Response to Bortezomib in Combination after Relapse o Non-Response to First Treatment with Bortezomib Alone in Myeloma Multiple Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5094-5094
Author(s):  
Araceli Rubio-Martinez ◽  
Valle Recasens ◽  
Pilar Delgado ◽  
Juan Carlos Garcia-Zueco ◽  
Daniel Rubio-Felix ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Dexamethasone Group ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Multiple Patients ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Background: Bortezomib has been shown to be effective in multiple myeloma (MM), but there is a limited experience in response to re-treatment. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of Bortezomib in refractory/relapsed MM. Patients and methods: 41 patients treated with Bortezomib (1,3 mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 in a 21-day cycle) in second or more line as clinical practice protocol were included. The response was evaluated according EGBMT criteria (Bladé J, Samson D, Reece E et al). Patients that no have reached response after 4 courses or relapsed after CR or PR received a combination of: bortezomib+dexamethasone (group BD) or bortezomib+melphalan+prednisone (group BMP). Adverse effects were registered. Results: 39 valuable patients (males 43.0%). Mean age 59.9 years (34–82), over 65 years (66.6%). Bortezomib was administered in second line: 10 (25.6%), in third or more: 29 (74.3%). Overall Response: 76.4%: (CR+PR 70.5%, MR 5.9%), (CR 41.1%/CR-IFE negative 14.7%), Mean courses to reached response: 4.7. No relation to response and presence or not chromosomal aberrations. At 32 months on follow-up 9 patients had dead (26.4%) and 15 (44.1%) maintained response without therapy. In 17 patients (43.5%), a combination of BD (10 patients) or BMP (7 patients) were administrated by relapse or progression. Responses: group BD 6 PR, 3 NR; 1NV group BM P 3 PR, 3 NR, 1NV. Adverse events: thrombocytopenia 38.4 (grade III: 17.9), fatigue 38.5%, peripheral neuropathy 33.3, constipation 35.8%, diarrhea 20.5%, ZHV 12.8%, infection 33.3, pyrexia 10.2%, hypotension 5.1%, grade 3 leucopenia 12.8%. In 3 patients (7.6%) the therapy was disrupted by toxicity. We haven’t found any differences in adverse events in patients treated with bortezomib in combination. Conclusions: Related to the synergism of Bortezomib in combination, the re-treatment induces response (60%) in refractory MM without severe adverse effects. In spite of the scarce follow-up some patients could be benefit in re-treatment with Bortezomib. It is necessary to explore more combinations and to know the results of clinical trials. When there is not response after the 4th course of Bortezomib it is recommendable to use in combination

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Combination of Lenalidomide, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (RMPT) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 868-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Patrizia Falco ◽  
Grazia Sanpaolo ◽  
Antonietta Falcone ◽  
Vincenzo Ferderico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Combination ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients the addition of lenalidomide or thalidomide or bortezomib to the standard oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival. In advanced MM, the 4 drug combination VMPT further improves response rate. In this multicenter open label phase I/II trial the safety/efficacy profile of the 4 drug combination, lenalidomide, melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (RMPT) was evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Methods: Oral lenalidomide was administered at 10 mg/day on days 1–21, oral melphalan at 0.18 mg/kg on days 1–4, oral prednisone at 2 mg/kg on days 1–4. Thalidomide was administered at 50 mg/day (Arm A) or 100 mg/day (Arm B) on days 1–28. Each course was repeated every 28 days for a total of 6 courses. Aspirin 100 mg/day was given as a prophylaxis for thrombosis. Maintenance therapy included lenalidomide alone at 10 mg/day on days 1–21. Results: Forthy-four patients, median age 69 years (range 47–80), with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled. Twenty-six patients received RMPT as second line of therapy, 18 as third line. Twenty patients received prior autologous transplant, 10 thalidomide-based regimen, 9 bortezomib-based regimen and 3 allogeneic stem cell transplant. After a median of 2 courses, 75.8% of patients achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 30% very good partial response (VGPR). Among patients who received RMPT as second line therapy the PR rate was 81.8%, including VGPR 36.4%.Among patients who received thalidomide 100 mg, the PR rate was 93.3% (including VGPR 46.7%) compared to 64.7% of thalidomide 50 mg. The 1-year-progressionfree survival was 48.6% and the 1-year survival from study entry was 90%. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included: neutropenia (66.6%), thrombocytopenia (36.3%) and anemia (30.2%). Grade 3–4 non hematologic adverse events included: infections (21.2%), neurological toxicity (6%) and fatigue (9%). No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion: Initial results showed that RMPT is an effective salvage therapy with a high proportion of responses. Toxicities were manageable. No thromboembolic complications were reported.

scholarly journals Two-Year Follow-up of Investigator-Initiated Phase 1 Trials of the Safety and Efficacy of Fully Human Anti-Bcma CAR T Cells (CT053) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Siguo Hao ◽  
Jie Jin ◽  
Songfu Jiang ◽  
Zonghai Li ◽  
Wenhao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a potential therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. CT053 comprises autologous T cells transduced with a second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) utilizing a fully human BCMA-specific single-chain fragment variant (25C2) with high binding affinity. CT053 was firstly studied in a single-arm, open-label Phase I, investigator-initiated program (NCT03716856, NCT03302403, and NCT03380039) in eastern China. Here we present the 24-month follow-up results of the study. Methods: The multicenter exploratory Phase 1 studies included adult subjects with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had received at least 2 prior lines of myeloma treatment. After preconditioning treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for 2-4 days, 21 subjects received one cycle of 1.5 × 108 T cells CT053 CAR-BCMA T cells. Three subjects respectively received 0.5 × 108, 1 × 108, or 1.8 × 108 cells. The primary objective was subject safety. The secondary objectives were pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Efficacy was assessed according to IMWG 2016 criteria. Results: A total of 24 subjects with a median age of 60.1 years (range, 38.5-69.9) were enrolled from Sept. 10, 2017 to Sept. 22, 2018. The subjects had a median of 4.5 (range, 2-11) prior lines of therapy, and 41.7% (10/24) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. At baseline, 10 subjects (41.7%) had concomitant extramedullary involvement, 8 subjects (33.3%) had ECOG scores 2-3, and 9 subjects (37.5%) reported ISS Grade III. As of June 30, 2020, 9 subjects completed 24 months of follow-up with responses including 8 stringent complete response (sCR) and 1 complete response (CR). Also, 15 subjects discontinued prior to completing the 24-month follow-up, of whom 13 discontinued due to disease progression (PD), and 2 discontinued for other anticancer therapy. The overall response rate was 87.5% (21/24) including 79.2% (19/24) with complete responses or stringent complete responses (3 CR, 16 sCR). The median duration of response (DOR) was 21.8 months (95%CI: 9.2, not evaluable [NE]). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.8 months (95%CI: 10.1, NE), with 6-month and 12-month PFS rates of 87% and 60.9%, respectively. Thirteen subjects progressed with median PFS of 10.2 months (range, 0.9-23 months): 3 progressed within 6 months, 6 progressed within 6-12 months, and 4 within 12-24 months. Compared to 9 subjects with persistent CR/sCR, the 13 progressed subjects had a higher percentage of ECOG scores 2-3 (46.2% vs 22.2%), ISS Grade III (53.9% vs 11.1%) and high-risk cytogenetics profiles (53.8% vs 33.3%). Rates of concomitant extramedullary diseases were similar, 46.2% and 44.4%, respectively. Hematological toxicities were the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade (G) 3 or higher, including leukopenia (83.3%), neutropenia (85%), lymphocytopenia (79.2%) and thrombocytopenia (20.8%). In general, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred at 1-4 days and resolved in a median 6 days (range, 3-9 days). Low-grade CRS was reported in 15 of 24 (62.5%) subjects. All CRS events (4 G1, 11 G2) resolved within 2-8 days; among them, 9 patients received a low dose of tocilizumab 4-6 mg/kg. One patient experienced G3 neurotoxicity, presenting as epilepsy and accompanied by simultaneous G2 CRS. This patient fully recovered within 3 days after treatment with methylprednisolone, diazepam and sodium valproate. Six patients (25%) experienced 10 cases of treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs), including lung infection (3), gastroenteritis (1), neutropenic infection (1), fever (1) and hematological toxicities (4). By the cutoff date, one subject died of SAE a (bone morrow failure and neutropenic infection) and PD, and seven subjects died of PD. CAR-BCMA T cell expansion was detectable as early as day 1-7 after infusion and reached peak values on day 7-21 with the highest concentration at 4.5×105 copies/µg genomic DNA. Median T cell persistence was 172 days. The longest persistence of CAR-BCMA copies was measured at 341 days and continues. No immunogenicity was detected. Conclusion: These studies demonstrated that CT053 had excellent efficacy in RRMM, showing early, deep and durable response with 21.8 months DOR. CT053 was well tolerated among the subjects. Figure Disclosures Li: CARsgen Therapeutics Co. LtD: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Wang:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Xiao:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Yuan:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment. Ma:CARsgen Therapeutics Corp.: Current Employment.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ixazomib-Based Regimens in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Routine Clinical Practice: Real World Data from a Multi-Center Study in China

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5592-5592
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Li Bao ◽  
Zhong-jun Xia ◽  
Kaiyang Ding ◽  
Bingzong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Refractory Diseases

J Li, L Bao, ZJ Xia and KY Ding contributed equally to this study. Background: Based on the promising results shown in the phase 3 trial (TOURMALINE-MM1, NCT01564537) and the China Continuation Study of MM1, the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (ixa) was approved in China in April of 2018, in combination with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) (IRd), for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Data on the efficacy and safety of ixa-based therapy in Chinese pts with MM in real-life practice is rather limited. A large national, multi-center, real-world study involving 14 centers from different areas of China was performed to investigate the current status of ixa usage in China and to evaluate the efficacy and safety in routine clinical practice. A total of 246 ixa-treated MM pts was enrolled, with 163 (66.3%) RRMM, 60 (24.4%) newly diagnosed MM and 23 (9.4%) pts received ixa as maintenance. Herein, we reported the data of RRMM in this study. Methods: Medical records, including demographics, disease characteristics, treatment regimen and duration, response rate, adverse events (AEs) and survival, of ixa-treated (at least one cycle completed with response evaluation result) RRMM pts were analyzed. Results: A total of 149 evaluable pts (out of 163 RRMM pts) treated from April 2018, to July 2019 were included in analysis. Baseline features and prior treatment are summarized in Table 1. Patients were categorized into MM1 trial-eligible/-ineligible groups according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of MM1 study. Median age was 62 years (range 33 - 87) with 52 (34.9%) ≥65 years. Most pts (75.2%) had ISS stage II-III disease. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (including del 17p, t (4;14), and/or t (14;16)) were detected in 19 patients (21.1%, among 90 patients with FISH results). Fifty-two (34.9%) pts had a ECOG PS ≥2. Overall, ixa-based regimens were used as the 2nd/3rd/4th/≥5th-line therapy in 29.7%, 33.1%, 16.2% and 17.4% of the pts, respectively. Prior treatment included bortezomib (91.9%), len (52.0%) and thalidomide (58.8%). More than half pts (54.7%) were refractory to previous bortezomib treatment, and 32.2% pts were len-refractory. MM-1 trial-ineligible pts had more advanced ISS stage, higher ECOG PS, more severe anemia, more lines of prior therapy and more refractory diseases. Treatment, outcome and survival were listed in Table 2. Ixa-based regimens included IRd in 70 (47.0%) patients, ixa-dex (Id) in 31 (20.8%) patients and Id plus chemotherapeutics/other agents (44, 29.5%; including cyclophosphamide in 14 pts, thalidomide in 12 pts, adriamycin in 6 pts, melphalan in 5 pts and daratumumab in 3 pts) in 20 (33.3%). (Table 2). One patient received stem cell transplantation (SCT) during follow-up. The best confirmed ORR (≥PR) for all 149 patients was 53.7% (80/149), including 28.2% of patients with ≥VGPR and 7.4% with a CR, with a median time to response of 41.5 days. Surprisingly, ixa-based regimens demonstrated efficacy in pts with PI/len refractory diseases, with an ORR and ≥VGPR rate of 44.4% and 19.9% for PI-refractory pts, and an ORR and ≥VGPR rate of 30.6% and 12.2% for len-refractory pts. Pts eligible for MM1 study shown comparable ORR (76.7%) with that reported in MM1 (ORR 78%). No significant difference in response between different ixa-based regimens was observed. The median PFS of the whole cohort, pts with standard/high cytogenetic risks, pts refractory to bortezomib/len and pts eligible/ineligible for MM1 trial was 8.2, 8.2, 6.8, 6.7, 5.9months, not reached and 6.6months respectively. The median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort and every subgroup was not reached. Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3/4, reported in 40 (27.2%) patients, included 10.1% thrombocytopenia, 5.4% anemia, 3.4% diarrhea and 6.0% pneumonia. Only 3 (2.01%) pts had a grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy during follow-up. Discussion and conclusion: Our results show that ixa-based therapy demonstrated good efficacy with limited toxicity for pts with RRMM in real-life clinical practice. Moreover, in pts with PIs- or len- refractory diseases, ixa-based therapy still showed acceptable effectiveness (ORR: 44.4% and 30.6%; mPFS: 6.7 months and 5.9 months). Although 70.5% pts in our real-life cohort were ineligible for MM1 trial, the efficacy and safety profile is similar to that reported in MM1 China Continuation Study. Ixa-based therapy is a reasonable choice for Chinese RRMM pts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Analysis of Adverse Events of Dasatinib and Nilotinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Outside Clinical Trials

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1902-1902
Author(s):  
Koung Jin Suh ◽  
Ji Yun Lee ◽  
Dong-Yeop Shin ◽  
Youngil Koh ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Day Range ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Background Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) encounter lifelong treatment. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are therefore one of the most important factors when making treatment decisions; yet studies focusing on AEs in "real life" setting and their impact on drug discontinuation and treatment outcomes are lacking. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the rates and severity of AEs in 201 patients with chronic phase CML treated with nilotinib or dasatinib used as both first- and second-line therapy in two Korean tertiary care centers. AEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from the start of the treatment to the earliest date of any of following event: treatment discontinuation due to AEs, loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), loss of major molecular response (MMR), progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blastic phase (BP), discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, and death from any cause on therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of the treatment to the earliest date of any of following event: loss of CHR, MCyR, MMR, progression to AP or BP, discontinuation due to treatment failure as assessed by the clinician, and death from any cause on therapy. Results There were 135 men (67%) and 66 women (33%). One-hundred and twenty (60%) received nilotinib (first line, n = 68; second line, n = 52) and 81 (40%) patients received dasatinib (first line, n = 37; second line, n = 44). For the majority of patients who received second line treatment with nilotinib and dasatinib, reason for imatinib discontinuation was resistance (81% in nilotinib group and 80% in dasatinib group). The median starting dose of nilotinib was 600mg/day (range 600 - 800mg/day) and dasatinib 100mg/day (range 100-140mg/day). During the median follow-up of 36.9 months (8.0 - 114.1) for nilotinib group and 37.2 months (2.2 - 95.0) for dasatinib group, 88.3% (106/120) of patients in nilotinib group and 86.4% (70/81) in dasatinib group experienced AEs. Dasatinib group had significantly higher grade 3-4 AEs compared to nilotinib group (21.7% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.001); however, rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological AEs were similar in both groups (13% vs. 14%, p = 0.960). Dasatinib group had more frequent dose reduction, interruption, and drug discontinuation (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.006, respectively). At the time of analysis, 58 out of 201 (29%) discontinued treatment because of AEs (n = 47, 23%), resistance (n = 9, 5%), or other reasons (n = 2, 1%). Eighty one percent (47 out of 58) of drug discontinuation was due to AEs, and half of AE leading to drug discontinuation was grade 2. Treatment discontinuation occurred more rapidly in the first line setting than in the second line setting (duration of treatment, 2.9 months vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.015). Pleural effusion occurred in 35% (n = 28) in dasatinib group, and led to dasatinib discontinuation in 14 patients (Grade 2, n = 11; Grade 3, n = 3). One patient stopped dasatinib due to pulmonary artery hypertension. In nilotinib group, stroke, acute coronary syndrome and peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) occurred in 5% (n = 6); only PAOD led to nilotinib discontinuation. Dasatinib group had significantly shorter duration of EFS than nilotinib group (median EFS not reached [NR] vs. 48.7 months, p = 0.040 for first line treatment; NR vs. 50.5 months, p = 0.036 for second line treatment). However, PFS did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0.505 for first line and p = 0.179 for second line). Conclusion AE was the main cause of nilotinib and dasatinib discontinuation in CML patients. Persistent grade 2 AEs, especially pleural effusion, were hard to manage and this translated into early discontinuation of drug especially in the first line setting and significantly shorter EFS in dasatinib treated patients compared to nilotinib treated patients. Large, prospective population based studies with long term follow-up are warranted to confirm our finding. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

PP455 Cost-effectiveness Of Ixazomib-Based Regimen Compared With Bortezomib-Based Regimen In Chinese Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Pei Wang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Peng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

IntroductionThe treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a common hematological malignancy, remains a great challenge in China, partially due to the limited accessibility to novel agents and inadequate public health insurance coverage. Ixazomib, a novel oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for RRMM in 2018. While bortezomib, a traditional PI, is the recommended agent in the clinical guideline for MM. Here, we compared their costs and effectiveness.MethodsRRMM patients who has received an ixazomib-based regimen (at least 2 cycles) were analyzed. Using a propensity score matching method, we generated a control group of RRMM patients who received the bortezomib-based regimen. The criteria included the number of treatment lines, age, and the revised international staging system stage (R-ISS) which representing the disease stage for myeloma, and paired at a ratio of 1:2 (allowing one control to match multiples). The difference in hospitalization stay, grade 3/4 adverse events rates, overall response rate (ORR), mortality during treatment, and treatment costs was then compared.ResultsNineteen patients received ixazomib and twenty-seven that received bortezomib were included. The ixazomib-group demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (9 days versus 27 days, p < 0.001), lower grade 3–4 adverse events rates (42.1% versus 55.6%, p < 0.001), higher ORR (63.2% versus 48.1%, p = 0.228), and lower mortality rate during treatment (0% versus 7.4%, p = 0.169) than that of bortezomib-group. The ixazomib group had lower total costs (127,620CNY versus 156,424CNY [18,033USD versus 22,103USD], p > 0.05), lower drug costs (98,376CNY versus 103,307CNY [13,901USD versus 14,598USD], p > 0.05), and the lower costs of supportive treatment (5,507CNY versus 14,701 CNY [778USD versus 2,077USD], p < 0.001). Only in terms of self-funded costs, the bortezomib-based regimen was significantly lower (37,127CNY versus 11,521CNY [5,246USD versus 1,628USD], p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared with the bortezomib-based regimen, the ixazomib-based regimen has better therapeutic effects on MM patients while saving costs. Hence, it may be preferable for use in the treatment of RRMM in China.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Depth of response and minimal residual disease status in ultra high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd): Results of the UK optimum/MUKnine trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8001-8001
Author(s):  
Martin F. Kaiser ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Ruth De Tute ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Ultra High Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

8001 Background: Patients with ultra high-risk (UHiR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) continue to have dismal outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. Recently, improved responses with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody combination therapy have been reported for NDMM patients. We report here outcomes for NDMM UHiR and PCL patients treated in the OPTIMUM/MUKnine (NCT03188172) trial with daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd) induction, augmented high-dose melphalan (HDMEL) and ASCT. With final analysis follow-up surpassed in Feb 2021, we report here early protocol defined endpoints from induction to day 100 post ASCT. Methods: Between Sep 2017 and Jul 2019, 107 patients with UHiR NDMM by central trial genetic (≥2 high risk lesions: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain(1q), del(1p), del(17p)) or gene expression SKY92 (SkylineDx) profiling, or with PCL (circulating plasmablasts > 20%) were included in OPTIMUM across 39 UK hospitals. Patients received up to 6 cycles of Dara-CVRd induction, HDMEL and ASCT augmented with bortezomib, followed by Dara-VR(d) consolidation for 18 cycles and Dara-R maintenance. Primary trial endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) status post ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. Data is complete but subject to further data cleaning prior to conference. Results: Median follow-up for the 107 patients in the safety population was 22.2 months (95% CI: 20.6 – 23.9). Two patients died during induction due to infection. Bone marrow aspirates suitable for MRD assessment by flow cytometry (10-5 sensitivity) were available for 81% of patients at end of induction and 78% at D100 post ASCT. Responses in the intention to treat population at end of induction were 94% ORR with 22% CR, 58% VGPR, 15% PR, 1% PD, 5% timepoint not reached (TNR; withdrew, became ineligible or died) and at D100 post ASCT 83% ORR with 47% CR, 32% VGPR, 5% PR, 7% PD, 10% TNR. MRD status was 41% MRDneg, 40% MRDpos and 19% not evaluable post induction and 64% MRDneg, 14% MRDpos and 22% not evaluable at D100 post ASCT. Responses at D100 post ASCT were lower in PCL with 22% CR, 22% VGPR, 22% PR, 22% PD, 12% TNR. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs during induction were neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and infection (12%). Grade 3 neuropathy rate was 3.7%. Conclusions: This is to our knowledge the first report on a trial for UHiR NDMM and PCL investigating Dara-CVRd induction and augmented ASCT. Response rates were high in this difficult-to-treat patient population, with toxicity comparable to other induction regimens. However, some early progressions highlight the need for innovative approaches to UHiR NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT03188172.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4774-4774
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Laura V. Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Leonard M Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document