Phase I-II Study of Fludarabine, Cytarabine and Oxaliplatin In Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract Abstract 4274 Introduction: The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is dismal. We designed a Phase I-II combination therapy of fludarabine, cytarabine and oxaliplatin (FAO) for patients with relapsed/refractory AML or high-risk MDS, hypothesizing that a mechanistic interaction of these agents combined would increase the leukemic cell death. Patients and Method: FAO consisted of fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV (Days 2–6); cytarabine 500mg/m2 IV continuous infusion (Days 2–6); and escalating doses of oxaliplatin (20, 25, 30 or 35mg/m2/day IV) (Days 1–4) (phase I). Patients received antibacterial, antiviral, antinausea and tumor lysis prophylaxis. Treatment was given every 28 days. Dose limited toxicity (DLT) was defined as any ≥ grade 3 non-hematological toxicity lasting ≥ 3 days involving a major organ system (brain, heart, kidney, liver, or lung). The maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin was used in the phase II portion of the study. The study was conducted based on an outcome-adaptive Bayesian procedure (Thall and Cook) and using the program “efficacy toxicity dose finding” (MD Anderson, Department of Biostatistics website). Results: Twenty-seven patients were treated: phase I, n=12 (3 patients per oxaliplatin dose level); and phase II, n=15. The median age was 58 years (range, 6–71). Six patients were ≥ 65 years. There were 11 men and 16 women. Six patients had performance status (PS) 0, 16 had 1 and 5 patients had PS 2. Twenty-one patients had complex cytogenetics (CG), 3 normal and 3 hyperdiploid. All patients were pretreated, including 11 patients who had prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). DLTs were Grade 3 transaminitis; Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia; and Grade 3 renal insufficiency and were all noted at the 35mg/m2/d oxaliplatin dose level. Therefore, the phase II recommended dose of oxaliplatin was 30 mg/m2/day. No DLT was noted in 18 patients treated at oxaliplatin 30 mg/m2/day dose level. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity was noted as follows: diarrhea (4 of 27 patients), hyperbilirubinemia (3 of 27 patients) and transaminitis (3 of 27 patients). Five of 27 (18.5%) patients responded to FAO (CR, n=3; CRp, n=2). Three of the 5 responders had prior SCT. Characteristics and clinical outcomes of responders are shown in Table: Conclusion: The Phase II recommended dose of FAO was fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV (Days 2–6); cytarabine 500mg/m2 IV continuous infusion (Days 2–6); and oxaliplatin 30mg/m2/day IV (Days 1–4) and it was well tolerated. FAO had significant antitumor activity in selected patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory poor-risk AML and warrants further investigation. Disclosures: Tsimberidou: Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Oxaliplatin - off-label use in a Phase I-II clinical trial (combined with fludarabine and cytarabine) for patients with relapsed/refractory AML or high-risk MDS.

Download Full-text

Update of a Phase I Study of Sorafenib in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.893.893 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 893-893 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

John Delmonte ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Michael Andreeff ◽

Stefan Faderl ◽

John J. Wright ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽

Phase I ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Maximal Response ◽

Daily Dose ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

The critical importance of the Ras, VEGF, and FLT3 pathways in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been well established. FLT3 abnormalities, internal tandem duplication (ITD) and point mutations, occur in about 30% of pts with AML and the FLT3-ITD mutation independently confers poor prognosis. Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the above pathways and is highly potent against FLT3-ITD mutants (IC50 1–3 nM) (ASH abstract, 2006). We are conducting a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different schedules of sorafenib. To date, 21 patients (pts) with refractory/relapsed AML (n=20) and high risk MDS (n=1) have been enrolled. Pts were randomized to sorafenib for 5 days per week for 21 days (arm A; n=11) or for 14 days every 21 days (arm B; n=10). In both arms the starting dose level (DL) is 200 mg twice daily. Successive dose levels are 600, 800, and 1200 mg daily in a standard 3+3 design. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were obtained for evaluation of FLT3 status and phosphorylated and total FLT3 and ERK expression. Median age is 62 years (range, 33–82), number of prior therapies 2 (range, 1–5), time from diagnosis to sorafenib treatment 9 months (range, 2–46), and median duration on study was 1.2 months (range, 0.1–3.4). Twenty pts are evaluable. 9/20 (45%) pts received ≤ 1 cycle of sorafenib because of disease progression (n=6), self-discontinuation (n=2), or no benefit (n=1), of whom 5 (56%) were FLT3-ITD negative, 3 (33%) were FLT3-ITD positive, and 1 (11%) was not tested. In contrast, 11/20 (55%) pts received > 1 cycle of sorafenib, of whom 8 (73%) were FLT3-ITD positive and 3 (27%) were FLT3-ITD negative; reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (n=5), self-discontinuation (n=2), stem cell transplant (n=2), or no benefit (n=2). Sorafenib has been well tolerated with 1 pt achieving a DLT of grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia at the 800 mg daily dose in arm B, but the MTD has not been reached; this cohort has been expanded. The only other grade 3 toxicity has been pleural effusion at the 600 mg daily dose in arm A, not considered a DLT because it occurred during cycle 2. A ≥ 50% reduction in PB or BM blasts was obtained in 11/20 (55%) pts. 9/11 (82%) pts harbored the FLT3-ITD mutation and had a median duration of response of 42 days (range, 15–87). In these 9 pts, the median PB absolute blast count at baseline and after maximal response to sorafenib was 10.3 (range, 0.2–18.7) and 0 (range, 0–1)(p=0.008). Median BM blast percentage at baseline and after maximal response to sorafenib was 72% (range, 14–96) and 42% (range, 12–58) (p=0.002), with 1 pt achieving a morphologic complete remission in the BM. Serial determinations of phosphorylation status following sorafenib (at 0, 2, 24,120 hours) in pts with the FLT3-ITD mutation demonstrated inhibition of phospho-FLT3 in 3/3 and phospho-ERK in 5/5 pts. In conclusion, sorafenib administration is safe in AML and appears to preferentially target the FLT3-ITD mutation. This study continues to accrue pts to define the MTD and it will be followed by combination studies of standard chemotherapy with sorafenib, with an emphasis on targeting pts with AML expressing the FLT3-ITD mutation.

Download Full-text

Oxaliplatin, Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and Rituximab Combination Therapy Induces High Response Rates in Agressive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Richter's Syndrome (RS).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3443.3443 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3443-3443 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽

William Wierda ◽

William Plunkett ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Off Label ◽

Level 3 ◽

Level 1 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Level 2

Abstract Abstract 3443 Poster Board III-331 Introduction The first Phase I-II clinical trial of oxaliplatin, fluradabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), and rituximab (OFAR1) demonstrated significant activity in refractory CLL and RS (Tsimberidou et al, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:196). To enhance the response rate and decrease myelosuppression, the dose of oxaliplatin was increased to 30mg daily, the dose of Ara-C was decreased to 0.5g/m2 daily and the optimal number of days of fluradabine and Ara-C administration was explored (OFAR2). Methods In a Phase I-II study of OFAR2, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 30mg/m2, D1-4; fludarabine 30mg/m2, Ara-C 0.5g/m2; rituximab 375mg/m2, D3; and pelfigrastim 6mg, D6. Fludarabine and Ara-C were given on D2-3 (dose level 1) D2-4 (dose level 2) or D2-5 (dose level 3); courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients received prophylaxis for tumor lysis, DNA viruses, and PCP. A “3+3” design was used and the planned number of patients in the Phase II was 90 (CLL, 60; RS, 30). Results Ninety-one patients (CLL, 67; RS, 24) have been treated to date: Phase I, 12 patients (by dose level: 1, n=3; 2, n=6; and 3, n=3). DLTs were noted in 2 of 3 patients on dose level 3 (G4 diarrhea, 1; G4 neutropenic sepsis, 1); thus, dose level 2 was the MTD. Seventy-nine patients (relapsed CLL, 58; RS, 19) have been treated in the Phase II portion of the study. Patient characteristics were as follows: age > 60 years, 65%; 17p deletion, 38%; 11q deletion, 13%; 13q deletion, 16%; trisomy 12, 21%; no findings, 12%; unmutated IgVH, 80%; ZAP70-positive, 75%; and CD38 ≥30%, 58%. Response in patients treated in the Phase II recommended dose is shown in Table (evaluable, 67). The overall response rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 48% and 55%, respectively. The median survival duration was 21 months (CLL, 21 months; RS, 9.5 months). At 18 months, the survival rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 66% and 76%, respectively. Twelve patients underwent stem cell transplantation after OFAR2 (as post-remission therapy, n=10; as salvage, n=2). Overall, 196 cycles were administered. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were noted in 63%, 72%, and 39% of patients and in 57%, 70%, and 25% of cycles and Grade 3-4 infections in 19% of patients. Conclusion Preliminary results demonstrated that OFAR2 induced response in 40% of patients with RS and 63% of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. OFAR2 had antileukemic activity in patients with 17p deletion. Clinical outcomes appeared to be superior to those of OFAR1 in refractory CLL, whereas results of OFAR1 appeared to be superior to those of OFAR2 in RS. Accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Tsimberidou: ASCO: ASCO Career Development Award; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Oxaliplatin is used off-label. Wierda:Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, GSK: Research Funding; GSK, Trubion, Ligand, Genentech, Medimmune, Abbot: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Plunkett:Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. O'Brien:Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy. Kipps:NCI: Grant P01CA-81534.

Download Full-text

Early Results Of a Phase I/II Trial Of Midostaurin (PKC412) and 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) For Patients (Pts) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3949.3949 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3949-3949

Author(s):

Paolo Strati ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

Aziz Nazha ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Naval G. Daver ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Flt3 Mutations ◽

Flt3 Inhibitors ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) affect primarily elderly pts. Their treatment with aggressive chemotherapy is frequently challenging. Moreover, pts with FLT3 mutations have very poor prognosis. We hypothesized that the combination of midostaurin, a FLT3 inhibitor, and 5-AZA, a hypomethylating agent, may be an effective and safe regimen. Methods Both untreated (8) and previously treated (36) pts with AML or MDS were eligible for this study, regardless of FLT3 mutation and prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. Pts received 5-AZA 75 mg/mq subcutaneously or intravenously on day 1-7 and midostaurin 25 mg bid (in cohort 1 of phase I) or 50 mg bid (in cohort 2 of Phase I and in Phase II) orally on day 8-21 during the first cycle and continuously thereafter, for 12 cycles of 28 days duration. Cytogenetic risk was defined according to MRC criteria. Differences between categorical variables were compared by the chi2 test. CR duration (CRD) was calculated from the time of CR achievement until relapse and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results Fourty-four pts were enrolled, 13 included in Phase I and 31 in Phase II. Baseline pts’ characteristics are shown in the Table. Thirty-eight pts (86%) received 50 mg bid of midostaurin, and 6 (14%; Phase I) received 25 mg bid. The median number of administered cycles was 2 (1-9). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities consisted of 95% neutropenia, 64% anemia and 93% thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities consisted of 45% infections, 23% hypokalemia, 16% hyponatremia, 7% reduction in ejection fraction, 7% hyperuricemia, 4% hyperglycemia, 4% nausea/vomiting, 4% QTc prolongation, 4% hyperbilirubinemia, and 4% elevated AST. Eleven pts (25%) achieved a CR, 9 with incomplete platelet recovery (20%), after a median time of 13 (10-16) weeks from treatment start. Five (11%) of these pts relapsed after achieving CR. Two pts (5%) received an allogeneic stem cell transplant while on study, one in CR and one primary refractory (after a blast count drop from 27 to 7%), and they are both still in CR and alive. Among 26 pts with FLT3 ITD and no D835 mutation, 9 (35%) achieved CR/CRp. Six of 18 (33%) pts not previously exposed to FLT3 inhibitors responded. There was no significant correlation of dose with response (24% with 50 mg bid vs 33% with 25 mg bid, p=0.63). After a median follow-up of 15 (3-72) weeks, 20 pts (64%) died, 3 (7%) while on study (2 died of sepsis, 1 of unknown causes with progressive disease). The median CRD was 16 (9-23) months. Factors significantly associated with a longer CRD were male sex (p=0.04), age older than 65 years (0.03) and use of 50 mg bid of midostaurin (p=0.02). Conclusions The combination of midostaurin and 5-AZA is safe and well tolerated. Its efficacy is most noticeable among pts with FLT3 mutations. A longer response duration is observed using midostaurin at 50 mg bid dose and in elderly male pts. Disclosures: Ravandi: CELGENE: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASTELLAS: Research Funding; AMBIT: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Cytarabine (MEC) Following Epigenetic Priming with Decitabine in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): A Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3730.3730 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3730-3730

Author(s):

Anna B. Halpern ◽

Elihu H. Estey ◽

Megan Othus ◽

Kaysey F. Orlowski ◽

Morgan A. Powell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: Most adults with AML or high-risk MDS will ultimately require salvage therapy. However, the likelihood of achieving a complete remission (CR) with standard salvage regimens is often 15-20% or less. Emerging data suggest that pre-treatment (“priming”) with a hypomethylating agent such as decitabine can sensitize AML cells to chemotherapeutics, prompting a dose-escalation study of MEC preceded by decitabine-priming in relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS. Methods: This single arm study aimed to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of decitabine-primed MEC in adults ≥18 years with relapsed/refractory high-risk MDS (>10% blasts) or AML requiring first or subsequent salvage therapy. Previous treatment with hypomethylating agents or MEC (but not the combination) was acceptable. Trial participation required a treatment-related mortality (TRM) score of <9.2, corresponding to an expected TRM of 4% with standard induction chemotherapy. Patients with post-transplant relapse were eligible if graft-versus host disease was well controlled. Excluded were patients with concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year, and active, uncontrolled infection. Cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 3 total dose levels of decitabine (20mg/m2 for 5, 7, or 10 days) followed by MEC (mitoxantrone 8mg/m2/day x 5 days; etoposide 100 mg/m2/day x 5 days; cytarabine 1 g/m2/day x 5 days) after a break of 5 days. In the case of persistent leukemia, patients were eligible for re-induction provided all non-hematologic toxicities had resolved to grade <2. Patients achieving a CR or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) could receive 2 additional cycles of decitabine-MEC given at doses identical to those used during induction. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: 1) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection; 2) any grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of febrile neutropenia/infection or constitutional symptoms, if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days. Results: 30 patients, median age 55 (range: 19-72) years, with primary refractory disease (n=13), first relapse (n=16), or second relapse (n=1) with median duration of prior CR of 4 (range: 1-19) months were enrolled and received a median of 1 (range: 1-3) cycles of therapy. During dose escalation, 1 DLT occurred at each the 2nd and 3rd tested dose level after cycle 1 (septic shock with multi-organ failure in both), identifying a 10-day course of decitabine together with standard dose MEC as the MTD. A total of 12 patients received therapy at the MTD level. 9/30 patients achieved a CR (30%). This CR rate compared favorably relative to a historic control population with patient matching based on duration of prior remission and number of prior salvage therapies (Blood 1996; 88:756), with an observed/expected CR ratio of 1.9. 5 additional patients achieved a CRp, and 1 achieved a CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) for an overall response rate of 15/30 (50%). Furthermore, 4 patients achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state, 8 had refractory disease, and 3 died before a response was assessed. Of the 15 patients who achieved a remission, 3 remain on study, 9 were taken off protocol to pursue further intensive consolidation therapy including hematopoietic cell transplantation, and 3 have died after a median CR duration of 68 days. In the 15 responders, the median response duration was 68 days (range 0-437), with 6 of these responses ongoing. Overall survival of these 15 patients was longer (median of 211 [range: 59-484] days) than that for patients who failed to achieve remission but lived at least 29 days (i.e. did not experience TRM) (median of 110 [range: 30-303] days). Six patients died within 28 days of treatment initiation for a TRM rate of 20%: 4 from infection, 1 from intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 from unknown cause. Besides grade 3-4 cytopenias, cough, fatigue, nausea and infection/neutropenic fever were the most common adverse events. Conclusion: Decitabine-primed MEC is feasible, well tolerated, and has anti-leukemic activity in relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS. A phase 2 study based on these findings has been initiated. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off-label use of some of the study drugs for either AML or high-risk MDS.

Download Full-text

Combination of Sorafenib and 5-Azacytidine Has Significant Activity in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory or Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia and FLT3-ITD mutation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1519.1519 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1519-1519

Author(s):

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Mona Lisa Alattar ◽

Mark J. Levis ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Mary A Richie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽

Off Label Use ◽

Off Label ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 1519 Background: The outcome of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and FLT3-ITD mutation is poor, particularly in the relapse setting. Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of FLT3 kinase with reported clinical activity as a single agent (Metzelder S, Blood, 2009), and in combination with chemotherapy (Ravandi F, JCO, 2010). A potential mechanism of resistance to FLT3 kinase inhibitors is high levels of FLT3 ligand (FL) as seen after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We hypothesized that combining sorafenib with a less myelosuppressive agent, such as 5-azacytidine (AZA), may lead to higher and more durable responses than cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, both drugs have demonstrated a potential for inducing differentiation in AML cells, thereby providing further rationale for the combination. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory AML, were 18 years of age or older, and had adequate performance status (ECOG ≤ 2) and organ function. Older pts without prior therapy were also eligible, if they were deemed unsuitable to receive chemotherapy. Presence of FLT3-ITD was not a requirement but these pts were targeted for enrollment. Treatment regimen included AZA 75 mg/m2 daily for 7 days together with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily for 28 days; cycles were repeated in approximately 4 to 5-week intervals. Overall responses were assessed after the completion of at least one cycle of therapy and at the time of the best peripheral blood and bone marrow response. Plasma samples were collected on approximately Day 1 and Day 10 of each cycle. To assess the degree of FLT3 inhibition, the plasma inhibitory activity (PIA) assay was performed using the Molm-14 cell line (Levis M, Blood, 2006). Plasma FL concentrations were measured using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems). Results: 43 pts with AML with a median age of 64 years (range, 24–87) were enrolled. They included 19 (44%) pts with diploid cytogenetics, 11 (26%) with chromosome 5/7 or complex cytogenetic abnormalities, and 13 (30%) with miscellaneous abnormalities. Prior to the initiation of treatment, FLT3-ITD was detected in 40/43 (93%) pts with a median allelic ratio of 0.28 (range, 0 – 0.93). They had received a median of 2 prior treatments (range, 0–7). 16 (37%) pts had received ≥3 prior regimens and 9 had failed therapy with FLT3 kinase inhibitors (5 with AC220, 1 with PKC412, and 6 with sorafenib, either as monotherapy or with chemotherapy or plerixafor); 3 had failed 2 prior FLT3 inhibitors. 6 pts were inevaluable as they discontinued therapy before response assessment at one month and 3 are too early for response assessment. The overall CR/CRi/PR rate among the 34 evaluable pts is 44%, including 10 (29%) with CRi and 4 (12%) with CR and 1 (3%) with PR (in this pt, bone marrow blast declined from 51% to 6% with normalization of blood counts). Overall, pts have received a median of 3 (range, 1–9) treatment cycles with the median number of cycles to response among the responders being 2 (range, 1 – 4) and the median time to achieving response, 2.1 months (range, 0.9 – 4.6 months). The median duration of CR/CRi Is 2.3 months (range, 1 – 12.2+ months). Six pts have proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. The most common study drug-related adverse events were rash and fatigue with no deaths attributable to study medications. One pt developed grade 3 cardiomyopathy suspected to be related to the study regimen. Of the 34 pts included in the clinical analysis, there were 22 pts from whom plasma samples spanning at least one cycle of therapy were available. Among them, 64% achieved FLT3 inhibition to a targeted level of less than 15% of baseline during their first cycle of therapy. Median survival in pts who achieved this degree of inhibition was 238 days, while median survival in pts who did not reach this level was 154 days (p=0.13). Mean FL levels at cycle 1, day 1 and cycle 1, day 10 were 9 pg/mL and 17 pg/mL, respectively. Mean FL levels at cycle 2, day 0 and cycle 2, day 10 were 27 pg/mL and 54 pg/mL, respectively. Conclusions: Combination of AZA and Sorafenib is effective for the treatment of older pts and pts with relapsed and refractory AML and FLT3-ITD mutation. While not statistically significant, there was a trend toward improved survival in pts with adequate FLT3 inhibition during cycle 1. FL levels did not rise to the levels seen in pts receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Disclosures: Ravandi: Bayer/Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Off-label use of sorafenib and 5-azacytidine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Levis:Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Plexxikon: Consultancy; Symphogen: Consultancy. Garcia-Manero:Celgene: Research Funding. Andreeff:Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Unrestricted gift, Unrestricted gift Other. Cortes:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Lenalidomide and Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2318.2318 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2318-2318

Author(s):

Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽

William Brady ◽

Wei Tan ◽

Carlos E Vigil ◽

James E. Thompson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Intermediate Dose

Abstract Background: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) remains a therapeutic challenge. Although cytarabine arabinoside (AraC) is the most active drug, constituting the backbone of a majority of r/r regimens, the benchmark response to therapy remains a dismal 17 to 20% (Burnett, Wetzler et al. JCO, 2011.). The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (Len), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for multiple myeloma and myelodysplasia and has demonstrated activity as a single agent in AML at doses as high as 50 mg for 21 days (d) of a 28 d cycle (Blum et al, JCO, 2010.). Based upon this activity profile we developed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Len in combination with AraC in patients with r/r AML. Methods: Eligible patients were older than 18 years(y), had r/r AML with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status better than 2 and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were excluded for active CNS disease, uncontrolled infections, congestive heart failure, adrenal insufficiency, anti-cancer therapy within 14 d of enrollment, or prior exposure to Len. All enrolled patients had to practice appropriate contraception. Patients received AraC 1.5 g/m2/d over 3 hours on d 1-5 of a 28 day cycle, with a plan for standard 3+3 Len dose escalation. Initial patients received Len 25 mg on d 6-10 (n= 3), subsequent patients received doses between 25 and 10 mg (dose de-escalation) on d 6-26 with 2 d of rest prior to the next cycle. Following induction, patients who had residual AML (>5%) could receive a second identical course of therapy, provided they demonstrated an improvement in blast percentage relative to baseline. Patients who achieved CR received maintenance with Len 10 mg/d continuously. A 12 patient expanded cohort was enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to assess efficacy. Responses were assessed by International Working Group Criteria for AML (Cheson B et al. JCO, 2003.). Patient Characteristics: Fifty-one patients were consented and 45 were treated on study, 32 of these were evaluable for response, all patients were evaluated for toxicity. Approximately half the patients were female (20/45). The median age was 66 y (range 33-82) and median WBC 2.42x109/L (range 0.18-63.15). Four patients (8%) had an antecedent hematological disorder. By European LeukemiaNet criteria 2 patients (4%) had favorable risk disease, 8 (18%) were Int-1, 12(27%) were Int-2 and 11 (24%) were adverse risk; 12(27%) patients were not evaluable by ELN due to lack of karyotype or molecular data from diagnosis. Twelve patients had primary refractory AML. Results: The MTD for Len given on d 6-26 in combination with AraC at 1.5 g/m2/d x 5 d was 10 mg. Dose de-escalation from the starting dose of 25 mg on this schedule was required due to excess toxicity. The most commonly observed non-hematologic drug related adverse events seen on the study (all < grade 2 unless indicated) were nausea, increased liver function tests (>grade 3), rash (grade >3), hypokalemia (> grade 3) and fatigue. At the 25 mg dose level the dose limiting toxicity was rash, while patients enrolled at the 15 mg dose level experienced dose limiting elevation in LFTs, fatigue and bleeding. Five patients achieved a CR (16%), 5 demonstrated CRi (16%) and there were 3 hematological improvements (HI) for an overall response rate (CR+Cri+HI) of 41% (13/32). The median overall survival (OS) (95% confidence interval) for patients treated on study was 5.8 (2.5, 10.6) months and disease free survival was 3.4 (2.3, 6.2) months. Conclusions: Although prior interesting data support the activity of single agent high dose Len in r/r AML, our single institute phase I study of intermediate dose AraC followed by Len was associated with marked skin and other toxicities at the Len 25 mg dose level, precluding dose escalation to the historically more active 50 mg dose. The CR rate in this study was not dissimilar to previously reported responses with single agent or combination AraC based regimens. Issues of dose and schedule for this combination may have had a significant impact on the potential benefit for these two drugs in combination. Nevertheless, the overall low CR rate from this study does not suggest any superiority for this combination in comparison with the historical single agent response rate for intermediate dose AraC in r/r AML. Disclosures Griffiths: Celgene, Incyte and Alexion: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Other. Wetzler:MedPace: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sigma Tau: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Plexus: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text