Reduced Relapse Risk In Patients With AML After Hhcmv-Replication Post Transplantation-First Results Of a Prospective Registration Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5503-5503
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Nina-Kristin Steckel ◽  
Meltem Kekec ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
Markus Ditschkowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5503 Introduction Early detection of inapparent replicative human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection together with its preemptive antiviral treatment has led to a marked reduction of life-threatening HCMV disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (alloSCT). A new aspect of HCMV reactivation and pretransplant HCMV serostatus has recently emerged by an earlier retrospectively performed report from us showing that the occurrence of a HCMV-reactivation after transplant reduces the risk for relapse in patients with AML and NHL. This idea was supported by a study by Scheper and co-worker (Leukemia, 2013) reporting recently, that gamma-delta T cells elicited by HCMV reactivation after alloSCT cross-recognize HCMV and leukemia. Here we evaluate the potential impact of early HCMV replication in a prospectively performed observational study about the occurrence of a HCMV- reactivation after T cell repleted alloSCT on the risk for leukemic relapse in patients with AML (Registration Trial DRKS00004300). Patients and Method Between January 2012 and March 2013 we enrolled in this trial 83 patients with AML who were consecutively transplanted at the University Hospital of Essen. 48 of 83 patients received a myeloablative (TBI based conditioning n=27, chemotherapy based conditioning n=23) and 35 patients a RIC regimen. Patients were transplanted in 1.CR (n=40), 2.CR (n=23) or more progressive disease stages (n=20) from HLA-identical sibling donor (n=17) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (URD) (n=42) or mismatched unrelated donor (n=24). The median age of patients was 53 years (range 18-72) and that of the donors 38 years (range 12-61). GVHD prophylaxis was performed with MTX and CSA, or CSA and MMF with or without ATG (n=64) (30-60mg total dose). The incidence of acute GVHD grade 2-4 was statistically not different in both groups (78% versus 85%). Results HCMV status of recipient (R) or donors (D) were in 29% R-/D-, 8% R-/ D+; 34% D+/R- and 29% R+/D+. Patients with a documented HCMV-reactivation (HCMV-R) had an estimated relapse incidence (CIR) at 1-year after transplant of only 8% compared to 43% in patients without a HCMV-R (p=0.03). Patients in more progressive disease phase of AML (N=43) benefit more from a HCMV-R in regard of CIR than patients in 1.CR of AML (0% versus 55% estimate for relapse at 1-year after transplant for patients with HCMV-R compared to patients without HCMV –R, p=0.028). One-year overall survival was statistically not different in both groups. Non relapse mortality was greater in patients with HCMV reactivation 37.8% versus 12.5%, p=0.1) Conclusion The first result of this prospective study confirms an independent advantageous effect of early HCMV replication on the leukemic relapse risk in patients with AML after transplant, which was more pronounced in patients in  progressive disease phase of AML than patients in 1.CR of AML. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The off-label use of HCG will be presented here for the first tiem for treatment of chronic GVHD and will clearly marked as off-label use.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4927-4927
Author(s):  
Luca Lo Nigro ◽  
Emanuela Cannata ◽  
Piera Samperi ◽  
Silvana Munda ◽  
Daria Bottino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background AML is an aggressive disease. Current pediatric protocols ensure a 60% survival rate (Pession A et al, Blood 2013), reaching a plateau of intensiveness. Nevertheless, patients with primary induction failure (PIF) (10%) or relapse (30%) after stem cell transplantation (SCT) still have a very poor outcome. Novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Case 1. In January 2013, a 13 year-old female with FAB-M1-AML, presenting with chromosome 11 monosomy, was enrolled on AIEOP-AML-2002/01 protocol (Pession A et al, Blood 2013) and showed a PIF after two cycles of induction phase. Leukemic blasts arose in a low peripheral blood cell (PBC) count, even in response to second line treatment (I-BFM-AML-relapse2001 protocol). A third line experimental therapy, azacitidine (AZA) and rapamycin, failed to induce remission. Low PBC count with blasts still remained. Based on a bright expression of CD117/cKit, detected by flow cytometry, we designed a salvage therapy with AZA (75mg/mq/day for 7 days, every 21 days), in association with Imatinib Mesylate (375 mg/mq/day). We observed an increase of PBC count, with rapid disappearance of blasts. After two courses of AZA-Imatinib, the patient achieved complete remission. Subsequently she underwent SCT from an unrelated donor (UD) (Nov/2013). Nine months later, immune-suppressive therapy was withdrawn and we confirmed complete remission with a 100% donor engraftment. She is currently alive and in remission. Case 2. In October 2013, a 13 year-old male with FAB-M5-AML, presenting with a complex karyotype and specific molecular markers (FLT3-ITD and NSD1-NUP98), was enrolled on AIEOP-AML-2002/01 protocol. He achieved complete remission after induction phase. Nearby SCT-UD program, he presented colonization with two multi-resistant-gram-negative bacteria. For this reason, he was shifted to a haplo-identical SCT program. He received two haplo-SCT from his mother (April/2014) and his father (June/2014) respectively, after which he showed a bone marrow relapse (Sept/2014). Based on his low performance status, we designed a salvage therapy with cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/day i.v. in a total 8-days/cycle) Sorafenib (600 mg/day orally, already started before the first haplo-SCT), in association with PEG-Asparaginase (Oncaspar) at 3500 UI/i.v. weekly for 4 administrations. Surprisingly we observed an increasing signs of cutaneous grade II graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), confirmed by flow cytometry analysis (high T-cell suppressors/NK cells), consistently with an increasing rate of donor's DNA (Dec/2014). Therefore, after a second cycle, the patient achieved the complete remission (Jan/2015) and a third haplo-SCT (Feb/2015) was given, using NK-alloreactive donor cells from his mother. Currently, the patient is alive and in complete remission with 100% donor. Conclusion. Our experience suggests that innovative combinational therapies are able to rescue patients with PIF or relapsed AML after SCT, the worst candidates. Association of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a demethylating agent showed a synergistic effect on leukemic blasts. More interestingly, PEG-LASP combined an anti-leukemic effect to an immune-modulation on donor's lymphocytes, as shown by immunophenotypic analyses. Disclosures Off Label Use: We used Imatinib Mesylate and PEG-L-Asparaginase in two children with AML: an off-label use for indication and age. .


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1199-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Federmann ◽  
Christoph Faul ◽  
Wichard Vogel ◽  
Lothar Kanz ◽  
Wolfgang Andreas Bethge

Abstract Abstract 1199 Poster Board I-221 Currently, most treatment algorithms reserve the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) to patients with a matched related donor (MRD) and intermediate/high-risk disease. However, the role of HCT from a matched or mismatched unrelated donor (MUD/MMUD) in patients with AML remains to be defined. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 219 consecutive adult patients (98 female, 121 male) with AML who received HCT from 2000-2009 at our institution. The patients were transplanted after either myeloablative (MAC, n=139) or dose-reduced-conditioning regimens (RIC, n=80). Median age of patients was 50 years (range, 18-76). 77 patients were transplanted from MRD, 80 patients from MUD and 62 patients from MMUD (one antigen mismatch (MM)=31; two antigen MM=2; one allel MM=24; two allel MM=3, one antigen/one allel MM= 2). In all but six patients receiving MMUD grafts, ATG was included in the conditioning. Age, risk profile and pretreatment were evenly distributed among the three cohorts of patients. At time of HCT 22 (MRD), 18 (MUD) and 28 (MMUD) patients were not in CR. Current overall survival is 40 of 77 (52%) in patients transplanted from MRD, 48 of 80 (60%) from MUD and 34 of 62 (55%) from MMUD with a median follow-up of 1309 (range, 98-3173), 796 (range, 87-3075) and 648 (range, 111-1973) days of alive patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was similar with 54% after MRD-, 56% after MUD- and 46% after MMUD-HCT (p=0.4554). In patients transplanted in CR, 3-year estimated OS was also comparable (64% MRD vs. 58% MUD vs. 55% MMUD, p=0.6614). However, in patients transplanted in partial remission (PR) we observed a trend for a better survival in patients receiving a MUD graft (30% MRD vs. 46% MUD vs. 39% MMUD, p=0.1707). In the patients receiving MAC we observed a better OS compared to RIC with an estimated 3-year OS of 58% vs. 38% (p=0.1047) mainly due to a lower incidence of relapse. In the subgroup of patients receiving MRD-HCT this survival benefit was significant (61% vs. 21%, p= 0.0327) while there was only a trend for MUD- or MMUD-HCT (60% vs 45%, p=0.5702 and 49% vs. 43%, p= 0.7566, respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute GvHD >II with 25% (MRD), 35% (MUD) and 34% (MMUD) or chronic GvHD with 43% (MRD), 46% (MUD) and 34% (MMUD), respectively. A significant better survival of patients with limited cGvHD vs. extensive or without cGvHD (estimated 3-year OS 73% vs. 34% vs. 47%, p=0.0001) was observed. This advantage was present in all subgroups with a significant better survival in the group with MRD (86% vs. 38% p= 0.0034), a trend in MUD (67% vs. 55% p= 0.0564) and MMUD (59% vs. 55%, p= 0.3111). No significant influence on survival or GVHD of the degree and loci of HLA-mismatch could be detected. In conclusion in our cohort of patients, HCT from MUD or MMUD in AML resulted in a similar outcome compared to MRD. In patients with PR at time of HCT, the use of MUD and occurrence of limited cGVHD may lead to improved survival due to an enhanced graft-versus-leukemia-effect. Disclosures: Off Label Use: some chemotherapeutical agents in the conditioning are off-label-use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 361-371
Author(s):  
Karl Peter Ittner ◽  
Joachim Koppenberg ◽  
Ute Walter
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungWenn zugelassene Arzneimittel außerhalb der in der entsprechenden Fachinformation dargelegten Beschreibungen angewendet werden, dann spricht man von einer nicht zulassungskonformen Anwendung oder von einem Off-Label-Use. Wie in fast allen medizinischen Fachgebieten gibt es auch im Rettungsdienst sogenannte Off-Label-Use-Pharmakotherapien. Sofern evidenzbasierte Informationen zu einer nicht zulassungskonformen Anwendung vorliegen, und insbesondere im konkreten Notfall keine zulassungskonforme Möglichkeit besteht, dann ist diese gerechtfertigt. Verwendet ein Notarzt aber ein Medizinprodukt außerhalb der Zulassung, dann stellt er ein neues Produkt her und haftet persönlich bei einem Patientenschaden.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (09) ◽  
pp. 551-555
Author(s):  
W. N. Vance ◽  
J. Wissel

ZusammenfassungAlle Indikationen zur Anwendung von Botulinumtoxin A (BoNT A) in der Urologie befinden sich im Status des sogenannten off label use, entsprechend sind Kernfragen wie z. B. die Kostenübernahme nicht geklärt. Erst 20 Jahre nach der ersten Anwendung in der Urologie werden Zulassungsstudien durchgeführt. Andererseits sind insbesondere die Behandlungsmöglichkeiten im Bereich der neurogenen Harnblase so etabliert, dass sie bereits in die urologischen Leitlinien Einzug gefunden haben. Hinsichtlich der Dosierung von BoNT A und der optimalen Anwendungstechnik bestehen weder allgemein anerkannte Handlungsanweisungen noch offizielle Empfehlungen. Dies gilt auch im Bereich der Anästhesie zur Injektion von BoNT A im urologischen Gebiet. Nicht wenige Patienten schrecken davor zurück, sich regelmäßig, zum Teil jährlich, einer Allgemeinanästhesie zu unterziehen. Ein besonderer Hoffnungsschimmer stellt für multimorbide Patienten mit hohem OP-Risiko die sich entwickelnde Behandlung der Prostatahyperplasie mittels BoNT A dar, insbesondere da in allen Studien die Lokalanästhesie angewandt wurde und nur wenige Nebenwirkungen auftraten.


Pneumologie ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Hohenforst-Schmidt ◽  
K Lorenz ◽  
C Axthelm ◽  
H Altmannsberger
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document