scholarly journals Obinutuzumab Short Duration Infusion Is Preferred By Healthcare Providers and Has Minimal Impact on Patient-Reported Symptoms Among Patients with Untreated, Advanced Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1345-1345
Author(s):  
Peter Trask ◽  
Jaisson Bortolini ◽  
Shinya Rai ◽  
Antonio Salar ◽  
Miguel Canales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Time Savings ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who are on initial treatment, report low levels of symptoms and a higher quality of life index in contrast to patients who have relapsed (Pettengell et al. Ann Oncol 2008). In the immunochemotherapy era, effective and safe treatments should create minimal treatment-related symptoms, regardless of the underlying patient characteristics. In the GALLIUM study (NCT01332968), patients treated with obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy followed by G maintenance reported low levels of symptoms (Davies et al. Ann Hematol 2020). Short duration infusions (SDI) of treatments for patients with untreated, advanced FL may yield substantial time savings for patients, and free up healthcare resources. The GAZELLE study (NCT03817853) is a prospective open label, multicenter, single arm, Phase IV study, which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI infusion from Cycle 2 (C2) onwards in patients with previously untreated advanced FL. G SDI appears to be safe, with no Grade 3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) reported in C2, and only one Grade 3 IRR reported in subsequent cycles (Canales et al. ASCO 2021). In this analysis, we report symptom levels and provider preference during G SDI administration. Methods: During the first cycle, patients received the first three infusions of G (1000mg) administered at the standard infusion rate on Days 1, 8, and 15. Patients who did not experience any Grade ≥3 IRRs during the first cycle received G as a SDI from C2 onwards. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI: range 0 [not present) to 10 [worst]) was used to assess the severity of disease/treatment-related symptoms, and how symptoms interfere with aspects of the patient's daily living. It was completed on Day 1 of C1-6, at the end of induction, during maintenance, at the end of maintenance, and at the end of the study. Additional MDASI analyses were conducted based on patient risk groups (bulky disease, Ann Arbor staging, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, B-symptoms, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index). At any time point after C4 Day 1, study investigators (physicians and nurses) completed an evaluation composed of questions addressing their site's experience with regards to time saved, convenience and infusion preference after administration of SDI and standard infusion of G, across all patients enrolled in the study. Results: 110/113 patients received at least one SDI of G, as per protocol. Median age was 62 years, (range: 28-86 years) and 62% of patients had stage IV FL, 51% presented with B-symptoms at baseline, 45% with bulky disease and 45% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Median baseline MDASI severity and interference scores were 0 or 1 for most symptoms. Interference scores did not meaningfully change over the course of treatment. Median MDASI scores (baseline or change over treatment), also did not differ by risk subgroups. Over 60% of providers reported that SDI of G would save at least 2 hours in infusion time per visit, with >65% saying it was much more convenient versus regular infusion. SDI was preferred by >95% of providers for reasons attributed to time savings and patient comfort. Conclusions: Untreated, advanced FL patients had no or mild symptom severity and interference at baseline regardless of risk group. These low levels were maintained during G SDI administration. Additionally, SDI administration was preferred by providers for the time it saved, convenience, and comfort for patients, suggesting that G SDI administration can be a beneficial treatment option for untreated, advanced FL patients by minimizing patient treatment burden with no impact on health-related quality of life. Disclosures Trask: Genentech: Current Employment; Genentech/Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bortolini: Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rai: Janssen Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau. Salar: Abbvie: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EusaPharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Hospital del Mar: Current Employment. Canales: Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; iQone: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sandoz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Klingbiel: F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Parreira: Hoffmann la Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria. Deraet: Hoffmann La Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Vorozheikina: IQVIA: Current Employment. Hübel: Celgene: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EUSA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Buchholz: Scripps Health Care System: Current Employment; Roche (Navify software): Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nucleix LLC: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ultimate Opinions in Medicine LLC: Honoraria; Empyrean medical systems: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mirada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Bleeding Complications in Patients with Cancer and COVID 19- Analysis from the COVID 19and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4997-4997
Author(s):  
Surbhi Shah ◽  
Shuchi Gulati ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
Julie Fu ◽  
Vaibhav Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background : Patients (pts) with COVID-19 are reported to have increased risk of venous thromboembolism yet bleeding has been an under recognized complication. Rates of bleeding remain unexamined in all patients especially in pts with cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To estimate the incidence of bleeding complication in patients with cancer and COVID 19 Methods: The CCC19 international registry (NCT04354701) aims to investigate complications of COVID-19 in pts with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of bleeding in hospitalized adult pts with cancer andCOVID-19, enrolled between March 16, 2020 and Feb 8, 2021. The incidence of bleeding complications was captured as defined by CCC19 and included both major and non major bleeding . Associated baseline clinic-pathologic prognostic factors and outcomes such as need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rates were assessed Results :3849 pts met analysis inclusion criteria. Bleeding was reported in 276 (7%) pts with median age of 70years; incidence was 6.6 % in females and 7.6 % in males, 6.5% in non-Hispanic white pts, 8.2 % in non-Hispanic Black pts, and 7.8 % in Hispanic pts. 74% had solid cancer and 29% had hematologic malignancies, 33% had received anti-cancer therapy in preceding 30 days, and 8% had surgery within 4weeks. In pts taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications at baseline, 7.2% developed bleeding. Need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, 30-day mortality, and total mortality were significantly higher in those with bleeding complications compared to those without, p<0.05 Conclusion : We describe the incidence of bleeding in a large cohort of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Bleeding events were observed in those with adverse outcomes including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and high mortality; the overall mortality of 43% in patients with bleeding complications is especially notable. This important complication may reflect underlying COVID-19 pathophysiology as well as iatrogenic causes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Diagnostica Stago: Honoraria. Zon: AMAGMA AND RLZ: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Byeff: Pfizer, BMS, Takeda,Teva, Merck, United health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Nagaraj: Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang: astrazaneca,Merck,bayer, Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKay: Myovant: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Calithera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dendreon: Consultancy; Caris: Other: Serves as a molecular tumor board ; Vividion: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Warner: Westat, Hemonc.org: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Connors: Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alnylam: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; Abbott: Consultancy. Rosovsky: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inari: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Ponatinib In Heavily Pretreated Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML): Management Of Adverse Events (AEs)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1496-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp D. Le Coutre ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
Charles Chuah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Peripheral Vascular ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Modification ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Initial Onset ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Ponatinib is a potent oral pan–BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with activity against native and mutant BCR-ABL. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg once daily) in pts with CP-CML were evaluated in the phase 2 PACE trial. Objectives To review the management of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) that emerged during therapy with ponatinib in the PACE trial. Methods A total of 270 CP-CML pts (267 in efficacy population) resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation were enrolled in this ongoing, phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 mos. Safety monitoring included collection of AEs, and the following variables were evaluated: incidence, severity, time to onset, duration, and management. Select TRAEs are discussed. Data as of 01 Apr 2013 are reported, with a median follow-up of 20 (0.1–28) mos. Minimum follow-up for pts remaining on study was 18 mos. Results Median age was 60 (18-94) yrs; median time from diagnosis to first dose was 7 (0.5-27) yrs; 93% had ≥2 prior TKIs, 60% ≥3. Ponatinib demonstrated significant activity in CP-CML pts: 56% MCyR, 46% CCyR, and 36% MMR. At the time of analysis, 60% of pts remained on study. The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were AEs (14%) and progression (8%). The most common hematologic TRAE was thrombocytopenia (41% any grade, 32% grade 3/4). The incidence by time to initial onset is shown below (Figure). Pts experienced thrombocytopenia for a median total duration of 166 days (64% of whom had >1 event) and typically required dose modification: 13% drug withdrawn, 40% dose reduced, 29% dose interrupted only, 17% no dose modification. Among pts with thrombocytopenia, 27% required a platelet transfusion. Thirteen percent of CP-CML pts experienced treatment-related neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The most common nonhematologic TRAE was rash (39% any grade, 4% grade 3/4), which includes erythematous, macular, and papular rash. Pts experienced rash for a median total duration of 65 days (46% of whom had >1 event) and most did not require dose modification: 0% drug withdrawn, 15% dose reduced, 11% dose interrupted only, 73% no dose modification. One additional pt discontinued due to grade 2 treatment-related exfoliative rash. Pancreatitis was observed (7% any grade, 6% grade 3/4). Median duration was 5 days. Pts were typically managed with dose modification: 5% drug withdrawn, 58% dose reduced, 32% dose interrupted only, 5% no dose modification. Treatment-emergent cardiovascular events were observed in 8% of pts and treatment-emergent cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular events in 11%. Cardiovascular events were considered treatment-related in 4%; cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular events were also considered treatment-related in 4%. The median time to initial onset was 9 mos for cardiovascular and 11 mos for cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular events. The median duration was 6 and 97 days, respectively. Management of pts with cardiovascular AEs: 20% drug withdrawn, 10% dose reduced, 40% dose interrupted only, 30% no dose modification. Management of pts with cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular AEs: 8% drug withdrawn; 8% dose reduced; 17% dose interrupted only; 67% no dose modification. Conclusions Ponatinib has robust antileukemic activity in heavily pretreated CP-CML pts (93% of whom received ≥2 prior TKIs). Treatment-related thrombocytopenia and pancreatitis generally occurred early in therapy and were manageable with dose modification. Treatment-related rash generally occurred early in therapy, was mild-to-moderate in severity, managed without the need for dose modification, and rarely led to discontinuation. Management of treatment-related arterial thrombotic events varied; pts with predisposing cardiovascular risk factors should be monitored closely and managed accordingly. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01207440 aIncidence = (number of pts with initial onset during time interval) / (number of pts dosed during time interval [N] excluding those who previously experienced the event) X 100 Disclosures: Le Coutre: Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Kim:BMS, Novartis, IL-Yang: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, ARIAD, IL-Yang: Research Funding; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, IL-Yang: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis, Ariad, BMS and Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Paquette:Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Honoraria; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chuah:Novartis, BMS: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, ARIAD, Teva: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Teva, Pfizer, ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS, TEva: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, ARIAD, Teva, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding; Ariad, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo:Ariad, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Rea:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad, Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Speakers Bureau. Muller:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, BMS: Honoraria. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Yanase:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Other, Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment. Haluska:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Deininger:BMS, ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Consultancy; BMS, NOVARTIS, CELGENE, GILEAD: Research Funding; ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Hochhaus:Ariad, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:ARIAD: Honoraria. Shah:Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Phizer: Research Funding. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding.

Chlorambucil PLUS Rituximab As FRONT-LINE Therapy for Elderly and/or Unfit CLL Patients. LONG-TERM Follow-up and Correlation with Biologic-Based Risk Stratification

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3240-3240
Author(s):  
Luca Laurenti ◽  
Idanna Innocenti ◽  
Francesco Autore ◽  
Raffaella Pasquale ◽  
Barbara Vannata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
11Q Deletion

Abstract Introduction. Elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and younger patients with comorbidities are often treated with chlorambucil (Chl), despite the relatively low response rates. The addition of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies to Chl substantially increases the response rates, without negatively affecting tolerability. Overall response rates (ORR) between 66% to 84% have been reported with these combinations, with complete responses (CR)ranging from 8% to 26%. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis on the use of the Chl-rituximab (R) combination as frontline treatment for elderly (≥65 years) and/or unfit (CIRS >6) CLL patients treated at 15 different Italian hematologic centers. The main aim of the study was to further establish the safety and efficacy of the Chl-R protocol and investigate whether certain CLL patients for whom this protocol could be particularly effective could be identified. To this end, we performed a subgroup analysis stratifying patients according to FISH and IGHV results: high risk group (HR) included patients with 17p deletion, intermediate risk group (IR) patients with 11q deletion and/or unmutated IGHV, low risk group (LR) patients without 11q or 17p deletion and/or unmutated IGHV. Results. One hundred and two patients who underwent treatment between 2009 and 2011 were enrolled in the study. Patients' clinical and biologic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Three patients discontinued treatment earlier than planned: 1 for an episode of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) that developed after the 2nd cycle of Chl and before starting R treatment and 2 patients for disease progression after the 3rd and 5th cycle of Chl-R, respectively. The median number of Chl and R cycles administered in the 102 patients was 8 (range 2-12) and 6 (range 1-9), respectively. The planned treatment schedule was different among centers: the two main schedules used were Chl administered at 1 mg/kg for each cycle every 28 days, given at a fixed daily dose of 10 mg starting from day 1 and repeated for 8 cycles, and Chl administered at 8 mg/m2/day for seven days of each of eight 28-day-cycles. R was added to Chl from the 3rd cycle onwards and was administered on day 1 of each cycle at a dose of 375 mg/m2 during the first administration and 500 mg/m2 for the subsequent 5 cycles. On an intention to treat basis, the ORR was 87.1%. Thirty-two patients (31.7%) obtained a CR and 56 patients (55.4%) obtained a partial response (PR). Nostatistically significant differences were noted in terms of ORR for age above or below 70 years, fitness status, ECOG, bulky disease, cytogenetic risk abnormalities, IGHV mutational status, ZAP-70 or CD38 expression.Median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to retreatment (TTR) were reached at 43.7 and 72.3 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 86.1% and 81.2% of patients were alive at 48 and 60 months, respectively. The most frequent serious adverse event was grade 3-4 neutropenia, occurring in 13.7% of patients. Grade 3-4 extra-hematologic side effects were uncommon (9.8%). Subgroup analysis of the LR and IR patients (no HR patients were enrolled) showed that LR patients had a significantly better PFS than IR patients (65.8 months vs 35.2 months, p=0.001; Fig. 1),with 54.9% of patients remaining free from progression 60 months after treatment. Conclusions. Treatment of elderly and/or unfit CLL patients with the Chl-R regimen is associated with low toxicity, a high ORR and durable PFS. Particularly good results are achieved in CLL patients with a mutated IGHV profile and not carrying both 17p and 11q deletion, suggesting that in this low-risk subset of unfit patients Chl-R could represent the optimal therapeutic option, in consideration of safety, efficacy and costs. Disclosures D'Arena: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Coscia:Gilead: Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Janssen: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Molica:Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau. Efremov:Gilead: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Results of a Phase II Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated, High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 125-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Jason R. Westin ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: FL, the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is characterized by a defective immune microenvironment that suppresses normal T-cell and natural-killer (NK)-cell activity. The clinical course is often depicted by high initial response rates coupled with a prolonged natural history and repeated relapses with most patients (pts) succumbing to their disease. Effective, well tolerated therapies are desirable. Obinutuzumab (O) is a humanized, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Lenalidomide (len) is an immunomodulatory agent that binds the cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex resulting in recruitment, ubiquitination, and degradation of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros resulting in T-cell and NK-cell activation. Therefore, combining O with len is anticipated to be synergistic in augmenting the innate and adaptive immune response in FL. The combination has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in relapsed FL (Fowler ICML 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore the efficacy and safety of O-len in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL. Methods: We conducted as single-center, phase 2 study in previously untreated, stage II, III, or IV, high tumor burden (defined by GELF) FL (grade 1, 2 or 3A). Pts received 1000mg of O on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2-6, and day 1 of even numbered cycles, cycle 8-30. Cycle length was 28 days. Len was administered as 20mg on days 1-21 of cycles 1-6. Pts in a complete response (CR) after 6 cycles received reduced dose len (10mg on days 1-21) for cycles 7-18. Among pts in a partial response (PR) after 6 cycles, len was continued at 20mg for the next 3-6 cycles or until CR, whichever occurred first, len was then dose reduced to 10mg on days 1-21 for the remainder of 18 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (according to Lugano 2014 criteria). Secondary endpoints included: safety, CR, PR, overall response (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Results: 90 pts with high tumor burden FL were enrolled. Median age was 58 years (range 33-84), 52% (N=47) were male, 67 (74%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 9 (10%) had stage II, 23 (26%) stage III, and 58 (64%) had stage IV disease. The majority had grade 1/2 FL (80%). Twenty-one percent had low risk FLIPI scores, 37% intermediate risk, and 42% were high risk. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-30 months), the 2-year PFS estimate is 96% (95% CI 92-100%) with only 2 pts experiencing progression to date. The ORR is 98% (85 CR, 1 PR), 92% achieved a CR at the first response assessment (cycle 4, day 1). Correlative studies are underway including serial circulating tumor DNA measurements. No deaths have been observed to date. Eleven pts (12%) discontinued therapy as a result of an adverse event (AE), upper respiratory infection was the most common reason (N=5). Other reasons included bradycardia with sick sinus syndrome, urinary tract infection, constipation, abdominal pain, fatigue, foot neuroma (N=1 for each instance). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs include neutropenia (16%, grade 3 N=5, grade 4 N= 9), rash (10%), lung infection (4%), neutropenic fever (1%). Conclusions: O-Len was associated with very high CR rates and 2-year PFS estimates in untreated, high tumor burden FL. The toxicity profile was manageable. Further study of this effective, immune therapy approach in untreated FL is warranted. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fowler:ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide in untreated follicular lymphoma

scholarly journals Updated Results of a Phase II Randomized Study (ROMULUS) of Polatuzumab Vedotin or Pinatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4457-4457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Catherine S. Diefenbach ◽  
Kathryn Kolibaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Previously reported results from an ongoing study of polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) and pinatuzumab vedotin (PiV), antibody drug conjugates (ADC) containing the anti-mitotic MMAE targeting CD79b (PoV) and CD22 (PiV), showed clinical activity in combination with rituximab (R) in relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Here we report updated results of ADC + R at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg and initial results of PoV + R in r/r FL at the PoV dose of 1.8 mg/kg. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive PoV or PiV + R (ADC 2.4 mg/kg + R 375 mg/m2). In a separate non-randomized cohort (Cohort C), r/r FL pts were treated with PoV (1.8 mg/kg) + R. ADC + R was given every 21 days. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 months. Results: As of 21 February 2014, 59 pts received PoV + R (39 DLBCL; 20 FL), 63 PiV + R (42 DLBCL; 21 FL); 20 r/r FL pts were treated in Cohort C. Median time of follow-up was 10 mo. for PoV + R, 9 mo. for PiV + R, and 5 mo. for Cohort C. Median prior therapies [DLBCL, 3 (1-10); FL, 2 (1-8)] were balanced among the randomized treatment (tx) arms, median prior therapies in Cohort C was 2 (1-13); overall 44% were R refractory. Median tx cycles in DLBCL: 6 PoV (range 1-16) and 7 PiV (1-15); FL: 10 PoV (3-17), 7 PiV (1-14), and 6 Cohort C (2-10). Overall safety profiles of both regimens in the randomized arms receiving 2.4 mg/kg ADC were similar. The most common tx-emergent adverse events (AE) ≥25%: fatigue (55%), diarrhea (43%), nausea (37%), peripheral neuropathy (PN) (39%), neutropenia (27%), constipation (26%), sensory PN (25%), and decreased appetite (25%). Grade ≥ 3 AE >3%: neutropenia (24%), diarrhea (6%), dyspnea (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%), hyperglycemia (4%), fatigue (3%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Serious AEs were reported in 43% and 36% of PiV and PoV treated pts, respectively. Discontinuation of study treatment for AE was reported in 49% and 41% of PiV and PoV treated pts, respectively. Thirty-five pts discontinued treatment due to PN with a median time to discontinuation of 5.6 mo. PN reversibility was observed following treatment interruptions and ADC dose modifications. Two of 9 Grade 5 AEs (sepsis, urosepsis) were attributed to CD22 ADC; no Grade 5 AEs were attributed to CD79b ADC. In Cohort C the most common tx-emergent AE ≥ 25%: fatigue (55%), nausea (45%), neutropenia (40%), sensory PN (30%), diarrhea (25%), constipation (25%) and pyrexia (25%). Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was reported in 7 pts; no other Grade ≥ 3 AE was reported in >1 pt. Serious AE were reported in 5 pts. Two pts discontinued study treatment for AE. No Grade 5 AEs were reported. Overall response rate (ORR), complete (CR) and partial (PR) response rates, n (%) [95% CI], and median PFS in DLBCL (95% CI) are shown in the table. Median PFS in the FL cohorts are not reported due to insufficient follow-up duration. Table PoV (CD79b) + R PiV (CD22) + R PoV [1.8 mg/kg] + R (Cohort C) R/R DLBCL ORR CR PR mPFS (mo.) N=39 22 (56%) [41, 71] 6 (15%) [7, 30] 16 (41%) [26, 58] 5.4 (2.8-8.4) N=42 24 (57%) [41, 72] 10 (24%) [12, 39] 14 (33%) [20, 48] 5.2 (4.1-NR) N/A R/R FL ORR CR PR N=20 14 (70%) [47, 86] 8 (40%) [21, 64] 6 (30%) [14, 53] N=21 13 (62%) [40, 80] 2 (10%) [2, 30] 11 (52%) [30, 72] N=16 7 (44%) [20, 70] 0 7 (44%) [20, 70] Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for both ADCs across DLBCL and FL with no free MMAE accumulation. Pts receiving PoV at 1.8 mg/kg had proportionately lower exposure of antibody conjugated MMAE compared to pts treated at the 2.4 mg/kg dose level. Conclusions: PoV and PiV + R were generally well-tolerated with similar toxicity profiles. Neutropenia, PN, and diarrhea were the principal toxicities. Similar efficacy was observed with both ADCs in heavily pretreated pts with DLBCL. The higher CR rate with PoV + R compared to PiV + R suggests greater clinical activity in r/r FL. Lower overall response rates were observed in r/r FL pts treated with a lower dose of PoV. Results based on longer follow-up to further assess differences in safety and tolerability between the two PoV doses in r/r FL will be presented. Additional data of pts who received crossover ADC + R treatment following documented disease progression on initial ADC + R treatment will also be presented. Combination studies of PoV + R with chemotherapy and with ADC schedules to reduce PN are ongoing or in planning. Disclosures Morschhauser: Genentech/roche: Honoraria, travel grants Other; Celgene: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Honoraria. Off Label Use: obinutuzumab and lenlidomide in relapsed follicular lymphoma. Flinn:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Advani:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Diefenbach:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Press:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Chen:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salles:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Tilly:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Cheson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Assouline:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagenbeek:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zinzani:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yalamanchili:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Lu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Jones:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Jones:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Chu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Sharman:Gen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Similar Quality of Life with 5mg Versus 25mg Lenalidomide Maintenance after First-Line High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Lenamain Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2003-2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelie Boquoi ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Michael Heinsch ◽  
Mathias J Rummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Travel Grant ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The LenaMain study is a prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter phase III trial which included 188 patients 3 months after first-line high dose treatment and autologous stem cell transplantation (NCT number: NCT00891384). Patients were equally randomized to receive either 25 (n = 94, arm A) or 5 mg (n = 94, arm B) lenalidomide maintenance until disease progression following a uniform 6 months of 25 mg lenalidomide consolidation. Final analysis after follow-up of 46.7 months was presented at ASCO 2018 (#8016) demonstrating an extended event-free survival for arm A (11.8 months, p=0.032) and an about 10% increase of grade 3/4 infections per year as main toxicity. Here we report analysis of quality of life (QoL) data as secondary endpoint of the study. Materials & Methods The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) was collected at baseline and then monthly at every new cycle. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale, the utility score and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, disease symptoms, and adverse effects of treatment) were compared between groups using a mixed model for repeated measures. Results Baseline questionnaire compliance was excellent (95.7%) and declined over time (82%, 76%, 71%, 54%, 49% after consolidation and after year 1, 2, 3 and 4 of maintenance, respectively). At baseline, GHS/QoL (67/67) and utility (0.73/0.72) scores for arm A/B were generally high and did not differ between both arms. The median GHS/QoL change between consolidation baseline and maintenance baseline was -1%. GHS/QoL scores appear constant for both treatment arms at most time points in the first 2 years of maintenance. Relevant improvements ≥ 5 points were observed in 30% of patients while improvements ≥ 15 points were observed in 20% of patients. During the same time a similar percentage of patients had relevant ≥ 5 and ≥15 point deteriorations, with a general tendency for a slight increase at the end of year 2. Notably, a greater number of deteriorations was found in the 5 mg lenalidomide arm. Mean GHS/QoL was constant during maintenance with a slight decrease of <2 over the 1st year, reaching borderline relevance after the 2nd year with a mean change of -6 which was mainly driven by the 5 mg lenalidomide treatment arm (25 mg arm: -4 vs. 5 mg arm: -8). Utility values remained constant during maintenance (change from baseline 0.003, p=0.9 at year 1; 0.02, p=0.7 at year 2) and the overall pattern in the change over time does not appear to show any clear differences between the two treatment arms. Looking at QLQ-C30 subgroup domains after two years of maintenance, we observed a significantly higher change from baseline for diarrhea in the 25 mg lenalidomide arm, which may be a long-term drug-related effect. Conversely, role functioning was also significantly better in patients treated within the 25 mg lenalidomide arm. Other subgroups did not show significant differences after the second year. Overall GHS/QOL scores were not significantly different in patients with CR vs. ≥ vgPR. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in patients on treatment for 1, 2, 3 or 4 years of maintenance or in patients suffering from grade 3/4 adverse events or not. Thus, neither disease activity, nor duration of treatment nor high-grade toxicity biased our results. Conclusion The LenaMain trial shows that maintenance treatment with 25 mg lenalidomide vs. 5 mg significantly prolongs event-free survival. QoL, as secondary objective, was not different between both treatment arms, even showing a trend for improved QoL in the 25 mg lenalidomide treatment arm. Thus, QoL was not governed by the higher rate of infectious toxicity during high-dose lenalidomide maintenance. Disclosures Boquoi: Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Travel grant; Celgene: Other: Travel grant. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy. Rummel:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Honoraria. Kroeger:Sanofi: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mai:Celgene: Other: travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Onyx: Other: travel grant; Mundipharma: Other: travel grant. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Fenk:Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety of Anti-NKG2A Blocking Antibody Monalizumab As Maintenance Therapy after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1817-1817
Author(s):  
Raynier Devillier ◽  
Sabine Furst ◽  
Agnes boyer Chammard ◽  
Thomas Pagliardini ◽  
Samia Harbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nk Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Receptor Saturation ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background Following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT), the phenotype and function of circulating NK Cells are altered; notably NK cells display an immature (CD56-bright/KIR -/CD57 -/NKG2A +) phenotype and a low cytotoxic activity. Since NK cells have demonstrated anti-leukemic activity in the context of Allo-HCT while less prone to induce GVHD than T cells, we hypothesized that NKG2A inhibition using the checkpoint inhibitor monalizumab (humanized IgG4 blocking monoclonal antibody) could improve NK cell mediated graft-versus-tumor effect, without triggering graft-versus-host disease. We thus performed the first clinical trial evaluating the safety of monalizumab as a prophylactic treatment after Allo-HSCT (NCT02921685). Method The objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a single infusion of monalizumab administered on day+75 or thereafter following Allo-HSCT. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult patients who underwent first Allo-HSCT for hematological malignancy; 2) no prior history of GVHD, 3) reduced toxicity conditioning regimen, 4) ATG or PT-Cy based GVHD prophylaxis, and 5) GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine A ongoing at the time of monalizumab infusion. Four dose levels were investigated in this dose escalation study (0.04, 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined by the occurrence of any grade 3 to 4 monalizumab-related adverse event within 28 days after infusion, including grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD. In case of DLT, a Bayesian continuous reassessment model (CRM) was used to predict the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) after each series of 3 patients treated at a given dose level. It was planned to treat 18 patients. Beyond clinical safety, blood samples were collected for NK and T cell immunomonitoring and receptor saturation assay. Results Fifteen patients received monalizumab at a median time of 83 days (range: 75-103) after Allo-HSCT (3 at 0.04 mg/kg, 3 at 0.1 mg/kg, 3 at 0.3 mg/kg, and 6 at 1 mg/kg). Patients were transplanted for hematological diseases (9 AML, 3 MDS, 1 lymphoma, 1 CLL and 1 myelofibrosis), from a matched sibling (n=8), matched unrelated (n=6) or haploidentical donor (n=1). No DLT was observed during the dose escalation process or among the 6 patients treated at the highest dose level, justifying study early termination after 15 patients. Two patients developed transient low grade GVHD that spontaneously resolved without treatment (1 grade I acute GVHD on day+8 and 1 mild chronic GVHD on day+118). Systemic steroid requiring GVHD occurred in 3 patients (20%): 1 severe overlap GVHD (day+42, CR after treatment), 1 severe chronic GVHD (day+80, death from GVHD) and 1 late severe chronic GVHD after cyclosporine tapering for mixed chimerism (day+149, complete remission [CR] after treatment). No disease recurrence was observed, except for one patient with myelofibrosis who relapsed 3 years after monalizumab infusion. At a median follow up of 22 months (3-48) after monalizumab infusion, 13 out of 15 patients are in CR from their underlining malignancy without GVHD and immunosuppressive treatment at last contact. At the dose of 1 mg/kg, receptor saturation assays (RSA) showed persistent binding of monalizumab on peripheral blood NK cells. Indeed, more than 90% of NKG2A-positive NK cells were positive for monalizumab detection (Anti-IgG4-PE) until at least 14 weeks post treatment. Conclusions Monalizumab can be safely administered after Allo-HSCT, with prolonged persistence on circulating NK cells. In the absence of DLT, MTD was not reached. Future trials will aim at measuring the clinical efficacy of monalizumab in this context, alone or in combination therapy. Disclosures boyer Chammard: Innate Pharma: Current Employment. Chabannon: Sanofi SA: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Terumo BCT: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Fresenius Kabi: Research Funding; EBMT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Olive: ImCheck Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alderaan Biotechnology: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergence Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Implication of Inherited Genetic Variants Associated with Follicular Lymphoma Susceptibility in the Prognosis of Patients Treated By Immunochemotherapy in PRIMA Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2780-2780
Author(s):  
Herve Ghesquieres ◽  
Youenn Drouet ◽  
Sarah Huet ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Marie-Helene Delfau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Histological Transformation

Introduction: Genome wide-association studies (GWAS) identified specific constitutional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at risk for follicular lymphoma (FL). Top SNP is localized in HLA region (rs12195582). Five genome wide significant loci have been identified outside of HLA region, including 11q23.3 (near CXCR5), 11q24.3 (near ETS1), 3q28 (near LPP), 18q21.33 (near BCL2), and 8q24 (near PVT1) in addition with three suggestive loci at 17q25.3 (near CYBC1), 3q13.33 (CD86), 18q12.3 (SLC14A2) (Skibola, Am J Hum Genet. 2014). We investigated if these nine known FL loci could affect response to immunochemotherapy, histological transformation and outcome of a subgroup of patients treated uniformly in the prospective PRIMA phase III study. Methods: Among the 1.193 patients included in the PRIMA study, 390 patients had genotyping of the nine SNPs associated with FL risk (HLA, rs12195582; CXCR5, rs4938573; ETS1, rs4937362; LPP, rs6444305; BCL2, rs17749561; PVT1, rs13254990; CYBC1, rs3751913; CD86, rs2681416; SLC14A2, rs11082438). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes before any treatment. The genotyping was performed using custom TaqMan genotyping assays as part of the FL GWAS (Skibola, Am J Hum Genet. 2014). Correlations between response to induction treatment, biopsy-proven histological transformation (HT) and progression free survival (PFS) were performed for the each nine SNP individually. We also computed a combined polygenic risk score (PRS) and the number of allele at risk (nbRA) using the 9 SNPs for each individual. The PRS is a weighted average of the number of risk alleles with the weights being the log of the odds-ratio (OR) reported in the FL GWAS (Skibola, Am J Hum Genet. 2014). Survival analyses were stratified on FLIPI score and randomized arm (rituximab maintenance or observation). Piecewise cox models with pre-specified cutoffs at 2 years and 5 years were used to study early and late relapses. This work is supported by the French NCI (INCA, PRT-K16-167). Results: Among the 390 patients who received immunochemotherapy in the PRIMA study, 173 were randomized in rituximab maintenance arm, 166 were observed and 51 were not randomized. Complete response (CR) and unconfirmed CR were achieved in 251 patients (68%) at the end of induction phase. HT was documented in 16 patients (18%) among the 91 patients who had a biopsy with histological documentation at relapse. With a median follow-up of 9.8 years, the 5-year PFS since registration date for the whole cohort was 57% (95%CI, 52-62), 71% (95%CI, 64-78) in the rituximab maintenance arm, 47% (95%CI, 40-56) in the observation arm, and 39% (95%CI, 27-56) for the patients not randomized, thereby confirming the results of the PRIMA study. SNP rs17749561 C>T (CC, n=326; CT+TT, n=61) at 18q21.33 near BCL2 (HRCT/TT: 2.13; 95%CI, 1.20-3.70, P=0.009) and SNP rs3751913 A>G (AA, n=292; AG+GG, n=90) at 17q25.3 near CYBC1 (HRAG/GG: 1.83; 95%CI, 1.12-2.99, P=0.016) influenced the quality of response after induction therapy (CR/CRu versus partial response, stable and progressive disease) after FLIPI stratification but not PRS and nbRA. HT was not influenced by the allele status of the 9 individual SNPs, nor PRS and nbRA with the limitation of the low numbers of events. rs3751913 A>G near CYBC1 influenced PFS with 5-year PFS rates of 55%, 63% and 30% for patients with AA (n=293), AG (n=80) and GG (n=10) (P=0.036), respectively, with the limitation of the low number of patients with GG genotype. No association with PFS was observed for the remaining SNPs and when the 9 alleles were combined in a PRS or nbRA analyzed as continuous variables or per quantiles. We then investigated the susceptibility SNPs could influence early or late relapse. Using Piecewise cox models, we globally did not observe any influence on the risk of relapse in the 2 years after registration, between 2 and 5 years and after 5 years of SNPs analyzed individually by PRS or nbRA. Conclusions: Two susceptibility SNPs for FL identify by GWAS near BCL2 and CYBC1 genes influenced the quality of the response after induction therapy by immunochemotherapy. CYBC1 gene codes for cytochrome b-245 chaperone 1, a member of multi-subunit phagocyte NADPH oxidase. These results require replication in an independent cohort. Overall, susceptibility SNPs for FL are not associated with HT and PFS in this cohort of patients. Disclosures Cartron: Roche, Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Celgene: Honoraria. Brice:Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda France: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Salles:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; BMS: Honoraria; Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Bortezomib, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Encouraging Activity in the Phase 2 VERTICAL Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 933-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Brad S Kahl ◽  
Peter Rosen ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Amanda Cashen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 933 Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an incurable, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although survival has improved with the introduction of rituximab (Rituxan®, R), relapse is inevitable and new therapies are needed. Bortezomib (Velcade®, V) plus rituximab is active in relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) FL (de Vos et al, ASH 2006). Bendamustine (Treanda®, B) plus R has also shown activity in rel/ref FL (Robinson et al, J Clin Oncol 2008), and V has been safely combined with B in patients (pts) with advanced multiple myeloma (Fenk et al, Leuk Lymph 2007). The single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 VERTICAL study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of V and R in combination with B (VBR) in pts with rel/ref FL. Here we report preliminary phase 2 efficacy and safety findings from pts treated with VBR at doses determined in the dose-escalation phase of this study (Matous et al, ASCO 2009). Pts with rel/ref FL who had received ≥4 prior doses of R (no prior V or B), and had ≥1 measurable tumor mass, no active central nervous system lymphoma, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥50%, adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) were eligible. Pts could receive up to five 35-d cycles of V 1.6 mg/m2 (d 1, 8, 15, 22), B 90 mg/m2 (d 1, 2), and R 375 mg/m2 (d 1, 8, 15, 22, cycle 1; d 1, cycles 2–5). Response was assessed by the investigator using International Working Group criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2007). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the CTCAE v3.0, and by laboratory assessment of hematologic toxicity. Sixty-three pts received VBR; median age was 58 years, 63% were male and 25% had KPS ≤80%. At diagnosis, 47% had grade 1, 26% grade 2, and 8% grade 3 histology, and 18% unknown histology; 35% had high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score. Pts had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–11), and 39% were refractory to their last prior rituximab-containing therapy. The median time from diagnosis was 48 months. As of data cut-off (14 Aug 2009), pts had received a median of 3 cycles (range 1–5); 29 pts remain on therapy and 10 have completed treatment. In the 49 pts with at least one post baseline response assessment, to date, the overall best response rate was 84%; 23 (47%) pts achieved a complete response (CR) and 18 (37%) a partial response (PR). VBR was generally well tolerated, with manageable toxicities. The most common treatment-related AEs were primarily grade 1 and 2 and included nausea (79%; 3% grade 3), fatigue (65%; 10% grade 3), diarrhea (57%; 3% grade 3), and vomiting (44%; 5% grade 3). Other non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than one pt included syncope (n=2; 3%) and PN (see below). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were seen in 25%, 6%, and 3% of pts, respectively. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 17 (27%) pts, including 3 (5%) with febrile neutropenia and 1 (2%) with grade 3 herpes zoster who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and discontinued therapy. Of the 17 (27%) pts with treatment-related PN, only 4 (6%) had grade 3 (2 discontinued therapy; no grade 4); PN has resolved in 5 (29%) pts to date. There was one on-study death (cardiac arrest) that was considered treatment-related. Additional follow-up is required to assess long-term outcomes, including progression-free and overall survival. VBR is active in this heavily pre-treated, high-risk population, with high CR rates, and was generally well tolerated. Efficacy and safety data will be updated and reported at ASH. Disclosures: Fowler: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kahl:Milllennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosen:Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Southern California Lymphoma Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Tower Cancer Research Foundation: Employment. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Amin:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Oncotype DX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Williams:Milllennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Smith:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Parasuraman:Milllennium: Employment. Cheson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1520-1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moaath Mustafa Ali ◽  
Basel Rouphail ◽  
Robert M. Dean ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease commonly graded as 1, 2, 3A and 3B based on percentage of large cells. While FL grade 3A is often considered as an indolent disease and grouped with grades 1-2, data suggest that FL grade 3B has clinical behavior similar to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) so is approached as an aggressive lymphoma. At the Cleveland Clinic, we reviewed a large series of patients (pts) diagnosed with FL grade 3A, 3B and FL grade 3 with areas of DLBCL and reported characteristics and outcomes in the rituximab era. Methods: Patients: We performed a retrospective IRB-approved analysis of patients diagnosed with FL 3A, 3B, or FL3 with concomitant areas of DLBCL. 72 subjects were identified with FL grade 3; including: 3A, 3B, FL 3/DLBCL, or unclassified FL3. We excluded subjects who had no follow-up data or diagnosed as unclassified FL 3, thus we analyzed a cohort of 46 patients. These 46 were divided into two groups. The aggressive lymphoma group (n=21) included subjects diagnosed with FL3B (n=11) and FL3 (A or B) with concomitant areas of DLBCL (n=10) (termed aggFL). The indolent lymphoma group (n=25) included subjects diagnosed with FL3A. All patients started their 1st treatment between 1998-2014. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes by comparing the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Results: Of the 46 patients, 25 (54%) had FL 3A, 11 (24%) FL 3B, and 10 (22%) FL3/DLBCL. Thus, the aggressive group (aggFL) had 21 patients (46%). For the entire cohort, 37 (49%) were male and 35 (51%) female; 78% were Caucasian. Table 1 compares FL 3A and combined 3B and FL 3/DLBCL cohorts. With median follow-up of 54 and 62 months for FL3A and aggFL, respectively; 75% of FL 3A and 86% of aggFL patients were alive. Among the FL3A and combined aggFL groups, 23 of 25 (92%) and 18 of 21patients (85%) received R-CHOP, respectively. There was no statistical difference in PFS between the 2 groups, and each group has apparent PFS plateau after ~ 3 years (Figure2). Similarly, we found that no statistical difference in Overall Survival between the groups of indolent FL (F3A) and aggFL (FL3B or FL3/DLBCL) lymphoma. Conclusion: The outcomes of the 1st large series of FL grade 3 patients in the rituximab era, primarily treated with R-CHOP, show no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS between FL 3A vs. aggFL with predominantly large cells (FL 3B/DLBCL). As expected, aggFL, FL3B and FL3/DLBCL, showed a plateau confirming that these pts should be treated with curative intent. Surprisingly, FL3A pts mainly managed with R-CHOP also show a plateau in survival; however, indicating the possibility of long term unmaintained remission in this histology and raising the issue of potential under-treatment with less aggressive regimens. Table 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics FL 3A FL 3b FL 3/ DLBCL N=25 % N=21 % P Age 0.45* Mean+ SD 61 ± 15.6 58 ± 11 Range 65 (19- 85) 55 (39-80) Gender 0.56** Male 14 54% 9 43% Female 12 46% 12 57% ECOG Performance Status 1** Good (ECOG 0,1) 18 72% 17 81% Poor (ECOG >1) 2 8% 1 5% Unknown 5 20% 3 14% B Symptoms 0.74** Present 8 32% 5 24% Not Present 17 68% 16 76% BM Involvement 0.47** Involved 6 24% 3 14% Not Involved 16 64% 16 76% Unknown 3 12% 2 10% Stage 0.76** I, II, III 17 68% 13 62% IV 8 32% 8 38% 1st Line Regimen 1** R-CHOP) 22 88% 18 85% Other 3 12% 2 9% Median/Average Follow-up (Months) From DX 54/60 62/65 0.68* From TX 55/58 59/56 0.91* *Anova **Fisher's Exact Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Hill: Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:celegene, spectrum, genentech: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document