Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516
Author(s):  
Esha Kaul ◽  
Gunjan L Shah ◽  
Chakra P Chaulagain ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Non Interventional Prospective Clinical Study on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Relapsed Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3852-3852
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn van Gorkom ◽  
Herve Finel ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
David Pohlreich ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Relapsed Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for many patients with relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma. Peripheral blood stem cells have become the main source for the ASCT worldwide, because of its advantages over bone marrow. Several risk factors have been identified for poor stem cell mobilization, and diagnosis of lymphoma is one of the most important ones, with an inadequate stem cell harvest reported in 4 to 25% of the cases. Even though stem cell mobilization in relapsed lymphoma patients can be relatively difficult, mobilization strategies have not been standardized and there is a significant variation amongst centers. The aim of this non-interventional prospective clinical study was to review the mobilization strategies used by EBMT centers in relapsed lymphoma and to evaluate the failure rates. Methods: All EBMT centers were invited to participate in this non-interventional prospective clinical study that was started in 2010 and ended in 2014. Centers were requested to collect data on all consecutive patients with relapsed lymphoma considered to be candidates for an ASCT and were 18 years of age or older. Data collected included age, sex, diagnosis, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, mobilization regimen, collected CD34+ cells and marrow harvests. Results: In total, 275 patients with relapsed lymphoma from 30 EBMT centers were registered for this study. There were 158 males and 117 females with a median age of 51 (range 18 – 77) years; 181 patients (66%) with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (DLBCL 28%, FL 17%, MCL 6%, PTL, 3%, other 12%) and 94 patients (34%) with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The median number of chemotherapy lines received before this relapse was one (range 1 – 8). 263 patients (96%) were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF being DHAP (43%) and ESHAP (11%) the most frequent protocols, and 12 patients (4%) were mobilized with G-CSF alone. Thirteen patients (5%) who were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF, received additional PLX in the first mobilization. These were all patients that were mobilized with chemotherapy as part of the mobilization regimen. Thirty patients (11%) failed to mobilize adequate stem cells (<2 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg) during first mobilization despite the use of PLX in four patients. The median number of stem cells collected at first mobilization was 5.6 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0 – 82). In 255 patients (92.7%) only one mobilization course was given, 18 patients (6.5%) had two mobilization courses, 2 patients (0.7%) underwent three mobilization courses. Three patients had a mobilization failure after only G-CSF; they all were successfully harvested in a second attempt after chemotherapy + G-CSF. Five of the patients failing the first mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF received PLX at second mobilization, but only three succeeded. One patient failed both first and second mobilization and received PLX at third mobilization without success. 22 patients (8%) still had an inadequate amount of stem cells in the end. Of those, only 4 patients (1.5%) underwent bone marrow harvest. Conclusion: In the EBMT centers participating in this study, a primary mobilization strategy based on the combination of salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF was used for virtually all patients with relapsed lymphoma. PLX was used in only 5% of the mobilization procedures during the time period analyzed. With 11% after the first mobilization attempt and 8% after several attempts, the failure rate was relatively low. Disclosures van Gorkom: Sanofi: Research Funding. Sureda:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Long-Term Outcome Of Patients With AL Amyloidosis Treated With High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplantation: 19 Year Experience At a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3328-3328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Gheorghe Doros ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
Anthony C Shelton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic and clinical remissions associated with prolonged survival. We have performed 593 transplants from July 1994 to December 2012 in the Amyloidosis Center at Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine. Patients were enrolled in several sequential institutional review board–approved protocols during the 19-year study period. Eligibility criteria for all protocols required biopsy proof of amyloid disease; evidence of a plasma cell dyscrasia and exclusion of other types as appropriate; at least one major affected organ; and adequate measures of cardiac and pulmonary function, and performance status. Functional measures included cardiac ejection fraction 40% or greater, absence of symptomatic pleural effusions, absence of heart failure or arrhythmias resistant to medical management, oxygen saturation of 95% or greater on room air, lung diffusion capacity of 50% or more of predicted, supine systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater, and Southwest Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less unless limited by peripheral neuropathy. Age, renal function, time from diagnosis, prior therapy, and details of the conditioning regimen varied among the trials. Overall, the median age of patients treated with HDM/SCT was 57 years (range, 28-80). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) defined as death occurring within 100 days after SCT occurred in 51 patients, leading to overall TRM of 9% (n=51/593). Additionally, there were 11 deaths during stem cell mobilization and collection phase. No death has occurred since 2005 during stem cell mobilization and collection and TRM has improved to 5% (n=11/235). Total of 324 patients (55%) received full dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 and 269 (45%) received modified dose melphalan at 100-140 mg/m2 per protocol, based upon age and organ function. Hematologic CR, as defined by international consensus criteria, occurred in 40% (n=202/508) of evaluable patients measured at 6-12 months post SCT; by intention-to-treat the CR rate was 34%. Hematologic CR occurred in 44% (n=129/291) patients who received 200 mg/m2 of HDM compared to 34% (n=73/217) patients who received 100-140 mg/m2 of HDM (chi square p=0.015). Hematologic relapse occurred in 40 patients (20%) with CR at a median of 3.9 years (range, 1.6-12.4). The median overall survival (OS) is 6.7 years with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The median OS has not been reached for patients achieving a hematologic CR but exceeds 12.4 years, compared to 5.9 years for those not achieving CR (log-rank p<0.001). The median OS for patients following hematologic relapse is 3.5 years. Twenty-five % of patients are alive, up to 19 years after undergoing HDM/SCT. These data highlight the remarkable long-term survival results that can be obtained in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with HDM/SCT. While survival is strongly dependent upon achieving a hematologic CR, the survival of patients who do not achieve a CR and of those who relapse after CR also is notable, suggesting a benefit of treatment. Strategies to improve risk-stratification of patients and reduce TRM, as well as using sequential or combination therapies to increase the CR rate, will likely improve outcomes in the future for patients who just a few years ago were considered to have a rapidly fatal diagnosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Impact of Induction Treatment on Stem Cell Collection: A COVID Related Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4848-4848
Author(s):  
Brad Rybinski ◽  
Ashraf Z. Badros ◽  
Aaron P. Rapoport ◽  
Mehmet Hakan Kocoglu
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Introduction: Standard induction therapy for multiple myeloma consists of 3-6 cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). Receiving greater than 6 cycles of a lenalidomide containing regimen is thought to negatively impact the ability to collect sufficient CD34+ stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (Kumar, Dispenzieri et al. 2007, Bhutani, Zonder et al. 2013). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at least 20 patients at University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCC) had transplant postponed, potentially resulting in prolonged exposure to lenalidomide containing induction regimens. Here, in the context of modern stem cell mobilization methods, we describe a retrospective study that suggests prolonged induction does not inhibit adequate stem cell collection for transplant. Methods: By chart review, we identified 56 patients with multiple myeloma who received induction with VRd or KRd and underwent apheresis or stem cell transplant at UMGCC between 10/1/19 and 10/1/20. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 cycles of a different induction regimen, had a past medical history of an inborn hematological disorder, or participated in a clinical trial of novel stem cell mobilization therapy. We defined 1 cycle of VRd or KRd as 1 cycle of "lenalidomide containing regimen". In accordance with routine clinical practice, we defined standard induction as having received 3-6 cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen and prolonged induction as having received 7 or more cycles. Results: 29 patients received standard induction (Standard induction cohort) and 27 received prolonged induction (Prolonged induction cohort) with lenalidomide containing regimens. The median number of cycles received by the Standard cohort was 6 (range 4-6), and the median number of cycles received by the Prolonged cohort was 8 (range 7-13). The frequency of KRd use was similar between patients who received standard induction and prolonged induction (27.58% vs. 25.93%, respectively). Standard induction and Prolonged induction cohorts were similar with respect to clinical characteristics (Fig 1), as well as the mobilization regimen used for stem cell collection (p = 0.6829). 55/56 patients collected sufficient stem cells for 1 transplant (≥ 4 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg), and 40/56 patients collected sufficient cells for 2 transplants (≥ 8 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg). There was no significant difference in the total CD34+ stem cells collected at completion of apheresis between standard and prolonged induction (10.41 and 10.45 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.968, Fig 2). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen a patient received and total CD34+ cells collected (R 2 = 0.0073, p = 0.5324). Although prolonged induction did not affect final stem yield, prolonged induction could increase the apheresis time required for adequate collection or result in more frequent need for plerixafor rescue. There was no significant difference in the total number of stem cells collected after day 1 of apheresis between patients who received standard or prolonged induction (8.72 vs. 7.96 x 10 6 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.557). However, patients who received prolonged induction were more likely to require 2 days of apheresis (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.1625) and there was a trend toward significance in which patients who received prolonged induction underwent apheresis longer than patients who received standard induction (468 vs 382 minutes, respectively, p = 0.0928, Fig 3). In addition, longer apheresis time was associated with more cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen, which neared statistical significance (R 2 = 0.0624, p = 0.0658, Fig 4). There was no significant difference between standard and prolonged induction with respect to the frequency of plerixafor rescue. Conclusions: Prolonged induction with lenalidomide containing regimens does not impair adequate stem cell collection for autologous transplant. Prolonged induction may increase the apheresis time required to collect sufficient stem cells for transplant, but ultimately clinicians should be re-assured that extending induction when necessary is not likely to increase the risk of collection failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badros: Janssen: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Phase III Randomized Stem Cell Mobilization Trial Comparing Standard Vs Double-Dose G-CSF Vs Standard Doses of G-CSF Plus GM-CSF in Hard to Mobilize Patients Undergoing An Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase I Study of Bortezomib(Bz), Pegylated Doxorubicin(DOX) and Dexamethasone(dex); ( VDD) with Escalating Doses of Cyclophosphamide(Cy) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 617-617
Author(s):  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Jose L Ochoa ◽  
Jyotishankar Raychaudhuri ◽  
Kara Kosakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 617 Background: The VDD treatment regimen has been shown to be highly effective as initial therapy for multiple myeloma. Given the established synergy between bortezomib and alkylating agents, incorporating an alkylator to VDD may increase the depth of response and may improve long term outcome. We report the results from a Phase I trial combining VDD with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide ( CVDD) in patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed myeloma. Methods: Pts received Bz 1.0–1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, DOX 30mg/m2 on day 4, Dex 20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 and Cy 250-750 mg/m2 on day 1, for up to eight 21-day cycles, at four planned dose levels (Cy/Bz: 250/1.0, 500/1.0, 750/1.0, 750/1.3). Dose-escalation proceeded (three-pt cohorts) depending on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; thrombocytopenia with platelets <10,000/mm3 on >1 occasion despite transfusion support; Grade 4 neutropenia for >5 days and/or resulting in neutropenic fever; inability to receive cycle 2/day 1 dose due to drug-related toxicity). Pts with Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) were excluded. Responses were assessed by International Working Group criteria. Pts with at least partial response ( PR) and standard risk cytogenetics could proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after 6 cycles. Responsive pts with high risk cytogenetics defined as the presence of one of the following at diagnosis; deletion of chromosome 13 by cytogenetics, hypodiploidy, or t (4;14), t(14;16) or deletion of 17 p by FISH, completed 8 cycles of therapy. Results: 26 pts have been enrolled to date: 12 in phase l, and 14 additional pts at the maximum planned dose (MPD). Median age 60 yrs, 62% men, 50% IgG MM, 81% with ISS stage II/III. Pts have received a median of 6 cycles; 17 have completed all 6-8 cycles, 1 has discontinued therapy. No DLTs were observed in the phase I portion of study. Dose reductions in cycle 2 and beyond have occurred in 31% of patients. Toxicities to date have been manageable, including all Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities (4-35%), Grade 3 hand foot syndrome( 15%), Grade 3 pneumonia (8%), Grade 3 UTI (8%), and Grade 3/4 metabolic (19%). There were no grade 3/4 PNY. There was 1 treatment-related mortality secondary to infection. The overall response rate in patients that have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy (ORR; ≥PR) is 90%, including 57% ≥VGPR, and 24% CR. ORR and VGPR rates were similar in patients with standard or high risk cytogenetics. Nine patients have proceeded to transplant and all have had successful stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone. Conclusions: CVDD produces high quality responses and is well tolerated in newly diagnosed MM pts, regardless of their cytogenetic status or ISS stage. MPD has been reached at CY 750 mg/m2, Bz 1.3 mg/m2, DOX 30 mg/m2, and Dex 20 mg, with phase II enrollment ongoing. Stem cell mobilization has been successful in all pts, with transplant course in pts otherwise unremarkable. Updated efficacy will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Alsina: Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Outcome of High Dose Melphalan with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant In Myeloma Associated with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2400-2400
Author(s):  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
Mubeen Khan ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2400 Background: Approximately 10% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have clinically overt primary systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and about 30% have concurrent occult AL amyloidosis. The impact of concurrent AL amyloidosis on the prognosis of myeloma is not well known. High-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto HCT) has shown significant activity in both MM and AL amyloidosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis and underwent auto HSCT with high dose Melphalan at MDACC between 01/1998 to 05/2010. We identified 41 patients with concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Twenty -six patients had occult AL amyloid, while 15 had clinically overt disease. Results: Median age at auto HSCT was 56 years (39-77), 58.5% being male with median follow up of 58.7 months from the time of diagnosis and 42.5 months from auto HCT. The median time from diagnosis to auto HCT was 8.9 mos (2.7-102.4 mos). 39% had Salmon Durie Stage III disease and 36.6% had more than one involved site at the time of transplant.Cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 24.4% of patients. Post transplant hematologic responses were as follows: ≥CR=10 (24%), ≥VGPR=16 (39%), >PR=33 (80.5%), ≥stable disease= 40 (97.6%). Among the patients with overt organ involvement, one had early death. Of the 15 evaluable patients, organ responses were scored using the published consensus guidelines for amyloidosis and were as follows: PR=5 (33.3%), ≥SD=7 (46.7%). No correlation was seen between organ response and hematologic response. The 100-day treatment related mortality (TRM) was 0 and 1-year TRM of 2.4% which is comparable to patients transplanted for MM alone at our center. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from auto HCT were 33.8 and 58.3 months, respectively.The median PFS and OS from diagnosis were 49.8 and 96 mos, respectively. In multivariate analysis, creatinine ≥ 2mg/dl was associated with a shorter PFS (p=0.043) and hemoglobin <10g/dl showed a trend towards a shorter PFS (p=0.093). None of these variables (Hb <10g/dl, Age>60yrs, Creatinine≥2mg/dl, B2M >3.5mg/l, BM plasma cells>30%) emerged as significant predictors of OS. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients with occult or symptomatic AL amyloidosis for OS (p=0.24) or PFS (P=0.9) Conclusion: In this analysis the outcome of patients with concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis was comparable to patients with MM alone. We believe these patients are acceptable candidates for auto HCT. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weber: novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Orlowski: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1595-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto M. Lemoli ◽  
Antonio de Vivo ◽  
Daniela Damiani ◽  
Alessandro Isidori ◽  
Monica Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Myeloablative Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Recovery ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stimulating Factor

AbstractWe assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (&lt; 10 cells/μL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 μg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 × 108, 3.72 × 104, and 0.82 × 106, respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 × 109/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 × 109/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF–primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

scholarly journals G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5823-5823
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Zaher Otrock ◽  
Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽  
Nabila Kreidieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. Most transplant centers use either a chemo-mobilization strategy using cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a steady state strategy using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor in case of mobilization failure. However, very few studies compared efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF versus G-CSF with preemptive plerixafor. In this study, we retrospectively compared our single center experience at the American University of Beirut in 89 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our past preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients with our new mobilization strategy using G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. The change in practice was implemented when plerixafor became available, in order to avoid CY associated toxicity. Patients and methods: Patients in the CY group (n=62) (Table 1) received either fractionated high-dose CY (n=56) (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 every 3 hours) or CY at 50mg/kg/day for 2 doses (n=6). G-CSF was started on day +6 of chemotherapy at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) (Table 1) received G-CSF at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours daily for 4 days. On day 5, if peripheral blood CD34+ was ≥ 20/µl, apheresis was started immediately. Plerixafor (240 µg/kg) was given 7-11 hours before the first apheresis if CD34+ cell count on peripheral blood on day 5 was <20/µl and before the second apheresis if CD34+ cells on the first collect were <3х106/kg. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-3) in both groups. Results: Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ counts (35 vs 111 cells/µl, P= 0.000003), and total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 х 106 vs 15.9 х 106 cells/kg, P= 0.003). All patients in both groups collected ≥4x106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Moreover, 60 (96.7%) and 46 (74.2%) patients in the CY group vs 24 (88.8%) and 6 (22%) patients in the plerixafor group collected >6х106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (P=0.16; P<0.00001). Only 4 (6.4%) patients required two apheresis sessions in the CY group compared to 11 (40%) in the plerixafor group (P=0.0001). Conversely, CY use was associated with higher frequency of febrile neutropenia (60% vs 0%; P<0.00001), blood transfusions (27% vs 0%; P<0.00001), platelets transfusion (25% vs 0%; P<0.00001) and hospitalizations (64% vs 0%; P<0.00001). No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Autografting was successfully performed in all patients using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 days (range: 16-156) in the CY group compared to 13 days (range: 8-40) in the plerixafor group (P=0.027); and median infused CD34+ cells were 7х106/kg (range: 3.1-15.3) versus 5.27 (2.6-7.45), respectively (P=0.002). The average total cost of mobilization using the adjusted costs based on National Social Security Fund (NSSF) prices in Lebanon in the plerixafor group was slightly higher compared with the CY group ($7964 vs $7536; P=0.16). Conclusions: Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with two-fold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost (including cost of hospitalization) but significantly increased toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib Given in Sequence with Anthracycline and Thalidomide-Containing Regimens Does Not Adversely Affect Stem Cell Mobilization and Engraftment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Hanna J. Khoury ◽  
Douglas R. Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) remains the standard of care, there is considerable interest in incorporating bortezomib into the initial treatment of MM. However, the role of bortezomib in frontline therapy for MM will depend in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. We conducted a pilot study of bortezomib administered pretransplant followed by high-dose melphalan with AHSCT. Two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cell mobilization was initiated by administering filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously on consecutive days until stem cell harvest was completed. Stem cell collection began on day 5 of filgrastim via large volume apheresis (20 L/day) performed daily until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients were subsequently admitted to the hospital for high-dose melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2/day subcutaneously was administered starting day +1 post-transplant and continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. To date, 23 of a planned 40 patients have been enrolled in this study with 19 patients having completed their initial therapy with bortezomib followed by AHSCT. Patient population consists of 16 male and 7 female patients with the median age at diagnosis of 58 years (range 38–68). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (16), IgA (7) with stage II (9) or stage III (14) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 11 patients were treated with VAD (vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) or DVd (Doxil, vincristine and dexamethasone), 5 patients with thalidomide and 5 patients with both. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. All patients successfully achieved the target of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in either one (15/19 patients) or two (4/19 patients) collections with the first apheresis product containing a mean of 5.79 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Analysis of peripheral blood by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant differences in lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment with bortezomib. Following AHSCT, all patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (time to platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 12 days (range 9–30 days). Eleven patients were evaluable for response at 100 days post-transplant. Compared to pre-bortezomib paraprotein levels, 3 patients achieved a CR or near CR, 7 maintained a PR while 1 patient developed PD. We conclude that pretransplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment in patients with MM undergoing AHSCT. Updated results and detailed analysis will be available at the time of presentation.

CD34+ Subclasses of Blood Stem Cell Grafts Collected After Plerixafor Injection in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Patients Mobilizing Poorly with Chemotherapy Plus G-CSF

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2990-2990
Author(s):  
Esa Jantunen ◽  
Ville Varmavuo ◽  
Piia Valonen ◽  
Taru Kuittinen ◽  
Tapio Nousiainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
In Vitro Growth ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2990 Background: Mobilization of blood stem cells is difficult in a subgroup of patients with standard methods. Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, has been used for stem cell mobilization in combination with G-CSF for some years. Mobilization method used may affect not only efficacy of stem cell mobilization and collection but also graft content which on the other hand may have effect on post-transplant outcomes. No data is available on CD34+ subclasses in grafts collected after plerixafor administration in patients who mobilize poorly with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Patients and Methods: Altogether blood stem cell grafts collected from 26 NHL patients were studies. Thirteen patients (8 M, 5 F, median age 51 yrs) were mobilized with a combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF ad received plerixafor due to poor mobilization followed by stem cell apheressis. Thirteen patients (10 M, 3 F, median age 56 yrs) were mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF without plerixafor and served as controls. Samples from the first collection after plerixafor and from the first apheresis of control patients were studied by flow cytometry using the following antibodies: CD34, CD38, CD 117, CD133, CD19 and CD45. Viability of CD34+ cells after freezing was assessed with 7-aminoactinomycin D staining. Also in vitro growth of granulocyte/macrophage progenitors (GM-CFU) were assessed from all grafts. Patients were followed after high-dose chemotherapy in regard to hematopoietic reconstitution. Results: The number of viable cells in the grafts was comparable between the plerixafor and the control groups (Table 1). The number of the most primitive stem cells (CD34+CD38−CD133+) was higher in plerixafor mobilized grafts (Table 1). Most of the CD34+ cells were myeloid progenitors, as defined by their CD117 antigen co-expression. No differences in GM-CFU were observed between the groups. All except one patient had received high-dose therapy. The median number of CD34+ cells collected from the patients was comparable (3.1 vs. 3.3 × 106/kg). The median time to reach neutrophils > 10 × 109/L was 10 days from the stem cell infusion in both groups and time to unsupported platelets was also comparable (16 d vs. 13 d). Platelet counts at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months were comparable between the groups. Absolute lymphocyte counts were higher in plerixafor group but the differences were not statistically significant. One early toxic death occurred in the plerixafor mobilized group and one death due to disease recurrence in both groups with a median follow-up of 301 and 348 days from stem cell infusion in prelixafor and control groups, respectively. Conclusions: Plerixafor added to chemomobilization in NHL patients resulted in higher number of the most primitive CD34+ cells in the graft with comparable in vitro growth and engraftment potential after BEAM chemotherapy when compared to patients mobilized without plerixafor. Longer follow-up of higher patient numbers are needed to evaluate whether differences in graft content have an effect on patient outcomes. Disclosures: Jantunen: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document