Impact of Comorbidities on Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Receive Hypomethylating Agents

Abstract BACKGROUND: Many efforts have been made in the attempt to address the conundrum question of fitness definition ad prognosis prediction in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Parametric definitions are expected to give an advantage in patient stratification; however, clinical examination remain de facto pivotal to formulate therapy decisions and frequently the comorbidities are empirically evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study collecting baseline comorbidity, laboratory data, CTCAE 4.0.3 adverse events (AE), and outcome of elderly patients (>65 years old) with new onset AML who received hypomethylating agents as 1st line therapy. We tested the impact on prognosis of baseline clinical and biological risk factors. Furthermore, we evaluated a score - acute myeloid leukemia-composite model, AML-CM (Mukherjee et al, 2017) - developed in chemotherapy-eligible patients, that accounts for baseline comorbidities, laboratory parameters, age and cytogenetic-molecular risk. The study was approved by local Ethical Authority (316/2019/Oss/AOUBo). RESULTS: We collected data from 131 consecutive elderly patients who received 1 st line HMAs between January 2008 and January 2021. Patients had a median age of 76 years (IQR 72 -79). Seventy-seven out of 131 patients (58.8%) had de novo AML, 32/131 (32.8%) had secondary AML, and 11/131 (8.4%) had therapy-related AML. Out of 123 evaluable patients, 43 (34.9%) had complex karyotype, 1 (0.8%) inv(16), 59 (48.4) normal karyotype, 18 (14.7%) other alterations; 8/108 patients harbored FLT3 ITD mutation (7.4%, 23 not tested), 12/101 NPM1 mutation (11.9%, 30 not tested). Based on these data, 111 patients were evaluable for ELN2010 risk stratification; 9 over 111 patients (8.1%) were stratified in the low risk, 42/111 (37.8%) in intermediate-1 risk, 17/111(15.3%) in intermediate-2 risk, and 43/111 (38.7%) in high-risk class. As expected, most of the patients had at least one comorbidity. Particularly, baseline arrhythmia was present in 29/130 (22.1%, 1 no data), cardiovascular comorbidity in 20/130 (15.4%, 1 no data), diabetes in 20/131 (15.3%), cerebrovascular comorbidity in 11/131 (8.4%), kidney disease in 15/130 (11.5%, 1 no data), lung chronic disease 19/130 (14.6% 1 no data), hypoalbuminemia in 25/111 patients (22.5%, 20 no data). With a median follow up of 28.2 months, median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 15.8 months (95% C.I. 11.2-19.4). We confirmed that patient who obtained a response (complete remission, partial response, hematological improvement) after 2 months of therapy had the best OS (figure A, median OS of 21 months for responders vs 7.4 months for non-responders, p <.001). Interestingly, lung chronic disease (median OS 6.6 months in affected vs 16.5 months in non-affected, p=.013) and hypoalbuminemia (median OS 7.4 months in affected vs 18 months in non-affected p<.001) confer significantly diminished OS. ELN2010 score impacted prognosis (median OS of 8.4 months for favorable, 23.4 months for int-1, 11.1 for 1int-2 and 6.5 months for high-risk, p=.004). To test the impact of comorbidities combined with cytogenetic and molecular risk, AML-CM was used. Our results indicate that AML-CM score was able to stratify prognosis in elderly patients receiving frontline HMAs (figure B, median OS in score group 1: 29.7 months, score group 2: 16.5 months, score group 3: 11.2 months, score group 4: 6.6 months, p=.038). The worse prognosis of patients with higher AML-CM score, which includes patients with increased baseline comorbidities, may be explained with a higher incidence of AEs (84.55, 116.01, 131.45, 229.3 events for 100 patients per year for score group 1,2,3, and 4, respectively) and infections (53.80, 55.10, 85.95, 140.13 events for 100 patients per year for score group 1,2,3, and 4, respectively), in patients with higher baseline comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In this study we found that baseline comorbidities, captured by AML-CM score, may define prognosis of elderly patients receiving 1st line HMAs; parametric comorbidity scores may improve our ability to predict outcome and tailor interventions. The impact of comorbidity on OS may be increased with novel and more aggressive therapy. For this reason, specific studies on functional fitness tests and geriatric assessments are highly warranted in patients receiving HMAs plus venetoclax. This work was supported by Bologna AIL. CP and AC shared last authorship. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martinelli: Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Cavo: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Papayannidis: Pfizer, Amgen, Novartis: Honoraria. Curti: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Venetoclax Combination Therapy with Hypomethylating Agents in Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129514 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5089-5089 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Varun Mittal ◽

Mimi Lo ◽

Lloyd E. Damon ◽

Karin L. Gaensler ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has high efficacy in treatment-naïve elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The role for VEN in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or other myeloproliferative neoplasms remains incompletely defined. In particular, the efficacy of VEN+HMA has not been studied systematically in patients who experience AML relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Method: All patients treated with VEN+HMA (azacitidine or decitabine) for R/R de novo or secondary AML or progressive MDS following allogeneic HCT were identified and reviewed retrospectively. All included AML patients had overt clinical relapse with ≥ 5% bone marrow blasts or extramedullary disease biopsy proven to be AML. Patients were included in this analysis if they received at least 14 days of VEN therapy. Results: Eleven patients with median age 66 (range 25-75) were treated for R/R AML post-allogeneic HCT. Transplant characteristics included use of reduced intensity conditioning in 10/11 (91%), matched sibling donors in 5/11 (45%), matched unrelated donors in 5/11 (45%), and cord blood in 1/11 patients. The median time from HCT to relapse/disease progression was 7 months (range 3-36). Two patients had extramedullary relapse only, and the remainder had marrow involvement. Eight patients (73%) received azacitidine and 3 (27%) received decitabine in combination with VEN. All but two patients (82%) had prior HMA exposure and most received VEN+HMA as initial post-transplant salvage therapy (64%). Only one patient received donor lymphocyte infusion in conjunction with VEN+HMA therapy, and none proceeded to a second allotransplant. Nine patients (82%) experienced an objective response, which included 4 CR/CRi (36%) and 5 PR/SD (45%). In patients with CR/CRi, three patients had adverse risk cytogenetics and one had a favorable risk profile at diagnosis consisting of normal cytogenetics with an isolated NPM1 mutation. All patients who failed to remit with VEN+HMA had intermediate- or high-risk genetic features. The median number of treatment cycles given was 3 (range 1-20). Median survival was 11 months and estimated 6-month and 12-month survival was 82% and 36%, respectively. Three patients remain alive with median 16.5 months follow-up (range 2.5-32). Conclusion: Venetoclax in combination with HMA is a viable salvage option in patients with relapsed AML or progressive MDS after allogeneic HCT, including those with prior exposure to HMA. Although one patient in this cohort sustained long term complete remission, overall prognosis remains dismal in this high-risk patient population and improved treatment options for relapsed/refractory AML following alloHCT remain needed. Disclosures Damon: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Olin:MedImmune: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; fujiFilm: Research Funding; Revolution Medicines: Research Funding. Logan:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TeneoBio: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy; Kadmon: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Impact of Day 28 Absolute Lymphocyte Count on Outcome of Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5256.5256 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5256-5256

Author(s):

Naresh Bumma ◽

Jing Ai ◽

Xuefei Jia ◽

Sean Hobson ◽

Donna Abounader ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Lymphocyte recovery after induction chemotherapy (IC) predicts outcome in adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Behl et al. Leukemia 2006; 20: 29-34). However, it is unknown whether absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery after IC predicts outcome in those pts who are then treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHCT) in first complete remission (CR1). We hypothesized that the prognostic impact of ALC might be nullified by AHCT in CR1 due to the abrogation of normal immunologic recovery. In this study, our aims were to (1) evaluate the impact of Day 28 ALC on all AML pts receiving IC and (2) to specifically, evaluate the impact of Day 28 ALC on the subset of AML pts proceeding to AHCT in CR1. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 180 adult AML pts (≥ 18 years of age) who were treated with IC during the years 2001- 2012 at the Cleveland Clinic was performed. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Pts with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded . Ninety-four of the 180 pts received AHCT in CR1. A total of 141 AML pts receiving IC and a total of 66 pts receiving IC and then receiving AHCT in CR1 were eligible for data analysis because Day 28 ALC was missing in the remainder of the pts. Prior studies in AML identified an ALC of < 500/ µL at Day 28 of IC as predictive of overall survival. We stratified Day 28 ALC into the following categories: (a)< 250/ µL (b) < 350/ µL (c) < 500/ µL and (d) < 500/ µL for Max ALC [Max ALC was defined as the maximum ALC value between days 26 and 30 after the initiation of IC]. Other variables collected included age at diagnosis, WBC at diagnosis, and cytogenetic (CG) risk. CG risk was ascribed by CALBG criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to summarize overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), which were measured for all pts from the time of diagnosis. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis of categorical factors and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for measured factors and multivariate analysis. We performed two separate analyses : one for all AML pts (n=141); and a second analysis only focusing on those receiving AHCT in CR1 (n=66). Results: Pt characteristics for the entire AML cohort: The median age was 58.0 years (20.0-80.0); 46.1% female. The median WBC at diagnosis was 11.6 K / µL (range 0.7-220.7) and median Day 28 ALC was 400/ µL (0-2.4). Twenty-seven pts (19.7%) had favorable CG, 84 (61.3%) intermediate, and 26 (19.0%) unfavorable. Most pts (91%) received "7+3" IC and 93 (66%) also received at least 1 cycle of post-remission chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, age ≥60 (HR 2.72, p< 0.001), CG risk (HR 2.13, p < 0.001), Day 28 ALC < 250/ µL (HR 1.60, p=0.022), Day 28 ALC < 350/ µL (HR 1.57, p=0.029), and max ALC < 500/ µL (HR 1.54, p=0.035) were associated with a worse OS from the initiation of treatment. Low ALC was associated with both a higher incidence of refractory disease and death during induction (p=0.015). In our second analysis of pts undergoing AHCT in CR1, although not statistically significant, max ALC < 500/ µL (during IC) was associated with a trend towards decreased OS from the start of treatment on both univariate (HR 1.88,p= 0.13) and multivariate (HR 2.16, p=0.075) analysis. Conclusions: Max ALC < 500/ µL is predictive of outcome in AML pts undergoing IC, and there is a suggestion that this effect may not be abrogated by AHCT. A larger study will be needed to further confirm these findings. Therapies to improve lymphocyte recovery may be important in the treatment of AML. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Mutational Studies Using Next Generation Sequencing in High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Azacitidine (High risk MDS 2009 protocol from CETLAM Group)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2905.2905 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2905-2905

Author(s):

Marta Cabezon ◽

Joan Bargay ◽

Blanca Xicoy ◽

Laura Palomo ◽

Sílvia Marcé ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of myeloid neoplasms originated in hematopoietic stem cells, characterized by citopenias, dysplasia in one or more cell lines, ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment of MDS depends on subtype and prognostic category. DNA methyltranferase inhibitors are approved for high risk MDS. Over the past decade, the application of new high-throughput technologies to the study of MDS has led to the identification of several recurrently mutated genes. These include genes producing proteins involved in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, chromatin modification, transcription, DNA repair control, cohesin function, RAS pathway, and DNA replication. There is a significant overlap between the genes mutated commonly in MDS with those found in AML. Mutation status is not widely used to select treatment in MDS. The aim of this study is to define the mutational status of MDS and secondary AML (sAML) patients at diagnosis that have been treated with azacitidine (AZA) to see if it could help to discriminate which patients will respond from those who will not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 36 patients with MDS and sAML treated with AZA. Genomic DNA was obtained from bone marrow at diagnosis. SeqCap EZ and KAPA Library Preparation Kit (Roche) reagents have been used to enrich DNA of 83 genes implicated in myeloid neoplasm. The customized panel has been analyzed in MiSeq Illumina platform with 150bp paired-end reads. Samples were preliminary analyzed using Illumina MiSeq Reporter and Variant Studio softwares. Data from response to treatment and survival have been collected from all patients. RESULTS:The mean depth of the targeted resequencing per base was 685-fold. After filtering all the variations obtained for quality, biological consequence and discard the known SNPs, we have obtained 162 variations, including 145 single nucleotide variants (SNV) and 17 insertions/deletions. All patients harbored at least 1 alteration with a mean of 4.5 variants per sample. The average of alterations detected in each cytological category can be observed in Table 1.Table 1.Average abnormalities detected by cytological category.Nº patientsAverage of alterations detected for patient (range)sAML104,8 (1-8)RAEB-274,9 (2-8)RAEB-1123,7 (1-6)RCDM54,4 (3-7)RCDM-RS16RARs11The most frequent altered genes have been TP53, TET2 and DNMT3A. The numbers of variations detected for each gene are represented in Table 2.Complete results, including correlation with treatment response will be presented in the meeting.Table 2.Number of variations in each gene.GeneNº of variations foundNº of diferent variationsNº of patients with variationsFrequency of variationsTP5322191952,8%TET214101027,8%DNMT3A88822,2%CREBBP75719,4%SRSF271719,4%ASXL165616,7%U2AF162616,7%EP30053513,9%STAG255513,9%CUX144411,1%ETV643411,1%MLL (KMT2A)43411,1%RUNX14438,3%BCOR3338,3%CDH133338,3%CTNNA13238,3%EZH23338,3%GCAT3338,3%MLL2 (KMT2D)3338,3%NF13338,3%PDGFRB3338,3%SH2B33338,3%TGM23238,3%UMODL13338,3%CEBPA2125,6%CSF3R2225,6%GATA22125,6%PHLPP12225,6%RAD212225,6%SF3B12125,6%SUZ122225,6%TIMM502125,6%Others*1112,8%*ABL1, BCORL1, CALR, CDH3, IDH2, KRAS, LUC7L2, NPM1, NRAS, PHF6, SF3A1, SFPQ, SMC3, TERT, WT1, ZRSR2. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted deep-sequencing technique is a good tool to study mutational profile in MDS and sAML. SNV are the most frequent type of alteration found in our cohort. The patients with sAML and RAEB-2 present more variations than patients with RAEB-1. The rest of groups are less representing to be evaluated. The most affected genes match with those described in the literature, with some exceptions that need to be studied in more detail. We expect to predict in advance which patients are going to respond when we study the correlation of mutational analysis with treatment response. Acknowledgments: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain (PI 11/02519); 2014 SGR225 (GRE) Generalitat de Catalunya; Fundació Josep Carreras, Obra Social "La Caixa" and Celgene Spain. Diana Domínguez for her technical assistance Disclosures Valcarcel: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Comprehensive Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of the Pharmacodynamic Changes Induced By MLN4924 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Reveals Rational Targets for Combination Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1271.1271 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1271-1271

Author(s):

Valeria Visconte ◽

Steffan T. Nawrocki ◽

Kevin R. Kelly ◽

Yingchun Han ◽

Anthony Possemato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

High Throughput ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Rna Helicase ◽

Tumor Type ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bet Inhibitors ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract NEDDylation controls the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of proteins that are critical for cell survival, oncogenic transformation, and therapeutic sensitivity. MLN4924 (4924, Pevonedistat) is a first-in-class inhibitor of NEDDylation that has been evaluated in multiple phase I trials. Despite its preliminary efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the specific pharmacodynamic (PD) effects that mediate the anti-leukemic activity of 4924 have not been completely defined. We conducted comprehensive proteome profiling of MV4-11 FLT3 ITD+ cells to determine the global impact of inhibiting NEDDylation with 4924 on the AML proteome. MV4-11 cells were treated with 4924 (1 μM) for 24 hours and processed for high-throughput proteome quantification. Using a 2-fold PD change cut-off, 47 of 3,812 unique detected proteins were significantly upregulated by 4924 treatment (P < 0.05). The effects of 4924 on the levels of selected proteins were confirmed by immunoblotting. 4924 triggered increased levels of many established NEDD8 substrates including CDT1, p27, KEAP1, NUSAP1, and MLX. Other notable factors elevated by 4924 treatment included RRM2, BRD2, NQO1, regulators of cellular redox status (GCLM, TXNRD1, HMOX1), the DNA helicase DNA2, and the DNA replication factor ESCO2. Reactome network analysis demonstrated that the significantly affected proteins primarily clustered in the cell cycle, mitosis, and stress response pathways. A comparison of our proteomic data with a comprehensive SILAC analysis performed in A375 melanoma cells similarly treated with MLN4924 revealed that 34% (16/47) of the pharmacodynamically increased proteins were identical between the two analyses. These findings suggest that the repertoire of proteins that are modulated by 4924 may be tumor-type dependent. Notably, several of the proteins modulated by 4924 in our study could represent biomarkers for patient stratification. For example, the chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein CHD3 (fold change: 2.23) was reported to be elevated in patients with MYST3-CREBBP AML or AML with a monocytic phenotype and high FLT3 expression that experienced short complete remissions following conventional therapy. It would be worthwhile to investigate whether patients with high basal CHD3 levels derive less benefit from treatment with 4924. We also detected drug-induced changes in 27 members of the RNA helicase family including DDX41, in which mutations were recently reported in AML and MDS. Out of these 27 helicases, DDX24 and DDX54 were most increased (1.74- and 1.51-fold, respectively). Although the impact of drug treatment on individual helicases fell below our set threshold of significance, the collective data suggest that 4924 may have a previously undefined class effect on RNA helicase function. Further investigation is required to assess whether NEDD8 plays a novel role in the regulation of RNA helicases and to determine how this may impact 4924 efficacy. Additionally, several of the targets that were elevated following treatment with 4924 are directly actionable with existing approved and investigational drugs. For example, a proof of concept FLT3-ITD+AML xenograft study confirmed that known effects of azacitidine (AZA) on RRM2 antagonized MLN4924-mediated upregulation of RRM2 and synergistically increased efficacy (P <0.01), implying a potential relationship between RRM2 expression and clinical response that could be explored in the ongoing trial of 4924 plus AZA in elderly patients with AML (NCT0181426). The ability of 4924 to increase BRD2 levels may also heighten the sensitivity of AML cells to BET inhibitors, which represents another clinical implication that could be seamlessly translated into the clinic and investigated in trials of existing BET inhibitor combinations. We are currently assessing this possibility in preclinical models of AML. In summary, our study demonstrates that high-throughput proteomic technology is a powerful tool with potential applications in patient refinement and the identification of rational actionable targets for precision combination therapeutic strategies. These findings support the implementation of high-throughput proteomics as a synergistic complement to genomics in novel anticancer drug development. Disclosures Sekeres: Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of APVO436, a Novel Anti-CD123 x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Molecule, in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141619 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-12

Author(s):

Justin M. Watts ◽

Tara Lin ◽

Eunice S. Wang ◽

Alice S. Mims ◽

Elizabeth H. Cull ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction Immunotherapy offers the promise of a new paradigm for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). CD123, the IL-3 receptor alpha-chain, represents an attractive target for antibody therapies because of its high expression on AML/MDS blasts and leukemic stem cells compared to normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. APVO436, a novel bispecific anti-CD123 x anti-CD3 ADAPTIR™ molecule, depleted CD123+ cells in AML patient samples ex vivo (Godwin et al. ASH 2017), reduced leukemia engraftment in a systemic AML xenograft model (Comeau et al. AACR 2018), and transiently reduced peripheral CD123+ cells in non-human primates with minimal cytokine release and in a dose-dependent fashion (Comeau et al. AACR 2019). These data provide a basis for the clinical application of APVO436 as a treatment in AML and MDS. Here, we report preliminary data from a first-in-human dose-escalation study of APVO436 in patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS. Study Design/Methods This ongoing Phase 1/1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03647800) was initiated to determine the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of APVO436 as a single agent. Major inclusion criteria were: R/R AML with no other standard treatment option available, R/R MDS with > 5% marrow blasts or any peripheral blasts and failure of a hypomethylating agent, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, life expectancy > 2 months, white blood cells ≤ 25,000 cells/mm3, creatinine ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN), INR and PTT < 1.5 x ULN and alanine aminotransferase < 3 x ULN. Patients were not restricted from treatment due to cytogenetic or mutational status. Intravenous doses of APVO436 were administered weekly for up to six 28-day cycles (24 doses) with the option to continue dosing for up to 36 total cycles (144 doses). Flat and step dosing regimens were escalated using a safety-driven modified 3 + 3 design. Pre-medication with diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and dexamethasone was administered starting with dose 1 to mitigate infusion related reactions (IRR) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). First doses and increasing step doses of APVO436 were infused over 20-24 hours followed by an observation period of 24 hours or more. Bone marrow biopsies were performed every other cycle with responses assessed by European Leukemia Net 2017 criteria for AML or International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria for MDS. Results The data cut-off for this interim analysis was July 9, 2020. Twenty-eight patients with primary R/R AML (n=19), therapy-related R/R AML (n=3), or high-risk MDS (n=6) have been enrolled and received a cumulative total of 186 doses. The number of doses received per patient ranged from 1 to 43 (mean of 6.4 doses). Most patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease; however, blast reduction was achieved in 2 patients, with one patient with MDS maintaining a durable response for 11 cycles before progressing. APVO436 was tolerated across all dose regimens in all cohorts tested. The most common adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were edema (32%), diarrhea (29%), febrile neutropenia (29%), fever (25%), hypokalemia (25%), IRR (21%), CRS (18%), chills (18%), and fatigue (18%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in more than one patient were: febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (18%), hyperglycemia (14%), decreased platelet count (11%), CRS (11%), IRR (7%), and hypertension (7%). After observing a single dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at a flat dose of 9 µg, step dosing was implemented and no DLTs have been observed thereafter. No treatment-related anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were observed. Transient serum cytokine elevations occurred after several reported IRR and CRS events, with IL-6 most consistently elevated. Conclusions Preliminary results indicate that APVO436 is tolerated in patients with R/R AML and MDS at the doses and schedules tested to date, with a manageable safety profile. Dose escalation continues and the results will be updated for this ongoing study. Disclosures Watts: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cull:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patel:Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; DAVA Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Shami:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cogle:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chenault:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Macpherson:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chunyk:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. McMahan:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gross:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Stromatt:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Allogeneic HSCT after Chemo-Based Conditioning in Infants with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission: A Multicenter EBMT-PDWP Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145858 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2862-2862

Author(s):

Andre Manfred Willasch ◽

Christina Peters ◽

Adriana Balduzzi ◽

Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽

Marco Zecca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Missing Data ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact ◽

First Complete Remission ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Pediatric patients younger than two years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) commonly receive a chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The optimal choice of cytotoxic agents is still controversial. Methods: A retrospective EBMT-registry based study was conducted to investigate the impact of different chemotherapy-based conditionings on the outcomes in young children. Children younger than two years of age receiving a first HSCT of bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or cord blood (CB) from matched siblings (MSD) or unrelated donors (UD) in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2019 were included. Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (BuCy) and BuCy/Melphalan (BuCyMel) were the most frequent combinations on which this analysis focused. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Multivariate analysis adjusting for differences between the conditioning regimens and risk factors influencing outcome was performed using the Cox's proportional hazards regression model. Results: 289 patients (56% male) transplanted at a median age of 1.2 years (IQR 0.9-1.6) after BuCy (164, 57%) or BuCyMel (125, 43%) were included. 184 (64%) patients received BM, 71 (24%) CB and 34 (12%) PBSC from UD (201, 70%) and MSD (88, 30%). In-vivo T-cell-depletion (TCD) was performed in 160 (58%, missing data 14) of the HSCTs with anti-thymocyte-globulin (ATG, 153) or alemtuzumab (7). Ex-vivo TCD was performed in 13 (5%, missing data 3) of the HSCTs. Graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD)-prophylaxis was Cyclosporin-A-based in 90% of the HSCTs. Median follow-up (FU) was 4.9 years (95% CI 3.9-5.5). After a median FU of 4 years, 4-y-LFS after BuCyMel (74.3%, 95% CI 65.1-81.4) was significantly better compared to BuCy (59.7%, 95% CI 51.2-67.2), hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.35-0.90, P=0.02). Overall survival (4-y-OS) after BuCyMel (77.2%, 95% CI 68.1-84.0) was significantly better compared to BuCy (66.6%, 95% CI 58.0-73.8), HR=0.58 (95% CI 0.35-0.97, P=0.04). No significant differences were found in the probability of relapse (4-y-RI (whole cohort) 26.2% (95% CI 21.0-31.7), HR of BuCyMel 0.59 (95% CI 0.34-1.02), P=0.06), non-relapse mortality (4-y-NRM (whole cohort) 7.8% (95% CI 5.0-11.4), HR of BuCyMel 0.49 (95% CI 0.19-1.24), P=0.13) and incidence of acute grade II-IV GvHD at day 100 (day-100-aGvHD II-IV (whole cohort) 36.8% (95% CI 31.2-42.5), HR of BuCyMel 0.59 (95% CI 0.35-1.01), P=0.06). Incidence of chronic GvHD (4-y-cGvHD (whole cohort)) was 9.8% (95%-CI 6.3-14.2). The donor type had no significant influence on the outcome. Conclusion: Bu-based conditionings of HSCT for infants with AML at high risk of relapse offer a high probability of cure. Conditioning with three alkylators (BuCyMel) resulted in better LFS and OS compared with two alkylators (BuCy) without significantly increasing the risk of both NRM and aGvHD. Future trials will evaluate the impact of the more recently introduced alkylator Treosulfan within the conditioning of HSCT in pediatric AML. Disclosures Peters: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants. Locatelli: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharamceutical: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Moraleda: Pfizer: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; MSD: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding. Biffi: BlueBirdBio: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Corbacioglu: Gentium/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Complexity of Interpreting Genomic Data in Patients with Primary and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.86.86 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 86-86

Author(s):

Aziz Nazha ◽

Ahmad Zarzour ◽

Tomas Radivoyevitch ◽

Hetty E. Carraway ◽

Jennifer S. Carew ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cytogenetic Analysis ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Genetic Alterations ◽

The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Recurrent Mutations ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex, heterogeneous neoplasm characterized by the accumulation of complex genetic alterations that are responsible for the initiation and progression of the disease. Secondary AML (sAML) represents a progression from antecedent hematologic disorders such as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myeloprolifrative neoplasms (MPN). Certain acquired mutations have been reported to be specific for sAML when compared to primary AML (pAML), but many limitations exist when cytogenetic grouping or other parameters are taken into account. In addition, some mutations have been shown to impact survival in some studies, but not others. Methods We performed targeted deep sequencing on samples from bone marrow and peripheral blood of pts diagnosed with sAML and pAML and treated at our institution between 1/2003-1/2013. Additional data on pAML was added from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A panel of 62 gene mutations described as frequently recurrent mutations in myeloid malignancies were assessed. Cytogenetic grouping was defined by CALGB/Alliance criteria. Differences were compared using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis to last follow up or death. Results: A total of 496 pts included: 273 with pAML and 223 with sAML. Comparing pAML to sAML, pts were younger (median age 59 vs. 68 years, p<.001) and had a higher WBC at diagnosis (13.5 vs. 3.9 X 109/L, p<.001), respectively. Cytogenetic analysis showed significant differences: 58% of pAML pts had normal karyotype (NK) compared to 37% of sAML (p=.002), whereas 24% and 26% of sAML had intermediate risk (other than NK) and complex karyotype (> 3 abnormalities) compared to 11% and 16% for pAML (p< .001, .009), respectively. Mutations in ASXL1 (p<.001), JAK2 (p=.014), CBL (p=.05), BCOR (p=.02), STAG2 (p =.003), SF3B1 (p=.04), SRSF2 (p=.001 ), and U2AF1 (p=.03) were highly specific for the sAML phenotype, whereas mutations in NPM1 (p<.001 ), FLT3 (p< .001), DNMT3A (p<.001), and IDH2 (p=.02) were more specific for pAML. When the analysis was restricted to pts with NK cytogenetics, only ASXL1 (p<.001) remained specific for sAML and DNMT3A (p<.001) for pAML.Further, when the analysis was restricted to pts with unfavorable risk cytogenetics, only ASXL1 (p=.01) remained specific for sAML. No other mutations were specific for pAML. We then evaluated whether the mutations that were specific to each AML phenotype had an impact on OS. We observed different mutations that impacted OS in each phenotype: DNMT3A (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.28-2.57, p<.001), TP53 (HR 3.1, 95% 1.74-5.53, p< .001), and SUZ12 (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.01-10, p=.05) led to worse OS in pAML, whereas mutations in EZH2 (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.07-4.21, p =.03), PRPF8 (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.20-4.46, p=.01), and TP53 ( HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.69-5.04, p<.001) lead to worse OS in sAML. Different mutations had a different impact on OS when cytogenetic analysis was taken into account. Mutations in FLT3 (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.37- 3.35, p<.001) and DNMT3A (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.57-3.70, p<.001) led to worse OS in NK pAML, whereas none of the mutations impacted OS in NK sAML. Further, in pAML with unfavorable cytogenetics, BCOR (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.57-3.70, p<.001) and TP53 (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.57-3.70, p<.001) had led to worse OS, whereas BOCR (HR 2.95, 95% CI 1.03-8.50, p<.001), SF3B1 (HR .19, 95% CI .05-.82, p<.001), SUZ12 (HR .12, 95% CI .01-.99, p<.001),and TP53 (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.09-3.46, p<.001) only impacted OS in sAML. Conclusion Clear genomic variations exist between sAML and pAML. Although some of these genomic changes are more specific to each phenotype in general, this specificity and the impact on OS differed for each cytogenetic subgroup, highlighting the complexity of interpreting genomic information in pts with AML and the need to incorporate both cytogenetic and molecular data in prognosis-driven treatment decisions. Disclosures Sekeres: TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Morphologic Leukemia-Free State in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Is Sufficient for Successful Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-133901 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-25

Author(s):

Cindy M. Pabon ◽

Zhiguo Li ◽

Therese Hennig ◽

Carlos De Castro ◽

Jadee Neff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Free State ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) improves survival in patients with relapsed or high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Complete remission (CR) is typically a pre-requisite for transplantation, though many do not achieve a formal CR. The traditional AML treatment starts with induction chemotherapy, followed by assessment of response to guide next steps. Response criteria definitions differ between that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), utilized by the majority of clinicians, and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Research (CIBMTR) data registry utilized by transplant centers, making interpretation of the impact of HCT difficult. Definitions for morphologic complete remission (CR) are the same, however complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) differs and the CIBMTR does not recognize the morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), thus mis-identifying such patients and preventing clear treatment guidelines for this population. We conducted a retrospective study, identifying a cohort of 35 AML patients at our center who underwent allogeneic HCT while in MLFS, to evaluate characteristics in patient demographics, disease status, treatment(s), and outcomes. From our cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 14 months, however 37% were alive and in remission with median follow-up of survivors of five years. Twenty three percent had progression of disease following transplant. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 35% with leading cause of death being infection. Our study reveals that transplant can induce long-term survival in patients with acute leukemia who are in MLFS at the start of induction, similar to data for patients with high risk disease in early relapse or in later remissions. Early transplantation while in MLFS and not waiting for full count recovery may protect patients from toxicities of further chemotherapeutic agents or prevent unnecessary delays that may allow for infections or other barriers to arise, and requires further study. Disclosures Leblanc: American Cancer Society, BMS, Duke University, NINR/NIH, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Agios, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CareVive, BMS/Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Flatiron, Helsinn, Heron, Otsuka, Medtronic, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Welvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rizzieri:Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mustang: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acrobiotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Diagnosis to Treatment Interval on the Outcome of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124150 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2212-2212

Author(s):

Samah Nassereddine ◽

Kimberley Doucette ◽

Vanya Aggarwal ◽

Richard Amdur ◽

Imad A. Tabbara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

University Hospital ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Characteristics ◽

Treatment Interval ◽

Initiation Of Therapy ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has historically been considered an oncologic emergency, requiring immediate intervention and initiation of therapy. Although urgency to initiate treatment has been debated, no guidelines exist to address the impact of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with AML. Recent FDA approvals have added treatment options using targeted therapy as monotherapy in older patients (e.g. - ivosidenib), or in combination with chemotherapy in younger patients (e.g.- midostaurin) in the newly diagnosed setting with improved outcomes. Unfortunately, results of molecular mutation testing often return several days after the initial diagnosis of AML has been made. While immediate induction is important to control disease and to minimize disease-related morbidity and mortality (Sekkers et al), molecular testing is becoming increasingly important for treatment decisions, and there may be benefit in waiting for these results. In addition, in 'real world settings', several barriers (e.g., lack of resources, correct diagnostic testing) often delay time to diagnosis, and initiation of therapy. We conducted a retrospective study in two academic centers in a major metropolitan area in the United States to evaluate the impact of DTI on the outcomes of patients with AML. Methods: We collected data from 196 patients who presented to George Washington University Hospital (120 patients) between June 2010 and July 2018 and Georgetown University hospital (76 patients) between January 2014 and December 2018. All patients were older than 18 years. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia and those who decided to pursue treatment elsewhere were excluded. Patients characteristics including age, gender, race, smoking past medical history and disease characteristics (Cytogenetics, FISH and NGS when available) were collected using retrospective chart review. Type of treatment received (low intensity vs high intensity), and the time from diagnosis to initiation of therapy were collected. We recorded mortality at day 30 and day 90. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of DTI with mortality independently from patient age. Chi-square test was used to examine the association of 30- and 90-day mortality with DTI. Results: A total of 140 patients were used in the analysis, 71% of whom were treated within 5 days of diagnosis (DTI <1-5 days), 16% in 6-10 days, and 12% in >10 days. Incidence of 30-day mortality was 15%, 14%, and 0% (p=.24), while 90-day mortality was 28% 18%, and 13% for <1-5, 6-10, and >10 days respectively (p=.33). Neither association was statistically significant, and adjusting for age and type of therapy did not change the findings. Conclusion: Our data does not support that shorter DTI is associated with improved mortality regardless of age or type of therapy. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a numerical trend of improved mortality in patients with delayed DTI (6-10 days) compared to those with a DTI of <1-5 days. Larger prospective studies need to be conducted to investigate DTI in AML patients based on patient's age, disease characteristics, and treatment type. In particular, given the growing importance of knowing molecular mutations at diagnosis, used for both prognosis and incorporation of potential targeted agents, it will be important to understand how long we can safely wait to treat patients without affecting outcomes. Disclosures Lai: Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Impact of Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors on the Survival of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Experience in Colombia, on Behalf of Acho's Renehoc-Pethema Investigators

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150930 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3374-3374

Author(s):

Claudia Lucia Sossa ◽

Virginia Abello ◽

Angela María Peña ◽

Luis Antonio Salazar ◽

Guillermo Quintero Vega ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Clinical Factors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Impact ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults, accounting for almost 80 percent of the cases. Incidence of AML increases with age and it ranges from 3 to 5 cases per 100,000 persons in the United States. Advances in treatment have led to significant improvements in outcomes for younger patients, while prognosis in the elderly remains poor. There are different sociodemographic and clinical factors that have an impact on survival such as type of leukemia (secondary vs novo), low socioeconomic status, age, gender, health regimen, co-morbidities and performance status Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the impact of sociodemographic and clinical factors on survival of patients with AML in 11 health institutions from Colombia, from 2009 to June 2021. Methods: Population based on RENEHOC (online platform) and PETHEMA (Spanish Program for Hematology Treatments). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS) and Relapse-Free Survival global (RFS) of the different evaluated factors. Results: A total of 463 patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range, 19-90) and 50.5% were female. According to the FAB classification, 95 (26.6%), 84 (23.6%), and 53 (14.9%) of patients were classified as M2, M0 and M1, respectively. The cytogenetic risk was applied for 227 patients (57%), 135 (59.5%) were intermediate and 78 (34.4%) were high-risk. Secondary AML were 73 (18.2%) and these cases evolved from hematological malignancies in 38 cases (80.8%), the most common were myelodysplastic syndrome (n=16; 34%) and chronic myeloid leukemia (n=7; 50%). For induction therapy, 232 (59.7%) patients received 7+3 (cytarabine/idarubicin), 47 (11.7%) received Azacitidine (AZA) and 23 (5.7%) received FLUGA (Fludarabine/cytarabine low doses). Complete remission (CR) after induction was achieved in 53% of patients, 12% had partial remission, 20.3% had primary refractory AML. Twelve percent died during induction. The most common consolidation regimen was high dose cytarabine (HiDAC), 143 (35,6%) and 36 (9%) of patients received 1 and 2 cycles respectively. Seventy-two (51%) patients that achieved a CR relapsed, and 46 (69.7%) received second line therapy. The most common treatment was FLAG-IDA (27%), followed by best supportive care (23.8%). The response rate was 40% (CR:31.1%/PR:8.9%) with 16 (36.6%) patients being refractory to treatment. Five (11.1%) died during salvage therapy. Thirty-eight (21%) patients had a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), 35 (92%) had allogeneic HCT and 3 (8%) autologous HCT, respectively. The median and 5-year OS for the whole population was 19 months and 27.6% (95%CI,19.7- 36.0). The median and 5-year RFS was 14 months and 21.8% (95%CI, 15.2 - 29.2), respectively (Figure 1). Sociodemographic and clinical factors such as age, ECOG PS, co-morbidies (Hypertension, diabetes, and chronic heart failure), AML subtype and leukocytosis at diagnosis were prognostic (Table 1). Conclusion: This is the first multicenter report analyzing real world data from AML patients in Colombia. Results confirm the impact of clinical factors: age, ECOG, secondary LMA on OS and RFS. Challenges includes low alloHSCT rate and low access to complete cytogenetic and molecular classification at diagnosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sossa: Amgen: Research Funding. Abello: Dr Reddy's: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Peña: Amgen: Research Funding. Salazar: Amgen: Research Funding. Sandoval-Sus: SeaGen, Janssen, MassiveBio, TG: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy.

Download Full-text