Can Disc 2014; Leonard et al, STM 2018), and the multi-kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (approved for patients with chonic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL)) has also shown potent activity in subsets of ALL (Kim et al., Blood 2017). However, the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax has not been evaluated to date in patients with ALL. Methods: We used a functional ex vivo screening assay to evaluate the potential efficacy of the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax (IBR+VEN) across a large cohort (n=808) of patient specimens representing a broad range of hematologic malignancies. Primary mononuclear cells isolated from leukemia patients were plated in the presence of graded concentrations of venetoclax, ibrutinib, or the combination of both FDA-approved drugs. IC50 and AUC values were derived from probit-based regression for each response curve. A panel of clinical labs, treatment information, and genetic features for tested ALL patient specimens was collated from chart review. Single and combination drug treatment sensitivity were compared within groups by Friedman test, across groups by Mann-Whitney test, and with continuous variables by Spearman rank correlation. Results: Consistent with clinical data and previous literature, IBR+VEN was highly effective in CLL specimens ex vivo (median IC50=0.015 µM). Intriguingly, among specimens from 100 unique ALL patients, we also observed that IBR+VEN demonstrated significantly enhanced efficacy by AUC and IC50 compared to either single agent (p<0.001; median IC50=0.018 µM). In contrast, evaluation of this combination on primary mononuclear cells from two healthy donors showed little to no sensitivity. Breakdown of combination sensitivity (as measured by AUC) by a variety of clinical and genetic features revealed no associations with gender or specimen type. Among continuous variables tested, age was modestly correlated with combination AUC (Spearman r = 0.26) and increased blasts in the bone marrow were associated with increased sensitivity to the combination (Spearman r = -0.41; p = 0.0068). More broadly, specimens from patients with B-cell precursor disease (B-ALL) were more sensitive to IBR+VEN than those with T-cell precursor leukemia (T-ALL) (p = 0.0063). Within the B-ALL patient samples, those harboring the BCR-ABL1 fusion were significantly less sensitive to IBR+VEN than other subtypes of B-ALL (p = 0.0031). Within the T-ALL subset, there was a trend toward reduced sensitivity in patients with evidence of mutations in NOTCH1, though statistical significance was not reached. Evaluation of the combination using an expanded 7x7 concentration matrix in human ALL cell lines revealed varying degrees of sensitivity. For example, IBR+VEN showed enhanced efficacy in RCH-ACV B-ALL cells and showed synergy for the majority of drug-pair concentrations by the highest single agent (HSA) method (ibrutinib, venetoclax, and combination IC50: 0.60, 3.4, and 0.28 uM, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the IBR+VEN combination, currently approved for patients with CLL, also demonstrates impressive efficacy against primary leukemia cells from ALL patients, warranting further investigation as a treatment strategy in the clinic to continue to improve outcomes for patients. Disclosures Leonard: Amgen: Research Funding. Druker:Cepheid: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute license #2063, Monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10, exclusive commercial license to Merck & Co; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (antibody royalty): Patents & Royalties: #2524, antibody royalty; OHSU (licensing fees): Patents & Royalties: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees ; Gilead Sciences: Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Beta Cat: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Aptose Biosciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees , Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Novartis: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Patents & Royalties: Patent 6958335, Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, exclusively licensed to Novartis, Research Funding; GRAIL: Equity Ownership, Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Patient True Talk: Consultancy; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Beat AML LLC: Other: Service on joint steering committee; CureOne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; ICON: Other: Scientific Founder of Molecular MD, which was acquired by ICON in Feb. 2019; Monojul: Other: former consultant; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tyner:Petra: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Syros: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Syros: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Petra: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Targeting MYC-Driven B-Cell Lymphoma By Inhibition of the Histone Methyltransferase DOT1L

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115475 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2839-2839 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Anagha Deshpande ◽

Benson Chen ◽

Parham Ramezani-Rad ◽

Alessandro Pastore ◽

Luyi Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Target Genes ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Lymphoma Cell ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genome Wide

Abstract Aberrant activation of the MYC proto-oncogene is a recurrent feature in human B-cell lymphomas of diverse sub-types, correlating with adverse prognosis and therapy resistance. Direct pharmacological MYC-targeting has proved difficult, but recent studies have shown that targeting chromatin regulators critical for MYC-driven oncogenesis may provide alternative avenues for therapeutic intervention. Recently, it has been demonstrated that MYC-driven oncogenesis in certain solid tumors is dependent on the histone 3 lysine 79 (H3K79) methyltransferase DOT1L. We hypothesized that B-cell lymphomas with hyperactive MYC-signaling might be responsive to DOT1L inhibition. In order to test this hypothesis, we tested the effect of the DOT1L inhibitor Pinometostat (EPZ-5676) on a panel of human B-cell lymphoma cell lines featuring elevated MYC. Pinometostat treatment reduced global H3K79 methylation levels, accompanied by a time and dose-dependent decrease in proliferation of several Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines including P493-6, Daudi and Raji. We observed that key MYC-target genes including CDK4, PPAT and NPM1 were significantly downregulated upon Pinometostat treatment, suggesting that DOT1L is required for the transcriptional activation of MYC-target genes in these cells. Pinometostat-treated B-lymphoma cells showed a significant decrease of cells in S-phase compared to controls as assessed by BrdU-labeling assays. Similar results were also obtained in a panel of B-cell lymphoma cell lines with MYC-rearrangements including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell lines Jeko-1, JVM2, Mino-1 and Maver-1 and the diffused large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell line Karpas 422. Next, we sought to investigate whether the DOT1L-dependence of MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma could be reproduced in a well-defined model of MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma. Towards this end, we utilized a mouse model in which expression of the Cre recombinase from a B cell specific promoter leads to ectopic expression of a transgenic human MYC allele and concomitant deletion of the tumor suppressor Pten in B cells. Similar to our in vitro studies, Pinometostat treatment led to a significant reduction in proliferation of B-cell lymphoma cells from these mice with an IC50 of 0.5 µM. Furthermore, we sought to ascertain whether these findings reflected on-target effects related to DOT1L inhibition. Therefore, we deleted DOT1L using CRISPR/Cas9 in B-cell lymphoma cell lines and assessed the effect on proliferation using competitive-proliferation assays. We observed that DOT1L-deletion progressively diminished the relative growth of anti-DOT1L sgRNA-expressing P493-6 and Jeko1 cells compared to non-targeted cells invitro. In order to test the requirement for DOT1L in lymphoma propagation in vivo, we performed intravenous injections of equal number of Jeko-1 cells with either anti-DOT1L or anti-Renilla control sgRNAs into sub-lethally irradiated non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice (NOD/SCID) mice. Mice injected with control anti-Renilla sgRNAs succumbed to disease with a median latency of 34 days while the latency of disease in the anti-DOT1L sgRNA cohort was 45 days. In summary, DOT1L depletion significantly delayed disease latency in this invivo disseminated model of B-cell lymphoma (P=0.02). We then performed transcriptomic analyses of Pinometostat-treated B-cell lymphoma cell lines compared to DMSO-treated counterparts using RNA-seq. Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RNA-seq data from three different B-cell lymphoma cell lines demonstrated that Pinometostat treatment significantly decreased the expression of MYC-target genes. In order to investigate the intriguing role of DOT1L in regulating MYC-target gene expression, we used ChIP-seq to assess the genome-wide occupancy of MYC following DOT1L inhibitor treatment. Strikingly, our studies demonstrated that DOT1L inhibition significantly reduced the chromatin occupancy of MYC. Taken together, our experiments demonstrate the role of DOT1L in MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis invitro and invivo. Furthermore, our genome-wide studies demonstrate the importance of DOT1L for genomic MYC occupancy. Based on these findings, we propose that therapeutic DOT1L targeting may be a viable strategy in MYC-driven B-cell lymphoma. Disclosures Weigert: Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Rickert:Pfizer: Employment. Ren:Elli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arima Genomics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deshpande:Salgomed Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; A2A Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Eicosanoid-GPCR Signaling Enhances Hematopoiesis and Marrow Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.495.495 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 495-495

Author(s):

Jamie L Lahvic ◽

Michelle B Ammerman ◽

Pulin Li ◽

Song Yang ◽

Nan Chiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Culture ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

G Protein ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Small Molecule ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

Marrow Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Small molecule treatment of hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo has the potential to expand these cells or increase their engraftability. Previously, we discovered that ex vivo treatment of marrow with 11,12-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET) enhances the engraftment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in both zebrafish and mammals. Additionally, EET treatment promotes specification of HSPC from the hemogenic endothelium, suggesting a broad pro-hematopoietic role of this molecule. Indeed, bioactive lipids play an important role as signaling molecules both during embryo development and adult tissue homeostasis. However, due to their small-molecule nature, identifying their receptors biochemically has been a long-standing challenge which impedes the understanding of the biological processes they regulate. The identity of the EET receptor remains unknown despite more than a decade of research. Here, we utilized a novel bioinformatic approach to identify candidate EET receptors and identified a candidate functional in cell culture, zebrafish and mouse assays. EET signaling is known to be G-protein dependent, suggesting its receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). We performed RNAseq on U937 monocytes, EaHy endothelial cells, and PC3M-LN4 prostate cancer cells, three human cell lines with clear EET-responsive phenotypes. These three cell lines expressed 37 GPCR in common at a basal level of greater than or equal to 0.3 fragments per kilobase per million reads (FPKM). 27 of these GPCR were also expressed in a non-EET-responsive cell line, HEK293, leaving only 10 candidate EET receptors. We screened 7 of these candidates for EET-responsiveness using a cell-culture based β-arrestin recruitment assay. Of these, only GPR132 exhibited EET-dependent recruitment of β-arrestin to the cell membrane, indicating GPCR activation. GPR132 was previously identified as a receptor for a variety of small oxygenated fatty acids, and we confirmed that these related molecules induce GPR132-dependent β-arrestin recruitment. We additionally treated developing zebrafish embryos with these molecules. Like EET, these GPR132 ligands increased HSPC numbers in the zebrafish aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) and caused ectopic expression of the HSPC marker runx1 in the zebrafish tail, a phenotype that was previously seen only with EET treatment. To test the requirement of GPR132 for EET signaling, we knocked down the zebrafish ortholog of GPR132 by morpholino injection, which prevented the EET-induced increase of runx1in both the AGM and tail. Finally, we performed competitive whole bone marrow transplant using wildtype and GPR132-/- mice as donors and found that while treatment with EET increases engraftment of WT donor cells, no such improvement is seen in GPR132-/- cells. GPR132 is thus required in both zebrafish and mice for EET phenotypes. Combining bioinformatic, biochemical, and genetic approaches, we identified GPR132 as a receptor for EET involved in regulating hematopoiesis and marrow transplant. GPR132 thus represents a therapeutic target for the enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and genetic manipulation of GPR132 could help illuminate the endogenous roles of its fatty acid ligands. Disclosures Zon: Fate, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder; Marauder Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder; Scholar Rock: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder.

Download Full-text