scholarly journals Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Case Series at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Exploring Treatment Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3658-3658
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abdullah Alsheef ◽  
Mukhtar Alomar ◽  
Abdul Rehman Z. Zaidi ◽  
Ghaydaa Juma Kullab ◽  
Mohammed AlHazzaa ◽  
...  

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon cause of stroke that mainly affects young adults and children. Initial treatment with heparin followed by wafarin is the mainstay of treatment. Only insufficient experience is available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Aims: The study aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of DOACs such as (Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran) in patients with objectively confirmed CVT. Methods: Data of 46 cases of CVT collected using a standardized case report form. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with CVT, confirmed by CT or MRI imaging. Results: The total number of patients was 46 (9 males and 37 females). The mean age of the patients was 35.2± 5 years. The most common clinical manifestations among our patients were headache followed by seizure. 52% of cases were unprovoked, while 48% were provoked by pregnancy and oral contraceptive pills. Superior sagittal sinus (55%) and transverse sinus (44.9%) were the most common sites. Involvement of more than three venous sinuses was 34.8%. Thrombophilic abnormality was detected in 21.7% of patients. Initiation of anticoagulation (AC) was mostly low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (80%), followed by unfractionated heparin (UFH) (17.7%) and fondaparinex (2%). Maintenance AC with Rivaroxaban after heparin (LMWH/UFH) was in 63% of our patients, the rest were switched from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban (34.8%), and one was treated by Dabigatran (2%). CVT recurrence was observed in one patient. Major bleeding (according to ISTH criteria) was not reported in our case series. Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated good safety and efficacy profile and can potentially replace warfarin in CVT patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e040212
Author(s):  
Gauruv Bose ◽  
Justin Graveline ◽  
Vignan Yogendrakumar ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
Dean A Fergusson ◽  
...  

ObjectivesCurrent guidelines do not recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to treat cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) despite their benefits over standard therapy. We performed a systematic review to summarise the published experience of DOAC therapy in CVT.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase and COCHRANE databases up to 18 November 2020.Eligibility criteriaAll published articles of patients with CVT treated with DOAC were included. Studies without follow-up information were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. A risk of bias analysis was performed.Primary and secondary outcome measuresSafety data included mortality, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) or other adverse events. Efficacy data included recurrent CVT, recanalisation rates and disability by modified Rankin Scales (mRS).Results33 studies met inclusion criteria. One randomised controlled trial, 5 observational cohorts and 27 case series or studies reported 279 patients treated with DOAC for CVT: 41% dabigatran, 47% rivaroxaban, 10% apixaban and 2% edoxaban, in addition to 315 patients treated with standard therapy. The observational cohorts showed a similar risk of death in DOAC and standard therapy arms (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 15.59). New ICH was reported in 2 (0.7%) DOAC-treated patients and recurrent CVT occurred in 4 (1.5%). A favourable mRS between 0 and 2 was reported in 94% of DOAC-treated patients, more likely than standard therapy in observational cohorts (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25).ConclusionThe evidence for DOAC use in CVT is limited although suggests sufficient safety and efficacy despite variability in timing and dose of treatment. This systematic review highlights that further rigorous trials are needed to validate these findings and to determine optimal treatment regimens.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Md Shameem Haidar ◽  
Md Abdur Razzak

Introduction: The seronegative arthritis is a heterogeneous group of inflammatory rheumatic diseases with predominant involvement of axial, peripheral joints and enthesitis. All of these have some distinct as well as some overlapping features, characteristic peripheral asymmetrical lower limb involvement and a negative rheumatoid factor. Involvement of joints is usually oligoarticular but rarely polyarthritis may be present. Diagnosis is usually made from clinical features rather than investigations. Objective: To evaluate the seronegative arthritis clinicopathologically by collecting and analyzing the relevant informations. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital, Chittagong from November 2015 to October 2016. A total 74 patients of suspected seronegative arthritis were included. Detail socio-demographic data were collected from the informant and recorded in structured case report form. Clinical examination and relevant investigations were done meticulously to confirm the aetiology of seronegative arthritis. Results: Maximum number of patients was in the 3rd to 4th decade (62.1%), mean age of the patient was 37.4±8.7 and 38.7±8.1 years in male and female respectively. Malefemale ratio was 2.65:1. Symmetrical sacroiliitis was found in 15(20.2%) patients, asymmetrical sacroiliitis in 36(48.6%) and in 23(31.2%) cases sacroiliac joint was not involved. Common aetiology for seronegative arthritis showed that, reactive arthritis recognized in majority of patients 29 (39.1%) and second most common cause was seronegative rheumatoid arthritis in 23(31%) patients. Conclusion: The Seronegative arthritis is a social, economical and health-care burden. Patients who develop 66 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 12, No 2 (December) 2016 arthritis have high disability, discomfort and loss of quality of life. Seronegative arthritis is an interesting group of related conditions with overlapping features and genetic and familial association. That may alert the primary care physician to attain possible diagnosis of spondyloarthritis and to consider a rheumatological opinion. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.12(2) 2016: 66-70


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
BN Kalpana ◽  
HR Samhitha ◽  
Kailash P Chhabria ◽  
Sonali Muralidhar ◽  
Kirti Raj

Objective : To analyse the clinical characteristics of intraocular cysticercosis and the association of neurocysticercosis with intraocular involvement in these patientsMaterials and methods: Retrospective case series of records of patients managed at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. Case records of patients managed at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India over two years (October 2012 – October 2014) were reviewed and cases reported with intraocular cysticercosis were included in the study and results analyzed.Results: Five (5) patients of intraocular cysticercosis were diagnosed in a two year period at our centre, 60% being bilateral. Eight (8) eyes of five (5) patients had intraocular cysts documented by clinical examination and B mode ultrasonography (75% eyes with active cysts, 25% eyes inactive) .Visual acuity at presentation of eyes with active cysts ranged from perception of light to counting finger 4m. The 75% eyes had tractional retinal detachment at presentation. Neurocysticercosis was documented in 80% of the cases oncomputed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging . Six (6) eyes with active cysts underwent parsplanavitrectomy with cyst removal using vitreous cutter with concurrent management of tractional retinal detachment in five (5) eyes. Postoperative visual recovery was poor in eyes with associated tractional retinal detachment while good anatomical outcome was achieved in all six (6) cases.Conclusion: Intraocular cysticercosis can be associated with cysts in other areas. High number of patients with neurocysticercosis (80%) in those with intraocular cysticercosis in our study may indicate positive association between the two which needs further investigation.


Author(s):  
Shabbir R. Pendhari ◽  
Kedar S. Joshi ◽  
Ramchandra P. Limaye

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are generally thought to be safer drug with fewer adverse effects. Though this class of the drug is thought to be well tolerated, a detail study about actual use of these agents in nephrology department is still awaited in many parts of India. There had been case reports and case series which were reporting PPIs producing acute interstitial nephritis progressing to acute renal failure. The risk of PPI treatment in haemodialysis patients remains unexplored. The aim of the study was to evaluate a drug utilization of PPI in patient undergoing haemodialysis procedure.Methods: In this study every day visit to the dialysis units of the hospitals was carried out. After taking consent from the patients, the information from the case-report form was noted like; age, sex, diagnosis, laboratory reports and drug prescried. No personally identifiable information about patient or physician was collected. After this an interview of patients was taken.Results: In this study, out of 126 patients 76.6% were male and 23.4% were female. Out of these 126 patients 88.89% patients were on PPI. Nearly 54% were using PPI for more than six months. Nearly 29% patients were using PPI for more than 12 months.Conclusions: As many case-reports and studies are suggesting, there is co-relation of PPI and acute interstitial nephritis from this study we suggest that especially in nephrology unit patients’, more caution must be exercised while using PPI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 501-505
Author(s):  
Sen Sheng ◽  
Krishina Nalleballe ◽  
Naga V. Pothineni ◽  
Rohan Sharma ◽  
Aliza Brown ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document