scholarly journals Sequential Blinatumomab with Reduced Intensity Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Ph Negative B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - Interim Analysis of the Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group ALL08 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1234-1234
Author(s):  
Shaun Fleming ◽  
John Reynolds ◽  
Ashish Bajel ◽  
Nicola Venn ◽  
John Kwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Toxicity ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract The advent of pediatric inspired regimens has improved the outcome for younger adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), however this comes at a considerable toxicity burden limiting its applicability in older adults. The advent of novel immunotherapies, such as Blinatumomab, an anti-CD19 targeting Bi-specific T-cell engager, has improved outcomes for adults with relapsed refractory and minimal residual disease (MRD) positive B-precursor (BCP) ALL. The Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) undertook a phase 2 proof-of-concept study to explore the combination of Blinatumomab with reduced intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph- BCP ALL. Patients received an initial pre-phase of corticosteroids (Prednisolone 100mg/d, 5 days) followed by a low intensity chemotherapy debulking (Cyclophosphamide 150mg/m 2 BD D1-3, Vincristine 2mg IV D1, 11 and Dexamethasone 10mg/m 2 D1-4, D11-14). Following this patients received Blinatumomab at 9mcg/d days 1-7 and 28mcg/d days 8-28. A B cycle of Hyper-CVAD (Cytarabine 3g/m 2 BD for 4 doses and Methotrexate 1g/m 2 D1 with Methylprednisolone 50mg BD D1-3). Patients then received 3 alternating cycles of Blinatumomab (28mcg/d for 28 days) and B-cycles of Hyper-CVAD followed by 2-years of POMP maintenance in subjects not proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) which was at investigator discretion. MRD assessments by ASO-PCR were performed after the first B cycle, second B cycle and prior to maintenance therapy with an MRD response being a level of 10 -4 or less. This analysis is from a pre-specified interim analysis with a data cutoff of 29 th June 2021. 30 patients were enrolled with a median age of 51.7(range, 39.5 - 66.5 years) with 70% male subjects. ECOG performance score was 0 in 14 subjects, 1 in 12 and 2 in 4. High risk disease was identified in 5 subjects (1 t(4;11), 2 hypodiploid, 1 t(1;19) and 1 Ph-like). All patients attained a CR, with 28 at end of 1B and a further 2 at end of 2B. Of 26 patients evaluable for MRD, 70% had achieved an MRD response after cycle 1B and 83% at the end of cycle 2B. 15 patients have ceased study therapy; 6 patients died with progressive disease, 4 subjects exited to allogeneic stem cell transplant, 1 patient was withdrawn due to progressive disease, 1 had intolerable toxicity (peripheral neuropathy) and 1 at investigator discretion. There were no treatment related deaths. 15 remain on protocol in maintenance with the remainder having completed therapy. At data cut-off the median event free survival (EFS) was not reached (95% CI 8.3 months - NA) with an estimated 24 month EFS of 61.8% (95% CI 36.3 - 84.2%) (figure 1A), and similarly the median overall survival (OS) S was not reached (95% CI 21.0 months - NA) with an estimated 24 month OS of 68.6% (95% CI 41.5 - 85.1%)(figure 1B). This predicted EFS was greater than the pre-specified stopping rule of a 24-month EFS of 50%. 2 episodes of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were recorded (1 grade 2, 1 grade 3) with the major toxicity being infective (53 episodes of sepsis, infection or febrile neutropenia) predominately related to chemotherapy cycles. 7 episodes of neurological toxicity were demonstrated (1 myelopathy and 4 peripheral neuropathy occurring during chemotherapy and 2 encephalopathy occurring during Blinatumomab administration). Overall, the combination of Blinatumomab with chemotherapy was tolerable and appeared efficacious with a high rate of remission and deep MRD responses observed. Responses appeared durable despite a low rate of alloHSCTin first remission. The major toxicity was infective and occurred in the context of chemotherapy cycles. Future developments from this protocol will emphasise further reduction in cytotoxic chemotherapy through incorporation of further novel agents to minimise this toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Fleming: Servier: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Reynolds: Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis AG: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Alcon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bajel: Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Yeung: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Verner: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd: Research Funding. Wei: Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Honoraria; Novartis, Abbvie, Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Servier and F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Former employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: Prof. Andrew Wei is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to Venetoclax. Greenwood: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab - usage in front-line therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

scholarly journals A Phase-Ib/II Clinical Evaluation of Ponatinib in Combination with Azacitidine in FLT3-ITD and CBL-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PON-AZA study)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2350-2350
Author(s):  
David Kipp ◽  
Sun Loo ◽  
Andrew Charles Perkins ◽  
Steven W Lane ◽  
Emily Blyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitors ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract Introduction Despite the advent of targeted therapy for FLT3-mutated AML, unmet need still exists for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, with no evidence that overall survival (OS) can be improved by combining either venetoclax (Konopleva et al., ASH 2020) or gilteritinib (Astellas press release, December 2020) with azacitidine. Although gilteritinib has been shown to improve median OS from 5.5 to 9.8 months, the majority will relapse (Perl et al., 2019). Adaptive on-target gilteritinib resistance may be due to the FLT3-F691L gatekeeper mutation, whereas off-target resistance may be due to loss-of-function variants in CBL, which encodes an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that negatively regulates FLT3 (McMahon et al, 2019). Ponatinib is a type-1 FLT3 inhibitor that is active in vitro against FLT3 F691L (Smith et al., 2013) and had an overall response rate (ORR) of 43% in a small pilot phase-I study (Talpaz et al., 2011). Combination of a FLT3 inhibitor with azacitidine may antagonize the synergistic hypermethylation reported for FLT3-ITD in association with epigenetic mutations (Shih et al., 2015). CBL loss-of-function mutations may also enhance responsiveness to FLT3 inhibitors (Taylor et al, 2015). We thus hypothesize that the combination of ponatinib and azacitidine could mitigate the rapid evolution of drug resistance typical of more selective FLT3 inhibitors used as single agents. Methods A phase-Ib study was conducted with the primary objective safety and key secondary objective preliminary efficacy of azacitidine in combination with ponatinib in patients with FLT3-ITD AML failing prior therapy or unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Exploratory objectives included mechanisms of ponatinib resistance and responsiveness of CBL-mutant AML to FLT3 inhibition. At dose level 1 (DL1), patients received azacitidine 60 mg/m 2 on days 1-5 and 8-9 and ponatinib 30 mg daily on days 5-25 of each cycle. In patients not achieving CR or CRi after cycle 1, the ponatinib dose was increased to 45 mg during cycle 2. For dose level 2 (DL2), the dose of azacitidine was increased to 75 mg/m 2. Results Thirty-one patients were evaluable for response. Median age was 67 years (range, 26-87). Frequency of prior lines of therapy was 0 (15%), 1 (46%), 2 (23%) or 3 (8%). Four patients had a history of prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant and one had previously received a FLT3 inhibitor. FLT3-ITD was present in 28 patients (median VAF 0.33; range, 0.009-17.95) and 3 had inactivating CBL mutations. A total of 20 patients were treated at DL1 and 12 patients at DL2. There were two grade-4 DLTs (raised AST/ALT [DL1] and tubulointerstitial nephritis [DL2]). Three grade-2 thromboembolic events were observed (two cannula-related DVTs and a distal lower-limb DVT). There were two grade-5 AEs (infection and cardiac failure), which were not considered drug related. The most common grade-3-4 AEs were febrile neutropenia (57%), neutropenia (47%), infections (47%), thrombocytopenia (40%) and anaemia (27%). Cardiac arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation/flutter, bradycardia, sinus tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia [1 patient]) were observed in 30% of patients. Of these, 80% were grade 1 or 2 and only one was considered by the investigator to be related to study treatment. Response was evaluable in 23 of 31 patients. Nine patients (39%) achieved CR or CRi, 3 (13%) achieved a PR and 8 (35%) achieved SD (ORR 52%). ORR at DL1 and DL2 was 43% and 66%, respectively. Median time to best response was 1.4 months (range 1.0-11.9). Median duration of best response was 12.9 months at both dose levels. Median OS for DL1 was 6.5 months and not reached for DL2. Despite shorter follow-up, DL2 patients experienced better OS than DL1 patients (p = 0.015). Responses were seen in 2 of 4 patients with post-allograft relapse. Two of three patients with a CBL mutation responded (1 CR and 1 CRi). Eradication of the CBL mutation was seen in one patient, who remains on therapy after 15 cycles. Molecular studies to investigate dynamic changes in molecular architecture are ongoing. Conclusions The recommended phase-II dose of ponatinib is 30 mg on days 5-25 and that of azacitidine is 75 mg/m 2 for seven doses each cycle. The ORR was 52% and durable disease control was observed, especially in patients receiving DL2. Preliminary efficacy was observed in CBL-mutated patients. Further clinical investigation of this regimen is warranted in patients with FLT3- or CBL-mutant AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kipp: Novartis: Honoraria. Perkins: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Lane: Novartis: Consultancy; Geron: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Enjeti: Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Bajel: Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Reynolds: Novartis AG: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Research Funding; Alcon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wei: Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Abbvie, Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau; Former employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: Prof. Andrew Wei is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to Venetoclax; Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy; Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Servier and F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ponatinib - used as an experimental therapy for AML in combination with azacitidine

scholarly journals BAX-Mutated Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients on Long-Term Venetoclax for Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Piers Blombery ◽  
Ella R Thompson ◽  
Xiangting Chen ◽  
Tamia Nguyen ◽  
Mary Ann Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clonal Hematopoiesis ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute ◽  
Over Time

Venetoclax (Ven) is an effective element of treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with high response rates observed in the upfront and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. In addition to inducing apoptosis in CLL cells, Ven also induces apoptosis within normal and malignant myeloid lineage populations (accounting for its efficacy in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia). We investigated the effects of Ven outside the target tumor compartment in patients (pts) with CLL receiving long-term continuous Ven and make the novel observation of the development of BAX-mutated clonal hematopoiesis in this heavily pre-treated patient group. 92 pts with CLL receiving continuous non time-limited Ven have been treated at our institutions on clinical trials. Of these, 41 had sufficient (>6 mo) follow up (median 70; range 14-95 mo) and suitable samples available for further analysis. 38/41 (93%) pts had received previous treatment with alkylators and/or fludarabine. In order to assess the non-CLL compartment in these 41 pts we identified those with peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate samples taken during deep response to Ven demonstrating either minimal (<5%) or no CLL involvement by flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-4). We initially performed unique molecular index (UMI)-based targeted next generation sequencing of apoptosis pathway genes as well a panel of 60 genes recurrently mutated in lymphoid and myeloid malignancy. From these 41 pts we identified mutations in the apoptosis effector BAX in samples from 12 (29%). 20 different BAX mutations were observed across these 12 pts at variant allele frequencies (VAF) consistent with their occurrence in the non-CLL compartment. Mutations included frameshift, nonsense, canonical splice site and missense mutations occurring in key structural elements of BAX consistent with a loss-of-function mechanism (Fig 1A). Interestingly, an enrichment of missense and truncating mutations predicted to escape nonsense mediated decay were observed at the C-terminus of the BAX protein affecting the critical α9 helix. Mutations in this region have previously been shown in cell lines to cause aberrant intracellular BAX localization and abrogation of normal BAX function in apoptosis (Fresquet Blood 2014; Kuwana J Biol Chem 2020). For comparison, NGS targeted sequencing for BAX mutations was performed on samples from cohorts of pts with (i) myeloid or lymphoid malignancy (n=80) or (ii) R/R CLL treated with BTK inhibitors (n=15) after a similar extent of preceding chemotherapy. Neither of these cohorts had previous exposure to Ven. BAX mutations were not detected in any samples from these pts. Longitudinal sampling from pts on Ven harboring BAX mutations in the non-CLL compartment was performed to further understand compartment dynamics over time (in 9 pts over 21-93 months of follow up). Multiple pts demonstrated a progressive increase in VAF of single BAX mutations over time to become clonally dominant within the non-CLL compartment and with observed VAFs consistent with their presence in the myeloid compartment. Mutations in other genes implicated in clonal hematopoiesis and myeloid malignancy including ASXL1, DNMT3A, TET2, U2AF1 and ZRSR2 were also detected in these pts samples. Targeted amplicon single cell sequencing (Mission Bio) demonstrated the co-occurrence of clonally progressive BAX mutations within the same clones as mutations in DNMT3A and ASXL1 as well as the existence of further BAX mutations at low VAF outside these dominant clones which remained non-progressive over time (Fig 1B). In addition, fluctuations in the presence and VAF of myeloid-disease associated mutations was noted with Ven exposure. In aggregate these data are consistent with the existence of a selective pressure within the myeloid compartment of these pts and an interplay of BAX with other mutations in determining survival and enrichment of these clones over time with ongoing Ven therapy. In summary, we have observed the development of BAX-mutated clonal hematopoiesis specifically in pts with CLL treated with long-term Ven. These data are consistent with a multi-lineage pharmacological effect of Ven leading to a survival advantage for clones harboring BAX mutations within the myeloid compartment during chronic Ven exposure. Finally, our data support the further investigation of BAX mutations as a potential resistance mechanism in myeloid malignancies treated with Ven. Disclosures Blombery: Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; Mei Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nurix: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tam:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria. Huang:Servier: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.; Genentech: Research Funding. Wei:Janssen: Honoraria, Other; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties; AMGEN: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Speakers Bureau; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding. Roberts:Janssen: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: for venetoclax to one of my employers (Walter & Eliza Hall Institute); I receive a share of these royalties.

scholarly journals High Major Response Rate, Including Very Good Partial Responses (VGPR), in Patients (pts) with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) Treated with the Highly Specific BTK Inhibitor Bgb-3111: Expansion Phase Results from an Ongoing Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1216-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Judith Trotman ◽  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
Gavin Cull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Research ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract Introduction: The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (IB) is highly active in WM, achieving major responses (CR+VGPR+PR) in approximately 70% of pts. However, VGPR is infrequent, with rates ≤15% in reported series (Treon NEJM 2015, Dimopoulos EHA 2016). BGB-3111 is a potent, highly-specific and irreversible BTK inhibitor, with greater selectivity than IB for BTK vs. other TEC- and HER-family kinases, and superior bioavailability. We previously reported that the recommended phase 2 dose of BGB-3111 is 320mg daily (in single or split dose) in pts with advanced B cell malignancies. This achieves plasma levels equivalent to 6-10 fold that of IB, and >90% continuous inhibition of BTK in lymph node biopsies. We specifically investigated the safety and efficacy of BGB-3111 in pts with WM in an expansion cohort of the initial Phase 1 trial. Reported here are updated results of this study, including data from WM specific expansion cohorts. Aims: To define the safety profile, and clinical activity of BGB-3111 in pts with WM. Methods: These results are from a pre-specified a component of a Phase 1 study (Part 1: dose escalation [DEsc] in pts with R/R B cell malignancies, Part 2: disease-specific dose expansion cohorts [EC] at the recommended Phase 2 dose that included patients with relapsed / refractory or previously untreated WM). Adverse events (AEs) were reported per CTCAE v4.03. Responses were determined according to the modified Sixth International Workshop on WM (IWWM) criteria. The data cut-off is 10 June 2016. Results: As of 10 June 2016, 31 pts with WM have been enrolled; 6 pts in DEsc (40mg [n=2], 80mg [n=2], 160mg QD [n=1], and 320mg QD [n=1]), and 25 in the WM EC (160mg BID [n=18], 320mg QD [n=7]). Three pts in DEsc were increased to 160mg QD after analysis of DEsc data, as allowed by protocol. Twenty-four pts are included in this analysis; 5 pts were excluded because of short (<60 day) follow-up for safety and efficacy, and 2 pts accrued at a single site were excluded because of insufficient documentation at baseline. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and prior treatment history are summarized in Table 1. BGB-3111 was well tolerated with 71% reporting no drug related AE >Gr 1 severity within the first 12 weeks of therapy. The most frequent AEs (>20%) of any attribution (all Gr 1/2) were upper respiratory infection (25%), diarrhea (25%), and nausea (21%). There were 2 SAEs assessed as possibly related to BGB-3111 (Gr 2 atrial fibrillation, Gr 3 cryptococcal meningitis); in both cases, BGB-3111 was temporarily held but safely resumed. In total, 2 pts developed AF (one Gr 1, one Gr 2). No serious hemorrhage (≥Gr 3 or CNS hemorrhage of any grade) was reported. After a median follow-up of 7.6 months (2-21 months), the response rate was 92% (22/24). The major response rate was 83% (20/24), with VGPR (>90% reduction in IgM and reduction in extramedullary disease) in 33% (8/24) and PR (50-90% reduction in IgM and reduction in extramedullary disease) in 50% (12/24) pts. Pts with WM refractory to their last therapy were equally responsive: major response 77% [10/13], VGPR 31% [4/13], PR 46% [6/13]. Median time to initial response and major response were 29 days and 34 days, respectively. IgM decreased from a median of 29.9g/l at baseline to 3.0g/l; hemoglobin increased from a median of 10.1 g/dl at baseline to 13.5g/l. Two of 3 pts who had a dose increase after reaching a stable IgM plateau had further falls in IgM levels after dose escalation. Kinetics of IgM and hemoglobin response are presented in Figure 1. Lymphadenopathy was present in 8 pts at baseline; serial CT demonstrated reduction or resolution in all 8 pts (27%-100% reduction in SPD). Only one patient discontinued BGB-3111, due to exacerbation of pre-existing bronchiectasis while in VGPR. There have been no cases of disease progression. Analysis of response by genomic characteristics (including MYD88 and CXCR4 mutational status) is ongoing. Conclusions: BGB-3111 is well-tolerated and highly active in WM. The depth and quality of responses, as reflected by the VGPR rate of 33%, warrant a randomized comparison against ibrutinib in pts with WM. Table 1. Table 1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Tam: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding. Simpson:Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene, Roche, Janssen: Honoraria. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Other: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research receives milestone payments for the development of venetoclax. Kirschbaum:Beigene: Employment. Wang:Beigene: Employment. Xue:Beigene: Employment. Yang:BeiGene: Employment. Hedrick:Beigene: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax.

Blinatumomab in Children with Relapsed or Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R-ALL): Final Results of 110 Patients Treated in an Expanded Access Study (RIALTO)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Noemi Mergen ◽  
Peter Bader ◽  
Sima Jeha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: The open-label, expanded access study (RIALTO) demonstrated that blinatumomab is efficacious with a manageable safety profile in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL). Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy that activates cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. Here, findings from the final analysis of RIALTO are presented (NCT02187354). Methods: Enrolled in the study were children &gt;28 days and &lt;18 years of age with R/R CD19+ BCP-ALL (defined as ≥2 relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [alloHSCT], or refractory to prior treatments) and ≥5% blasts or &lt;5% blasts but with minimal residual disease (MRD) level ≥10−3. Blinatumomab was given as continuous infusion in a 6-week cycle (4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles and safety follow-up visit 30 days post-treatment. Patients with &lt;25% blasts were dosed at 15 µg/m2/day, whereas those with ≥25% blasts were dosed at 5 µg/m2/day (days 1-7 of cycle 1) followed by dose increase to 15 µg/m2/day. Primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent (TE) and treatment-related (TR) adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR; &lt;5% blasts) and MRD response (&lt;10−4 blasts by PCR or flow-cytometry) in the first 2 cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and alloHSCT rate after blinatumomab treatment. Results: As of the data cutoff date (January 10, 2020) for the final analysis, demographics and baseline characteristics of 110 patients enrolled (median age, 8.5 years [95% CI 0.4-17.0]), 61% had &lt;50% blasts at baseline, and 11% had &lt;5% blasts (n=12; with MRD ≥10−3) remain unchanged compared with the primary analysis (Table 1). For best treatment response within the first 2 cycles, results are comparable to that of the primary analysis. Among 110 patients, overall CR rate was 62.7% (n= 69). Of 98 patients with ≥5% blasts at baseline, 59% (n=58) achieved CR; of them, 79% (n=46) achieved an MRD response and 62% (n=39) proceeded to HSCT. The 2 patients with t(17;19) achieved CR with an MRD response. Of the 4 patients with germline trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), 3 achieved CR with an MRD response Among the 12 patients with &lt;5% blasts but with MRD ≥10−3 at baseline, 92% (n=11) achieved CR and MRD response; 75% (n=9) proceeded to HSCT (Table 2). Of the 5 patients who had received prior blinatumomab , 4 achieved CR. Of 110 patients treated with blinatumomab, median OS (95% CI) was 14.6 (11-24.5) months with median follow-up time of 18.2 months, which increased by 1.5 months compared with that reported in the primary analysis, with 29.9% of patients still surviving at month 24. Median RFS (95% CI) remains unchanged at 8.5 months (4.7-14.0), with a median follow-up time of 11.5 months in patients who achieved CR; 38% of patients relapsed and 9% died. RFS was more favorable for patients who received HSCT post blinatumomab (70%) than for those who did not (30%) at month 12, respectively, which is consistent with the results from primary analysis. Among patients who had HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 45), median OS (95%) was 16.6 (7.1-NE) months vs 14.6 (10.9-24.5) months in patients without HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 65). Compared with the primary analysis, 5 additional patients received HSCT after achieving CR in the final analysis. Median OS among patients in CR after HSCT by MRD responders vs MRD non-responders was NE at 15-month analysis (Figure). Safety results in the final analysis were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis. Of 110 patients, 99% experienced TEAEs, with 65% being grade ≥3 (see Table 3 for details). TRAEs were reported in 74% of patients; 26% were grade ≥3 and 19% were deemed serious. Details on grade ≥3 TRAEs are shown in Table 3. The 9 fatal AEs, unrelated to blinatumomab, occurred due to relapse and progressive nature of the disease (Table 3). Conclusions: Overall, the safety and efficacy results from the final analysis are consistent with those reported in the primary analysis as no new safety signals were observed. These findings strengthen the observation that blinatumomab demonstrates durable efficacy and is a suitable treatment option in children with R/R BCP-ALL. Table 1. Disclosures Locatelli: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceeutical: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zugmaier:Amgen: Current Employment, Other: Personal Fees ; 20190300609: Patents & Royalties: Licensed patient . Mergen:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Research Funding. Schlegel:bluebird bio: Honoraria. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel Support. Handgretinger:Amgen: Honoraria. Brethon:Amgen: Other: invitation to meetings, remunerations for oral presentations, advices for the record of Blinatumomab in pediatrics in France. Rössig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kormany:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viswagnachar:IQVIA: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Response Adaptive Salvage Treatment with Carfilzomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Failing Front-Line Bortezomib-Based Induction Therapy - Final Analysis from the Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM17 Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1663-1663
Author(s):  
Rose Turner ◽  
Hang Quach ◽  
Noemi Horvath ◽  
Ian H Kerridge ◽  
Flora Yuen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Depth Of Response

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival rates in multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly improved in recent decades with the advent of high-dose chemotherapy conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and the availability of novel agents for induction therapy (Kumar SK et al. Blood 2008). Failure to respond to front-line bortezomib-based induction therapy remains a significant clinical challenge in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and is associated with poor outcomes with shortened progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Lee SE et al. Ann Hematol. 2014). In combination with immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), carfilzomib, a second generation proteosome inhibitor, has been shown to be highly effective in the context of MM induction with high rates of negativity for minimal residual disease (MRD) and few dose limiting toxicities (Langren O et al. Leukemia 2019). The ALLG MM17 trial is a multicentre single arm study of carfilzomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (KTd) in TE NDMM patients refractory or with suboptimal response to bortezomib-based induction therapy, designed to evaluate the efficacy of early response adaption with a switch to an intensive salvage strategy. METHOD Eligible patients included those with TE NDMM, aged 18 years and older, demonstrating sub-optimal response to bortezomib-based induction therapy (failure to achieve a minimal response after 2 cycles, partial response [PR] after 4 cycles, or disease progression within 60 days of completing induction). Salvage therapy consisted of 100mg daily oral thalidomide, with 20 mg of oral dexamethasone and 20mg/56mg of IV carfilzomib on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, with of each 28-day cycle. Following 4 cycles, patients in stringent complete response (sCR) proceeded to melphalan conditioned ASCT whereas those in less than sCR received a further 2 cycles of KTd prior to ASCT. Consolidation therapy consisted of a further 2 cycles of KTd, followed by maintenance 100mg daily thalidomide and 40mg weekly dexamethasone (Td) continuing until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 12 months of therapy. Primary objectives were to determine the overall response rate (ORR) and safety profile of treatment with KTd salvage therapy, with secondary objectives to determine the maximal depth of response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) achieved with sequential treatment with KTd salvage, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation, and maintenance Td therapy. Efficacy assessments were performed via serum protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain and bone marrow evaluation. Next generation flow (NGF) cytometry MRD evaluation of bone marrow aspirate was undertaken pre-ASCT, at day 100 post-ASCT, after 2 cycles of consolidation KTd, and following completion of Td using standardized 8-colour EuroFlow platform. RESULTS 50 patients were recruited across 6 Australian sites between September 2016 and April 2018. Overall response rate to KTd salvage was 78% (Credible Interval 95%: 64.4-87.1%), with dual proof of concept criteria met (observed ORR ≥ 50% and posterior probability that the true ORR exceeds 30% is ≥ 0.90). Response rates included 12% sCR, 6% CR, 38% VGPR, and 22% PR. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment (32%) including 10 cases (20%) of progressive disease, and 2 patient deaths without progression. NGF MRD negativity was found to be 32%, 36% and 55% at the pre-ASCT, post-ASCT and post-consolidation time-points. At the cut-off date, estimated median follow-up for disease status was 38.6 months and median PFS and OS had not been reached. At 36 months PFS and OS were 63.9% (95%CI: 49.0 - 75.5%) and 79.9% (95%CI: 65.8 - 88.6%) respectively (Figure 1). KTd was found to be well tolerated with 44% of patients experiencing a grade 3 of higher adverse event (AE). Most common AEs included upper respiratory infection (48%), peripheral neuropathy (36%), musculoskeletal pain (32%), dyspnoea (28%), fatigue or lethargy (28%), and constipation (28%). Significant cardiac toxicity was not observed at this higher dose level of carfilzomib. CONCLUSION Results demonstrate that response-adaptive utilisation of KTd salvage, ASCT, and consolidation therapy induces high response rates, improving depth of response with high levels of sequential MRD negativity, and durable responses with an acceptable toxicity profile in TE NDMM patients failing bortezomib-based induction therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Quach: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen/Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kalff: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Bergin: Amgen: Other: Travel to workshop; Celgene: Consultancy. Reynolds: Novartis AG: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Alcon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Research Funding. Spencer: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; STA: Honoraria.

Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Analysis of the Optum US Electronic Health Records and Commercial Claims Database

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Jeff Zonder ◽  
James Hoffman ◽  
Sandy W. Wong ◽  
Michaela Liedtke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Diagnosis Date

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease in which deposits of insoluble amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains accumulate and cause dysfunction of organs including the heart and kidneys. In order to reverse organ damage and improve overall survival, treatment must provide rapid, deep, and sustained hematologic responses. Although therapies approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma have demonstrated some efficacy, there are currently no health authority-approved treatments for AL amyloidosis. A retrospective observational study was undertaken to characterize patients and describe treatment patterns in patients with AL amyloidosis from real-world data in the US. Methods: Data were extracted from Optum Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (claims) databases. Eligible patients had (1) a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (ICD-10 code E85.81) on or after January 1, 2008 or (2) a diagnosis of amyloidosis (ICD-9 codes 277.30, 277.39; ICD-10 codes E85.89, E85.9) on or after January 1, 2008 and at least one line of therapy (LOT) comprising one or more of the following treatments: bendamustine bortezomib, carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, daratumumab, dexamethasone, doxorubicin, elotuzumab, etoposide, interferon alfa-2a, interferon alfa-2b, ixazomib, lenalidomide, melphalan, panobinostat, pomalidomide, prednisone/prednisolone, thalidomide, vincristine, or autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were required to have continuous medical enrollment during the 365 days prior to the index amyloidosis diagnosis date (claims data) or have first active date at least 365 days prior to index amyloidosis date (EHR data), must not have had prior cancer in the 365-day period prior to the index amyloidosis diagnosis date, and must have been age ≥18 years at time of amyloidosis diagnosis. Patients treated with dexamethasone only or dexamethasone and prednisolone only for ≤90 days and those treated with prednisone/prednisolone only irrespective of duration were excluded. LOTs were defined by a start date, an end date, and a distinct regimen made up of ≥1 drugs. Patients may have multiple sequential LOTs during the available follow-up period. Comorbidities were scored according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). A score of 0 reflects no comorbidities; higher scores reflect increased mortality risk and the maximum score is 24. Descriptive statistics are provided for patient characteristics at index diagnosis date for patients who had ≥1 LOT, distribution of regimens in each LOT, treatment attrition, and duration of treatment in each line of therapy and by regimen. Results: Data from 1688 patients (Optum claims, n=624; Optum EHR, n=1064) were included in the analysis (Figure). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years and 55.7% of patients were male. Almost 70% of patients had an index diagnosis date between 2013 and 2019. The median CCI score at index diagnosis date (based on comorbidities in the 365-day pre-index diagnosis period) was 1 and 10.9% of patients had a stem cell transplant on or after the index diagnosis date. The three most common comorbidities were hypertension (50.8%), renal failure (26.2%), and congestive heart failure (24.6%). Median follow-up period was 28 months. Treatment information for regimens used by ≥5% of patients for LOT1 is summarized in the Table. The most common treatment regimen for LOT1 was a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an alkylating agent, and a steroid (n=392, 23.2%); this combination was used for an average of 111 days. Of patients treated with this combination, the most common regimen was bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCd), used by 358 patients. Steroid only (dexamethasone for ≥90 days) regimens accounted for 16.4% and a PI ± steroid for 13.2% of LOT1. A limitation of the study is that assumptions were used to classify AL amyloidosis vs other types of amyloidosis. Conclusions: VCd is the most commonly used regimen in patients with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This is consistent with clinical guidelines and real world data from Europe (Palladini et al, EHA 2020), supporting this regimen as the current standard of care for treatment of patients with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Zonder:Intellia, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Regeneron, Alnylam, Caelum, Oncopeptides: Consultancy; BMS, Celgene: Research Funding. Hoffman:Loxo: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Wong:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Liedtke:Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abonour:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. D'Souza:Amgen, Merck, TenoBio: Research Funding; Akcea, Imbrium, Janssen, Pfizer: Consultancy. Lee:Janssen: Current Employment. Nair:Janssen: Current Employment. Potluri:SmartAnalyst Inc.: Current Employment. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lam:Janssen: Current Employment. Mehra:Janssen: Current Employment.

The Single-Agent Bcl-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Responses Observed In All Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1789-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
John F. Gerecitano ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Research ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract Introduction New treatment options are needed for patients (pts) with R/R NHL, particularly in MCL where there are no curative options. Dysregulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 is a hallmark of NHL pathogenesis and contributes to chemotherapy resistance. ABT-199 is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable small molecule Bcl-2 inhibitor that is a promising agent for the treatment of pts with NHL. Methods The primary objectives of this phase I, dose-escalation study were to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ABT-199. Secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy of ABT-199 and to explore biomarkers for response. Adult pts requiring therapy, with ECOG performance status ≤1 and adequate marrow function (ANC ≥1.0 x 109/L, Plt ≥50 x 109/L) received ABT-199 on Week 1 Day -7 (W1D-7), followed by continuous, once-daily dosing from W1D1 until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. A 2 to 3 week lead-in period with stepwise escalation starting with lower doses to final cohort doses of 200, 300, 400, 600, and 900 mg was implemented. Evaluations include adverse events (AE; NCI-CTCAE-V4), PK parameters and disease responses (IWG 2007 criteria). Results As of July 4, 2013, 32 pts were enrolled, 11 (34%) with follicular (FL), 8 (25%) with MCL, 8 (25%) with diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), 1 (3%) with marginal zone (MZL), 3 (9%) with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), and 1 (3%) multiple myeloma (MM). The median age was 68 (range 35-85), 63% were male with a median of 3.5 prior therapies (range 1-7), and the median time on study was 6.0 months (range 0.5-15.0). 44% of the pts had bulky disease ≥5 cm, including ≥10 cm in 16%. 22 pts have discontinued (D/C) drug: 18 due to progressive disease, 2 due to AEs, and 2 who proceeded to stem cell transplant in ongoing response. The most common AEs of any grade (G) occurring in ≥20% of pts were nausea (41%), diarrhea (31%), vomiting (22%), fatigue (22%), and upper respiratory tract infection (22%). G 3/4 AEs occurring in >3 pts were anemia (15%), neutropenia (13%), and thrombocytopenia (13%). G 3/4 thrombocytopenia was not dose-dependent or dose-limiting. Two of 10 pts in cohort 5 experienced a DLT (G3 febrile neutropenia and G4 neutropenia) at the target dose of 600 mg. G3 laboratory tumor lysis syndrome was seen after the initial dose in 1 pt with bulky MCL (elevations in phosphate and potassium only) and 1 pt with DLBCL (elevations in phosphate and uric acid only). After a single dose with food, ABT-199 had Tmax and T1/2 of approximately 8 and 15 hours, respectively. Food increased ABT-199 bioavailability by 3-4 fold. Preliminary efficacy data are summarized in the table. Conclusions ABT-199 showed anti-tumor activity as monotherapy for several NHL subtypes, with an overall response rate of 53% in this R/R population. Anti-tumor activity was seen in all MCL and WM pts treated across the range of ABT-199 cohort doses, and responses in DLBCL and FL pts were observed at doses ≥600 mg. Dose escalation is continuing to determine the MTD and RP2D. Biomarker studies are also underway in various NHL subtypes to explore a potential correlation with response. Disclosures: Seymour: Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gerecitano:AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Kahl:AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wierda:AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Employee, which recieves commercial income related to ABT-199, Employee, which recieves commercial income related to ABT-199 Other. Rudersdorf:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Gressick:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Stock Other. Montalvo:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Yang:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Busman:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Dunbar:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Cerri:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Enschede:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Humerickhouse:AbbVie, Inc.: Employment, Stock Other. Roberts:AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Employee, recieves commercial income related to ABT-199, Employee, recieves commercial income related to ABT-199 Other, Employment.

scholarly journals The Omission of High-Dose Cytarabine during Consolidation Therapy of Ph-Positive ALL Patients Treated with Nilotinib and Low-Intensity Chemotherapy Results in an Increased Risk of Relapses Despite Non-Inferior Levels of Late BCR-ABL1 MRD Response. First Results of the Randomized Graaph-2014 Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 512-512
Author(s):  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Yves Chalandon ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
To Receive

Abstract On behalf of the GRAALL group. Introduction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In a previous randomized trial (GRAAPH-2005; Chalandon Y., Blood 2015), our group demonstrated that anthracycline and cyclophosphamide could be safely omitted during the first Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy cycle when combined to imatinib. In the present GRAAPH-2014 trial, we investigated whether the use of nilotinib, a 2 nd generation TKI, would allow further decreasing chemotherapy intensity through the omission of high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) during consolidation cycles 2 and 4. Methods. From March 2016, patients aged 18-60 years old were randomized frontline to receive 4 cycles (1=3, 2=4) of chemotherapy combined with continuous nilotinib 400 mg bid. Cycle 1 and 3 were similar in both arms, identical to the less-intensive first cycle of the previous GRAAPH-2005 trial with weekly vincristine and dexamethasone and nilotinib instead of imatinib. Cycle 2 and 4 differed between control arm A (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h, HD-AraC 3 g/sqm/12h for 2 days) and experimental arm B (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h only). Marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by both BCR-ABL1 and IG-TCR qPCR after each cycle (MRD1-4). Patients in complete remission (CR) after cycle 4 were eligible to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Non allografted patients had the option to receive autologous SCT (autoSCT) if a major molecular response (MMolR) (MRD4 BCR-ABL1 &lt;0.1%) was achieved. AlloSCT and autoSCT were followed by a 2-year imatinib maintenance. The randomization was stratified on age (≤40y, &gt;40y) and BCR-ABL1 breakpoint region (M/m-bcr). MMolR rate at MRD4 was the primary endpoint of this non-inferiority study, with a margin set at 0.15. In February 2019, the study DSMB decided to stop the randomizations after an unplanned analysis demonstrating a significant excess of relapse in arm B (without HD-AraC). An intention-to-treat analysis is provided. All patients gave informed consent. The study is registered at EudraCT under the number: 2014-002146-44. Results. A total of 156 patients were randomized (77 in arm A, and 79 in arm B). Median age was 47.1 years old (range 18.1-59.9). One-hundred and ten patients had the m-bcr (70.5%) and 46 (29.5%) the M-bcr. An IKZF1 intragenic deletion was found in 87/153 (56.9%). Median follow-up was 2.8 years (95%CI 2.6-3.1). All evaluable patients reached CR after a maximum of two cycles. Three patients died during cycle 1 (2 in arm A, 1 in arm B), and 2 during cycle 2 (1 per arm). Most patients received the 4 scheduled cycles (n=143, 91,7%). AlloSCT was performed in 91 patients (58.3%), whereas 41 patients received an autoSCT (26.3%) with no difference in allo/autoSCT rates between arms. A non-inferiority in late MRD response (MRD4) between the two arms was observed (primary endpoint). MMolR was reached in 55/75 (73.3%) and 61/78 (78.2%) of CR patients in arm A and B, respectively, with an estimated 95% CI of difference of -11% to +16% (-9.2% to +20.8% in the ITT analysis treating missing data as failures). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 86.0% in arm A versus 74.2% in arm B (p=.08, Figure A). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.6% in arm A versus 57.2% in arm B (p=.008, Figure B). Thirty-one patients experienced hematological relapse (8 in arm A and 23 in arm B). Twenty-height out of 31 relapsed patients were tested for the acquisition of BCR-ABL1 mutations, 20/28 (71%) had at least one mutation and 10/28 (36%) had a T315I mutation. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21.3%, significantly higher in arm B than in arm A (30.8% vs 10.6%, p=.007). When analyzing the CIR considering alloSCT as a competing event for relapse, a significant higher CIR was still observed in arm B as compared to arm A (Figure C). Conclusion. Four cycles of the combined administration of nilotinib and chemotherapy is very efficient for bridging younger adults with Ph-positive ALL to SCT. However, omitting HD-AraC is associated with a higher relapse incidence despite non-inferior levels of BCR-ABL1 MRD4. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Vincent: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Nilotinib as a therapy for PH-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

scholarly journals A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Blinatumomab Vs. Chemotherapy As Post-Reinduction Therapy in Low Risk (LR) First Relapse of B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) in Children and Adolescents/Young Adults (AYAs): A Report from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1331

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 363-363
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Brown ◽  
Lingyun Ji ◽  
Xinxin Xu ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Laura Hogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Relapse

Abstract Standard treatment of children and AYAs with LR first relapse of B-ALL [LR defined as bone marrow with or without extramedullary (BM±EM) relapse ≥36 months or isolated EM (IEM) relapse ≥18 months from initial diagnosis, and low (&lt;0.1%) BM minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of reinduction chemotherapy] consists of approximately 2 years of standard chemotherapy without hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The objective of this study was to compare survival [primary: disease-free (DFS); secondary: overall (OS)] of LR first relapse B-ALL patients aged 1-30 years randomized following reinduction chemotherapy (Block 1 of UKALLR3/mitoxantrone arm) to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks (Blocks 2 and 3 of UKALLR3) followed by continuation and maintenance chemotherapy of UKALLR3 (chemotherapy control) vs. the same except with integration of three 4-week cycles of blinatumomab, one replacing Block 3 chemotherapy and two added during continuation and maintenance (blinatumomab experimental). All patients with central nervous system (CNS) leukemia at relapse (isolated or combined with BM relapse) received additional intensified CNS-directed chemotherapy (intrathecal and systemic) and 1800 cGy of cranial radiation during maintenance. Patients with testicular leukemia at relapse that persisted after Block 1 reinduction received 2400 cGy testicular radiation during Block 2. A total of 255 LR patients were randomized: Blinatumomab: 127; Chemotherapy: 128. Selected baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. With median follow up of 2.9 years (data cut-off 12/31/20), the intent-to-treat (ITT) 4-year DFS (%±standard error) was 61.2±5.5% for blinatumomab vs. 48.2±6.0% for chemotherapy (p=0.15, 1-sided stratified log-rank test per pre-specified statistical plan). The 4-year OS was 91.6±3.0% for blinatumomab vs. 83.3±4.5% for chemotherapy (p=0.096). Striking differences in DFS and blinatumomab efficacy were noted according to site of first relapse (Figure 1). For BM±EM relapses, 4-year DFS was 74.0±6.4% for blinatumomab vs. 51.8±7.9% for chemotherapy (p=0.016), and 4-year OS was 96.6±2.5% for blinatumomab vs. 84.4±5.6% for chemotherapy (p=0.013). Significant predictors of DFS in Cox multivariable regression for BM±EM relapses included treatment arm, age at relapse, and time from diagnosis to first relapse (Table 2). For IEM relapses, 4-year DFS was 34.2±8.6% for blinatumomab vs. 39.3±8.5% for chemotherapy (p=0.73), and 4-year OS was 81.7±7.0% for blinatumomab vs. 80.8±7.2% for chemotherapy (p=0.61). The only predictor of DFS in IEM patients was site of first relapse [hazard ratio for testes vs. CNS 0.19 (0.04-0.87), p=0.015]. The difference in DFS between BM±EM and IEM patients was driven by excess of second relapse in isolated CNS relapse patients (Table 3). Of 64 CNS relapses, 39 (61%) had a second relapse, of which 28 (72%) were also isolated CNS, with no difference by treatment arm. Of the 191 remaining patients, 35 (18%) had a second relapse [13 (14%) blinatumomab (6 BM±EM, 7 IEM), 22 (23%) chemotherapy (15 BM±EM, 7 IEM)]. Blinatumomab cycle 1 was better tolerated than Block 3 chemotherapy, with lower rates of CTCAEv4 grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia (3% vs. 47%, p&lt;0.001), infections (5% vs. 51%, p&lt;0.001), anemia (12% vs. 57%, p&lt;0.001) and mucositis (1% vs. 7%, p=0.018). The rate of selected blinatumomab-related adverse events (AEs) in blinatumomab cycles 1/2/3 (all grades) were: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) 12%/7%/7%, seizure 3%/1%/3%; other neurotoxicity (e.g., cognitive disturbance, tremor, ataxia, dysarthria) 19%/9%/5%. All blinatumomab-related AEs were fully reversible. In conclusion, for children and AYA patients with LR first relapse of B-ALL, while there was no significant difference in outcome for the entire population, the blinatumomab arm was superior to the standard chemotherapy arm for patients with BM±EM relapse, establishing this regimen as a new standard therapy for these patients. The blinatumomab arm was not superior in IEM relapse. Isolated CNS relapse patients had a strikingly high relapse rate on both arms; better treatments are urgently needed for this subset. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brown: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KIte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borowitz: Amgen, Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member. Gore: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mirati: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OnKure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sanofi Paris: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Whitlock: Amgen; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hunger: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab, used as post-reinduction consolidation without regard to MRD

scholarly journals Real-World Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using Tisagenlecleucel That Is out of Specification for Commercial Release

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-44
Author(s):  
Jenna Rossoff ◽  
Christina Baggott ◽  
Snehit Prabhu ◽  
Holly Pacenta ◽  
Christine L Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Patient ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T

Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been extremely efficacious in pediatric patients with multiply relapsed and/or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with overall remission rates of 81% by three months post-infusion (Maude et al., N Engl J Med, 2018), and achieved FDA approval for this indication. In order for the product to meet the standards of this approval for commercial release, both the leukapheresis and manufactured products must meet a variety of specific requirements, some of which are more stringent than those in these pivotal clinical trials. The Managed Access Program (MAP) provides access to tisagenlecleucel for patients with B-ALL or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that is out of specification (OOS) for whom repeat leukapheresis is not feasible. Patients may also receive OOS tisagenlecleucel by applying for a single-patient Investigational New Drug (IND). Previous reports have shown no difference in efficacy or toxicity between patients receiving tisagenlecleucel that meets commercial release specifications and those receiving OOS tisagenlecleucel (Grupp, et al., Blood Abstr 614, 2019; Jaglowski, et al., Blood Abstr 627, 2019). This study seeks to evaluate outcomes in pediatric and young adult patients who received tisagenlecleucel via the MAP or a single-patient IND in our Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium (PRWCC). Methods Retrospective data were abstracted from the PRWCC database of patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL from fifteen different US institutions who received tisagenlecleucel as an FDA-approved therapy outside the context of a clinical trial. Patients whose cellular product was obtained through the MAP (NCT03601442) or with single patient IND approval due having either a cryopreserved leukapheresis product and/or manufactured tisagenlecleucel that did not meet specifications for commercial release were categorized as MAP/IND and those whose product met all release criteria were categorized as standard of care (SOC). Results Among 185 total infused patients in our database, 24 (13%) received tisagenlecleucel either via the MAP (n=14) or a single patient IND (n=10). Baseline patient and disease characteristics were not significantly different for MAP/IND patients versus the SOC cohorts (Table 1). Median duration of follow-up post-CAR T cell infusion for these infused patients was 342.5 days (range 107-780) versus 318 days (range 6-863) for the SOC cohort (p=0.43). Reasons for products being OOS included cell viability &lt;80% (n=17), total nucleated cell count &lt;2x109 in leukapheresis product (n=3), failed interferon gamma release assay (n=2), cryopreserved leukapheresis product collected &gt;9 months prior (n=1), and determination of residual beads &gt;50 beads/3x106cells (n=1). Overall survival at 6- and 12-months was 96% versus 83% and 85% versus 70% for the MAP/IND versus SOC, respectively. Event-free survival at 6- and 12-months was 65% versus 63% and 55% versus 51%, respectively. Probability of continued remission at 6- and 12-months among patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) at day 28 was 79% versus 75% and 66% versus 63% for the MAP/IND versus SOC, respectively (Figure 1). Comparing toxicities between patients in the MAP/IND versus SOC cohorts, cytokine release syndrome (CRS, any grade) occurred in 46% versus 61%, CRS (&gt;grade 3) in 17% versus 19%, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 8% versus 22%, and infectious complications in 54% vs. 37%, respectively (p=ns for all). Conclusions In our retrospective cohort evaluating the use of tisagenlecleucel to treat pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL in the real-world setting, neither the efficacy nor safety of tisagenlecleucel seem to be compromised by use of products OOS for commercial release. Larger studies are needed to further delineate specific cut-offs outside of which either efficacy and/or safety may truly be impacted. Disclosures Phillips: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stefanski:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Margossian:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verneris:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bmogen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Uptodate: Consultancy. Myers:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: ELIANA trial Steering Committee, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qayed:Mesoblast: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Hermiston:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Satwani:Mesoblast: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Curran:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Consultancy. Mackall:Apricity Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; Lyell Immunopharma: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; NeoImmune Tech: Consultancy. Laetsch:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Cellectis: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document