Pegylated Interferon-α 2a in Combination to Nilotinib As First Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Provides High Rates of MR4.5. Preliminary Results of a Phase II Study.

Abstract Abstract 166 Background Imatinib mesylate combined to pegylated interferon alfa 2a (Peg-IFN) has been reported to significantly enhance the molecular responses for de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients compared to Imatinib alone in a Phase 3 study (Preudhomme et al. NEJM 2010). Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI2) such as nilotinib induce significantly higher levels of cytogenetic and molecular responses than imatinib as front line therapy for CP-CML (Saglio et al., NEJM 2010). Aims Test the combination of nilotinib + Peg-IFN as front line therapy in CP-CML patients in order to check the safety and evaluate the molecular response rates (EudraCT 2010–019786–28). Methods In this 2-step French national study, patients were assigned first to Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 mg/wk for ≥ 1 year. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed (on 2 datapoints) molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in %. Results In the first cohort, 40+1 patients (1 screen failure) were enrolled and a second cohort of 20 patients was planned once the last patient of cohort 1 attained 1 year of treatment, if the primary endpoint would have not been reached. The current median follow-up is 13.6 (10.1–16.3) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. Euro score was high for one patient. The median age was 53 (23–85) years. Two patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 had additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had a “major” BCR transcript. Five percent of patients were in CHR at 1 month of Peg-IFN and 100% at month (M) 2 (after 1 month of combination therapy). The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at 3, 6, and 12 months of combination (i. e. at 2, 5, 8 and 11 months of TKI2) were 47%, 71%, 100% respectively on evaluable samples. The incidence of molecular responses are mentioned in figure 1. Of note, 87% of the patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3. The rates of molecular responses broke down by major molecular response (MMR): 27%, 4 log reduction (MR4): 36%, and ≥4.5 log BCR-ABL reduction (MR4.5, MR5 and undetectable): 21% with a total number of 84% patients in ≥MMR and beyond (17.5% and 67.5% in intention-to-treat respectively) at 1 year. Confirmed molecular results at 1 year will be presented. Nilotinib trough levels centrally analysed at M3, 6 and 12 for the vast majority of patients were ≥ 1000 ng/ml and Peg-IFN did not seem to impact on its pharmacokinetics. One patient went on unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6 and is alive after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Four additional patients were withdrawn from study: At M2 for non observance, at M6 for seizures related to an extra-dural hematoma, at M6 for recurrent grade 3 hepatic toxicity, at M9 for recurrent grade 3 pruritus. The median dose of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first month was 90 (0–180) mg/wk, 45 mg/wk at M2, 3, 9, 12, and 33.75 mg/wk at M6. The median doses of nilotinib delivered to the patients were 600 mg daily at M2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 as initially planned. The rate of grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities overall were anemia 2.5%, thrombocytopenia 41%, neutropenia 41% and pancytopenia 5%. These were observed mainly during M2 (16% neutropenia, 24% thrombocytopenia, 3% anemia), M3 (16% neutropenia, 13% thrombocytopenia, 3% pancytopenia) and M6 (12.5% neutropenia, 5% thrombocytopenia) and disappeared thereafter. Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred mostly during the first 3 months with 15% cholestatic episodes, 5% of ALAT elevation, 2.5% of lipase elevation, 2.5% arthro-myalgias, 2.5% abdominal pain without lipase elevation, 2.5% of depression. No PAO was observed and, to date, no dyslipidemia. Conclusion The combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN seems relatively well tolerated despite frequent initial and transient hematologic and hepatic toxicities, and provides very high rates of molecular responses at 1 year and beyond. According to the initial methodology of this trial, the second cohort of patients will not be enrolled as the MR4.5 rates at M12 are beyond the initial expectations. A randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is warranted. Disclosures: Nicolini: Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Etienne:Novartis, Pfizer, speaker for Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Roy:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Huguet:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Legros:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis, BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Novartis, Pfizer, speaker for Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Guilhot:Novartis, Ariad, and BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2a in Combination with Nilotinib As First-Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Nilopeg trial). Four-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1578.1578 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1578-1578 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Gabriel Etienne ◽

Viviane Dubruille ◽

Lydia Roy ◽

Françoise Huguet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Pegylated Interferon ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Log Reduction

Abstract Background & aims In the Nilopeg trial (EudraCT 2010-019786-28), we have previously demonstrated that the combination of nilotinib (Tasigna® Novartis), a second generation inihibitor (TKI2), combined to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a (Peg-IFN, Pegasys®, Roche) in de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients is able to induce high rates of molecular responses with an acceptable additional toxicity (F. E. Nicolini et al. Lancet Haematology 2015) within 24 months of follow-up. We report here the ≥4-year follow-up of such patients for toxicity and efficacy. Methods In a phase 2 study, newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were assigned to a priming strategy by Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk, prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 micro.g/wk for ≥ 1 year, maximum 2 years. After 2 years nilotinib was continued alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in % for 2 years and then performed in each center [all expressed in % on the international scale (IS)]. All data presented here are in intention-to-treat. Events were defined as death, progression to AP or BC, failure on nilotinib or nilotinib treatment discontinuation for any cause excluding treatment-free remission (TFR). Results Fourty-two patients were enrolled in this trial (one withdrawn its consent prior to treatment initiation), and the median follow-up is now 50.7 (47.8-52.8) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. The median age at treatment initiation was 53 (23-85) years, 2 patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had "major" BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at "6", and "12" months of combination (i. e. at 5 and 11 months of TKI2) were 71%, and 100% respectively. Eighty seven percent of patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3 (i. e. after 2 months TKI). The rates of molecular responses respectively at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 76%, 78%, 83%, 73% for MMR, 51%, 58.5%, 66%, 58.5% for 4 log reduction (MR4), 17%, 34%, 34%, 44% for 4.5 log reduction (MR4.5), 12%, 32%, 29%, 41.5% for ≥5 log reduction (MR5), shown as cumulative incidence curves for MR4.5 in figure 1. The median doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first year were 45 (0-45) micro.g/wk, and for nilotinib 600 (300-600) mg daily. Interestingly, logistic regression analysis adjusted on MR4.5 responses showed a significant relationship with the mean doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients at 12 months (p=0.003, OR = 1.09 [1.03-1.16]), 24 months (p=0.005, OR = 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) and 48 months (p=0.024, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], but not with the mean doses of nilotinib [p=0.84, OR = 0.99 [0.99-1.01], p=0.087, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01], and p=0.88, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01] respectively. Eight patients (19.5%) were in TFR for a median of 6.8 (0.5-9.5) months after 2-year consecutive MR4.5, and none lost MMR yet at last follow-up. One patient died of progression (unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6, who relapsed after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation). There was no additional grade 3-4 hematologic or biochemical toxicities occurring after 24 months. At last follow-up 10 patients switched for another TKI (2 for dasatinib, 5 for imatinib, and 3 for imatinib followed by dasatinib), for unsufficient cytogenetic or molecular response (2 patients) or for toxicity (7 patients). Overall, 4 patients presented some cardio-vascular events 3 coronary stenoses, one brain stroke). Conclusion Despite additional initial toxicities Peg-IFN priming strategy, followed by the combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN during the first year induces very high rates of durable deep molecular responses (MR4 and MR4.5) at later time-points, offering TFR for number of patients. To date, no emerging severe adverse events occurred. However, to confirm these promising results, a randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is absolutely warranted and in progress. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Nilotinib in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.341.341 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 341-341 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge Cortes ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Dan Jones ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Marina Konopleva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Blast Phase ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 341 Background: Nilotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with increased selectivity against Bcr-Abl and approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib, is effective in CML after imatinib failure. We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib as 1st line therapy in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib as first-line therapy for pts with CML-CP. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of pts attaining major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mo). Pts with untreated CML-CP within 6 mo from diagnosis were eligible and received nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. A cohort of patients with previously untreated CML in accelerated phase (AP) was also included. Results: Sixty-five pts (61 CP, 4 AP) have been treated for a median of 17 mo (range 1 to 43). The median age was 46 years (range 19 to 86). Among 48 pts who were not in CHR at the start, 47 (98%) achieved CHR (one discontinued after 2 weeks without adverse events). Among 51 pts followed for at least 3 mo, 50 (98%) achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MMR has been achieved in 32 (63%) pts, including 12 (24%) with a complete molecular response. The rate of CCyR at different time points (intention-to-treat) for pts in CP compares favorably to that observed in historical controls treated with imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily: MMR was achieved by 55% at 12 mo and 53% at 24 mo (corresponding rates with imatinib 400 mg 34 and 55%, and with imatinib 800 mg 58% and 66%, respectively). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia 11%, neutropenia 12%, and anemia 5%. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events (regardless of causality) included elevation of bilirubin in 8% and lipase in 6%, and non-neutropenic fever in 6%. 24 (37%) pts had transient treatment interruptions and 11 (17%) had dose reductions. The actual median dose is 800 mg daily. Ten pts have discontinued therapy: 4 pts for toxicity, 2 because of transformation to accelerated or blast phase, and 4 for other reasons. 24 mo EFS (event = loss of CHR, loss of MCyR, AP/BP, death, or off because of toxicity) is 90%. All patients are alive. Among pts in AP, 3 achieved CCyR (all of them sustained); one patient progressed to blast phase and died. Conclusion: Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily induces a CCyR in nearly all patients as early as 3 mo after the start of therapy and MMR in more than 50% at 12 months with a favorable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Cortes: BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Presentation will include use of nilotinib as initial therapy for CML, and indication for which nilotinib is not approved.. O'Brien:Novartis: Research Funding. Jones:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jabbour:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; MGI Pharma (Eisai): Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

ENESTPath: A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Effect of Nilotinib Treatment Duration on Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Previously Treated with Imatinib: 24-Month Analysis of the First 300 Patients in the Induction/Consolidation Phase

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3094.3094 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3094-3094 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Delphine Rea ◽

Gianantonio Rosti ◽

Nicholas CP Cross ◽

Andrzej Hellmann ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Low Grade ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Current Recommendation ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Consolidation Phase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for patients (pts) with CML-CP. The current recommendation is to continue TKI therapy indefinitely.1 Results of several clinical trials indicate that pts achieving sustainable deep molecular response (DMR; defined as molecular response ≥ MR4) on imatinib (IM) may achieve long-lasting TFR. Nilotinib (NIL) at 300 mg bid induces higher rates of DMRs compared to IM.2 Also, DMRs can be achieved in pts with NIL (400 mg bid) who are switched after long-term IM.3 However, the optimal duration of consolidation treatment with NIL to increase the chances for successful and continuous TFR (≥ MR4) after stopping treatment is not yet known. Objective ENESTPath was designed to assess the proportion of pts (pretreated with IM and subsequently treated with NIL 300 mg bid) who can achieve a sustained DMR and maintain TFR without relapse for 12 months (mo) upon treatment discontinuation after different durations of treatment in consolidation phase. Methods ENESTPath is a randomized, phase 3 study enrolling pts with CML-CP who achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), but not MR4, after at least 24 mo of treatment with IM. After enrollment, pts were assigned to receive NIL at 300 mg bid for either 24 mo or 36 mo (arm 1 and arm 2, respectively). Pts with stable MR4 or better for at least 12 mo will enter the TFR phase. A stable MR4 was defined by 4 of the 5 preceding quarterly real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-PCR) assessments ≥ MR4 and ≥ MR4 inthe last assessment performed by IS certified EUTOS laboratories. Results A total of 619 pts were enrolled in the study between May 2013 and June 2015. The present analysis reports the results of the first 300 pts (mean age, 50.8 years; 63.7% of males) enrolled and treated with NIL for 24 mo in induction and consolidation phase or who had discontinued earlier. Details of the baseline characteristics are given in Table 1. At data cutoff, 108 pts were in stable MR4; 101 (33.7%) were randomized and 7 (2.3%) were scheduled for randomization at that time point. 192 pts (64%) were not eligible for randomization, primarily due to lack of stable MR4 in 126 pts (42%), adverse events (AEs) or abnormal laboratory values in 44 pts (14.7%), and for other reasons in 22 pts (7.3%). The rates of MR4 at baseline*, 6 mo, 12 mo, 18 mo, and 24 mo were 14.3%, 43.3%, 45.7%, 43.7%, and 46%, respectively. By 24 mo of treatment with NIL, cumulative incidences of major molecular response (MMR), MR4, and MR4.5 of all treated pts not in respective MR at baseline were 93.2%, 69.3% and 42.1%, respectively (Figure 1). Further analysis showed that pts with MMR at baseline had a higher probability of achieving an MR4 than those lacking MMR at baseline, with a cumulative incidence of MR4 by 24 mo of 75.8% and 44.2%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed during the 24 mo consolidation with NIL. The majority of the AEs were low grade. Most common AEs irrespective of the relationship to the study drug were pruritus (19%), hypercholesterolemia (14.0%), rash (10.7%), asthenia (10%), and arthralgia (10%). The most common newly occurring or worsening all-grade biochemistry laboratory abnormalities included increase in total cholesterol (68.7%), increased ALT (54%), hyperglycemia (32.7%), and hyperbilirubinemia (37%); majority of them were grade 1 and 2. Newly occurring or worsening all-grade cytopenias include anemia (12.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.3%), leukopenia (2%), and neutropenia (1%). Grade 3 or 4 cardiovascular events (CVEs) were experienced by 6.7% of pts including ischemic heart disease (4.7%), peripheral artery occlusive disease (1.7%), and ischemic cerebrovascular events (0.7%) (Table 2). Conclusions This analysis of the first 300 pts after 24 mo of NIL treatment showed a cumulative incidence of MR4 in ~ 70% of pts who were not in MR4 at baseline with an advantage in favor of MMR at baseline. 108 pts (36%) were with stable MR4 at data cutoff and 192 pts (64%) discontinued the study due to very stringent protocol definitions of eligibility for randomization and AEs. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were consistent with the previous reports.4 References 1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia V.1.2016 ©2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2. Hochhaus A, et al. Leukemia. 2016;30:1044-1054. 3. Hughes TP, et al. Blood. 2014;124:729-736. 4. Rea D, et al. Blood. 2015;125:[abstract 4040]. Disclosures Rea: Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Rosti:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cross:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pregno:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Orlandi:Ariad: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Almeida:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Illes:University of Debrecen faculty of medicine department of hematology: Employment. Sagues:ICO-Girona/hospital Universtiari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta: Employment. Haenig:Novartis: Employment. Supekar:Novartis: Employment. Shah:Cognizant: Employment; Novartis: Other: Vendor. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Steegmann:Aria: Honoraria, Other: Research funding for Spanish CML Group; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Research funding for Spanish CML Group; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Research funding for Spanish CML Group; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Research funding for Spanish CML Group. Baccarani:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Imatinib as Second-Line Therapy, Ameliorates or Maintains Molecular Responses Obtained with Ponatinib First-Line in Chronic Phase CML Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1894.1894 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1894-1894

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Gaelle Fossard ◽

Valerie Coiteux ◽

Viviane Dubruille ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Front Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Line Setting

Abstract Background & aims The third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Ponatinib demonstrates extremely potent BCR-ABL inhibitory activity in CML patients in chronic or advanced phase, resistant to 1, 2 or 3 prior TKI (Cortes NEJM, 2013) and it seemed interesting to test this agent in the front-line setting of chronic phase patients. The EPIC trial was a phase III trial set up to compare the molecular outcomes of Imatinib 400 (IM400) versus Ponatinib 45 mg daily at one year. However, this trial has been abrogated at early stages by the FDA despite the impressive molecular efficacy of Ponatinib (Lipton, Lancet Oncol 2016) because of unexpected and unacceptable rates of arterial thrombotic events that occurred in another trial (PACE). A majority of patients in the Ponatinib arm were switched towards IM400, but their outcome is not known. The aim of this study was to analyse the general and molecular outcomes of such patients in our country. Methods This is an observational study following the rules and regulations of these studies in our country. Data were monitored and retrospectively collected in the 5 centers involved in the EPIC trial. Molecular analyses were performed locally during ponatinib exposure (in parallel with centralised assessments) and during IM treatment thereafter. Only local results, expressed in % BCR-ABL (IS), were used in this analysis, and all respective molecular biology laboratories have been involved in the Eutos/ELN BCR-ABL accreditation system. Results Thirteen patients were analysed, 9 males and 4 females, with a median age of 58.5 (range 19.5-69) years at chronic phase CML diagnosis. Sokal scores were low for 4, intermediate for 7, high for 2 patients, Euro score was low for 7, intermediate for 5 and high for 1, Eutos LTS score was low for 10, intermediate for 2 and high for 1. Patients were harbouring a "conventional" Philadelphia chromosome without clonal evolution (20-28 metaphases analysed/patient) at diagnosis. All patients were harbouring a Major BCR-ABL transcript. The median BCR-ABL transcript level was 109 (range 35-440) % at diagnosis. Blood pressure was normal in all patients at diagnosis except one. Ponatinib was initiated in all patients at 45 mg daily after a median of 1.5 (range 0.8-2.75) months after diagnosis. Median Ponatinib duration was 4 (range 0.5-6.3) months. Complete Hematologic Response was obtained in 0.98 (range 0.5-1) month in all patients. At 3 months, median BCR-ABL ratio was 0.19 (range 0.008-2.74) %, all patients being in early molecular response (EMR) and 4 patients being already in major molecular response (MMR). Median Ponatinib dose at cessation was 45 (range 0-45) mg daily. IM was started at 400 mg daily in all patients after a median of 1 (range 1-35) day after Ponatinib cessation and after a median of 4 (range 0.54-6.54) months after Ponatinib initiation. The median BCR-ABL transcripts at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 months of Ponatinib (i.e. after a median time of 7, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40 and 46 months of IM) were 0.22 (range 0.01-27)%, 0.08 (0.005-8.99)%, 0.08 (0.01-2.01)%, 0.1 (0.003-1.9)%, 0.03 (0.001-1.61)%, 0.01 (<0.001-0.21)%, 0.01 (0.001-0.21) and 0.01 (0.001-0.02) respectively (see figure 1). On the 10 evaluable patients for molecular analyses, at Ponatinib cessation 40% of patients were >MMR, 40% of patients in MMR, 20% in MR4. At last follow-up, on IM400 10% of patients were in >MMR, 40% in MMR, 20% in MR4, 10% in MR4.5 and 20% in MR5, i. e. 50% in deep molecular response. At last follow-up, all patients were alive, still on IM400 daily for 32 (27.75-37.4) months, except 4 [1 grade 3 asthenia (now on Dasatinib), 2 molecular failure (now on Dasatinib and Bosutinib)], 1 free of treatment]. None of the patients progressed towards advanced phases to date. No thrombotic events occurred in any of the patients on Ponatinib. Three patients developed hypertension on Ponatinib requiring treatment, still ongoing at last follow-up in all. Conclusion The use of Imatinib after Ponatinib first-line therapy for chronic phase CML patients is safe. Despite a significant tyrosine kinase inhibition inferior activity in vitro, it allows the maintenance or the improvement of molecular responses throughout time and serves as a consolidation therapy. These data might pave the way for the design of future clinical trials using Ponatinib in the front-line setting in conjunction with Ponatinib dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Mouchel:Ariad/Incyte: Employment. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Etienne:novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Guerci:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Nilotinib and Dasatinib Therapies in Newly Diagnosed Patients in the Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111732 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4268-4268

Author(s):

Noriyoshi Iriyama ◽

Kei-Ji Sugimoto ◽

Eriko Sato ◽

Tomoiku Takaku ◽

Michihide Tokuhira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Scoring Systems ◽

Molecular Response ◽

First Line ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Once Daily ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Background and Aim: Treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Based on the results of the ENESTnd and DASISION studies, the European LeukemiaNet 2013 guidelines now recommend the use of TKIs, imatinib (400 mg once daily), nilotinib (300 mg twice daily), and dasatinib (100 mg once daily) as first-line treatment for patients with CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Compared to imatinib, the new generation TKIs, nilotinib and dasatinib, were found to have deeper and faster treatment response rates with acceptable toxicities. However, a direct comparison between nilotinib and dasatinib has never been reported previously. Our study aims to compare the outcomes and molecular responses achieved following the first-line use of these two agents in patients with CML-CP. Patients and Methods: The database of the CML Cooperative Study Group, which includes patients who were initially diagnosed with CML after the introduction of imatinib (April 2001), was reviewed, and patients who were given nilotinib or dasatinib as first-line therapy were identified. The event-free survival (EFS, defined as the loss of treatment efficacy, disease progression, or any cause of death), and rates of cumulative major molecular response (MMR), and deep molecular response (DMR, defined as the depth of MR 4.5) were compared between the nilotinib and dasatinib groups. Further, the predictive ability of the Sokal, Hasford, and European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) scoring systems for the achievement of molecular responses was also evaluated. For the analysis of molecular responses, patients who switched from their initial treatment agent to another TKI before achievement of MMR or DMR were considered to have no MMR or DMR. Results and Discussion: Out of 361 patients with CML-CP enrolled in our database, 58 and 63 were treated with conventional doses of nilotinib (300 mg twice daily) and dasatinib (100 mg once daily), respectively, as first-line therapy. Patients who had been started on a low dose TKI therapy were excluded from this analysis. The patient demographics, including age, sex, observation periods, and the Sokal, Hasford, and EUTOS scores did not show significant differences between the groups. In total, there were five events during the observation period (1 in the nilotinib group and 4 in the dasatinib group), and all events were deaths unrelated to CML, except for one in a patient in the dasatinib group who showed loss of complete cytogenetic response. The disease did not progress to the accelerated or blastic phase in any of the cases. The EFS did not differ between these two groups (p = 0.214). The MMR rates by 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 59%, 72%, 74%, and 81%, respectively, in the nilotinib group and 52%, 73%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, in the dasatinib group. The DMR rates by 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 7%, 17%, 24%, and 28%, respectively, in the nilotinib group and 3%, 16%, 25%, and 29%, respectively, in the dasatinib group. During the first 24 months of treatment, 4 (7%) patients in the nilotinib group and 11 (17%) in the dasatinib group had been switched to other TKIs (p = 0.0983). Among the three scoring systems, only the Hasford score could predict the achievement of DMR, and all of them failed to predict the achievement of MMR in the entire cohort. Our data suggest that both nilotinib and dasatinib have comparable efficacies, with high molecular response rates and promising outcomes. The validity of our findings should be tested in a randomized study, which is currently underway in Japan. Disclosures Takaku: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tokuhira:Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Speakers Bureau. Asou:Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; SRL Inc.: Consultancy; Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Kizaki:Nippon Shinyaku,: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Kawaguchi:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Determinants of Choice of Front-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Chronic Phase CML: A Study from the "Registro Italiano LMC & Campus CML"

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135972 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-36

Author(s):

Mario Tiribelli ◽

Roberto Latagliata ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Isabella Capodanno ◽

Maria Cristina Miggiano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Front Line ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Concomitant Medications

Introduction : therapy of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in virtually all patients. Three TKIs are approved for first-line therapy in Italy: imatinib and two second-generation (2G) TKIs, dasatinib and nilotinib. Choice of the front-line TKI is based on a combined evaluation of patient's and disease characteristics, age, risk, comorbidities and concomitant medications. Treating physician's preference and, in some cases, economic considerations, particularly after the advent of generic imatinib, may play a role in TKI selection. However, to date, few data are available on TKI use in a whole nation and on the possible drivers of treatment choice. Aim of the present work was to analyse the use of front-line TKI therapy in a large, unselected cohort of Italian CP-CML patients, correlating patient's features to drug choice. Methods: in the framework of the national Campus CML program, we retrospectively evaluated 1422 patients with CP-CML diagnosed from 2012 and 2019 in 21 haematologic Centres, mostly in academic and/or tertiary hospitals, widespread through the entire Italian territory and treated frontline with imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib. Results: median age at diagnosis was 59.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 47.1 - 71.7], with 317 (22.3%) patients under 45 years, 552 (38.8%) between 45 and 65 years and 553 (38.9%) older than 65 years; 821 (57.7%) patients were males. Among 1364 evaluable patients, CML risk according to Sokal score was low in 540 (39.6%), intermediate in 610 (44.7%) and high in 214 (15.7%) patients respectively; the number at low, intermediate or high risk according to the novel ELTS score among 1325 evaluable patients was 759 (57.3%), 402 (30.3%) and 164 (12.4%) respectively. Considering comorbidities, 1003 (70.6%) patients had at least one active disease at the time of CML diagnosis, the most common being hypertension (n=547, 38.5%), previous neoplasms (n=185, 13.0%), diabetes (n=150, 10.6%), chronic bronchopulmonary diseases (n=114, 8.0%), acute myocardial infarction (n=95, 6.7%), previous stroke (n=36, 2.5%) and other vascular diseases (n=98, 6.9%). Among 1335 evaluable patients, 813 (60.9%) were taking at least one concomitant medication, with 280 (21.0%) taking 3-5 drugs and 140 (10.5%) taking 6+ drugs at time of TKI start. As to the frontline therapy, 794 (55.8%) received imatinib and 628 (44.2%) were treated with 2G-TKIs, (226 dasatinib and 402 nilotinib) respectively. According to age, 2G-TKIs were chosen for majority of patients aged <45 (69.1%) while imatinib was used in 76.9% of patients over 65 (p<0.001). There was a predominance of imatinib use across all Sokal (51.1% in low, 61.3% in intermediate and 51.4% in high) and ELTS (50.3% in low, 60.4% in intermediate and 66.5%) risk categories. We observed a prevalent use of 2G-TKIs in patients presenting with higher WBC counts (55.1% if WBC >100,000/mm3 vs 38.2% if WBC <100,000/mm3; p<0.001), lower Hb (53.8% if Hb <10 g/dl vs 41.9 if Hb >10 g/dl; p=0.001) and bigger spleen (65.1% if spleen >5 cm vs 44.8% if spleen 1-5 cm vs 37.3% if spleen not palpable; p<0.001). There was a decreasing use of 2G-TKIs with higher number of concomitant drugs: 64.4% for 0, 47.7% for 1-2, 27.0% for 3-5 and 13.6% for >5 drugs, respectively (p<0.001). Concordantly, there was a significant higher use of imatinib in patients with hypertension (69.8%), diabetes (70.0%), COPD (73.7%), previous neoplasms (73.0%), AMI (86.3%) or stroke (97.2%) history (p<0.001 for all conditions). Lastly, we observed a wider use of imatinib (61.1%) in patients diagnosed in years 2018-19, compared to those of the period 2012-17 (53.7%; p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, factors correlated with imatinib use were age > 45 years, intermediate or high Sokal risk, presence of some comorbidities (2nd neoplasia and stroke) and number of concomitant medications. Conclusions: preliminary results of this observational study on almost 1500 patients show that around 55% of newly diagnosed Italian CP-CML patients receive imatinib as front-line therapy, and that the use of 2G-TKI is prevalent in the younger patients and in those with no concomitant clinical conditions. The counterintuitive finding of imatinib prevalence as frontline treatment in high risk patients might be explained by the older age of these patients. Introduction of the generic formulation in 2018 seems to have fostered the use of imatinib. Figure Disclosures Breccia: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long Term Adherence to Imatinib Therapy Is the Critical Factor for Achieving Molecular Responses in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3290.3290 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3290-3290 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Alex Bazeos ◽

Jamshid Khorashad ◽

François-Xavier Mahon ◽

Lina L Eliasson ◽

Dragana Milojkovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Imatinib Therapy ◽

Adherence Rate ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Adherence To Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3290 Poster Board III-1 There is a great variability in the degree of molecular responses achieved by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib. These different levels of molecular response could reflect different degrees of adherence to therapy. We measured the adherence to imatinib therapy in 87 consecutive CML chronic phase patients who had received imatinib 400 mg day as first line therapy for a median of 59.7 months before enrolment (range 25–104) and therefore all them were in complete cytogenetic response. Adherence levels were monitored during a 3-month period using microelectronic monitoring devices (MEMS) and were related to levels of molecular response. MEMS consist of an electronic device fitted in the cap of a normal looking medication bottle that automatically records each time the bottle is opened. MEMS are considered as the ‘gold standard' for measuring adherence. We also measured the imatinib plasma level, the presence of TKD mutations and the following prognostic factors measured at diagnosis: hOCT1 transcripts level, polymorphism 1236C>T in ABCB1, Sokal risk group, hemoglobin, leukocytes , BCR-ABL1 transcript type and BCR1-ABL1 ratio and demographic data. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and patients gave written informed consent to participate. The median adherence rate was 97.6% (range 22.6–103.8%). In 23 (26.4%) patients adherence was ≤90% (median 76%) and in 12 (13.8%) ≤80% (median 63%). We found a strong association between adherence rate (≤90% or >90%) and the 6-year probability of major molecular response (MMR) (28.4% vs 94.5%, p<0.0001) and complete molecular response (CMR) (0% vs 43.8%, p=0.002) (Fig 1). Multivariate analysis identified adherence (RR=11.7, p=0.001) and expression of the molecular transporter hOCT1, (RR=1.79, p=0.038) as the only independent predictors for MMR. Adherence was the sole independent predictor for CMR. No molecular responses were observed when the adherence was ≤20% (p=0.0001). In patients whose imatinib dose had been increased (n=32) the adherence was poor (median 86.4%). Adherence was the only independent predictor for failure to achieve a 3-log transcript reduction (RR=17.66, p=0.006) in this subgroup of patients. Patients with CML vary greatly in their response, as demonstrated originally by Sokal et al. in 1984, and the same variation is seen in patients treated with imatinib in the modern era. The basis for this variation is unknown but it has been attributed to the intrinsic biological heterogeneity of the leukemia. In contrast we show here that adherence to therapy is the major factor determining the degree of response that a CML patient treated with imatinib will achieve. Disclosures: Mahon: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rezvani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Occurrence, Management, and Outcomes In Patients with Pleural Effusion During Dasatinib Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) In the First-Line Setting: Analysis of the DASISION Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2282.2282 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2282-2282 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Kimmo Porkka ◽

Michele Baccarani ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Satu Mustjoki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pleural Effusion ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Risk Scores ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Once Daily ◽

Management Interventions ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2282 Background: The Phase 3 DASISION trial comparing dasatinib 100 mg once daily with imatinib 400 mg once daily as initial treatment in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety of dasatinib after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (Kantarjian, H, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2260). While fluid retention was more frequent with imatinib than with dasatinib, pleural effusion was seen only with dasatinib. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of pts experiencing pleural effusion, a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Methods: 519 pts with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive CML-CP (median disease duration of 1 month) were randomly assigned to either dasatinib 100 mg once daily (259 pts) or imatinib 400 mg one daily (260 pts). Key endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and safety. All pts were assessed by chest x-ray at baseline and at 6 months after randomization, or more frequently, if indicated clinically. Pts with pleural effusion at baseline were excluded. Pleural effusion was graded according to CTCAE version 3 (grade 1, asymptomatic; grade 2, symptomatic, up to 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 3, symptomatic requiring supplemental oxygen, < 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 4, life-threatening, hemodynamic instability). Results: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months with median treatment duration of 14.3 months (range, 0.3–25.8), 26 (10%, median age, 60 years) of the 258 dasatinib-treated pts (median age, 46 years) experienced pleural effusion. Of the pts with pleural effusion, 6 (23%) had low, 17 (65%) had intermediate and 3 (12%) had high Hasford risk scores. There were no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion events. All events were grade 1(2%) or grade 2 (8%). Most events (n = 22, 85%) occurred more than 8 weeks after the start of study drug. In pts who had a pleural effusion, the median time to the event was 28 weeks (range, 4–88). Lymphocytosis (defined as peripheral blood lymphocyte count > 3.6 × 109/L) was noted in 11 (42%) of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, as compared to 46 (20%) of 232 pts with no pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was managed by dose modification and/or medical intervention. Therapy was interrupted in 19 pts, and the dose of dasatinib was reduced in 8 pts (4 pts, to 80 mg; 1 pt, to 70 mg; 3 pts, to 50 mg). Twelve pts received diuretics, 7 received corticosteroids, and only 1 pt underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. Only 3 pts (1.2%) discontinued therapy due to pleural effusion (grade 2). Eleven pts who continued dasatinib had resolution of their pleural effusion. Five pts had recurrent effusions. Of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, 24 (92%) achieved a CCyR and 17 (65%) achieved a MMR by 12 months of treatment; the corresponding CCyR and MMR rates in the total pt population were 83% and 46%, respectively Seven of the 8 pts with pleural effusion who reduced their dose achieved CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib as initial therapy, pleural effusion was mild to moderate in severity, and was manageable with dose interruption and/reduction and/or a short course of diuretics and/or corticosteroids. The occurrence of pleural effusion and management interventions did not negatively affect the achievement of CCyR or MMR. These findings are in line with data reported previously for second-line dasatinib in CML pts resistant or intolerant to imatinib (Porkka, K, et al. Cancer 2010;116:377). Furthermore, pleural effusion and peripheral lymphocytosis may be indicative of immune-mediated antitumor activity of dasatinib. Disclosures: Porkka: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mustjoki: BMS, Novartis: Honoraria. Bradley-Garelik: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Wyeth: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Disease Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase Switched to Nilotinib or Dasatinib As Second-Line Therapy.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2796.2796 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2796-2796

Author(s):

James D. Griffin ◽

Annie Guerin ◽

Lei Chen ◽

Alexander R. Macalalad ◽

Jiayuan Luo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Free Survival ◽

Analysis Group ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Abstract 2796 Background: Nilotinib and dasatinib are two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) commonly used for the treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Both TKIs have been shown to be more potent than imatinib. However, no head-to-head clinical trials have been conducted comparing the efficacy of nilotinib to dasatinib as 2nd-line therapy for CML-CP patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. This study compared disease outcomes of patients treated in the community who were switched from imatinib to 2nd-line nilotinib or dasatinib. Methods: Through an online chart abstraction form, participating community physicians submitted de-identified information on CML-CP patients ≥ 18 years old who switched after 10/28/2007 from imatinib to 2nd-line nilotinib or dasatinib with at least 30 days of follow-up. When multiple patients met the selection criteria, up to 8 patients in each group were selected randomly by physicians. Patients enrolled in clinical trials or with concurrent malignancies were excluded. Information was collected on demographics, clinical characteristics, cytogenetic response, progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, and death from any cause. Documented complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at a particular time point was defined as 0% Philadelphia chromosome positive cells on cytogenetic testing; patients with missing tests at that time point were counted as non-responders. Disease progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, progression-free survival, and overall survival were compared using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounding factors, including patient demographics and clinical characteristics at the time the patient switched to a 2nd-line TKI. Results: 122 hematologists and oncologists provided information on 597 patients, including 301 patients on nilotinib and 296 patients on dasatinib. The median follow-up was 11 months for nilotinib patients and 10 months for dasatinib patients. Age, sex, race, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics were similar for both groups, except that nilotinib patients were more likely than dasatinib patients to have switched due to secondary imatinib resistance (p=0.047) and were less likely to have switched due to imatinib intolerance (p=0.024). Nilotinib patients had similar rates of documented CCyR compared to dasatinib patients at 12 months (37% vs. 35%, p=0.54), 24 months (42% vs. 40%, p=0.62), and 36 months (44% vs. 44%, p=0.95) following the switch. However, nilotinib patients had lower risk of progression (p=0.004), higher progression free survival (p=0.023) and a trend towards prolonged overall survival (p=0.067), adjusting for potential confounders. The table below summarizes these results. Conclusions: Among patients with CML-CP switched to nilotinib or dasatinib for 2nd-line therapy, nilotinib patients had significantly lower rates of progression and longer progression-free survival compared to dasatinib patients. Disclosures: Griffin: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guerin:Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc, which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Other, Research Funding. Chen:Novartis Oncology: Employment, Own stock in Novartis Other. Macalalad:Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc, which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Other, Research Funding. Luo:Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc, which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Other, Research Funding. Wu:Analysis Group, Inc.: Consultancy, Employment, I am an employee of Analysis Group, Inc, which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Switching To Nilotinib In Patients (pts) With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) With Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response (CyR) On Imatinib: First Results Of The LASOR Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.95.95 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 95-95 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Carmino Antonio De Souza ◽

Jose Luis Lopez ◽

Manuel Ayala ◽

Eduardo Bullorsky ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Endpoint ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Alternate Treatment ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Loss Of Response

Abstract Introduction The phase 3 LASOR trial is the only randomized trial that compares the effects of imatinib dose escalation with those of switching to nilotinib in pts with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) CML-CP who experience suboptimal response to frontline imatinib. Suboptimal response has been associated with inferior long-term outcomes in several landmark analyses and was observed in 13% of pts randomized to the imatinib arm of ENESTnd by 12 mo (vs 4% in each nilotinib arm). Methods Adults (N = 191) with CML-CP with suboptimal CyR to frontline imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD) were randomized 1:1 to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 96) or imatinib 600 mg QD (n = 95). Suboptimal CyR was defined according to 2009 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria as: no CyR ≥ 3 to < 6 mo (Ph+ > 95%), no partial CyR (PCyR) ≥ 6 to < 12 mo (Ph+ 36%-95%), or no complete CyR (CCyR) ≥ 12 to <18 mo (Ph+ 1%-35%) after starting imatinib. All pts had complete hematologic response at study entry. The primary endpoint was CCyR (Ph+ 0%) at 6 mo after randomization. The key secondary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) at 12 mo. Crossover to the alternate treatment arm was allowed for pts who failed to achieve CCyR by 6 mo or had intolerance or loss of response at any time. Results Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms, with most pts entering study for not having PCyR at 6 mo or CCyR at 12 mo (Table). The primary endpoint, CCyR at 6 mo after randomization, was observed in 47 (49.0%) and 40 (42.1%) pts in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively (P = .3844). Crossover was more common in pts randomized to the imatinib arm. Crossover occurred before the primary endpoint analysis at 6 mo in 6 pts in the nilotinib arm (5 for intolerance; 1 for lack of efficacy) and 15 pts in the imatinib arm (13 for intolerance; 1 for lack of efficacy; 1 for loss of response). Median time to crossover was 3.9 and 3.6 mo in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively. None of the nilotinib pts who crossed over to imatinib vs 6 of the 15 imatinib pts who crossed over to nilotinib achieved CCyR at the primary analysis time point 6 mo after randomization. Ten pts in the nilotinib arm and 7 in the imatinib arm had neither samples evaluable for CyR at 6 mo nor had crossed over to the alternate treatment arm. Excluding these pts (evaluable population) and counting crossed-over pts as non-responders, 47 of 86 pts (54.7%) in the nilotinib arm and 34 of 88 (38.6%) in the imatinib arm achieved CCyR at 6 mo. Analyses of molecular response at 6 mo after randomization suggested higher rates in the nilotinib arm for BCR-ABLIS ≤ 1% (CCyR equivalent) and ≤ 0.1% (MMR) compared with the imatinib arm (52.1% vs 29.5% and 31.3% vs 11.6%, respectively). The safety profile for both drugs was consistent with prior reports of pts who switched therapy after inadequate responses to imatinib. Conclusions Patients with suboptimal CyR to imatinib (today classified by ELN as warning/failure) represent a significant unmet need in the treatment of CML-CP. This important study is the only randomized evaluation of imatinib dose escalation vs switch to the more potent BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib in this population. Although the primary endpoint was not met, sensitivity analyses accounting for crossover and more sensitive molecular monitoring demonstrated higher rates of response with switch to nilotinib vs imatinib dose escalation in pts with suboptimal response to frontline imatinib. Disclosures: Cortes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bullorsky:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Sacha:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Owugah:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Kumar Nidamarthy:NOVARTIS HEALTH CARE Pvt Ltd: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Piccolo:Novartis: Employment. le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Download Full-text