scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes with Fedratinib Therapy in Patients Who Discontinued Ruxolitinib for Primary Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3645-3645
Author(s):  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
Quynh Do ◽  
Youbei Lou ◽  
Manoj Chevli ◽  
Pranav Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Index Patient ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative disorder in whichdysregulation of the janus kinase 2 (JAK2) hematopoiesis-signaling pathway disruptsbone marrow production of blood cells, leading to anemia, fatigue and splenomegaly.Until recently, the dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib (RUX), has been the onlyapproved pharmacological therapy for intermediate/high-risk MF. However, manypatients receiving RUX experience a suboptimal response or develop cytopenia, leadingto discontinuation. Fedratinib (FEDR), an oral, selective inhibitor with activity againstwild-type and mutationally activated JAK2 and the receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3, wasapproved in the US in August 2019. The real-world effectiveness of FEDR in the post-RUX setting has not yet been assessed. Aim: To assess the baseline characteristics and survival outcomes among patientsdiagnosed with MF who discontinued RUX and were subsequently treated with FEDR ornot. Methods : Adult US patients who received RUX after an initial diagnosis of primary MF(identified by ICD-9/10-CM codes) were identified using Flatiron Health's nationwideelectronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Patients were stratified by whetherthey subsequently received post-ruxolitinib fedratinib (FEDR group) or not (non-FEDRgroup). The non-FEDR group was further stratified by time of RUX discontinuation(before [non-FEDR subgroup A] and after [non-FEDR subgroup B] US approval of FEDRin August 2019) to enable a contemporaneous comparison with the FEDR group. Indexdate was the start of FEDR therapy in the FEDR group, and last date of RUX therapy inthe non-FEDR groups. Patients were included if they had ≥2 recorded visits in theFlatiron network on or after January 1, 2011- Oct 31, 2020; were aged ≥18 years atindex; had ≥1 months' data before and also after index; and had no record of receivingunclassified clinical study drugs prior to index. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were assessed at index. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time fromindex until death or censoring, and was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Landmarksurvival was defined as the proportion of patients who survived at a given point.Association of baseline variables and survival were assessed by Cox proportionalhazards model and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, 229 MF patients were evaluated (FEDR group: n=70; non-FEDRgroup: n=159). The median age at index for the FEDR group and non-FEDR group was71.0 and 70.0 years, 55.7% and 50.3% were female, 64.3% and 68.6% were white, andmedian follow-up from index was 7.0 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among patients withEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) at index, 90.2%(46/51) and 74.3% (84/113) had an ECOG score of 0-1, respectively (Table). Median(range) duration of FEDR therapy in the FEDR group was 3.7 (0-12.2) months; 47.1%(33/70) of patients receiving FEDR initiated therapy with 400 mg FEDR once daily, and21.4% (15/70) initiated with 200 mg FEDR once daily. Median OS was not reached in theFEDR group and was 17 months in the non-FEDR group. Landmark survival in theFEDR and non-FEDR groups was 91.3% and 76.5% at 3 months, and 71.6% and 53.5%at 12 months, respectively. In the non-FEDR subgroup B, the corresponding survivalrates at 3 months and 12 months were 75.0% and 47.9%. The Cox proportional hazardsmodel suggested that being male, 'other' (non-white, non-black/African-American, non-Asian, non-missing) race, Charlson comorbidity index ≥1, ECOG score 2-4, and bodymass index <18.5 kg/m were significantly associated with poorer survival. Conclusions: This real-world analysis demonstrates that these two groups of patientswith primary MF who had received prior RUX had broadly comparable baselinecharacteristics. FEDR appeared to be associated with improved survival up to 1 yearafter index compared with non-FEDR therapy. When the FEDR group and non-FEDR Bsubgroup were compared, the differences in survival rate remained. FEDR may offersubstantially improved survival probability in patients receiving post-ruxolitinib therapy of primary MF in routine clinical practice. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Passamonti: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Do: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lou: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chevli: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Abraham: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Real-World: Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1388
Author(s):  
Manlio Mencoboni ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
Paola Taveggia ◽  
Alessia Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

Immunotherapy based on anti PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the new standard of advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are used in clinical practice. The strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials do not allow researchers to fully represent treatment effects in the patients that will ultimately use these drugs. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these drugs, and more generally of ICIs, as second-line therapy in NSCLC patients in real world practice. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to include original studies published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 32 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The overall radiological response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21%, 52%, 3.35 months and 9.98 months, respectively. The results did not change when analysis was adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and age. A unitary increase in the percent of patients with liver and CNS metastases reduced the occurrence of DCR by 7% (p < 0.001) and the median PFS by 2% (p = 0.010), respectively. The meta-analysis showed that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in everyday practice is comparable to that in clinical trials.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of INCB057643 Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis (INCB 57643-103)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Christine Lihou ◽  
Gongfu Zhou ◽  
Fred Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Bet Inhibitor ◽  
Laboratory Values ◽  
Consensus Report

Background: Activation of transcription factors that regulate oncogenic processes is frequently observed in cancers such as myelofibrosis (MF). In preclinical studies, tumors associated with dysregulation of transcription factors appear to be responsive to inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) protein [Delmore JE, et al. Cell 2011; Shimamura T, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2013]. In addition to exerting a direct effect on tumor cells, BET inhibitors may also modulate tumorigenic inflammation; in a mouse model of MF, BET inhibition in combination with the Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib resulted in decreased inflammation and reduced disease burden [Kleppe M, et al. Cancer Cell 2018]. In the first-in-human study INCB 57643-101, the small-molecule BET inhibitor INCB057643, was safe and generally well tolerated as monotherapy, and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in 2 out of 3 patients with MF when administered alone or in combination with ruxolitinib [Falchook G, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2020]. The INCB 57643-103 trial is designed to further evaluate the safety and tolerability of INCB057643 monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MF. Methods: INCB 57643-103 (NCT04279847) is a phase 1, single-arm, open-label, two-part dose confirmation and expansion study evaluating INCB057643 in patients with measurable histologically or cytologically confirmed (World Health Organization criteria 2016), relapsed or refractory primary MF or secondary MF (post-polycythemia vera, post-essential thrombocythemia). Patients must be ≥18 years of age, have received ≥1 line of prior therapy including ruxolitinib and have no option for therapy known to provide clinical benefit, have a risk category of intermediate-2 or high according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, have a life expectancy of 24 weeks or more, and be willing to provide a pretreatment bone marrow biopsy and/or aspirate at baseline (or an archival sample obtained after most recent therapy). Patients will be excluded if they have received prior treatment with a BET inhibitor; received anticancer treatment within specified intervals before the first administration of study drug or receiving concurrent anticancer therapy; received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (6 months or less before enrollment) or have active graft versus host disease or received immunosuppressive therapy after allogeneic transplant 2 weeks or less before study drug treatment; have significant and uncontrolled medical events such as gastrointestinal or cardiovascular; have a history of bleeding disorder or at a high risk of bleeding; or have abnormal hematologic, hepatic, renal, coagulation, or metabolic laboratory values. Approximately 15 patients will be enrolled. Part 1 will evaluate initial safety and tolerability of INCB057643. Up to 6 patients will self-administer oral INCB057643 4 mg once daily (QD) continuously. Doses will be declared tolerable if dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occur in ≤2 patients and discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurs in ≤2 patients during the DLT evaluation period. Part 2 will further characterize safety and tolerability as well as evaluate preliminary efficacy. Up to 9 patients will receive INCB057643 at 4 mg QD if the dose is deemed tolerable in Part 1; if not, the starting dose will be 2 mg QD. Treatment may continue as long as benefit is derived and discontinuation criteria are not met. The primary study objective is assessment of safety and tolerability of INCB057643 monotherapy by monitoring the frequency and severity of AEs, performing physical examinations, and collecting vital signs and laboratory values. Secondary objectives include evaluation of anemia response by International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Consensus Report, red blood cell transfusion dependence, spleen volume, rate of spleen response and duration of spleen response by IWG-MRT and ELN Consensus Report, and impact on quality of life. Patients will be assessed every 3 cycles and will receive follow-up for safety for 30-35 days after last dose of study drug. Disclosures Lihou: Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhou:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zheng:Incyte: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Treatment patterns among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma following discontinuation of PD1/L1 inhibitor therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Alicia K. Morgans ◽  
Simrun Kaur Grewal ◽  
Zsolt Hepp ◽  
Rupali Fuldeore ◽  
Shardul Odak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Treatment Patterns

414 Background: There are a lack of published real-world data on treatment patterns for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) previously treated with programmed death 1/ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/L1i) therapy. The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical characteristics and treatments among patients with la/mUC following discontinuation of first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) PD-1/L1i therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at 26 geographically diverse clinical sites in the US. Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma and radiographic evidence of metastatic or locally advanced disease were identified. Included patients had initiated and subsequently discontinued PD-1/L1i therapy in the 1L or 2L setting for la/mUC between May 15, 2016-July 31, 2018. All patients had follow-up through October 31, 2019. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Among the 300 patients included in the chart review, 198 (66%) received PD-1/L1i therapy as 1L and 102 (34%) as 2L therapy. Mean (SD) age at la/mUC diagnosis was 69.4 (8.7) years, and a majority of patients were male (66.0%) and White (74.7%). Consistent with age, most patients (82.7%) had comorbidities at la/mUC diagnosis; 39.7% hypertension, 23.7% coronary artery disease, 17.7% pulmonary disease, and 9.3% renal disease. At initiation of therapy, a higher proportion of patients who received 1L PD-1/L1i therapy had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or more than patients who received 2L PD-1/L1i therapy (36.8% vs 22.5%, respectively). Following discontinuation of PD-1/L1i therapy, 34% (n = 68) received subsequent therapy in 2L and 29% (n = 30) in third-line (3L). The most common subsequent therapies in 2L were gemcitabine monotherapy (24%), gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin (22%), PD-1/L1i therapy (22%), and taxane monotherapy (19%). The most common subsequent therapies received in 3L were taxane monotherapy (50%), pemetrexed (17%), and PD-1/L1i therapy (16%). Overall, switching from one PD-1/L1i therapy to another distinct PD-1/L1i therapy occurred in approximately 20% of patients, with “better efficacy/survival” noted by treatment teams as the most common reason for switching therapy among this subgroup. Conclusions: In this real-world case series, only a minority of patients with la/mUC who discontinued PD-1/L1i therapy received subsequent therapy. Among those that did, no clear standard of care was observed and approximately one-fifth of patients were treated with a second PD-1/L1i therapy after the first failed to control disease. Collectively, the data highlight significant unmet need for patients with la/mUC who discontinue PD-1/L1i therapy.

scholarly journals The real-world experience with nivolumab in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a cancer center in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waseem Abbas ◽  
Rudra Prasad Acharya ◽  
Archit Pandit ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Ranga Raju Rao
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Background: PDL-1 inhibitors have emerged as the new standard of care for second line treatment of NSCLC. Methods: Eligible patients included, histologically proven NSCLC, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0, 1 or 2, age 18 years and above, availability of pre-treatment tumor specimen, adequate end organ function, at least one prior platinum-based therapy. Patients who received a minimum of 6 doses of nivolumab were eligible. Results: Eleven previously treated patients with chemotherapy, started on nivolumab from April of 2016 to December of 2018, were retrospectively studied and analysed. The median age of patients was 58 years. Eight (72.73%) of the eleven patients were male. Seven (63.64%) of the patients were current or former smokers. Majority of patients had non-squamous histology; seven (63.64%) adenocarcinoma and four (36.36%) squamous cell carcinoma. 5 (45.46%) of the patients received one prior therapy, three (27.27%) received two prior therapies, and three (27.27%) received three prior therapies. Four (36.36%) of the patients had brain metastasis. Two (18.18%) of the patients were more than 70 years of age. Median number of cycles of nivolumab administered were 10 (range, 6 to 21). At the time of analysis, the median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 1.52-14.47) and median OS was 15 months (95% CI, 6.9-23.09). Treatment was well tolerated and generally side effects were grade 1 and grade 2, except two patients who develop grade 3/4 pneumonitis. Conclusions: This is a real-world study of eleven previously treated patients with chemotherapy, started on Nivolumab from April of 2016 to December of 2018. Although, our sample size was small, our data supports the use of nivolumab as a new treatment option for patients of stage 4 NSCLC.

Real world eligibility of treatment-refractory stage IV colorectal cancer patients for palliative intent regorafenib monotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15007-e15007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkhjamil Angeles ◽  
Wayne Hung ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Correct Trial ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Ecog Ps

e15007 Background: The CORRECT trial demonstrated overall survival benefits of regorafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who were refractory to prior chemotherapy and biological therapy. However, stringent criteria used to determine treatment eligibility in the trial setting may limit its external validity in the real world. We aimed to examine treatment attrition rates and eligibility of regorafenib in routine clinical practice. Methods: All patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC between 2009 and 2014 who received 2 or more lines of systemic therapy at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were identified. During the study timeframe, cetuximab (cmab) and panitumumab (pmab) were only used in the chemo-refractory setting. Data on clinical factors, pathological variables and outcomes were ascertained and analyzed. Eligibility was defined based on criteria outlined in the CORRECT trial. Results: A total of 391 patients were included among whom only 39% were considered eligible for regorafenib. Median age was 61 (range 22-84) years. 247 (63%) were men, 305 (78%) were Caucasian, and 237 (60%) had a colonic primary. The disease burden at diagnosis was high: 267 (81%) had lymph node involvement, and 225 (59%) had distant metastases. In patients previously treated with cmab, main reasons for regorafenib ineligiblity were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) > 1 (26.9%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (6.5%), and arterio-venous thrombotic or embolic events in the preceding 6 months (6.5%). In the group treated with pmab previously, main reasons for ineligibility were ECOG PS > 1 (46.6%), total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN (14.1%), and thrombotic or embolic events in the past 6 months (5.7%). Additional analyses showed that regorafenib-eligible patients had increased median overall survival compared to ineligible patients (44.0 vs 37.1 months, P= 0.028). Conclusions: The strict trial eligibility criteria disqualified the majority of real world patients with metastatic CRC for regorfenib. As ineligibility predicts poorer outcomes, trials aimed at serving protocol-ineligible patients are warranted.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Double-Class Refractory or Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective US Electronic Health Record Database Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2705-2705
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Boris Gorsh ◽  
Maral DerSarkissian ◽  
Prani Paka ◽  
Rachel Bhak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Analysis Group ◽  
Refractory Status ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drug

Abstract Introduction: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) resistant to multiple drug classes remain a high unmet need population, despite advances in MM patient care. The objective of this study was to assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with RRMM who had failed multiple prior lines of therapy (LOT) and were refractory to multiple drug classes to identify gaps in their treatment pathways. Methods: This longitudinal retrospective cohort study utilized the COTA de-identified real-world database derived from US electronic health records of partnered healthcare providers from Q3 1988 through Q1 2020. Adults with active RRMM previously exposed to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug and who received ≥3 prior LOTs were identified. Patients were further categorized as refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory drug (double-class refractory [DCR]) or additionally to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (i.e. daratumumab; triple-class refractory [TCR]). Determining refractory status was based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Index LOT was a new LOT after evidence of DCR or TCR status following ≥3 (DCR) or ≥4 (TCR) prior LOTs. Patient characteristics described included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetic risk, age, index date, sex, and follow up time. Treatment pattern assessments included treatments received before/during/after index LOT, reasons for discontinuation, refractory status, and retreatment characteristics. Patient outcomes (overall survival [OS], duration of treatment [DOT], and time to next therapy [TTNT]) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis methods. Results: After excluding patients who were aged &lt;18 years at start of index LOT with no evidence of clinical activity and who participated in a clinical trial during index LOT, 381 (DCR) and 173 (TCR) patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up from index LOT initiation through end of data availability/death was 14 (DCR) and 8 (TCR) months. Demographic characteristics were consistent between DCR and TCR patients. Approximately half were aged ≥65 years (49% DCR; 53% TCR), majority had high-risk cytogenetics (56% DCR; 66% TCR) or prior autologous stem cell transplantation (&gt;62%), and 14-16% had ISS stage III. Patients had a median of 3 (DCR) and 6 (TCR) prior LOTs. Prior to index LOT, bortezomib and lenalidomide were the most commonly received PI and immunomodulatory drug (received by &gt;98% of DCR or TCR patients) and the most common PI and immunomodulatory drugs to which patients were refractory (71% and 84% DCR; 76% and 83% TCR, respectively). At index LOT, PI/immunomodulatory drug-based and daratumumab-based therapies remained the most common therapies. Bortezomib and lenalidomide had the longest time to refractory status and highest retreatment rates among DCR or TCR patients. Approximately 40% of TCR patients were retreated with daratumumab-based therapies after becoming refractory (Table). After index LOT, 70% of DCR and 58% of TCR patients continued to a subsequent LOT. Patients most frequently discontinued index LOT due to disease progression (59% DCR; 60% TCR), toxicity (23% DCR; 25% TCR), or doctor preference (14% DCR; 10% TCR). Median duration of gaps between LOTs generally were shorter than 1 month (Table). Median OS was 22.3 (DCR) and 11.6 (TCR) months. Median DOT was 3.3 (DCR) and 2.8 (TCR) months, and median TTNT was 4.1 (DCR) and 3.2 (TCR) months. In multivariate statistical analyses, inferior baseline ECOG performance scores, and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with worse prognosis (higher risk of death, shorter DOT, and shorter TTNT) in DCR and TCR patients. Age was not a significant factor after adjusting for other baseline factors. Conclusions: Treatment options are limited for US patients with DCR and TCR RRMM. DCR and TCR patients were frequently retreated with a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, or daratumumab, despite refractoriness to these agents. Many DCR and TCR MM patients stopped active MM treatment after discontinuing index treatment. Patients with DCR and TCR MM have poor prognosis, especially among high cytogenetic risk and poor performance status patients. This study provides the benchmark for new therapies, like BCMA-targeted agents, to be tested in this population. Funding: GSK (Study 217353). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gorsh: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. DerSarkissian: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment. Paka: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bhak: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Boytsov: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zichlin: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Current Employment. Sansbury: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yee: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Ferrante: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Khanal: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment. Noman: Analysis Group, Inc.: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Duh: Novartis: Other: I am an employee of Analysis Group, a consulting company that received funding from Novartis for this research study..

scholarly journals Real-World IgG Testing Frequency and Characteristics Associated with Hypogammaglobulinemia after Anti-CD20 Exposure in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Ian J. Hooley ◽  
Kathleen Maignan ◽  
Alexandra Jacob ◽  
Angelica Medina ◽  
Lauren Benderoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Unknown Status ◽  
Detection Window ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Anti Cd20

Introduction: Hypogammaglobulinemia is a known potential adverse event in patients with CLL receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy. However, real-world immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing rates have not been extensively studied. We used a real-world database to investigate IgG testing rates in patients with CLL before and after anti-CD20 exposure. We further examined factors that increased the likelihood of new onset hypogammaglobulinemia following anti-CD20 therapy. Methods: The Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database was used to select patients with abstraction-confirmed CLL diagnosed before 6/1/2020 with: (1) Exposure to an anti-CD20 mAb, (2) At least one IgG lab within 180 days prior to first anti-CD20 line start, and (3) No evidence of hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG &lt; 7g/L) within 6 months prior to first anti-CD20 line start. A "hypogammaglobulinemia detection window" was defined for each patient as the time between first anti-CD20 administration through to 365 days thereafter. Patients were grouped into 3 categories: (A) "Unknown status": those with no IgG testing during the window, (B) "Confirmed hypogam": those with hypogammaglobulinemia detected on any test during the window, and (C) "No detected hypogam": those tested for IgG during the window with 0 tests meeting the hypogammaglobulinemia threshold. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics were compared across the groups. A logistic regression was performed to compare factors associated with higher likelihood of detecting hypogammaglobulinemia among patients with an IgG test in the detection window. Factors included were: patient age at start of detection window, exposure to chemotherapy before detection window (Y/N), concurrent chemotherapy to anti-CD20 during the detection window (Y/N), and whether anti-CD20 was given in the first line (1L) setting (Y/N). We also performed a separate scenario analysis with outcome of severe hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG &lt; 5 g/L, compared to &lt; 7 g/L in primary analysis). Results: We found 5,838 anti-CD20 mAb-exposed patients with CLL, of which 1,927 (33%) had at least 1 IgG lab within 180 days of anti-CD20 start. Of those, 922 (48%) had hypogammaglobulinemia within 6 months prior to starting anti-CD20 therapy, leaving 1,005 patients in the cohort. 526 patients (52%) fell into the 'unknown status' category. 182 (18%) patients fell into the 'confirmed hypogam' category, and 297 (30%) fell into the 'no hypogam detected' category. Patients across these 3 categories had similar baseline characteristics (Table 1). Among the patients with an IgG test in the detection window (N=479), patients with 'confirmed hypogam' had more IgG tests during the window than the patients with 'no detected hypogam' (mean 3.9 vs. 2.8 tests, p&lt;0.001). Results of the logistic regression for IgG &lt; 7 g/L did not yield any factors significantly associated with higher likelihood of hypogammaglobulinemia (Table 2). However, the regression at IgG &lt; 5 g/L (incl. changing cohort inclusion criteria 3, N=703) found that concurrent exposure to chemotherapy was associated with higher likelihood of severe documented hypogammaglobulinemia (odds ratio 1.89; 95% CI 1.23-2.96; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with CLL with at least one IgG test within 6 months prior to anti-CD20 mAb initiation, hypogammaglobulinemia was common. A majority of the cohort was not tested for IgG post anti-CD20 mAb initiation, which likely reflects clinical practice of infrequently obtaining IgG levels in patients with normal pre-treatment IgG levels. As clinically expected, patients with hypogammaglobulinemia were tested for IgG more frequently than those who were not. This hypothesis-generating study suggests that administering chemotherapy concurrently to anti-CD20 mAbs increases the likelihood of documented severe hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG &lt; 5g/L) in patients with CLL. Further research should confirm this. Our analyses did not account for patients who may have had transient hypogammaglobulinemia during anti-CD20 treatment, and did not stratify by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) usage in this population. Further research should examine the effect of anti-CD20-associated hypogammaglobulinemia on outcomes, and determine if IgG surveillance should be standardized as part of clinical guidelines. Disclosures Hooley: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding; Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Maignan:Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding; Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jacob:Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding; Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Medina:Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding; Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Benderoff:Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding. Chen:Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Research Funding; Roche Group: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huntington:AbbVie: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Assessment of Clinical Outcome of Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis Treated ‎With Ruxolitinib in the Real-World Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Alaa Fadhil Alwan ◽  
Yaseen Muhialdeen Taher ◽  
Hayder Adnan Fawzi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Real World ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Compassionate Use ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

BACKGROUND: Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a disease that characterized by bone &lrm;marrow fibrosis which &lrm;may &lrm;result sometime in cytopenias and extramedullary &lrm;hematopoiesis causing massive &lrm;splenomegaly. Ruxolitinib (Rux) therapy that targeted &lrm;Janus Kinase-2 receptor and approved &lrm;for treatment of primary myelofibrosis. &lrm; OBJECTIVE: evaluate the clinical &lrm;outcome of patients with &lrm;primary myelofibrosis &lrm;receiving Ruxolitinib treatment as &lrm;a compassionate use program &lrm;and compare this treatment with the best &lrm;available treatment (BAT).&lrm; METHODS: &lrm;This is a retrospective case series conducted at the national &lrm;center of hematology /&lrm;&lrm;Mustansiriyah University. The enrollment of patients started &lrm;in May 2014 and ended in May &lrm;&lrm;2017. There were &lrm;&lrm;22 patients diagnosed with PMF (7 on &lrm;the Ruxolitinib arm and 15 on best &lrm;available treatment arm). The &lrm;treatment response &lrm;was evaluated according to consensus criteria &lrm;of IWG-MRT 2013 in primary &lrm;&lrm;myelofibrosis. RESULTS: In this study 3 out of 7 patients on Ruxolitinib arm showed reduction in spleen size and reduction in anemia. In addition to &lrm;that 4 patients &lrm;showed clinical response specifically in spleen &lrm;size (with 65% reduction from baseline during the first three months of treatment). CONCLUSION: Rux is effective and safe to treating &lrm;primary myelofibrosis with &lrm;symptomatic splenomegaly.

scholarly journals Final Primary Results from the Defifrance Registry Study: Effectiveness and Safety of Defibrotide in the Treatment of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 35-36
Author(s):  
Mohamad Mohty ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Delphine Lebon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
World Data

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially fatal complication that occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning. In its most severe form, VOD/SOS is associated with multi-organ failure (MOF) and a mortality rate of &gt;80% if untreated. Defibrotide is approved for the treatment of hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HCT in adult and pediatric patients in the United States and severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HCT in patients aged &gt;1 month in the European Union. The DEFIFrance study collected real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of defibrotide in France. This analysis presents final primary data on the subgroup of DEFIFrance patients who received defibrotide for the treatment of severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. This post-marketing study collected retrospective and prospective real-world data on patients receiving defibrotide at 53 HCT centers in France from July 15, 2014 to March 31, 2020. VOD/SOS severity was categorized using European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (adults) or study steering committee member adjudication (pediatric patients). The primary endpoints included Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated Day 100 (post-HCT) survival and Day 100 complete response (CR; total serum bilirubin &lt;2 mg/dL and MOF resolution per investigators' assessment) in patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of adverse events (AEs) of interest, such as hemorrhage, coagulopathy, injection-site reactions, infections, and thromboembolic events, irrespective of their relationship to treatment. Of the 775 defibrotide-treated patients included in the study analysis, 250 received defibrotide for the treatment of severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT (severe: 119 [48%]; very severe: 131 [52%]). The median patient age was 45 years (range: 5 months, 74 years) and 52 (21%) patients were less than 18 years of age. A total of 219 (88%) patients had received allogeneic HCT and 95 (38%) patients had an unrelated donor. The Day 100 KM-estimated survival was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52%, 64%) in patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. The estimated Day 100 survival rate was higher in patients with severe (74% [95% CI: 65%, 81%]) versus very severe (43% [95% CI: 35%, 52%]) VOD/SOS. Among patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT, the CR rate at Day 100 was 53% (95% CI: 47%, 59%). The Day 100 CR rate was higher in patients with severe (68% [95% CI: 60%, 77%]) versus very severe (39% [95% CI: 30%, 47%]) VOD/SOS. Treatment emergent AEs of interest occurred in 41% of patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS, with infection (23%) and bleeding (17%) being the most commonly reported. The DEFIFrance study represents the largest collection of real-world data on the use of defibrotide. The effectiveness and safety observed in this study build upon prior studies supporting the utility of defibrotide for treating severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT in a real-world setting. Among patients receiving defibrotide for VOD/SOS post-HCT, outcomes were better in patients with severe versus very severe disease, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of VOD/SOS before patients reach the most severe stage of VOD/SOS. Disclosures Mohty: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Yakoub-Agha:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Labopin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Renard:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Jubert:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bouvatier:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dalle:Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peffault De Latour:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Real-World Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Regimens in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Israel: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3727-3727
Author(s):  
Yair Herishanu ◽  
Neta Goldschmidt ◽  
Gilad Itchaki ◽  
Itai Levi ◽  
Ariel Aviv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab or obinutuzumab) has demonstrated superior outcomes and manageable safety as compared to chemo-immunotherapy in phase III clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Moreover, venetoclax-based regimens induced high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD). Prospective data on the effectiveness of venetoclax-based regimens specifically with regard to achieving uMRD in a real-world setting are still lacking. Here we report the first interim analysis for efficacy and safety of an ongoing nationwide real-world study of venetoclax based therapy for CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Method: A prospective observational nationwide multicenter study. Treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL patients were enrolled in 13 medical centers in Israel. The primary endpoint was clinical response, per physician assessment 12-months after the initiation of venetoclax treatment. Key secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and uMRD as assessed at a central laboratory by 8-color flow-cytometry. Results: Between February 10, 2019, and Jun 17, 2021 (data cut), 199 CLL/SLL patients were enrolled from 13 medical centers in Israel to receive venetoclax based therapy. The study included 83 TN and 116 R/R evaluable CLL/SLL patients with a median age of 69 years (range, 34-85) and 70.5 years (range, 25-91), respectively (Table 1). R/R patients had received a median of one prior therapy with a range up to 8, of these patients 60 (51.7%) were previously treated with a B-cell receptor inhibitor (BCRi) including ibrutinib in 52 (44.8%) and idelalisib in combination with rituximab in 6 (5.2%). TN patients had been treated with venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab (92.8%) or rituximab (4.8%) and R/R patients received either venetoclax with rituximab (60.3%) or obinutuzumab (9.5%), venetoclax monotherapy (25.8%) or triple therapy with venetoclax, rituximab and ibrutinib in 5 (4.3%). Dose escalation of venetoclax to the recommended dose of 400 mg daily was achieved in 80.7% (n=67) of TN and 81% (n=94) of R/R patients. The median duration of ramp-up was 38 and 42 days in TN and R\R patients, respectively. Prior to therapy, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was considered high in 12% and 29.3% of TN and R/R patients, respectively (Table 1). Laboratory TLS occurred in one TN patient and 4 R/R patients, whereas 3 of the R/R patients experienced clinical TLS. Nineteen TN and 75 R/R patients had a follow-up of at least 12 months or discontinued study prematurely. The 12-month overall response rate (ORR) for TN and R/R patients was 89.5% [complete response (CR) 13 (68.4%), partial response (PR) 4 (21.1%)] and 73.3% [CR 37 (49.3%), PR 18 (24%)], respectively. In the R/R cohort, the 12-month ORR among assessed patients was 67.6% (25/37) in BCRi-exposed versus 85.7% (30/35) in BCRi-naïve patients. At 12 months, peripheral blood uMRD (&lt;0.01%) was achieved in 12 out of 14 (85.7%) TN and 26 out of 38 (68.4%) R/R evaluated patients. At a median follow-up of 5.1 months (range, 0.5-15.6) for TN and 10.1 months (range, 0-25.7) for R/R patients, the median PFS and OS, for both cohorts have not been reached. The estimated 12-month PFS was 90.9% for TN and 81.1% for R/R patients. For R/R patients with prior exposure to BCRi, the estimated 12-month PFS was 69.6% versus 94.8% in BCRi-naïve patients (figure 1). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 34.9% of TN patients and 43.9% R/R patients. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs documented were neutropenia (TN: 19.2% and R/R 17.2%), infections (TN: 4.8% and R/R: 21.5%) and febrile neutropenia (TN: 2.4% and in R/R: 2.6%). COVID-19 occurred in 7 patients including one death. At the time of data cut, 10 deaths occurred, one TN and 9 R/R patients. Causes for death included infections (5 patients), disease progression (2 patients), acute myeloid leukemia/ myelodysplastic syndrome (2 patients) and a soft-tissue sarcoma (1 patient). Conclusions: This first interim analysis of our ongoing prospective real-world study of venetoclax-based treatment for TN and R/R CLL/SLL, demonstrates high efficacy together with a high proportion of undetectable MRD levels and a favorable toxicity profile. These efficacy results are comparable to those reported in previous Phase III clinical trials for CLL, with no new safety signals. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Herishanu: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Goldschmidt: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Itchaki: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Levi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Aviv: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fineman: AbbVie: Research Funding. Dally: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tadmor: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ruchlemer: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Abadi: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shvidel: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Braester: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cohen: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Frankel: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ofek: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berelovich: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Grunspan: AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: May hold equity. Benjamini: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document