MM-008: A Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability Of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5393-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Hien K. Duong ◽  
Claudia Kasserra ◽  
Min Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Pomalidomide (POM) is indicated for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. Renal impairment (RI) is a common comorbidity in multiple myeloma (MM), occurring in > 40% of pts. POM is extensively metabolized, with < 5% eliminated renally as the parent drug. Thus, renal function may not substantively affect exposure of the active parent compound. POM + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has shown efficacy in pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with moderate RI in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. However, pts with severe RI were excluded from these trials. MM-008 is an active multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study designed to prospectively assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and normal or severely impaired renal function. Methods Pts with RRMM and ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible for enrollment. Pts in Cohort A (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥ 60 mL/min) served as the control population and received POM 4 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Pts in Cohort B (CrCL < 30 mL/min but not requiring dialysis) followed a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, receiving POM 2 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle and based on results, escalating to 4 mg. Dosing for Cohort C (CrCL < 30 mL/min and requiring dialysis) was informed by the results from Cohort B. All cohorts received dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Pts were not permitted to enroll in more than 1 cohort. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for management of neutropenia was not permitted in cycle 1, but could be started on day 1 of the next cycle at the physician’s discretion. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 4.0). PK samples were obtained pre- and post-POM dose on days 1, 2, and 3 (after single doses) and days 21, 22, and 23 (after multiple doses) of cycle 1 for cohorts A and B. PK data were dose-normalized for comparison across cohorts by dividing the measured exposure by the POM dose in milligrams. Results As of April 1, 2013, 11 pts have been treated (8 in Cohort A; 3 in Cohort B at 2 mg). At screening, median age (range) was 68 years (46-71 years) and 64 years (57-64 years) while median CrCL (range) was 85 mL/min (53.1- 114.8 mL/min) and 18.4 mL/min (12.5-25.7 mL/min) in cohorts A and B, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (Cohort A: 4 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt), infections (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts), and anemia (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt). No dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 have been reported. Median duration of treatment and relative dose intensity were similar between cohorts A and B, 4.1 months (range, 1.8-5.1 months) vs 3.9 months (range, 1.8-8.5 months) and 1.0 (range, 0.5-1.1) and 1.1 (range, 1.0-1.1), respectively. Only 1 pt (Cohort A) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Five pts remain on study (Cohort A: 3 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts). Initial PK analyses showed that mean dose-normalized AUC024 in Cohort B was approximately 20% lower than in Cohort A. Mean dose-normalized Cmax in Cohort B was approximately 30% lower than that in Cohort A after a single dose but comparable after multiple doses. Based on these results, additional pts in Cohort B and pts in Cohort C will receive POM 4 mg. Updated PK and adverse event data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion MM-008 is an ongoing trial prospectively evaluating the PK and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with severe RI. Preliminary data suggest that dose-normalized exposure in pts with RRMM with severe RI is similar to that in pts with normal to mildly impaired renal function. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported, and early tolerability data are encouraging. Disclosures: Matous: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Approved in the US but not in Europe. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Duong:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kasserra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Doerr:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Selinexor Plus Pomalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (SPd) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1993-1993
Author(s):  
Christine I Chen ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
Rami Kotb ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Darrell J. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of cell cycle regulators such as p53, IkB, and Rb. Pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) is approved in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)with an overall response rate (ORR) of 30% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate of <4 months in patients (pts) having received a prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) and IMiD. Strategies to improve the ORR and PFS are needed. In murine MM models, the combination of selinexor with IMiDs shows synergistic anti-MM activity and good tolerability. Methods- Pts with RRMM who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide (len) and a PI were enrolled. Selinexor was evaluated in 2 different dosing schedules of once-weekly (QW, 60 or 80 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, 60 or 80 mg), with pomalidomide (pom)3 or 4 mg PO daily, and dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg BIW or 40 mg QW. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of selinexor, pomalidomide, and low dose dex (SPd) in pts with RRMM. Results- As of July 20th2018, 34 pts (16 male / 18 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 61 years and patients received a median of 4 (range, 2 - 9) prior treatment regimens. Thirty-two patients were IMiD refractory (21 len, 11 pom/len). Six dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: G3 fatigue (60 mg BIW, pom 4 mg), G3 febrile neutropenia (FN) (60 mg BIW, pom 3 mg), G3 FN and G4 neutropenia (80 mg QW, pom 4), G3 thrombocytopenia (80 mg QW, pom 3 mg) and 4 missed doses in Cycle 1 due to symptomatic hyponatremia (80 mg BIW, pom 4 mg). Enrollment on selinexor 80 mg QW, pom 3 mg is ongoing. Common SPd treatment related adverse events included (all grades, grades 3/4): neutropenia (62%, 56%), thrombocytopenia (59%, 32%), anemia (53%, 29%), anorexia (56%, 0%), fatigue (50%, 9%), nausea (47%, 0% ). Thirty pts were evaluable for response, which is outlined in Table 1. Median PFS is 10.3 months with a median follow up of 9.4 months. Conclusions- Enrollment is ongoing to evaluate once weekly selinexor in combination with Pd , (SPd). This all-oral SPd combination has clinical activity with an ORR 55% in pom-naive pts with heavily pretreated MM compared to previously published data of 30% ORR for Pd alone. Similarly, the PFS on SPd is 10.3 months vs. <4 months for Pd alone. No unexpected adverse events were noted. Phase 1 dose escalation of the combination of SPd is ongoing to define the optimal RP2D. Disclosures Chen: Amgen: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Bensinger:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Leblanc:Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Schiller:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipe:Celgene: Consultancy. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Jeha:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bahlis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase 1/2 Study of the Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, KPT-8602, in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4509-4509 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Frank Cornell ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Craig C Hofmeister ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - Inhibition of Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a novel treatment approach for multiple myeloma (MM). XPO1 mediates the nuclear export of cell-cycle regulators and tumor suppressor proteins leading to their functional inactivation. In addition, XPO1 promotes the export and translation of the mRNA of key oncoproteins (e.g. c-MYC, BCL-2, Cyclin D). XPO1 overexpression occurs in solid and hematological malignancies, including MM and is essential for MM cell survival. Selinexor, the first oral SINE compound, has shown promising anti-MM activity in phase 1 studies but has been associated with gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities including nausea, anorexia and fatigue. KPT-8602 is a second generation oral SINE compound with similar in vitro potency to selinexor, however, has substantially reduced brain penetration compared with selinexor, and demonstrated markedly improved tolerability with minimal anorexia and weight loss in preclinical toxicology studies. In murine models of MM, KPT-8602 can be dosed daily (QDx5) with minimal anorexia and weight loss. We have therefore initiated a phase 1/2 first-in-human clinical trial. Methods - This phase 1/2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate KPT-8602 as a single agent and in combination with low dose dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed / refractory MM (RRMM). KPT-8602 is dosed orally (QDx5) for a 28-day cycle with a starting dose of 5 mg. Low dose dex (20 mg, twice weekly) is allowed after cycle 1 if at least a minimal response (MR) is not observed. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evidence for anti-MM activity for KPT-8602 single agent and in combination with dex. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PDn; XPO1 mRNA) profile of KPT-8602 will also be determined. PDn predictive biomarker analysis and ex vivo drug response assays are underway using tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates before treatment, during and at relapse. These analyses include cell death pathway assays by flow and nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of XPO1, NF-ƙB, IƙBα, IKKα, NRIF and p53 by imaging flow and IHC. Results - As of 01-Aug-2016, 6 pts 2 M/4 F, (median of 6 prior treatment regimens, median age of 71) with RRMM have been enrolled. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts), nausea (2 pts) and diarrhea (2 pts). Grade 3 AEs include neutropenia (1 pt) and dehydration (1 pt). No grade 4 or 5 AEs have been reported. No DLTs have been observed and the MTD has not been reached. 5 pts were evaluable for responses (1 pt pending evaluation): 1 partial response, 1 minimal response, and 3 stable disease; no pts have progressed on therapy with the longest on for >5 months. The PK properties following oral administration showed that 5 mg of KPT-8602 was rapidly absorbed (mean tmax= 1 hr, mean Cmax= 30.6 ng/mL). The mean AUCinf was calculated to be 141 ng•hr/mL. After tmax, KPT-8602 declined at an estimated mean t½ of 4 hr. At the same dose level, XPO1 mRNA expression was the highest (~2.5 fold) at 8 hr post dose. Conclusions - Oral KPT-8602 is well tolerated in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities observed with twice weekly selinexor have not been observed with 5x/week KPT-8602, including in pts on study for >4 months. PK was predictable and in line with selinexor. These early results show encouraging disease control with pts remaining on therapy. Enrollment is on-going. Disclosures Rossi: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arno Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Signal Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Incyte, Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustik:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richter:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vogl:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedlander:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Sullivan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Pmd-107: Marizomib, Pomalidomide and Low Dose-Dexamethasone Combination Study in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT02103335): Full Enrollment Results from a Phase-1 Multicenter, Open Label Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3326-3326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Simon Harrison ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Ashraf Z Badros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Marizomib (MRZ) is a novel, irreversible, pan subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) with preclinical evidence demonstrating in vitro and in vivo activity in multiple myeloma (MM). This study was designed to evaluate the safety and antimyeloma activity of pomalidomide (POM), MRZ and low dose dexamethasone (Lo-DEX) (PMD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Thirty-eight heavily pretreated patients with RRMM were enrolled [dose-escalation cohort (n=14); recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) cohort (n=24)]. IV MRZ (0.3 to 0.5 mg/m2) was administered on Days (D) 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3 or 4 mg) on D1 through 21; and Lo-DEX (5 or 10 mg) on D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22, 23 of every 28-D cycle. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy; 100% received prior lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BTZ), 34% carfilzomib (CFZ), and 50% thalidomide. 53% of patients were refractory to both LEN and BTZ and 21% were refractory to LEN, BTZ, and CFZ. There were no dose limiting toxicities during the study. The most common study treatment related ≥Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (11/38 pts: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 pts 11%), anemia (4/38 pts; 11%), thrombocytopenia (4/38 pts; 11%), and febrile neutropenia (2/38 pts; 5%), with two grade 4 AEs (neutropenia related to POM and viral infection related to DEX), and one grade 5 AE (cardio-respiratory arrest from a suspected PE related to POM). Overall, MRZ was well tolerated, did not add to the incidence or severity of POM/Lo-DEX AEs and the regimen may have fewer hematological and infectious AEs compared to that observed with POM/Lo-DEX. MRZ pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that it was rapidly cleared with a short T1/2 (6.2-11mins) and a large volume of distribution (41-86L) suggesting extensive tissue distribution. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated rapid and robust inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in both packed whole blood (PWB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs), reflecting the irreversible binding nature of MRZ. Evolving inhibition of trypsin-like and caspase-like proteasome activity was also observed in PWB and PBMC with continued dosing. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for the 36 response evaluable patients was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively (Table 1). Subpopulation analysis demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5/10) in high risk cytogenetic patients, 56% (10/18) in LEN/BTZ refractory patients, 71% (5/7) in LEN/BTZ/CFZ refractory patients and 80% (8/10) in CFZ refractory patients. These data compare favorably against POM/Lo-Dex with a near doubling of ORR in both the total patient population and the double refractory patients. Substantial activity in high-risk patients that are triple refractory and in patients that are refractory to CFZ in prior last regimen was observed. MRZ activity in RRMM patients exposed and/or refractory to multiple PIs is likely a consequence of its unique pan proteasome subunit inhibitory actions. In conclusion, MRZ in combination with POM and Lo-DEX was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pretreated, high-risk RRMM patients. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Harrison: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Zonder:Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Khot:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacLaren:Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reich:Triphase Accelerator: Consultancy. Trikha:Encycle Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Results from Phase 1/2 Trial of Tagraxofusp in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3145-3145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Myo Htut ◽  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: The bone marrow microenvironment of many multiple myeloma (MM) patients contains high levels of CD123-expressing plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). These pDCs have been shown to augment MM growth and contribute to drug resistance (Chauhan, et al., Cancer Cell, 2009). Tagraxofusp, a novel CD123 targeted therapy, has demonstrated high levels of anti-tumor activity in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), an aggressive CD123+ malignancy of pDC origin. Tagraxofusp demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity against MM cell lines and primary tumor samples via both a direct anti-MM effect and indirect pDC-targeting effect (Ray, et al., Leukemia, 2017), as well as demonstrating synergy in these systems when used in combination with traditional MM therapies including pomalidomide (POM). As such, targeting pDCs with tagraxofusp may offer a novel therapeutic approach in MM. Methods: This multicenter, single arm Phase 1/2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) MM and tested two different doses of tagraxofusp (7 or 9 mcg/kg). Patients received tagraxofusp as a daily IV infusion for days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle as a single agent for the initial run-in cycle (cycle 0) and in combination with standard doses/administration of POM and dexamethasone (DEX) in cycles 1 and beyond. Objectives included evaluation of safety and tolerability, identification of the maximum tolerated or tested dose, and efficacy. Results: 9 patients with r/r MM received tagraxofusp (7 mcg/kg, n=7; 9 mcg/kg, n=2). 5 males, median age 65 years (range: 57-70), median 3 prior therapies (range 2-6). Median follow-up was 12 months (range: 7 - 19). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were hypoalbuminemia 67% (6/9); chills, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and pyrexia each 56% (5/9); and dizziness, headache, hypophosphatemia, and thrombocytopenia each 44% (4/9). The most common grade 3 and 4 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia 44% (4/9) and neutropenia 33% (3/9). No grade 5 events reported. 5 patients treated with tagraxofusp and POM+DEX had a partial response (PR) after tumor evaluation. These patients demonstrated a rapid decrease in a set of myeloma-related laboratory values from pre-tagraxofusp treatment levels after the first combination cycle of tagraxofusp and POM+DEX. Additionally, these 5 patients demonstrated >50% decreases in peripheral blood pDC levels after both tagraxofusp monotherapy and combination therapy. Conclusions: Tagraxofusp was well-tolerated, with a predictable and manageable safety profile, when dosed in combination with POM+DEX in patients with r/r MM. Evidence of pDC suppression in peripheral blood and BM was observed in this patient population. 5 patients that received tagraxofusp and POM+DEX combination had PRs and decreases in pDC levels while on treatment with tagraxofusp. Given CD123 expression on pDCs in the tumor microenvironment and the potential synergy of tagraxofusp with certain MM agents including POM, tagraxofusp may offer a novel mechanism of action in MM. NCT02661022. Disclosures Richardson: Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Zonder:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Roche and Juno: Consultancy; Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. McDonald:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rupprecht:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wysowskyj:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chauhan:C4 Therapeutics.: Equity Ownership; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy. Anderson:Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board; OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder .

Analysis of Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Vs without Moderate Renal Impairment

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3031-3031 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Siegel ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Renal impairment (RI) occurs in ≈ 20% to 40% of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM; Kastritis et al, Haematologica, 2007) and is a major comorbidity with this disease (Korbet et al, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). Pts with MM who relapse on or become refractory to treatment (Tx) experience shortened overall survival (OS; Kumar et al, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) is approved for the Tx of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in pts who have had Tx failure with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib. POM + LoDEX demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with RRMM (MM-010; Dimopoulos et al, EHA 2015) as well as extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone (MM-003; San Miguel et al, Lancet Oncol, 2013) or POM alone (MM-002; Richardson et al, Blood, 2014). Each trial included pts with moderate RI, and this pooled analysis examines the safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with moderate RI. Patients and Methods: Pts from MM-002, MM-003, and MM-010 who had received POM + LoDEX were grouped by RI status (with moderate RI [creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min] and without RI [CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min]) and assessed for safety and efficacy. Results: Overall, from the 3 trials, data from 356 pts with moderate RI and 716 pts without RI were analyzed. Pts with moderate RI were slightly older (70 vs 63 yrs) and more commonly had International Staging System stage III disease (45.8% vs 25.4% in the 271 and 544 pts with available data). Median time from diagnosis was similar, 5.2 yrs (with moderate RI) vs 5.3 years (without RI); pts in both subgroups had a median of 5 prior Tx. The proportions of pts with moderate RI vs without RI who were refractory to LEN (95.5% vs 93.0%), BORT (82.0% vs 80.7%), and both LEN and BORT (78.4% vs 76.1%) were similar. The median Tx duration was slightly shorter for pts with moderate RI vs without RI (16.6 vs 20.4 weeks), but the median average daily dose (4.0 mg/day) and median relative dose intensity (0.9) were the same between renal subgroups. There were similar frequencies of discontinuations (7.4% vs 5.8%), dose reductions (22.7% vs 21.1%), and interruptions (63.1% vs 63.5%) due to adverse events (AEs) between subgroups of pts with moderate RI vs without RI. The most common grade 3/4 AEs for pts with moderate RI vs without RI were neutropenia (45.5% vs 48.3%), anemia (34.9% vs 27.5%), infections (31.3% vs 32.3%), and thrombocytopenia (21.3% vs 22.6%). The frequency of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy was ≤ 2% in both subgroups. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32.0% vs 33.0%, the median PFS was 18.1 weeks (95% CI, 15.6-20.9 weeks) vs 21.1 weeks (95% CI, 19.0-24.3 weeks), and median time to progression (TTP) was 20.3 weeks (95% CI, 17.3-24.1 weeks) vs 24.0 weeks (95% CI, 20.1-25.6 weeks) in pts with vs without moderate RI, respectively. Consistent with the poor prognosis associated with RI, median OS was shorter for pts with moderate RI (45.6 weeks [95% CI, 37.9-50.1 weeks]) vs those without RI (62.7 weeks [95% CI, 54.9-70.3 weeks]). Conclusions: In a pooled analysis of 3 trials of pts with RRMM treated with POM + LoDEX, ORR, PFS, TTP, and tolerability results appeared to be independent of the presence or absence of moderate RI. This analysis supports the use of POM + LoDEX as a standard of care in RRMM for pts with or without moderate RI. Disclosures Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Dimopoulos:Genesis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Baz:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delforge:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Song:Celgene Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palumbo:Novartis, Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment: Analysis of Patients from the Phase 3b Stratus Trial (MM-010)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4755-4755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Treatment (Tx) with novel agents, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), has extended survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, pts who have relapsed on or become refractory to Tx have significantly shortened overall survival (OS) and poorer outcomes (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Renal impairment (RI) occurs frequently, in approximately 20% to 40% of MM pts (Kastritis, Haematologica, 2007), and is a leading cause of death in this pt population (Korbet, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). In the phase 3 MM-003 trial, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs. high-dose dexamethasone in pts in whom BORT and LEN Tx failed, including those with moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 60 mL/min; Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (N = 456), including those with moderate RI. Methods: Pts must have had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), at least 2 prior therapies, BORT and LEN failure after ≥ 2 cycles of each (alone or in combination), and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last line of Tx; pts with CrCl < 45 mL/min were excluded. POM was administered 4 mg D1-21/28-day cycle and LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. For this analysis, pts were retrospectively grouped by baseline CrCl (< 60 mL/min vs. ≥ 60 mL/min). Results: A total of 456 pts have been enrolled, of whom 452 received POM + LoDEX and 165 (36%) had moderate RI (CrCl < 60 mL/min). After a median follow-up of 6.8 mos, the most frequently reported grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min) were neutropenia (39% vs. 40%), anemia (33% vs. 24%), and thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 19%); the most common Gr 3-4 nonhematologic TEAEs were pneumonia (12% vs. 11%), fatigue (6% vs. 4%), and hypercalcemia (4% vs. 4%), respectively. Only 2% of pts in each respective renal subgroup discontinued POM due to Tx-related TEAEs. Gr 3-4 renal toxicities were similar in both subgroups: acute renal failure occurred in 3% of pts with moderate RI and 2% of pts without moderate RI; blood creatinine increased in 2% and 1% of pts, respectively. Overall, Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and peripheral neuropathy (PN) were infrequent independent of renal status (Table). Median relative POM dose intensity was similar between subgroups (0.95 in pts with moderate RI vs. 0.96 in pts without moderate RI). In pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI, ORR was 35% vs. 34%, median DOR was 5.8 mos vs. 6.5 mos, median PFS was 3.7 vs. 4.6 mos, and median OS was 9.3 vs. not reached, respectively (Table). The 1-yr OS was 33% for pts with moderate RI vs. 53% for pts without moderate RI. Conclusions: POM + LoDEX has acceptable safety and efficacy profiles comparable to those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial. Tolerability was consistent across renal function subgroups, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. In addition, responses to POM + LoDEX were similar between pts, irrespective of renal function. POM is currently being prospectively evaluated in pts with severe RI in the MM-008 (US) and MM-013 (EU) trials. Table.With Moderate RICrCl < 60 mL/min (n = 162)Without Moderate RICrCl ≥ 60 mL/min(n = 290)Grade 3-4 TEAEs, %Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia39 33 19 1240 24 19 11Grade 3-4 EOI, %DVT/PE PN2 20 1Efficacy(n = 165)(n = 291)ORR (≥ PR), % (95% CI) Median DOR (95% CI), mos Median PFS (95% CI), mos Median OS (95% CI), mos35 (27.9-43.0) 5.8 (3.7-NE) 3.7 (2.9-5.2) 9.3 (6.3-11.5)34 (28.9-40.1) 6.5 (4.7-7.9) 4.6 (3.7-5.6) NR (10.9-NR) EOI, events of interest; NE, not estimable, NR, not reached. Disclosures Weisel: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Miller:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The MM-021 Trial Of Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Chinese Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Impact Of Prior Therapies On Efficacy and Safety

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3227-3227
Author(s):  
Jie Jin ◽  
Xin Du ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Fangping Chen ◽  
Dao-bin Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The combination of lenalidomide (LEN) and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) is approved in China for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) who have received at least 1 prior antimyeloma treatment. The MM-021 China registration study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LEN + LoDEX (Rd). This sub-analysis investigated the impact of the number of prior antimyeloma therapies on treatment outcomes. Methods MM-021 was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM) pts (aged ≥ 18 yrs) were given LEN (25 mg/day on days 1-21) and LoDEX (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or discontinuation. Pts included in the pharmacokinetics cohort did not receive DEX on day 1, cycle 1. All pts received thromboprophylaxis during the study. The primary end-point was best overall response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of pts who achieved a best response of at least partial response. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data were analyzed according to the number of therapies that pts had received prior to study screening: 1-2, 3-4, or > 4. Results The analysis cut-off date was January 4, 2013, with a median follow-up of 17.6 mos. All pts in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 199) were included in the safety analysis, and 187 pts were included in the efficacy-evaluable (EE) population. At the cut-off date, 42 pts had completed treatment and 157 had discontinued. Overall, the median age of pts was 59.0 yrs (range 35-81) and 62.8% were male. The majority of pts had advanced disease (85.9% had Durie-Salmon stage III MM); 40.7% of pts (ITT population) had received > 4 prior anti-myeloma therapies; 33.2% had received 3-4, and 26.1% had received 1-2. Most pts had received prior treatment with thalidomide (THAL; 68.8%) or bortezomib (BORT; 63.8%) (Table 1). After a median treatment duration of 8.3 mos (range 0.9-24.8) or 9 treatment cycles (range 1-27), the ORR was 47.6% in the overall EE population, and highest in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies (Table 2). Median OS, PFS, and TTP were longer in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies compared with those who had received 3-4 and > 4 prior therapies, and compared with the overall EE population (Table 2). In the safety population, the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (26.1%), neutropenia (25.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.6%), pneumonia (13.1%), leukopenia (9.5%), and decreased neutrophil count (8.5%). In general, grade 3-4 TEAE rates were lower in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies (60%), and comparable in pts who had received 3-4 (71%), > 4 prior therapies (75%), and the overall safety population (70%). There were 2 reports of grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy. AEs resulted in discontinuation of LEN in 5.8% (n = 3), 10.6% (n = 7) and 9.9% (n = 8), of pts who had received 1-2, 3-4 and > 4 prior therapies, respectively. Conclusion Rd is an effective treatment option for Chinese RRMM pts who have relapsed after one or more prior therapies, including THAL and/or BORT. More robust efficacy and higher ORR was observed for Rd in patients who had received 1-2 prior therapies compared to those who had received additional lines of treatment. The tolerability of Rd was similar in heavily and less heavily pretreated pts. Discontinuations were infrequent, even in heavily pretreated pts who had received > 4 prior therapies. Disclosures: Zhang: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wortman-Vayn:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hou:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J & J: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Once-Weekly Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone Demonstrated Promising Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Regardless of Age and Prior Bortezomib Exposure

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2129-2129
Author(s):  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Roger Lyons ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Anita Zahlten-Kuemeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The multicenter phase 1/2 CHAMPION-1 study (NCT01677858) showed that once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone was well tolerated and active in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) (Berenson et al. Blood. 2016;127:3360−3368). We present a secondary analysis of the efficacy and safety of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone in the CHAMPION-1 study according to prior bortezomib (BTZ) exposure and age. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM (1−3 prior therapies) were eligible. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone (phase 1) and to determine the overall response rate (ORR; phase 2). Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and tolerability, and evaluation of the clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase 2 portion. Patients received carfilzomib as a 30-minute, intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28 day cycles. Patients received carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 on cycle 1, day 1; subsequent doses were escalated to 45, 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2, using a standard 3+3 escalation schema to determine the MTD. In the phase 2 portion, patients received carfilzomib at the MTD. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg (IV or orally) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 28 day cycles for cycles 1−8; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 for cycles ≥9. The MTD of once-weekly carfilzomib (30-min IV infusion) with dexamethasone was established to be 70 mg/m2 (Berenson et al. Blood. 2016;127:3360−3368). In this secondary analysis, the efficacy and safety of once-weekly carfilzomib at this dose were evaluated by prior BTZ exposure (no prior exposure vs exposed but not refractory vs refractory) and age (<65 vs 65−74 vs ≥75 years). Results: The data cutoff date for this analysis was Nov 5, 2015.A total of 104 patients (phase 1 and 2; <65 years, n=34; 65-74 years, n=41; ≥75 years, n=29) received carfilzomib at a dose of 70 mg/m2 (no prior BTZ exposure, n=17; prior BTZ exposure but not BTZ-refractory, n=33; BTZ-refractory, n=54). The ORR for all 104 patients receiving the 70 mg/m2 dose was 77%; the median PFS was 14.3 months. Efficacy by prior BTZ exposure is presented in Table 1. The ORRs were 94%, 91%, and 63% for patients with no prior BTZ exposure, those exposed but not refractory to BTZ, and BTZ-refractory patients, respectively. The proportions of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or better were 35% (no prior BTZ exposure), 21% (exposed to but not refractory to BTZ), and 9% (BTZ-refractory). The median PFS durations were 21.0, 19.4, and 5.3 months in these subgroups, respectively. The median treatment durations by age were 6.4 months (<65 years), 6.2 months (65-74 years), and 9.9 months (≥75 years); mean cumulative doses of carfilzomib received were 1876.8, 1846.5, and 2156.1 mg/m2, respectively. Efficacy and safety outcomes by age are shown in Table 2. The median PFS durations were 7.4 and 10.2 months for patients aged <65 and 65−74 years, respectively; the median PFS was not reached for those aged ≥75 years. The ORRs were 79%, 73%, and 79% for patients aged <65 years, 65−74 years, and ≥75 years, respectively. The ≥CR rates were 26% (<65 years), 15% (65-74 years), and 10% (≥75 years). Overall rates of treatment discontinuation were similar among age subgroups (Table 2). The rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were 3% (<65 years), 17% (65−74 years), and 21% (≥75 years). The proportions of patients with at least one grade ≥3 adverse event were 56% (<65 years), 61% (65−74 years), and 76% (≥75 years). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest by age are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: Once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) with dexamethasone was safe and active for patients with relapsed or refractory MM, regardless of prior BTZ exposure or age. As expected, the median PFS durations in the BTZ-naïve or -sensitive patients were longer relative to that in the BTZ-refractory patients. Although there were higher incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events in older patients (≥65 years) relative to younger patients (<65 years), median PFS was not negatively affected by increasing age. Overall, once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, irrespective of prior BTZ exposure or age. Disclosures Berdeja: Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding. Rifkin:Amgen/ONYX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aggarwal:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Iskander:Amgen Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berenson:Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Phase 1 Study Of TH-302, An Investigational Hypoxia-Targeted Drug, and Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1948-1948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Philippe Armand ◽  
Robert L. Schlossman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background In multiple myeloma (MM) mouse models, diseased animals demonstrate a marked expansion of areas of hypoxia in the bone marrow, suggesting that hypoxia may be a therapeutically meaningful target in this disease. TH-302 is an investigational 2-nitroimidazole prodrug of the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide (Br-IPM) designed to be selectively activated in hypoxia. TH-302 exhibited anti-tumor activity in preclinical MM models in vitro and in vivo (Hu et al, Blood 2010; Chesi et al, Blood 2012), and synergism was seen when combined with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Hu et al, Mol Cancer Ther 2013). Based on these findings, a Phase 1/2 study of TH-302 plus dexamethasone was initiated for patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Methods Eligible patients in the study (NCT01522872) had ECOG PS ≤ 2, receipt of at least 2 prior therapies, and acceptable hepatorenal function and hematologic status. A standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used with a fixed oral 40 mg dose of dexamethasone (dex) and 40% dose increments of TH-302. TH-302 was administered IV with dex on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. The objectives were to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical activity of TH-302 plus dex; and study the relationship between hypoxia within the bone marrow and response to TH-302. Results As of August 2013, 13 patients have been treated: 8 males/5 females with a median age of 59 years (range: 53 – 86) and 6 prior therapies (range: 3 – 10). All had previously received both bortezomib and lenalidomide/thalidomide containing regimens as well as an alkylating agent. TH-302 was dosed at 240 (n=5), 340 (n=6), and 480 (n=2) mg/m² for a median of 5 cycles (range: 1 – 18). No DLTs were reported at 240 or 340 mg/m². Two patients treated at 480 mg/m² had DLTs of grade 3 mucositis, exceeding the definition of MTD. Four patients had serious adverse events (SAEs) related to TH-302 (pneumonia (n=2), proctalgia (n=1), anemia (n=1)). Three patients continue on study after a median of 17 cycles (range: 7 – 18). Twelve patients have had efficacy evaluations: 2 patients with partial responses (PRs), 3 patients with minimal responses (MRs), and 7 patients with stable disease (SD), for a clinical benefit rate (MR or better) of 42%. Conclusions TH-302 can be administered at 340 mg/m2 biweekly together with dex, with dose limiting mucositis seen at higher doses. Initial clinical activity has been noted with a clinical benefit rate of 42% in heavily pretreated MM patients who are relapsed/refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Disclosures: Ghobrial: BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noxxon: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Raje:Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Handisides:Threshold Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kroll:Threshold Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson&Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Phase 1, Dose-Escalation Study (CHAMPION-1) Investigating Weekly Carfilzomib In Combination With Dexamethasone For Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1934-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Leonard Klein ◽  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Priti Patel ◽  
Sandra Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
The Us ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a selective proteasome inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) (Kyprolis PI, 2012). The approved dose and schedule for single-agent CFZ is 20/27 mg/m2 administered intravenously (IV) over 2–10 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Using the same consecutive daily dosing schedule, 56 mg/m2 CFZ administered IV over 30 minutes has been found to be well tolerated as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone (DEX), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 55%–60% for patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory MM (Badros et al, ASH 2012, abstract 4036). In this multicenter single-arm phase 1/2 study (CHAMPION-1; NCT01677858), we are evaluating the safety and efficacy of once-weekly CFZ with DEX. Results from the phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the study are presented herein, including an evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), clinical benefit rate (CBR, ≥minimal response [MR]), ORR (≥partial response [PR]), and time to response. Methods Pts with relapsed or refractory MM who had received 1−3 prior regimens were eligible for enrollment. Pts were treated with CFZ as a 30-minute IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in a standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme. All pts received CFZ (20 mg/m2) on day 1 of cycle 1; subsequent doses started at 45 mg/m2 in the first cohort and were escalated to 56, 70, or 88 mg/m2in successive cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Pts also received 40 mg DEX (IV or oral administration) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1–8. During cycle 9 and beyond, patients continued to receive the same doses and schedules of CFZ and DEX, with the exception that DEX was not administered on day 22. The primary objective of the phase 1 portion of the study was to determine the MTD of weekly CFZ plus DEX. Response was assessed by IMWG criteria. MR was assessed by EBMT criteria. Results As of July 11, 2013, 18 pts have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 43–84), and a median of 1 prior regimen (range, 1–2). The 45 and 56 mg/m2 dosing cohorts enrolled 3 pts each, and the 70 and 88 mg/m2 dosing cohorts enrolled 6 pts each. Pts have received a median of 5.5 cycles of treatment. At 88 mg/m2, 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: grade [Gr] 3 dyspnea and Gr 3 vomiting. All 18 pts were evaluable for safety. The only grade 3 adverse event (AE) reported in more than 1 patient was increased blood creatinine (n=2). Four serious AEs were reported in 3 pts: Gr 3 dyspnea, Gr 3 pneumonia, Gr 3 increased blood creatinine, and Gr 4 hyponatremia. No peripheral neuropathy was reported. Six pts discontinued treatment for the following reasons: AEs of decreased renal function (n=1) and dyspnea (n=1), progressive disease (n=2), physician decision (n=1), and withdrawal of consent (n=1). Five patients had a dose reduction from 88 mg/m2 to 70 mg/m2 (1 due to an AE, 1 due to a DLT, and 3 per protocol due to the 2 DLTs in the 88 mg/kg2 cohort); 2 of the 5 pts had an additional dose reduction owing to AEs. PK analysis (n=12) from pts that received 20, 70, or 88 mg/m2 of CFZ showed a dose-dependent increase in mean Cmax (703, 2640, and 3172 ng/mL, respectively) and AUC (283, 1045, and 1247 h·ng/mL, respectively) for CFZ. The mean terminal half-life was ∼0.8 h. Fifteen pts were included in the response evaluation; 3 pts did not have a postbaseline assessment at the time of the data cutoff. The ORR was 67%, and the CBR was 87% (4 pts achieved a complete response, 1 very good PR, 5 PR, and 3 MR). One pt had stable disease, and 1 pt was not evaluable for response, as the pt had a DLT and was no longer on treatment. Median time to response for pts that achieved a ≥PR (n=10) was 1.6 months. Conclusions These preliminary results demonstrate that weekly CFZ at doses ≥45 mg/m2 in combination with DEX in pts with relapsed or refractory MM was tolerated and showed rapid and promising efficacy with an ORR of 67% and a CBR of 87%. Weekly infusion of 70 mg/m2 CFZ demonstrated a lower Cmax, comparable half-life, and higher AUC per cycle compared with the currently approved twice-weekly CFZ dosing regimen. Overall, these findings suggest that CFZ at doses up to 70 mg/m2 in combination with DEX may be administered in a convenient once-weekly schedule. The study is ongoing to confirm the MTD at 70 mg/m2, at which point the phase 2 portion of the study will be initiated. Disclosures: Berenson: Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor that is approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Klein:USONC: Employment. Rifkin:Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Onyx: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dixon:Onyx: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Onyx: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document