Belumosudil for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) after 2 or More Prior Lines of Therapy: The Rockstar Study (KD025-213)

Introduction: Belumosudil (KD025) is a novel oral selective rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor specifically designed for the treatment of cGVHD, an immune-mediated inflammatory and fibrotic disorder. In a previous dose-finding study (KD025-208, N=54), two-thirds of patients, including those with fibrotic and inflammatory manifestations, achieved a partial or complete response with belumosudil. Herein, we report on the top-line results (6 months after the last patient in) from the pivotal phase 2 trial (ROCKstar [KD025-213], N=132). Methods: This phase 2, open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluated belumosudil 200 mg QD (n=66) and BID (n=66) in patients with cGVHD who received 2 to 5 prior lines of therapy (LOT). Treatment continued until clinically significant progression of cGVHD. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), defined per the 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Additional end points included duration of response (DOR), Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) score, failure-free survival (FFS), corticosteroid (CS) dose reductions and overall survival. The study was powered such that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) excludes 30%, with appropriate multiplicity adjustment. Results: At enrollment, the median age was 56 years, the median time from cGVHD diagnosis to enrollment was 29 months, 67% of patients had severe cGVHD, 52% had ≥4 organs involved, 72% had received ≥3 prior LOT (including ibrutinib [n=46] or ruxolitinib [n=38]) and 73% were refractory to their last LOT. The baseline characteristics of both arms were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the ORR (95% CI) with belumosudil 200 mg QD and BID was 73% (60%-83%) and 74% (62%-84%), respectively (Table 1). In patients who previously received ruxolitinib (29%), the ORR with belumosudil 200 mg QD and BID was 65% (41%-85%) and 72% (47%-90%), respectively. In patients who previously received ibrutinib (35%), the ORR with belumosudil 200 mg QD and BID was 73% (50%-89%) and 71% (49%-87%), respectively. High ORRs were seen in all patient subgroups, regardless of length of time from diagnosis to treatment, including those with severe cGVHD, involvement of ≥4 organs and a refractory response to prior LOT (Figure 1). The response rate was similar across all affected organs. The median time to response was 4 weeks. Of responders, 49% have maintained response for ≥20 weeks. The median DOR has not yet been reached. Clinically meaningful improvement (≥7-point reduction) in LSS score on consecutive assessments was observed in 39% and 33% of patients in the QD and BID groups, respectively. Both responders (43%) and nonresponders (17%) experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in LSS score. FFS was 77% (69%-84%) at 6 months. CS and calcineurin inhibitor discontinuations were seen in 18% and 13% of patients, respectively. Belumosudil was well tolerated, with >95% relative dose intensity in 83% of patients. Drug discontinuation occurred in 10% of patients due to possible drug-related adverse events (AEs), 3% due to progression of underlying disease and 12% due to progression of cGVHD. AEs were consistent with those expected in patients with cGVHD receiving CS and other immunosuppressants (Table 2). Common AEs included fatigue (32%), diarrhea (29%), nausea (26%), cough (24%), dyspnea (24%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), peripheral edema (21%) and headache (20%). At least 1 serious AE occurred in 34% of patients. Twenty-three percent of patients had at least 1 liver-related investigation; the most common was increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (11%), and only 1 patient showed an increase in bilirubin. Eight patients died during the study; 5 due to AEs (1 possibly related to belumosudil) and 3 during long-term follow-up (>28 days after last dose). There were no reports of cytomegalovirus reactivation or infection. Conclusion: Treatment with belumosudil at both doses resulted in high ORRs across key subgroups, meeting the primary end point of this pivotal randomized trial in cGVHD. Responses were durable and clinically meaningful, irrespective of patient and cGVHD characteristics, and were seen in patients who previously received ruxolitinib and ibrutinib. Belumosudil was well tolerated, with limited and manageable AEs. Further studies will evaluate its use earlier in disease management. The 12-month data analysis will be presented at ASH 2020. Disclosures Cutler: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. Rotta:Merck: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Ramakrishnan:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Cigna: Honoraria. Eiznhamer:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schueller:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yang:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Green:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Aggarwal:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Consultancy; Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc: Current Employment, Other: stock options. Blazar:BlueRock Therapeutics: Research Funding; BlueRock Therapeuetic: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-founder. Jagasia:Ocugen: Other; Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination with Prednisone in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia — Final Results of a Prospective Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-120203 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1764-1764

Author(s):

Lucia Masarova ◽

Naval G. Daver ◽

Tapan M. Kadia ◽

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Elias J. Jabbour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Prospective Phase

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Pomalidomide (POM) is a potent second-generation immunomodulatory agent that has been suggested to have a better toxicity and safety profile than thalidomide and lenalidomide. In patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia, the combination of POM plus prednisone showed up to 36% responses per International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria (IWG-MRT). OBJECTIVE: We present an efficacy and safety data of a prospective phase 2 study of POM in MF patients with anemia after a median follow up of 37.5 months (range, 2-98 months). This report substantiate on previously published results (Daver et al., Leuk Res, 2014; Daver et al., Leuk Res, 2013) and represents final analysis of the study. METHODS: Newly diagnosed or previously treated patients ≥ 18 years with MF and anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL or transfusion [PRBC] dependency) in a need for therapy were eligible. Patients were treated with single POM 3 mg / daily (3 weeks on / 1 week off) or POM 0.5 mg daily continuously with prednisone taper for first 3 months. Responses were re-assessed according to IWG-MRT 2013 criteria. RESULTS: Seventy patients with MF (primary MF, n = 64) of median age of 68 years were enrolled between 07/2009 - 03/2013. Cohort with POM 3 mg (n=21) was closed after 3 months due to excessive toxicity (Daver et al, Leuk Res, 2013). Nine patients who remained on the therapy continued on POM 0.5 mg daily along with 49 additionally enrolled patients, accounting for 58 patients included in this analysis (Table 1). The median time on therapy was 7 months (range, 2-97 months); with 19 patients (33%) treated with more than 12 cycles. Median follow-up from enrollment to data cut-off (May 2018) was 32.5 months (range, 1-99). In total, IWG-MRT responses were identified in 9 patients (16%); only one of them was originally treated with POM 3 mg. The median time on study for responding patients was 16 months (range, 8-71 months). Responses included Clinical Improvement (CI) in hemoglobin in 3 patients (5%); PRBC independence in 6 (10% all, 26% of PRBC dependent patients), and CI spleen in 2 patients (3% all, 20% of patients with splenomegaly). Two patients achieved combined responses; CI spleen with CI hemoglobin and CI spleen with PRBC independence (1 each). Overall median response duration was 8.4 months (range, 3.7-30.3); and it was longer for PRBC independence (30.3 months; range, 8-30.3), and CI spleen (14 months; range, 13-15). Additional 13 patients (without achievement of IWG-MRT response) derived clinical benefit while on study and continued on therapy for a median of 24.5 months (range, 12-93). Observed benefit in these patients included improvement of thrombocytopenia [1], improvement of performance status and/or reduced frequency of PRBC [11], and disease stabilization [1]. One patient progressed to acute leukemia (AML) on a study after 7 cycles of therapy. The treatment was well tolerated with 26 patients (45%) experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) regardless of causality. The most frequent AE were neutropenia (12%); rash (10%); fatigue (10%); and gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea/constipation, nausea; 9%). Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 12 patients (21%). All enrolled patients discontinued study due to the following reasons: no response / loss of response [42]; progression to AML [1]; toxicity [4]; stem cell transplantation (SCT) [2]; patient's preference [4]; death [2]; unrelated medical conditions [3]. Reasons for treatment discontinuation due to drug related AE were thrombocytopenia in 2 patients, pneumonitis in 1 patient and allergic reaction in 1 patient. By the time of data cut-off, 43 patients (74%) died with 20 known causes of death: MF progression [4]; AML [2], other medical conditions [7], sepsis [3], myocardial infarction and hemorrhagic stroke [2 each], SCT complications and mesenteric artery ischemia [1 each]). Two of these deaths occurred while on a study; one due to hemorrhagic stroke and one of unknown cause after 31 and 42 months on study, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pomalidomide with prednisone is safe therapy with good anti-anemia activity in patients with MF. It could lead to transfusion independence in one third of patients for a median duration of about 30 months. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00946270. Table 1. Disclosures Daver: Alexion: Consultancy; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Kiromic: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:BMS: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pemmaraju:plexxikon: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib in Combination with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-120251 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 352-352 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Lucia Masarova ◽

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Prithviraj Bose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) abrogates symptoms and organomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Combination with azacitidine (AZA) may further improve its efficacy. Methods: We initiated a single institutional, single arm, prospective, phase 2 study of RUX AZA combination in adult patients with MF and < 20% blasts. Previous therapy with RUX or AZA was not allowed. RUX 5 - 20 mg orally twice daily was given continuously since cycle 1. AZA 25 - 75 mg/m2 on days 1 - 5 of each 28-day cycle was added starting cycle 4. Responses were assessed per International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment 2013 criteria (IWG-MRT). Enrollment cut-off for this analysis was December 31st, 2017 to allow > 6 months of follow-up for all enrolled patients. We plan to present updated results with additional 5 months of enrollment at the meeting. Results: Fifty two pts were enrolled on study between 03/2013-12/2017, and were evaluable for responses. Forty seven pts (84%) were treated with both agents (RUX and AZA), with a median of 25 cycles (range, 1-55). Median age was 66 years (range, 48-87). Thirty four pts (65%) had int-2/high DIPSS score, 40 pts (77%) had spleen ≥5 cm. Thirty pts (58%) were JAK2V617F positive. Among 36 pts tested for non-driver mutations (28-gene panel); 7 pts had ASXL1, 6 had TET2, 3 had IDH1/2 and 2 had EZH2 and TP53. After a median follow-up of 22+ months (range, 1-59+); 21 pts (40%) are on therapy with a median overall follow-up of 30+ months. The most common reasons for therapy discontinuation were elective stem cell transplantation (n=12), and uncontrolled disease (n=8), including progression to acute leukemia (n=4). Four pts (8%) primarily discontinued therapy due to drug related toxicity (cytopenias). Three treatment unrelated deaths occurred on study; one each due to sepsis, meningitis and metastatic melanoma. Thirty eight pts (73%) had objective response on a study (Table). Median time to response was 1.8 months (range, 0.7-19). Seven responses (21% of responders) occurred after the addition of AZA with a median time to response of 2 months. These responses included spleen and symptom clinical improvements in 26% and 16% of pts, respectively. In total, 26 (65%), and 23 (58%) pts had palpable spleen reduction by > 50% at any time on study, and at week 24, respectively. JAK2V617F allele reduction was noted in 13 (81%) of 16 evaluable pts. Thirty one pts (60%) had available bone marrow for sequential evaluation. Nineteen pts (61%) had a documented improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, collagen or osteosclerosis, with a median time to first response of 12 months (range, 6-18). The most common grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity on a study was infection (34%), constipation (21%), and nausea (14%). New onset of grade ≥3 anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 33%, 30% and 16% of pts, respectively. Conclusion: Concomitant RUX with AZA was feasible with overall IWG-MRT response rate of 73%, including >50% spleen reduction in 65% of pts. Moreover, 61% of pts achieved improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, collagen or osteosclerosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01787487. Table. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:novartis: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Daver:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Long Term Exposure to Lenalidomide in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2964.2964 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2964-2964

Author(s):

Guillemette Fouquet ◽

Stéphanie Tardy ◽

Helene Demarquette ◽

Sarah Bonnet ◽

Julie Gay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Vte Prophylaxis ◽

First Relapse

Abstract Abstract 2964 Background. Lenalidomide is an oral IMiD®, immunomodulatory compound, approved for use in combination with dexamethasone (Len/Dex) in patients with RRMM who have received one prior therapy. Len/Dex is indicated until evidence of disease progression at the best-tolerated dose of both Len and Dex (Dimopoulos et al. Leukemia 2011). However, the tolerability profile of long term exposure to Len/Dex is not well described, and evidence that long term exposure to Len/Dex would improve on the response rate and survival has yet to be determined. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety profile of long term exposure to Len/Dex in RRMM pts in a multicentre study. Method. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 50 RRMM pts treated with Len/Dex and remaining on Len for ≥2 years with a special focus on pts receiving Len for ≥3 years. All pts included had complete follow up records. Results. The median (range min-max) age was 58 years (39–79) with 30% (n=15) > 65 years (elderly MM), the sex ratio M/F was 1.2, 49% (n=24) ISS 2 and 3, 12% (n=6) severe renal insufficiency (CrCl < 30mL/min), and 8% (n=4) adverse FISH [del17p and/or t(4;14)]. Overall, 25 pts (50%) had Len/Dex at first relapse, 19 pts (38%) at second relapse and 6 (9%) pts in subsequent relapses. Len/Dex was given at first relapse in 10 (66%) elderly patients. The median time from diagnosis to starting Len/Dex was 4.5 years (1–16) for overall cohort and 3 years (1–8) for elderly patients (p=0.05). 28 pts (56%) received Len/Dex for ≥3 years. The median duration on Len/Dex was 3 (2–7) years for the overall cohort, and was 4 (3;7) years for patients exposed to Len ≥3 years. Treatment duration was similar across age categories and across number of previous relapses. With a median follow up of 4 years, 19 patients had stopped Len/Dex. The response rate (ORR, ≥PR) was 96% (n=48), including 37 (74%) patients with ≥VGPR, similar across age categories. Interestingly, the ORR and ≥VGPR were similar irrespective of whether patients have stopped Len/Dex in our study. The ORR was also similar across number of previous relapses, but the ≥VGPR rate was lower in patients at third relapse and beyond, (50%; p=ns). The ORR and ≥VGPR rate was 93% and 77% in patients exposed to Len ≥3 years, similar to the whole cohort. The median time to first response and best response were 2 (1–5) months and 4.5 (2–9) months, respectively. Overall, 9 (18%) patients stopped treatment due to toxicity, 9 (18%) progression of MM, and 1 (0.5%) patient decision. With a median follow up of 4 years, the median (95%CI) TTP was not reached, the estimated 4-yr TTP was 51.5%. There was no imbalance in the incidence of toxicity based on age, number of previous relapses, and patients exposed to Len ≥3 years did not discontinue more often due to toxicity, 14% versus 19% for those receiving Len < 3 years. The hematological safety profile was similar across age categories, number of previous relapses, and patients exposed to Len ≥ 3 years; overall, 8 (16%) patients experienced grade 3–4 neutropenia, 6% thrombopenia, and 6% anemia. Ten (20%) patients experienced a thromboembolic event (VTE), all of them of venous type. Two patients had previous history of VTE, but none of them experienced VTE on Len/Dex, likely related to adequate VTE prophylaxis. The median time to first occurrence was 5 (1;28) months, although 4/10 occurred in patients with ≥3 years on Len. All VTE occurred while on VTE prophylaxis except for 1 patient, 5 on aspirin, 2 on prophylactic doses of LMWH, and 2 on VKA (target INR 2–3). The incidence rate of second primary malignancy (SPM) was 3 (6%) (larynx, lung, and MDS). The SPMs occurred at a median time of 4 years from start of Len, while Len was already stopped in 2/3 patients, the latter stopped len at time SPM was diagnosed. Interestingly, none of the patients with more than 3 years exposure on Len had SPM. Conclusions. The current study provides estimates of responses, TTP and safety in a series of MM pts with long-term exposure to Len-based regimen at relapse. 62% of patients remained on Len beyond 3 years reflecting the efficacy and good safety profile of Len in relapsed MM, irrespective of age and number of prior therapies. Furthermore, no excess of long term side effects, including SPM, was observed with a prolonged long follow-up in this study. Disclosures: Robinson: Celgene: Employment. Miljkovic:Celgene: Employment. Morel:Celgene: Employment. Boccacio:Celgene: Employment. Facon:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leleu:Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LeoPharma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

KD025 for Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) - Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 2a Study (KD025-208)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125986 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 872-872 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Madan Jagasia ◽

Amandeep Salhotra ◽

Carlos R. Bachier ◽

Behyar Zoghi, MD, PhD, FACP ◽

Aleksandr Lazaryan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Meaningful Improvement ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Reductions ◽

Fund Research

Introduction: cGVHD exhibits both autoimmune and fibrotic features across multiple organ systems. KD025 is an orally available Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 2 (ROCK2) selective inhibitor that (1) decreases human T cell IL-21 and IL-17 secretion via STAT3, IRF4 and RORγt regulation; (2) increases percentages and function of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells via a STAT5-dependent mechanism; and (3) reverses established cGVHD in 2 distinct preclinical models. KD025 modulates the immune system by shifting the Th17/Treg balance towards homeostasis. Methods: KD025-208 enrolled 3 sequential cohorts (C) (C1: 200 mg QD, C2: 200 mg BID and C3: 400 mg QD) of patients (pts) with cGVHD after 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Treatment is in 28-Day continuous cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) as per 2014 NIH response criteria in the mITT population. Additional endpoints include duration of response (DOR), corticosteroid (CS) dose reductions, failure free survival (FFS) and Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) score. Results: 17, 16 and 21 pts were enrolled in C1, C2, and C3 between Sep-2016 and Mar-2018. Data as of 8-Mar-2019 are included, reflecting a median duration of follow up of 112, 97 and 64 weeks (wks), respectively. At enrollment, median age was 52 yrs, median time from cGVHD diagnosis to treatment was 20 mos, and patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. 71% of patients were refractory to the last line of therapy prior to enrollment. 50% of pts had cGVHD in ≥4 organs. The median duration of treatment was 37, 33 and 39 wks, respectively. As of 30-Jun-2019, 24% of pts had received >18 months of KD025 therapy. 14 pts remain on KD025 treatment. Reasons for discontinuation included cGVHD progression (18), pt voluntary withdrawal (7), relapse of underlying disease (5), investigator decision (5), AE (3) and death (2). ORR (95% CI) was 65% (38%, 85%) in C1, 69% (41%, 89%) in C2, and 62% (38%, 82%) in C3, i.e. 65% (51%, 77%) across all 3 cohorts. Responses were achieved across key subgroups with ORRs of 62% (24/39) in pts with ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy, 70% (19/27) in pts with ≥4 organs involved and 60% (25/42) in pts with severe cGVHD. CRs were observed in all affected organs except lung; PRs were observed in lung. Responses were rapid, and often achieved within 8 wks, although 4/35 responses occurred after 24 wks. Of note, organs with fibrotic manifestations such as lungs, joints and eyes responded after 24 weeks in some pts. Responses were durable, with a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) median DOR of 34 weeks across all cohorts. 57% of responders sustained a response for ≥20 wks. The K-M median DOR was 34 wks in pts with ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. FFS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 mos was 76%, 47%, 40% and 33%, respectively. Baseline median CS dose was 0.21 mg/kg/day of prednisone equivalent. During treatment with KD025, the median CS dose was reduced by 50%. 67% of pts reduced CS dose and 20% discontinued CS completely. The median CS dose reduction was 66% in responders and 25% in non-responders. 52% of pts reported a clinically meaningful improvement (≥7-point reduction) in LSS score during treatment with KD025 with a median time to improvement of 9 wks and a duration for responders of 21 wks. 63% of responders and 32% of non-responders reported a meaningful improvement in LSS score. KD025 was well tolerated with a median Relative Dose Intensity of 98%. Dose reductions/interruptions occurred in 21/54 pts; median duration of interruption was 8.5 days (range 3-20). AEs were consistent with those expected in cGVHD pts receiving CS. Common AEs were URI (35%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (31%), fatigue (30%), dyspnea (28%), increased LFTs (24%), and peripheral edema (22%). 63% had a Grade ≥3 AE; the most common was dyspnea (13%). <10% of pts experienced Grade 3 anemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. SAEs were reported in 43%; none were considered related to KD025. Three pts discontinued KD025 due to possibly related AEs (C1: diarrhea, headache; C3: fatigue). No apparent increased risk of infection was observed. Three pts died on study (C3: relapse of leukemia; lung infection; cardiac arrest); none were considered related to KD025. Conclusions: Durable and clinically meaningful responses have been observed across all 3 cohorts. KD025 was well tolerated, allowing pts to remain on treatment and realize potential benefits of sustained therapy. Disclosures Jagasia: Kadmon: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding. Salhotra:Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Bachier:Viracyte: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Consultancy. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Weisdorf:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding. Green:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment. Schueller:Kadmon Corporation LLC: Employment. Huang:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment. Yang:Kadmon Corporation: Employment. Eiznhamer:Kadmon Corporation: Employment. Aggarwal:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blazar:Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Incyte: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kadmon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) in Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) and in Stable Deep Molecular Response (DMR) to Dasatinib - the Dasfree Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1895.1895 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1895-1895 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Neil P. Shah ◽

Ronald Paquette ◽

Martin C. Müller ◽

Susanne Saussele ◽

Valentin Garcìa-Gutiérrez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Kinetics Of

Abstract Background: Prior clinical trials demonstrated that 33-61% of patients with CML maintain disease control following TKI discontinuation in the 1st line and beyond (Thielen, Eur J Cancer. 2013; Mahon, Lancet Oncol. 2010; Hochhaus, ASCO 2016; Hughes, ASCO 2016; Imagawa, Lancet Haematol. 2015). Patients who relapsed after discontinuation regained major molecular response (MMR) upon retreatment. Dasatinib, a 2nd generation TKI, induces fast and deep molecular responses, making it an effective option for patients in view of a possible TFR. Here, we report interim results from the phase 2 DASFREE study, investigating TFR with dasatinib in the 1st and 2nd line settings. Methods: DASFREE (CA180-406/NCT01850004) is a phase 2 open-label, single-arm study in adults with CML-CP who were on dasatinib for ≥2 yr as 1st line or subsequent therapy, had confirmed dasatinib-induced DMR (defined as MR4.5, BCR-ABL1 ≤0.0032% [IS]) for ≥1 yr prior to enrollment, and achieved a 1-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 from baseline within 3-6.5 mo of starting dasatinib. Prescreening for MR4.5 was done at a local lab, with confirmation at a central lab twice over a 3-mo interval prior to dasatinib discontinuation (screening phase). BCR-ABL1 was monitored centrally after treatment discontinuation every mo in the 1st yr, then every 3 mo. If loss of MMR occurred, patients resumed dasatinib at the previous dose. The primary endpoint is MMR rate at 1 yr after dasatinib discontinuation. Secondary endpoints include kinetics of loss of response, event-free survival (EFS; no loss of MMR), relapse-free survival (RFS; no loss of MMR, complete cytogenetic response, or complete hematologic response, or progression to accelerated/blast phase CML), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses include frequency of adverse events (AEs) after discontinuation and during dasatinib treatment, and molecular response rates after reinitiating dasatinib. All patients will be followed for up to 5 yr. This analysis reflects a planned interim assessment of patients followed for TFR for ≥1 yr. Results: Currently, 71 patients are enrolled out of 79 planned. Thirty patients (14 male; median age 51 yr [range: 29-76]; Sokal scores: 60% low, 27% intermediate, 3% high, 10% unknown) followed for ≥1 yr after dasatinib discontinuation were included in this interim analysis. MMR rate at 1 yr following discontinuation was 63% (95% CI: 46-81). EFS rate at 1 yr following discontinuation was 63% (95% CI: 44-78; Figure). RFS rate at 1 yr following discontinuation will be presented. Eleven of 30 patients lost MMR, with a median time to loss of MMR of 4 mo (range: 1-8). Median time on dasatinib prior to discontinuation was 40 mo (range: 26-114) for patients who lost MMR and 55 mo (range: 31-87) for patients who retained MMR. Eleven patients who lost MMR restarted dasatinib therapy: 10 regained MMR, and 1 patient chose to restart therapy at a nonstudy site, discontinued study, and was lost to follow-up. The kinetics of molecular relapse, the number of patients that regained DMR, and the time to regain MMR or DMR will be presented. No transformation events or deaths were observed at the time of this analysis. After discontinuation, 5 patients had musculoskeletal AEs; in 2 patients (with 3 events) these AEs were attributed to withdrawal from dasatinib by investigators. Additional AEs following discontinuation included hypertension (17%) and skin disorders (13%). For patients who restarted dasatinib, AEs were consistent with the known safety profile, and none of the on-treatment AEs resulted in discontinuation. Conclusions: This interim analysis of the first 30 patients enrolled in DASFREE demonstrated patients with dasatinib-induced DMR treated in the 1st and 2nd line had high rates of success at maintaining remission after treatment was discontinued (63% MMR and EFS at 1 yr), and there was rescue of molecular response in all patients once dasatinib was reinitiated. There is a suggested correlation between time on dasatinib prior to discontinuation and maintaining MMR. Dasatinib withdrawal appears to be tolerable, as there was a low incidence of withdrawal symptoms. These data build upon the growing body of evidence supporting the feasibility of TFR in patients with CML-CP and demonstrate that with frequent monitoring of BCR-ABL1, patients treated with dasatinib in the 1st and 2nd line can successfully discontinue treatment. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing. Figure Figure. Disclosures Shah: Bristol-Myers Squibb, ARIAD, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Plexxikon: Research Funding. Paquette:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Müller:Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy; Institute for Hematology and Oncology, IHO GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saussele:Novartis, BMS, Ariad, Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding. Garcìa-Gutiérrez:Novartis, BMS, Ariad and Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS, Ariad and Pfizer: Research Funding. Nicolini:Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mauro:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mahon:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Martin-Regueira:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Subar:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Employment. Li:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Lipton:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide. the EMN011 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114029 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 801-801 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Sonja Zweegman ◽

Michele Cavo ◽

Kazem Nasserinejad ◽

Rosella Troia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Advisory Role

Abstract Introduction and background The treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) with relapse or progressive disease after bortezomib, lenalidomide and high-dose therapy represents an important challenge. In the EMN02 collaborative trial newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were randomized to receive VCD induction followed by HDM/ASCT or VMP, followed by a second randomization for VRD consolidation or no consolidation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance until progression (Cavo et al, ASH2017, abstract #397; Sonneveld et al, EHA2018, abstract #108). The present Phase 2 trial was designed for patients with refractory disease or first progression after inclusion in EMN02 in order to evaluate a salvage treatment with next generation proteasome inhibition and IMId, i.e., Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone. The primary endpoints were response and progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR5349 and EudraCT 2013-003265-34. Methods Patients who were included received four 28-days re-induction cycles of KPd, i.e. Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2, days 1,2,8,9,15,16) with Pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and Dexamethasone (20mg days 1,2,8,9,15,16). In patients who had not previously received HDM/ASCT, HDM(200 mg/m2) was administered followed by autologous stem cell transplantation with stem cells harvested during after induction therapy in the EMN02 trial. Consolidation consisted of 4 additional cycles of KPd, identical to the induction cycles. Patients with stable disease or better received Pomalidomide 4mg w/o Dexamethasone in 28 days cycles until progression. Results At the time of this first planned interim analysis 82 patients were registered and this analysis was performed in the first 60 patients. 48% were randomized prior HDM/ASCT and 42% VMP, and 10% were not randomized. Prior best responses in the EMN02 trial were 35% CR/sCR , 75% ≥VGPR, 97% ≥PR. The median follow-up from inclusion in EMN02 was 43 months (range 21 - 62 months). In 44 patients cytogenetic risk were known, 15 (34%) of them had high-risk FISH (del17p, t(14;16) or t(4;14)). 57 fifty-seven (95%) of patients had progressed during lenalidomide maintenance, 3 patient's data are not yet available. In the present trial 38 (63%) of patients achieved normal completion of treatment according to of the protocol. Twenty patients received their first HDM plus ASCT. Median time on therapy was 14 months. Full dose re-induction treatment according to protocol could be administered in 68% (for Carfilzomib) and 64% (for Pomalidomide) of patients respectively, while for consolidation this was 62% for both Carfilzomib and Best response on protocol was 31% CR/sCR, 65% ≥VGPR, 87% ≥PR, respectively, with no difference according to response on initial treatments. Median time to response (≥PR) was 2 months. At a median follow-up of 16.3 months (range 3 - 32 months) median PFS was 18 months with better outcome in standard risk cytogenetics (HR=0.27 (0.09, 0.83) 95% CIs vs NR) and in patients with prior VMP treatment (HR=0.49 (0.21, 1.16) 95% CIs vs NR). 48 (80%) of patients are alive and in follow-up. KPd-emerging non-hematologic grade 3 and 4 adverse events included cardiovascular (5%), respiratory (5%), infections (20%) and neuropathy (3%). There were 3 fatal SAEs not related to progression (1 patient cardiac failure, 2 patients pneumonia). KPd-emerging hematological toxicity grade 3 and 4 occurred in 30% of patients. Discussion This Phase 2 clinical trial demonstrates that KPd is a feasible, effective and safe triple drug regimen in RRMM patients who have been previously treated and/or are refractory to bortezomib and refractory to lenalidomide. A 87% overall response rate including 31% CR/sCR is clinically relevant in this population. Since median OS has not been reached, longer follow-up is needed. Acknowledgments This trial was conducted as an investigator sponsored trial in EMN and supported by independent grants and drug supply from Amgen and Celgene. Disclosures Sonneveld: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zweegman:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Corradini:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sandoz: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Lecturer; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer. Patriarca:Janssen: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory Role; Travel, accommodations, expenses; Jazz: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; MSD Italy: Other: Advisory Role; Medac: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Costa:celgene: Employment. Iskander:amgen: Employment. Boccadoro:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Health-Related Quality of Life Results from the KarMMa Clinical Study in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with the B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145155 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2835-2835

Author(s):

Michel Delforge ◽

Nina Shah ◽

Paula Rodríguez-Otero ◽

Julia Braverman ◽

Devender Dhanda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Health Utility Index ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Meaningful Improvement

Abstract Introduction: Patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have poor outcomes and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy ide-cel has shown frequent, deep, and durable responses in patients with RRMM who were triple-class exposed (TCE) to immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors (PI), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in the pivotal, phase 2, single-arm KarMMa trial (Munshi NC, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:705-716). Ide-cel is approved in the US by the FDA for the treatment of adults with RRMM after ≥ 4 prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug, PI, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. We have shown previously that in the KarMMa trial, ide-cel provides clinically meaningful benefits in HRQoL at 9 months' follow-up (Delforge M, et al. HemaSphere 2020;4(suppl 1). Abstract EP1000; Shah N, et al. Blood 2020;136(suppl 1):28-29). The aim of this analysis was to extend previous reports by analyzing the effect of ide-cel on HRQoL at 24 months post-infusion data cut off (December 21, 2020) in patients with TCE RRMM in the KarMMa trial. Methods: In the KarMMa trial (NCT03361748), eligible patients had ≥ 3 prior antimyeloma treatment regimens, were TCE, and refractory to their last treatment regimen per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. To assess HRQoL, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20) and EuroQoL 5 dimensions 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires were administered at screening, baseline, at ide-cel infusion, at months 1-6, and every 3-6 months up to month 24 or end of study. Thresholds for clinically meaningful changes from baseline were predefined. Statistical significance was calculated using the 2-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test (0.05 significance level). Results: Of 128 patients treated with ide-cel, 126 (98%) had a baseline and ≥ 1 post-baseline HRQoL assessment and were included in the HRQoL-evaluable population. The patient questionnaire completion rate was ≥ 75% up to month 6 and 50%-70% thereafter for most visits. For the predefined primary HRQoL domains, mean scores improved after ide-cel treatment and were comparable to the general population (Table). Mean changes from baseline exceeded the minimal important difference (MID) threshold for clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue, pain, physical functioning, cognitive functioning, and global health status/quality of life (QoL) scores of QLQ-C30 and disease symptom scores of QLQ-MY20 through month 24 (data cutoff, December 21, 2020). Side effects of treatment (QLQ-MY20) remained stable. Overall, 40%-70% of patients had clinically meaningful improvements in the QLQ-C30 fatigue, pain, physical functioning, and global health status/QoL scores at later timepoints. Moreover, 30%-40% of patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in cognitive functioning, disease symptoms, and side effects, with 40%-60% of patients remaining stable in these domains, across most of the post-baseline assessment visits. Predefined secondary HRQoL domains included all other domains from QLQ-C30 and -MY20, EQ-5D-5L health utility index scores, and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Mean changes from baseline exceeded the MID thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement and reached statistical significance across most follow-up visits for role functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea (QLQ-C30), future perspectives (QLQ-MY20), health utility index scores (EQ-5D-5L), and VAS scores (EQ-5D). Mean changes from baseline for nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, financial difficulties (QLQ-C30), and body image (QLQ-MY20) scores were not clinically meaningful. At the individual level, most patients remained stable or achieved clinically meaningful improvements in secondary domains of interest across almost all follow-up visits. Conclusion: In this study, patients with TCE RRMM who received a single infusion of ide-cel showed clinically meaningful improvements across multiple HRQoL domains during the 24-month follow-up period. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Delforge: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Sanofi: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Nektar: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Teneobio: Research Funding. Rodríguez-Otero: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline, Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Regeneron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Braverman: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dhanda: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shi: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Guo: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; UCB: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Evidera: Current Employment. Yu: Evidera: Current Employment. Liao: Evidera: Current Employment. Campbell: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Munshi: Legend: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: scientific founder, Patents & Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 36-37

Author(s):

Gavin Hui ◽

Abdullah Ladha ◽

Edna Cheung ◽

Caroline Berube ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Trial of Ibrutinib and Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141243 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 29-29

Author(s):

Walter Hanel ◽

Beth A. Christian ◽

Kami J. Maddocks ◽

Narendranath Epperla ◽

Basem M. William ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Immune Escape ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Complete Response ◽

Median Number ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by an extensive inflammatory infiltrate with abundant Th2 and Treg cells which facilitate immune escape of Reed Sternberg (RS) cells and provides a growth promoting microenvironment by cytokine secretion and CD40/CD40L engagement. Our group previously show that ibrutinib irreversibly inhibits both Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and interleukin-2 inducible kinase (ITK), a kinase important in Th2 signaling (Dubovsky et al Blood 2013). We hypothesized that the addition of ibrutinib to nivolumab would lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by normalizing the Th1/Th2 balance thus reversing immune escape of RS cells. We present results of a planned interim analysis of the first 10 patients enrolled with a data cutoff of June of 2020. Methods: This is a single arm, phase II, single institutional clinical trial testing the clinical activity of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who have received at least one prior line of therapy and who were either not candidates for or had a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Prior treatment with nivolumab was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) prior to cycle 7 assessed per Lugano criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were reported using CTCAE Version 4.0. Results: Of the first 11 cHL patients enrolled, one patient withdrew consent prior to initiating therapy. Of the remaining 10 patients, the median age was 41 years (range 20-84) and 4 patients (40%) were male. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 4.5 (range 1-11), 5 patients (50%) had prior ASCT, 8 patients (80%) had prior brentuximab, and 5 patients (50%) had prior nivolumab. Four of the five patients with prior nivolumab had progressed while receiving therapy while the remaining patient had stable disease upon completing nivolumab with a median time from the last nivolumab treatment of 15.6 months (range 0.7-23.2). Of the 10 patients who received treatment, one patient came off study after two cycles due to persistent grade 2 transaminitis lasting for several weeks attributed to nivolumab requiring high dose oral steroids. One patient came off study after cycle 9 due to grade 3 hematuria attributed to ibrutinib and another came off study due to a pericardial effusion after 8 cycles of ibrutinib maintenance. In the remaining patients, treatment was generally well tolerated with most AEs being grade 1-2 (Table 1). The median number of total cycles received was 9 (range 2-22). Of the 9 patients evaluable for response, 6 patients responded (ORR = 66%), 4 of whom had a complete response (CRR = 44%) with a median time to response of 2 months (Table 2, Fig.1). In intention-to-treat analysis, the ORR was 60% and CRR was 40% meeting our prespecified interim efficacy endpoint of a 30% CRR for trial continuation. Notably, of the 5 patients with prior nivolumab, 3 responded to nivolumab + ibrutinib (ORR = 60%), with one having a CR (CRR = 20%). Overall, at a median follow up of 9.5 months, both the median PFS and duration of response have not yet been reached, with 3 patients remaining in CR at the time of data cutoff. Three of 4 patients discontinued trial treatment to undergo SCT [2 allogeneic; 1 autologous]. Of the 2 allogeneic SCT patients, the first one underwent SCT 3 weeks after the last nivolumab infusion and developed multi-organ acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) followed by severe chronic GVHD requiring extracorporeal photopheresis. The second patient underwent allogeneic SCT 2 months following the last nivolumab infusion and had no acute GVHD and experienced only mild chronic GVHD which was medically managed. Conclusions: Although the numbers are small and further recruitment is ongoing (target n=17), the combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab was generally well tolerated and with high response rate with more than half of responding patients achieving a CR. In addition, responses were seen in patients with prior nivolumab treatment. Our results suggest a possible novel role for BTK inhibition in reversing nivolumab resistance in cHL, at least in some cases. Correlative studies including peripheral blood and tumor immune subset analyses are ongoing and the latest results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Christian: Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; F Hoffman-La Roche: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maddocks:Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Epperla:Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. William:Incyte: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy. Bond:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Brammer:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Baiocchi:viracta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: This trial uses ibrutnib in cHL to augment the responses of concurrent nivolumab administration.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text