scholarly journals Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Yields Comparable Outcomes to CPX-351 in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3895-3895
Author(s):  
Hannah Asghari ◽  
Dasom Lee ◽  
Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Najla Al Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background The therapeutic landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become complex with recent drug approvals. CPX-351 has become standard-of-care for patients (pts) with therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Moreover, earlier phase studies combining hypomethylating agents (HMA) and Venetoclax (HMA+Ven) in the frontline setting for elderly patients have demonstrated high response rates and improved survival. Given the overlapping indications, yet lack of comparative outcome data between these therapeutic regimens, treatment decisions have become challenging in the frontline setting. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of newly diagnosed AML pts receiving HMA+Ven vs. CPX-351. Methods We retrospectively annotated 119 pts that received frontline treatment with HMA+Ven and CPX-351 at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System between 2013 and 2019. Pts were divided in two cohorts: HMA+Ven (Cohort A) or CPX-351(Cohort B). Via comprehensive chart review of each patient that received HMA+Ven, we further classified a subgroup of pts meeting criteria to receive CPX-351 as CPX-351eligible. Clinical and molecular data were abstracted for each patient in accordance with IRB requirements. Overall response rate (ORR) was the combined total of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was used to determine significance. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate median overall survival (mOS) with log-rank test to determine significance. All p-values are two-sided. Results Out of 119 total pts, 41 pts received HMA+Ven (Cohort A) and 78 pts received CPX-351 (Cohort B) with baseline characteristics outlined in Table 1. Among 111 response evaluable pts, ORR was 64.1% in Cohort A, including 28.2% with CR and 28.2% with CRi (Table 2). ORR was 50.0% in Cohort B, comprised of CR in 29.2% and CRi in 18.1%. There was no difference in ORR between Cohort A and Cohort B (64.1% vs. 50%, p 0.17). A significantly greater fraction of pts in Cohort B underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) (24.4% vs. 2.4%, p=0.004). ORR was higher in pts with European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-defined favorable/intermediate (fav/int) risk compared to adverse risk group in Cohort A (100% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03), however there was no difference in Cohort B (52.6% vs. 49.1%, p=1.0). ORR was similar among adverse risk groups in both cohorts (58.3% in Cohort A vs. 49.1% in Cohort B, p=0.47). Among responders, median time to best response was significantly longer in Cohort A (61.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p<0.0001). Median duration of response was not reached (NR) in both cohorts. Impact of somatic mutations on ORR is represented in Figure 3. Median follow-up was 6.5 months (mo) in Cohort A and 13.0mo in Cohort B. Median OS was similar in both cohorts (A vs. B, 13.8mo vs. 11.1mo, p=0.82) (Figure 1). Among responders, mOS was NR in Cohort A and 18.2mo in Cohort B (p=0.88) (Figure 2). Compared to Cohort B, mOS was superior for pts with fav/int risk disease in Cohort A (14.2mo (B) vs. NR (A), p=0.045) and not different for adverse risk group (11.1mo (B) vs. 7.3mo (A), p=0.2). Prior HMA exposure was 26.8% in Cohort A and 29.5% in Cohort B for an antecedent hematologic malignancy, however it did not impact mOS (p=0.86) or ORR (p=0.7). Early mortality rates for Cohort A and B were similar at day 30 (2.4% vs. 0%) and day 60 (4.9% vs. 3.8%). Rate of relapse was similar between cohorts A and B (16.0% vs. 30.6%, p=0.24). We then compared the outcomes of pts in Cohort B to CPX-351eligible arm from Cohort A (n=14). ORR and mOS were similar in Cohort B and CPX-351 eligible arm (ORR: 50% vs. 50%, p=1.0; mOS 11.1mo vs. 13.8mo, p=0.43). Only 1 patient (7.1%) of the CPX-351eligible arm underwent allo-SCT. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that HMA+Ven results in comparable response rates and survival outcomes to patients receiving CPX-351 when used as an initial remission therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML, however the median follow up for patients receiving HMA+Ven was short. Survival did not appear to be impacted by a significantly greater proportion of patients proceeding to allo-SCT in the CPX-351 arm. Overall, HMA+Ven may represent a reasonable frontline remission therapeutic choice in patients with AML and a randomized trial would seem justified. Disclosures Kuykendall: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Children Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage (ALAL) Benefit from Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treatment Protocols: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Georgia Avgerinou ◽  
Ilona Binenbaum ◽  
Stavros Glentis ◽  
Marianna Tzannoudaki ◽  
Stefanos Papadhimitriou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background:Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage (ALAL) is a very rare type of leukemia, comprising 2%-5% of Acute Leukemias (AL). There is a lack of a uniform definition, with two different classification systems used (EGIL and WHO 2008/2016), making the optimal chemotherapy approach undetermined. Patients and Methods:The medical records of newly diagnosed ALAL patients (BAL based on the EGIL criteria or ALAL based on the 2008/2016 WHO criteria), who were admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to August 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients characteristics including age, sex, blood count, blasts in bone marrow and peripheral blood, morphology, immunophenotyping, and cytogenetic/molecular studies were obtained. Treatment methods and outcome data including induction chemotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, use of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in first CR (CR1), and death were reviewed. Results:Among a total of 168 newly diagnosed patients with AL, 7 (4.17%) patients (5 male & 2 female), fulfilled prerequisites of ALAL/MPAL. The median age at diagnosis was 5 years (range 1-14 years). Distinct dimorphic lymphoid and myeloid (monocytic) blast populations were present in one case with bilineal leukemia, as well as in two cases of biphenotypic leukemia. The remaining cases had morphologic and cytochemical features of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), French-American-British (FAB): M1, M5 subtypes in two cases and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) FAB L1-L2 subtype in one case. One case presented with early switch of lineage from ALL at diagnosis to AML M5 at the end of induction treatment. The AML directed regimen was associated with better complete remission rate at the end of induction treatment (CR 100%) compared to the ALL directed regimen (CR 0%). It is of note that the two patients that failed to achieve CR with ALL directed chemotherapy did respond to the AML induction treatment. Six patients underwent HSCT in CR1. One patient relapsed and underwent HSCT in CR2, but succumbed due to treatment related mortality during the transplantation period. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range 1-8 years) the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the event free survival (EFS) were 80% and 60%, respectively. Conclusions:Considering that ALAL is a very rare leukemia, the optimal treatment approach remains a dilemma for many clinicians. Although patient numbers are small and follow-up periods are short, the use of AML treatment protocols for ALAL appears to be promising and efforts need to be made on an international collaborative scale. Disclosures Kattamis: Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Vertex:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genesis Pharma SA:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Apopharma/Chiesi:Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Celgene/BMS:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Ionis:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Agios:Consultancy;Vifor:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Increased Idarubicin Dosage during Consolidation Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
Bradstock Kenneth ◽  
Emma Link ◽  
Juliana Di Iulio ◽  
Jeff Szer ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Anthracylines are one of the major classes of drugs active against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increased doses of daunorubicin during induction therapy for AML have been shown to improve remission rates and survival. The ALLG used idarubicin in induction therapy at a dose of 9 mg/m2 x 3 days (total dose 27 mg/m2) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide (Blood 2005, 105:481), but showed that a total idarubicin dose of 36 mg/m2 was too toxic in this context (Leukemia 2001, 15:1331). In order to further improve outcomes in adult AML by anthracycline dose escalation, we conducted a phase 3 trial comparing standard to an increased idarubicin dose during consolidation therapy. Methods: Patients achieving complete remission after 1 or 2 cycles of intensive induction therapy (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 daily x3, cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5 and 7, and etoposide 75 mg/m2 daily x7; ICE protocol) were randomized to receive 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 75 mg/m2 for 5 days, and idarubicin 9mg/m2 daily for either 2 or 3 days (standard and intensive arms respectively). No further protocol therapy was given. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival from randomization to consolidation therapy (LFS) with overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 422 patients with AML (excluding cases with CBF rearrangements or APL) aged 16 to 60 years were enrolled between 2003-10, with 345 (82%) achieving complete remission, and 293 being randomized to standard (n=146) or intensive (n=147) consolidation arms. The median age was 45 years in both arms (range 16- 60), and both groups were balanced for intermediate versus unfavorable karyotypes and for frequency of mutations involving FLT3-ITD and NPM1 genes. Of the randomized patients, 120 in the standard arm (82%) and 95 in the intensive arm (65%) received the second consolidation cycle (p<0.001). The median total dose of idarubicin received in the 2 consolidation courses was 36 mg/m2 (range 17-45), or 99% (47-125%) of the protocol dose in the standard arm, versus 53 mg/m2 (18-73), or 98% (33-136%) of the protocol dose in the intensive arm. The durations of grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in the intensive arm, but there were no differences in grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities. There were no non-relapse deaths during consolidation on the standard arm and 2 in the intensive (0% vs 1%; p =0.50). Subsequently, 41 patients in the standard arm and 37 in the intensive arm underwent elective allogeneic BMT during first remission. On intention to-treat analysis uncensored for transplant and with a median follow-up time of 5.3 years (range 0.6 - 9.9), there was improvement in LFS in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm (3 year LFS 47% (95% CI 40-56%) versus 35% (28-44%); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99); p=0.045) (Figure 1). The 3 year OS for the intensive arm was 61% (95% CI 54-70%) and 50% (95% CI 43-59%) for the standard arm; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05); p=0.092). Although adverse cytogenetics, presence of FLT3-ITD mutation, and absence of NPM1 mutation were all associated with poorer outcomes, there was no evidence of a benefit of intensive consolidation being confined to specific cytogenetic or gene mutation sub-groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in adult patients in complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy an increased dose of idarubicin delivered during consolidation therapy results in improved LFS, without increased non-hematologic toxicity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Szer: Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wei:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartwright:ROCHE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Gill:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Outcome of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Refractory to 1 or 2 Cycles of Induction Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1319-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zarzour ◽  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
Bhumika J. Patel ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Resistance To Chemotherapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Achieving a complete remission (CR) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline (7+3) remains an important treatment goal associated with better overall survival (OS). Approximately 25-30% of younger, and up to 50% of older patients (pts) fail to achieve CR. AML pts with residual leukemia at day 14 receive a second cycle of the same regimen; whether these pts have worse survival than pts not requiring re-induction is unclear. Information on pts with primary refractory AML and the best treatment strategy in this setting are limited. Methods Pts with newly diagnosed AML treated at our institution between 1/2000 and 1/2015 were included. Pts received standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine for 7 days and an anthracycline for 3 days (7+3). Bone marrow biopsies were obtained at day 14 and a second cycle of the same regimen (7+3 for younger adults, 5+2 for older adults) was given to pts with residual leukemia (blasts > 5%). All responses were assessed at day 30 +/- 5 days post induction. Response was defined as CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or platelet recovery (CRp) per International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria. Cytogenetic risk stratifications were based on CALGB/Alliance criteria. OS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to time of death or last follow up. A panel of 62 gene mutations that have been described as recurrent mutations in myeloid malignancies was used to evaluate whether genomic data can be used to predict response. Results: Among 227 pts with AML, 123 received 7+3 and had clinical and mutational data available. Median age was 60 years (range, 23-82). Median baseline WBC was 8.2 X 109/L (range, 0.3-227), hemoglobin 8.9 g/L (range, 4.7-13.8), platelets 47 X 109/L (range, 9-326), and BM blasts 46% (range, 20-95). Cytogenetic risk groups were: favorable in 12 (10%), intermediate in 68 (56%) [normal karyotype in 44 (36%)], and unfavorable in 42 (34%). A total of 93 pts (76%) responded, 69 (74%) received 1 cycle of induction and 24 (26%) required re-induction at day 14 due to residual leukemia. A total of 39 pts (32%) received allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT): 18 (46%) from a matched sibling donor, 16 (41%) from a matched unrelated donor and 5 (13%) had an umbilical cord transplant. With a median follow up of 13.5 months, the median OS for the entire group was 13 months (m, range, 0.1-120). The median OS for pts who failed 1-2 cycles of 7+3 was significantly worse than pts who responded (median 2.6 vs 16.9 m, p = 0.002). When pts undergoing ASCT were censored, the median OS was 2.3 vs 9.9 m, p= 0.003, respectively. Overall, 33 pts (27%) had residual leukemia at day 14 and received re-induction, 24 (72%) achieved a response at day 30+/- 5 days. The median OS for pts who received re-induction was inferior compared to pts who did not (10.1 vs. 16.1 months, p= 0.02). When pts who received ASCT were censored, the OS was similar (8.5 vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.49, respectively). Among the 30 pts with persistent disease following induction therapy at day 30, 11 (37%) died from induction complications, 6 (20%) received salvage therapy with mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine, 3 (10%) received high dose cytarabine, 2 (7%) received azacitidine, and 8 (27%) received best supportive care. Among pts who received salvage chemotherapy 56% achieved CR and proceeded with ASCT. Two pts had ASCT with residual leukemia and relapsed within 3 m of ASCT. Pts who received ASCT after induction failure had a significantly better OS compared to non-transplant pts (median OS 22.0 vs. 1.4 months, p < 0.001, respectively); however, this benefit was only seen in pts who had ASCT in CR. We then investigated if genomic mutations can predict response or resistance to chemotherapy. Out of the 62 genes tested, only a TP53 mutation was associated with resistance, p = 0.02. Further, pts with TP53 mutations had significantly inferior OS compared to TP53 wild type regardless of ASCT status (1.4 vs 14.8 m, p< 0.001) Conclusion: Pts with newly diagnosed AML who fail induction chemotherapy with a 7+3 regimen have a poor outcome. Re-induction with the same regimen at day 14 for residual leukemia converted most non-responders to responders, but was associated with worse OS. ASCT improves outcome only in pts who achieve CR with salvage therapy. TP53 mutations predicted resistance to chemotherapy with 7+3. Disclosures Carew: Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Sekeres:TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Midostaurin in Combination with High-Dose Daunorubicin in 7+3 Induction for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with FLT3 Mutation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3896-3896
Author(s):  
Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽  
Robert Wilkinson ◽  
Amanda Brahim ◽  
Stephanie Boisclair ◽  
Jose Sandoval-Sus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with varied outcomes dependent on patient cytogenetic and mutational status. Thirty percent of adults with newly diagnosed AML have a mutation in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene. Midostaurin is a small molecule inhibitor that acts on multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including FLT3. The RATIFY trial showed improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival in patients treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine (7+3) plus midostaurin (Stone et al, NEJM 2017). In this trial, a dose of daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered. High dose (HD) 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin significantly improved the rate of complete remission and overall survival, including in patients with FLT3-ITD (Luskin et al, Blood 2016). HD daunorubicin has also been shown to be more effective than idarubicin in patients with FLT3-ITD AML (Lee et al, J Clin Oncol 2017). This data raises the question of whether the combination of midostaurin and HD daunorubicin would further improve outcomes of FLT3 mutated AML patients, while maintaining a tolerable safety profile. The objective of this study is to describe the safety and efficacy endpoints of FLT3 mutated AML patients treated with HD daunorubicin plus midostaurin as part of induction therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular data of patients at Memorial Healthcare System, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Sylvester Cancer Center with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutated AML treated from May 1st, 2017 to July 1st, 2019. Clinical data was abstracted in accordance with institutional review board approved protocol. All patients were induced with HD daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1-7, and midostaurin 50 mg PO twice daily on days 8-21. Growth factor and antimicrobial support were used per institutional guidelines. Demographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. OS was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. Other efficacy outcomes were CR, CRi (assessed according to the European Leukemia Network Criteria for AML), proportion of patients needing re-induction, and proportion of patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and early (30- and 60-day) mortality. Results: Twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Patient characteristics are outlined in TABLE 1. All patients were FLT3 mutated, as confirmed with molecular studies. The FLT3 subtype was ITD (high) in 3 patients, ITD (low) in 16 patients, TKD in 5 patients, and both in 2 patients. Seventy-seven percent of patients achieved a CR/CRi after one induction cycle, and 96.2% attained CR after two induction cycles. Median time to ANC and platelet recovery was 28 and 26 days, respectively. One patient died during the first 60 days, due to Enterococcus sepsis. The most common non-hematological AEs were nausea (77%), diarrhea (62%), mucositis (58%), rash (54%), and increased ALT (54%). Cumulative incidence of relapse in the cohort was 28% (n=7). Four patients relapsed pre-transplant and achieved CR2 with additional therapy. All 7 of these patients had co-occurring mutations of various types. Of the 20 patients who were considered transplant eligible, 13 (65%) underwent HSCT and 4 (20%) are pending transplant. Of the 13 transplanted patients, 3 experienced relapse post-transplant. After a median follow up of 14.5 months, median OS has not been reached. Conclusion: In our multi-center experience, induction with HD daunorubicin, cytarabine, and midostaurin is clinically effective and seems to be well tolerated. Short term mortality was low and AEs were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. Also, CR/CRi rates were higher than previously reported, suggesting that the combination of HD daunorubicin and midostaurin may improve the outcomes of patients with FLT3 mutated AML. Future analyses with larger patient samples and longer follow up are warranted to further evaluate long-term safety and efficacy for this regimen. Figure Disclosures Sandoval-Sus: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sallman:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sweet:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Pegcrisantaspase in Combination with Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4433-4433
Author(s):  
Sandrine Niyongere ◽  
Vu H. Duong ◽  
Dominique R Bollino ◽  
Rena G. Lapidus ◽  
Erin T. Strovel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Despite new therapeutic advances, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still has poor outcomes, especially in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease with complex karyotype (CK) and/or TP53 mutation. Venetoclax (Ven), an oral BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) has been approved by the FDA for treatment of newly diagnosed AML in adults who are unfit for intensive therapy with encouraging results, but the combination has been found to be less effective in patients with R/R AML. AML cells have been shown to be sensitive to extracellular glutamine depletion or manipulation of intracellular glutamine metabolism. Asparaginase converts asparagine and glutamine to aspartate and glutamate, decreasing plasma concentrations of asparagine and glutamine, with anti-leukemia activity. We previously published that crisantaspase produced complete plasma glutamine depletion in patients without dose-limiting toxicities and was associated with anti-leukemic activity in R/R AML (Emadi et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018). In preclinical studies, we found that Pegcrisantaspase (PegC), a long-acting crisantaspase, not only had potent single-agent anti-AML activity, but also synergized with Ven in CK-AML cell lines and primary cells in vitro and in vivo (Emadi et al. Leukemia 2021). Ven-PegC targets the mTOR-eIF4E-driven ribosomal translational protein synthesis apparatus in AML. With no standardized treatment and poor outcomes for R/R AML, there is an unmet need for effective treatment options. Trial Design: We present an ongoing, non-randomized, open-label Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating Ven administered orally daily in combination with PegC administered intravenously every 14 days in 28-day treatment cycles in adults patients with R/R AML. The trial consists of two phases: dose escalation (four cohorts) and dose expansion at the final recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds). Adult patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AML whose disease has relapsed or is refractory to at least one line of AML therapy and with adequate organ function and no prior history of pancreatitis or ≥ Grade 3 thrombohemorrhagic events are eligible for this trial. All patients with FLT3, IDH1 or IDH2 mutation must have received at least one line of therapy with an available FLT3/IDH1/IDH2 inhibitor to be eligible for this trial. The study will include CK-AML and TP53-mutated AML. The primary objectives of the trial are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Ven-PegC and estimate the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and/or biologically active doses (e.g. RP2D) of Ven-PegC in patients with R/R AML. The primary endpoints of the trial are incidences of regimen-limiting toxicities (RLTs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The secondary endpoints include the rates of complete remission (CR) and composite complete remission (CR+CRh+CRi), event-free survival, overall survival, the rate of conversion from transfusion dependence to transfusion independence, and achievement of MRD &lt;0.02% within 2 cycles of treatment with Ven-PegC. If a patient does not achieve at least hematologic improvement within 3 cycles of treatment, the patient will be taken off study. Responding patients can continue with the assigned doses until progression. The study uses a 3+3 design. Up to 24 subjects will be enrolled during dose escalation (in case exactly one RLT occurs in the first three patients enrolled at each of the four dose levels). Another 10 subjects will be enrolled at the final RP2D in an expansion cohort, for a total of 16 patients treated at the RP2D. The study is currently open at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04666649. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Emadi: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NewLink Genetics: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Secura Bio.: Consultancy; KinaRx, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Co-founder.

scholarly journals A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Entospletinib in Combination with Intensive Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Adults with Newly Diagnosed N ucleophosmin 1-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1282-1282
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
Thomas Oellerich ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a component of both lymphoid and myeloid cell signaling pathways and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) defined by dysregulated expression of the HOXA9 and MEIS1 transcription factors. Entospletinib (ENTO) is an oral, selective SYK inhibitor that is acceptably tolerated when administered with intensive induction and consolidation in newly diagnosed AML patients. In a phase 2 study, following induction with cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) plus ENTO, higher rates of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) were observed in patients with rearrangements of the KMT2A (MLL) gene (MLL-r) and mutations of the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene, both of which are associated with aberrant expression of HOXA9 and MEIS1, as compared to patients without these mutations. In an exploratory analysis, patients with HOXA9/MEIS1 expression levels above the median experienced superior overall survival (OS) as compared to patients with expression levels below the median. In the AGILITY trial, we hypothesize that the addition of ENTO to intensive induction/consolidation in newly diagnosed patients with NPM1-mutated AML will improve the rate of CR without evidence of measurable residual disease (MRD-negative CR) post-induction and duration of event-free survival (EFS). Methods: AGILITY will be a global, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ENTO in combination with cytarabine plus daunorubicin or idarubicin induction (7+3) and age-adjusted high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation in newly diagnosed AML patients aged 18-75 years who are candidates for intensive induction and harbor a documented NPM1 mutation based on local or central mutation testing. Patients with co-mutated FLT3 (internal tandem duplication or tyrosine kinase domain) and for whom midostaurin with 7+3 is indicated are excluded. Patients will be stratified based on age (&lt;60 vs ≥60 years) and anthracycline administered during induction (daunorubicin vs idarubicin). Approximately 180 patients will be randomized to receive 7+3 induction and HiDAC consolidation with ENTO (400 mg orally twice daily) versus 7+3 induction and HiDAC with placebo. Patients with &lt;5% leukemic blasts after 1 cycle of induction will proceed to the first cycle of HiDAC consolidation while patients with ≥5% residual blasts will undergo a second induction cycle. Patients who do not achieve CR after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (either 2 induction cycles or 1 induction and 1 consolidation cycle) plus ENTO or placebo will be designated as induction treatment failures (ITF). Patients who achieve or remain in CR after 2 chemotherapy cycles will be evaluated for MRD in bone marrow based on enumeration of mutant NPM1 alleles using a molecular assay. Patients may receive up to 3 cycles of consolidation with HiDAC and ENTO or placebo beyond chemotherapy cycle 2 per their original randomized treatment assignment. The number of consolidation cycles and timing of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or other post-consolidation therapy (if any) is at the discretion of the investigator. All patients will be followed for relapse and survival. The primary endpoint will be the rate of MRD-negative CR (&lt;0.01% mutant NPM1 alleles). Patients without an evaluation of response and MRD after chemotherapy cycle 2 will be imputed as treatment failures for the analysis. A key secondary endpoint will be EFS, defined as time from randomization to the earliest occurrence of ITF, relapse from CR, or death from any cause. Patients without an event at the time of the EFS analysis will be censored at the last study evaluation they were event-free. EFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and summarized by treatment group. Differences between treatment groups will be assessed with the log-rank test stratified by age (&lt;60 vs ≥60 years) and choice of anthracycline in induction (daunorubicin vs idarubicin). OS will be analyzed in a similar manner. Key exploratory endpoints will be the correlation between recurring genomic mutations and response or progression and longitudinal assessment of peripheral blood for detection of NPM1-m alleles among patients who achieve MRD-negative CR post-induction. An independent data-monitoring committee will monitor emerging safety and efficacy data from this trial on an ongoing basis. Disclosures Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes: Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Minden: Astellas: Consultancy. Oellerich: Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Kronos Bio, Inc.: Consultancy; Merck KGaA: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stein: Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; PinotBio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Elder: PharPoint Research, Inc.: Current Employment. Kumar: Kronos Bio, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bray: Kronos Bio, Inc.: Consultancy. DiMartino: Kronos Bio, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Entospletinib is an investigational therapy

scholarly journals RUNX1 Mutation Is Associated with Poor Outcome in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2052-2052
Author(s):  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Chetasi Talati ◽  
Hannah H Asghari ◽  
Jinming Song ◽  
Mohammad Hussaini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) is a key regulator of hematopoiesis, and aberrant expression of this gene can facilitate leukemogenesis. RUNX1 mutations (RUNX1mut) are thought to carry a poor prognosis and have been recently incorporated into the risk stratification systems for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) (Dohner et al. 2017) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN et al. 2019). However, the clinical significance of this mutation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is controversial with a recent study suggesting that allo-SCT may reverse the unfavorable influence of RUNX1mut(Qin et al. 2017). In this study, we describe the prognostic impact of RUNX1mutin patients with AML undergoing allo-SCT and compare the outcomes to ELN-defined adverse risk, RUNX1wtAML patients and patients with intermediate risk AML. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our database of 407 patients who received allo-SCT at the Moffitt Cancer Center between 2013 and 2018. Only AML patients undergoing allo-SCT during first complete remission that had molecular information prior to transplant were included. This cohort was divided into three subgroups: 1) RUNX1mutAML 2) ELN-defined adverse risk, RUNX1wtAML and 3) ELN-defined intermediate risk AML. We utilized clinical data captured by BMT Research and Analysis Information Network (BRAIN). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using log-rank and Cox regression, respectively. Cumulative incidence function was performed as defined by the Fine and Gray model. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to estimate median overall survival (mOS) from the time of diagnosis. Results: Among 407 AML patients reviewed, we identified 28 patients with RUNX1mut, 71 adverse risk RUNX1wtpatients, and 69 intermediate risk patients. Of the 28 patients (18 males/10 females) with RUNX1mut, 53.6% were under age 60, two-thirds had de novo AML (dAML), and 92.9% had intermediate risk cytogenetics as defined by ELN 2017 at diagnosis. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Univariate analysis identified RUNX1mutto be predictive of inferior OS compared to the intermediate risk cohort (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.12-4.64, p=0.022). Subsequent multivariate regression using covariates of age, sex, AML type, lines of therapy prior to allo-SCT, and conditioning regimen confirmed RUNX1mutas an independent covariate for reduced OS (HR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.18-5.33, p=0.016). At a median follow-up of 29.3 months for the entire cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed an inferior mOS in patients with RUNX1mutcompared to the intermediate risk group (25.7 months vs. 59.8 months, p=0.029) and was not different from RUNX1wtadverse risk group (25.7 months vs. 45.7 months, p=0.872) (Figure 1A). Cumulative incidence of relapse after allo-SCT for patients with RUNX1mutis significantly higher than intermediate risk patients (p=0.005, Figure 1B); however, there was no difference compared to RUNXwtadverse risk AML (p=0.295). There was no difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM) between RUNX1mutand intermediate risk patients (p=0.789, Figure 1B) or RUNX1mutand RUNX1wtadverse risk AML (p=0.323). When impact of concomitant somatic mutations on disease recurrence in RUNX1mutcohort was assessed, no discernible trends were identified. RUNX1mutwas mutually exclusive with NPM1 and frequently co-occurred with DNMT3A (21.4%), IDH2 (17.9%), and SRSF2 (17.9%) (Figure 2). Interestingly, 92.9% of the patients with RUNX1muthad ELN-defined intermediate risk cytogenetics and only 7.1% of the cohort had ELN-defined adverse risk cytogenetics. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that allo-SCT AML patients with RUNX1muthave poor outcomes analogous to RUNX1wtadverse risk AML. Disclosures Talati: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria. Kuykendall:Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy. Sweet:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Outcome of Allogeneic HSCT after Chemo-Based Conditioning in Infants with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission: A Multicenter EBMT-PDWP Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2862-2862
Author(s):  
Andre Manfred Willasch ◽  
Christina Peters ◽  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Marco Zecca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Missing Data ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Pediatric patients younger than two years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) commonly receive a chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The optimal choice of cytotoxic agents is still controversial. Methods: A retrospective EBMT-registry based study was conducted to investigate the impact of different chemotherapy-based conditionings on the outcomes in young children. Children younger than two years of age receiving a first HSCT of bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or cord blood (CB) from matched siblings (MSD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2019 were included. Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (BuCy) and BuCy/Melphalan (BuCyMel) were the most frequent combinations on which this analysis focused. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Multivariate analysis adjusting for differences between the conditioning regimens and risk factors influencing outcome was performed using the Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Results: 289 patients (56% male) transplanted at a median age of 1.2 years (IQR 0.9-1.6) after BuCy (164, 57%) or BuCyMel (125, 43%) were included. 184 (64%) patients received BM, 71 (24%) CB and 34 (12%) PBSC from UD (201, 70%) and MSD (88, 30%). In-vivo T-cell-depletion (TCD) was performed in 160 (58%, missing data 14) of the HSCTs with anti-thymocyte-globulin (ATG, 153) or alemtuzumab (7). Ex-vivo TCD was performed in 13 (5%, missing data 3) of the HSCTs. Graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD)-prophylaxis was Cyclosporin-A-based in 90% of the HSCTs. Median follow-up (FU) was 4.9 years (95% CI 3.9-5.5). After a median FU of 4 years, 4-y-LFS after BuCyMel (74.3%, 95% CI 65.1-81.4) was significantly better compared to BuCy (59.7%, 95% CI 51.2-67.2), hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.35-0.90, P=0.02). Overall survival (4-y-OS) after BuCyMel (77.2%, 95% CI 68.1-84.0) was significantly better compared to BuCy (66.6%, 95% CI 58.0-73.8), HR=0.58 (95% CI 0.35-0.97, P=0.04). No significant differences were found in the probability of relapse (4-y-RI (whole cohort) 26.2% (95% CI 21.0-31.7), HR of BuCyMel 0.59 (95% CI 0.34-1.02), P=0.06), non-relapse mortality (4-y-NRM (whole cohort) 7.8% (95% CI 5.0-11.4), HR of BuCyMel 0.49 (95% CI 0.19-1.24), P=0.13) and incidence of acute grade II-IV GvHD at day 100 (day-100-aGvHD II-IV (whole cohort) 36.8% (95% CI 31.2-42.5), HR of BuCyMel 0.59 (95% CI 0.35-1.01), P=0.06). Incidence of chronic GvHD (4-y-cGvHD (whole cohort)) was 9.8% (95%-CI 6.3-14.2). The donor type had no significant influence on the outcome. Conclusion: Bu-based conditionings of HSCT for infants with AML at high risk of relapse offer a high probability of cure. Conditioning with three alkylators (BuCyMel) resulted in better LFS and OS compared with two alkylators (BuCy) without significantly increasing the risk of both NRM and aGvHD. Future trials will evaluate the impact of the more recently introduced alkylator Treosulfan within the conditioning of HSCT in pediatric AML. Disclosures Peters: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants. Locatelli: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharamceutical: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Moraleda: Pfizer: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; MSD: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding. Biffi: BlueBirdBio: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Corbacioglu: Gentium/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Therapy in a Heavily Treated Cohort of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update of the Pethema Registry Experience

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2325-2325
Author(s):  
Jorge Labrador ◽  
Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez ◽  
Maria Dunia De Miguel ◽  
Almudena De Laiglesia ◽  
Carlos Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) is very poor, and treatment options are very limited. The exciting results of venetoclax (VEN) in untreated AML have led to its off-label use in RR-AML. However, evidence in RR-AML is still scarce and the available data are mostly from retrospective and single-center studies. The aim of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of VEN use in patients with RR-AML reported to the PETHEMA AML epidemiological registry. Initial results were presented previously (Labrador J, et al. ASH 2020). Here, we report an updated analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of a cohort of patients with AML-RR who were treated with venetoclax in the hospitals of the PETHEMA group. We evaluated efficacy, CR/CRi rate and overall survival (OS). We performed a descriptive analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Fifty-one patients were included, 33 men and 18 women, with a median age of 68 years (25-82). The main characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 167 days, 10/51 patients (19%) continued to receive VEN at the time of analyses. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (0-8). VEN was administered with azacitidine (AZA) in 59%, with decitabine (DEC) in 29% and with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in 12% of patients, respectively. The CR/CRi and partial response (PR) rates were 12.4% and 10.4%, respectively. The CR/RCi and overall response (ORR, CR/CRi+PR) was higher in patients receiving VEN+AZA (17.9% and 32.1%) than in those receiving DEC + VEN (6.7% and 13.3%) or LDAC + VEN (0%). The presence of NPM1 or CEBPA variants were the only two variables associated with increased CR/CRi with VEN in RR-AML. Median OS was 104 days (95% CI: 56 - 151) (Figure 1A), 120 days in combination with AZA, 104 days with DEC, and 69 days with LDAC; p=0.875. Treatment response (Figure 1B) and ECOG 0 were the only variables that influenced OS in a multivariate model adjusted for age and sex (Table 2). VEN-resistant patients who received subsequent salvage therapy had superior median OS (98 vs. 5 days, p=0.004).Twenty-eight percent of patients required discontinuation of VEN due to toxicity. Sixty-one percent of patients required admission, mainly due to infections (45%), 10% due to bleeding and other causes in 12%. One case of tumor lysis syndrome was described. Conclusions Our real-life series depicts a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after venetoclax-based salvage. Patients treated with this regimen had very poor-risk features, and were heavily pre-treated, which could explain in part the observed poor outcomes. Although follow-up is still short, the small proportion of responders did not reach the median OS. Further studies will help to identify those patients potentially benefiting from venetoclax-based salvage regimens. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Belén Vidriales: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pérez-Encinas: Janssen: Consultancy. Tormo: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

scholarly journals Effect of Age on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3933-3933
Author(s):  
Audrey M. Sigmund ◽  
Justin Jiang ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Patrick Elder ◽  
Ashley E. Rosko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients &lt;65 years old and ≥65 years old who received allo-SCT at the Ohio State University. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients &lt;65 years. The median age at transplant for the &lt;65 years group was 49 years (range: 18-64 years) and 68 years (range: 65-76 years) for the ≥65 years group. Gender, race, Karnofsky score, and comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning (65.1%) in the &lt;65 years of age compared to 20% in the ≥65 years of age (p&lt;0.01). A higher proportion of older patients had matched unrelated donors (57.3%), and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (80%). The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age &lt;65 years and 168 days (range: 34-6079 days) for age ≥65 years. Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 5.9 years (range 0.8-35.9 years) and 3.4 years (range: 1.0-9.6 years) from transplantation among survivors. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar among the groups (p=0.35; 0.11). 3 year OS of 42.3% (95% CI: 38.7-45.8%) and PFS of 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%-41.9%) were observed for age &lt;65 years. The corresponding OS and PFS for age ≥65 years was 46.3% (95% CI: 37.9%-54.3%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.7%-51.0%), respectively (Figure 1a & 1b). Cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year in &lt;65 and ≥65 years were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively (p=0.43). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year in &lt;65 and ≥65 years was 23.2% and 17.3%, respectively (p=0.12; Figures 1c and d). The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar in the two age groups. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD at day 100 in &lt;65 and ≥65 years was 40.3% (95% CI: 36.4%-44.2%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.9%-50.7%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD at day 365 in &lt;65 and ≥65 years was 40.8% (95% CI: 36.9%-44.6%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.6%-49.4%), respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document