The Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Selinexor (KPT-330) Demonstrates Broad and Durable Clinical Activity in Relapsed / Refractory Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 396-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kuruvilla ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Joseph M Flynn ◽  
Ramiro Garzon ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: The nuclear export protein, XPO1 is overexpressed in all types of malignant lymphoma. The SINE selinexor (KPT-330) is a slowly reversible XPO1 antagonist that forces the nuclear retention and activation of over 10 tumor suppressor proteins (TSP) such as p53, IkB, FOXO and p21. In addition, selinexor inhibits the nuclear export and the translation of oncogenic mRNAs such as c-myc and Bcl-XL levels. Together these effects result in apoptosis of cancer cells in preclinical models of both T- and B- cell NHL. In DLBCL cell lines (n=10), selinexor induced potent cytotoxicity against both germinal center (GCB) and nonGCB including those with high MYC and/or BCL2/6 protein levels. Methods: Selinexor was administered orally for 4-10 doses in a 28-day cycle in this phase 1 study. Serial tumor biopsies were performed. Response evaluation was performed in cycle 1 and 2 and then every 2 cycles. All pts had heavily pretreated NHL with documented progressive disease (PD) on study entry. Results: 58 pts (34 males 24 females; median age 62 yrs; ECOG PS 0/1/2: 19/35/4; median prior regimens: 3) received selinexor across 13 dose levels (3 to 80 mg/m2). The recommended Phase 2 dose is 60 mg/m2 based on results across all Phase 1 studies. Grade 3/4 events (>5%) include thrombocytopenia (31%), neutropenia (22%), fatigue (10%), and anemia (7%). The most common Grade 1/2 AEs were: nausea (66%), anorexia (47%), fatigue (40%), and vomiting (40%) that were manageable with supportive care and were seen less frequently following cycle 1. Increases in XPO1 mRNA levels were observed at all doses and sustained for 4-48 hours, supporting twice weekly dosing. Tumor biopsies confirmed TSP nuclear localization, c-myc reductions, and apoptosis induction of cancer cells. Objective responses were observed in all classes of NHL studied (Table 1). An objective response rate (ORR) of 31% was observed across all NHL types. An ORR of 40% was observed in pts with rel/ref aggressive B-NHL (DLBCL, Follicular NHL grade 3b (FLgrd3b) and transformed NHL) at doses ³60 mg/m2 vs an ORR of 33% at 23-50 mg/m2 and 25% at ²20 mg/m2. Across all NHL types, time to best response was delayed, including 5 complete responses (CR) (4 in DLBCL and 1 T-NHL). Nine pts out of 34 have remained on therapy for >6-23 months without clinically significant cumulative toxicities or major organ dysfunction. Conclusions: Selinexor treatment is generally well tolerated with supportive care and can be given over a prolonged period. Durable single agent activity in pts with heavily pretreated NHL has been observed. Phase 2 studies in DLBCL, Richter's transformation and T-NHL of single agent selinexor as well as in combination with other agents including CD20 antibodies are expected to begin in the near future. Abstract 396. Table 1 Cancer Type Selinexor Dose (mg/m2) N* ORR (%) CR (%) PR (%) SD (%) PD (%) WC/NE (%) Aggressive B-NHL (DLBCL, FLgrd3b, Transformed) ≤20 4 1 (25%) -- 1 (25%) 1 (25%) 2 (50%) -- 20 – 50 21 7 (33%) 4 (19%) 3 (14%) 5 (24%) 6 (29%) 3 (14%) ≥60* 10 4 (40%) -- 4 (40%) 4 (40%) -- 2 (20%) Follicular & Other Indolent NHL ≤30 4 -- -- -- 4 (100%) -- -- ≥35 4 2 (50%) -- 2 (50%) 1 (25%) -- 1 (25%) Mantle Cell Lymphoma ≤30 2 1 (50%) -- 1 (50%) 1 (50%) -- -- ≥35 2 -- -- -- -- 1 (50%) 1 (50%) T-Cell Lymphoma ≤30 4 -- -- -- 2 (50%) -- 2 (50%) ≥35 1 1 (100%) 1 (100%) -- -- -- -- Richter's Transformation ≤30 3 1 (33%) -- 1 (33%) 2 (67%) -- -- ≥35 3 1 (33%) -- 1 (33%) -- -- 2 (67%) TOTAL 58 18 (31%) 5 (9%) 13 (22%) 20 (34%) 9 (16%) 11 (19%) * First pt in this population was dosed on 23-July-2012 ORR=Objective Response Rate; CR=Complete Response; PR=Partial Response; SD=Stable Disease; PD=Progressive Disease; WC=Withdrew Consent; NE=Non-Evaluable Disclosures Byrd: Pharmacyclics, Genentech: Research Funding. Porcu:Infinity: Research Funding; Seattle genetics: Research Funding; Actelion: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stone:AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Baz:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Flinn:AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Klebanov:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. Marshall:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. McCartney:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. McCauley:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Carlson:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Norori:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Consultancy. Savona:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rashal:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Mirza:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A Phase 1/2 Study of the Second Generation Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, KPT-8602, in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4509-4509 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Frank Cornell ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Craig C Hofmeister ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - Inhibition of Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a novel treatment approach for multiple myeloma (MM). XPO1 mediates the nuclear export of cell-cycle regulators and tumor suppressor proteins leading to their functional inactivation. In addition, XPO1 promotes the export and translation of the mRNA of key oncoproteins (e.g. c-MYC, BCL-2, Cyclin D). XPO1 overexpression occurs in solid and hematological malignancies, including MM and is essential for MM cell survival. Selinexor, the first oral SINE compound, has shown promising anti-MM activity in phase 1 studies but has been associated with gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities including nausea, anorexia and fatigue. KPT-8602 is a second generation oral SINE compound with similar in vitro potency to selinexor, however, has substantially reduced brain penetration compared with selinexor, and demonstrated markedly improved tolerability with minimal anorexia and weight loss in preclinical toxicology studies. In murine models of MM, KPT-8602 can be dosed daily (QDx5) with minimal anorexia and weight loss. We have therefore initiated a phase 1/2 first-in-human clinical trial. Methods - This phase 1/2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate KPT-8602 as a single agent and in combination with low dose dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed / refractory MM (RRMM). KPT-8602 is dosed orally (QDx5) for a 28-day cycle with a starting dose of 5 mg. Low dose dex (20 mg, twice weekly) is allowed after cycle 1 if at least a minimal response (MR) is not observed. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evidence for anti-MM activity for KPT-8602 single agent and in combination with dex. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PDn; XPO1 mRNA) profile of KPT-8602 will also be determined. PDn predictive biomarker analysis and ex vivo drug response assays are underway using tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates before treatment, during and at relapse. These analyses include cell death pathway assays by flow and nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of XPO1, NF-ƙB, IƙBα, IKKα, NRIF and p53 by imaging flow and IHC. Results - As of 01-Aug-2016, 6 pts 2 M/4 F, (median of 6 prior treatment regimens, median age of 71) with RRMM have been enrolled. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts), nausea (2 pts) and diarrhea (2 pts). Grade 3 AEs include neutropenia (1 pt) and dehydration (1 pt). No grade 4 or 5 AEs have been reported. No DLTs have been observed and the MTD has not been reached. 5 pts were evaluable for responses (1 pt pending evaluation): 1 partial response, 1 minimal response, and 3 stable disease; no pts have progressed on therapy with the longest on for >5 months. The PK properties following oral administration showed that 5 mg of KPT-8602 was rapidly absorbed (mean tmax= 1 hr, mean Cmax= 30.6 ng/mL). The mean AUCinf was calculated to be 141 ng•hr/mL. After tmax, KPT-8602 declined at an estimated mean t½ of 4 hr. At the same dose level, XPO1 mRNA expression was the highest (~2.5 fold) at 8 hr post dose. Conclusions - Oral KPT-8602 is well tolerated in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities observed with twice weekly selinexor have not been observed with 5x/week KPT-8602, including in pts on study for >4 months. PK was predictable and in line with selinexor. These early results show encouraging disease control with pts remaining on therapy. Enrollment is on-going. Disclosures Rossi: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arno Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Signal Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Incyte, Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shustik:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richter:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Chen:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vogl:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedlander:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Sullivan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Selinexor Demonstrates Marked Synergy with Dexamethasone (Sel-Dex) in Preclinical Models and in Patients with Heavily Pretreated Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4773-4773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine I. Chen ◽  
Martin Gutierrez ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Joshua R. Richter ◽  
Nina Wagner-Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Nuclear Retention ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: The nuclear export protein exportin 1, (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including MM and often correlate with poor prognosis. Selinexor (KPT-330) is an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) XPO1 antagonist in Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) and reduction of many proto-oncogenes, including MDM2, MYC and Cyclin D. In addition, selinexor potently deactivates NF-κB, through forced nuclear retention of IκBα. Together these effects induce selective apoptosis in MM cells and inhibition of NF-κB dependent osteoclast activation. XPO1 is also responsible for nuclear export of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). We hypothesized that selinexor will enhance the activity of dexamethasone (DEX)-bound GR, resulting in synergistic tumor cell killing. Methods: In vitro tumor cell viability measurements were based on MTT (CellTiter 96¨/Promega) and combination indices were calculated using CalcuSyn software. For xenograft studies, utilized NOD-SCID mice with subcutaneous inoculation of MM.1s cells. GR nuclear localization was measured with immunofluorescent anti-GR (phosphor-S211) antibody and quantitative imaging. To assess GR transcriptional activation, GR binding to a GCR consensus sequence was measured in nuclear extracts using an ELISA method (GR ELISA kit/Affymetrix). Patients (pts) with heavily pretreated refractory MM were dosed with oral selinexor at doses of up to 60 mg/m2 (8-10 doses/4 wk cycle) as part of a Phase 1 program in advanced hematological malignancies. Response we defined based on the IMWG criteria. The effect of combining DEX with selinexor was analyzed in all pts who received selinexor at moderate to high doses (30-60 mg/m2). Safety and efficacy were analyzed separately in three groups: no DEX, <20 mg DEX and 20 mgs DEX. Results: In MM.1s cells Sel-Dex showed synergy for nuclear retention of the DEX activated GR (Ser211-phosphorylated) and concomitant GR transcriptional activation. Sel-Dex showed highly synergistic cytotoxicity in MM.1s cells in vitro and in vivo, with a corresponding increase in apoptosis. Selinexor alone was potently cytotoxic in the DEX resistant MM cell lines MM.1R and ANBL6, but addition of DEX provided no additional effect. Twenty-eight pts with heavily pretreated refractory MM (16 M, 12 F; median age 62; ECOG PS 0/1: 7/21; median prior regimens: 6) received selinexor at 30 – 60 mg/m2 with either 0, <20, or 20 mgs DEX. All pts have received a proteasome inhibitor and an Imid and the majority of the pts have received pomalidomide (68%) and/or carfilzomib (36%). The most common Grade 1/2 AEs for these three groups were: nausea (82%/86%/70%), fatigue (55%/86%/40%), anorexia (36%/71%/60%), and vomiting (36%/57%/10%). Of the 28 pts treated; 10 heavily pretreated refractory MM pts treated with a combination of selinexor (45 mg/m2 twice weekly) and DEX (20 mg with each selinexor dose) were found to have dramatically improved disease response (n=10, ORR 60%), with one stringent complete response (sCR, 10%), 5 partial responses (PR, 50%) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) rate of 80% (Figure 1). Treatment with ³30mg/m2 selinexor and <20 mg DEX (n=7), resulted in ORR of 14% and CBR of 86%, while treatment with selinexor (30-60 mg/m2) without DEX (n=12) showed best response of stable disease (50%). Sel-Dex was also associated with an increase in time on study relative to selinexor alone, with 7 of out 10 pts in the 20 mg DEX combo group still on study (11-25 weeks). Five additional pts were treated with selinexor at a dose of 60 mg/m2 in combination with 20 mg DEX. Response evaluation is pending. Conclusions: Sel-Dex combination is markedly synergistic in preclinical models, which is supported by the preliminary clinical data presented. One potential mechanism underlying this synergy is the amplification of GR activity due the combined effects of selinexor-induced nuclear retention of activated GR coupled with DEX-mediated GR agonism. These results provide a promising basis for the continuing study of Sel-Dex for treatment of pts with refractory MM. Phase 2 studies of Sel-Dex in pts with MM refractory to both pomalidomide and carfilzomib are planned for early 2015. Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide maintenance therapy after ASCT. Gutierrez:Senesco: PI Other. Siegel:Celgene, Millennium, Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Azmi:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Research Funding. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Marshall:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. McCartney:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Employment. Norori:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Consultancy. Savona:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rashal:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Carlson:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Mirza:Karyopharm Therpeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reece:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen : Honoraria; Amgen : Honoraria.

Results from Phase 1/2 Trial of Tagraxofusp in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3145-3145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Myo Htut ◽  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: The bone marrow microenvironment of many multiple myeloma (MM) patients contains high levels of CD123-expressing plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). These pDCs have been shown to augment MM growth and contribute to drug resistance (Chauhan, et al., Cancer Cell, 2009). Tagraxofusp, a novel CD123 targeted therapy, has demonstrated high levels of anti-tumor activity in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), an aggressive CD123+ malignancy of pDC origin. Tagraxofusp demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity against MM cell lines and primary tumor samples via both a direct anti-MM effect and indirect pDC-targeting effect (Ray, et al., Leukemia, 2017), as well as demonstrating synergy in these systems when used in combination with traditional MM therapies including pomalidomide (POM). As such, targeting pDCs with tagraxofusp may offer a novel therapeutic approach in MM. Methods: This multicenter, single arm Phase 1/2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) MM and tested two different doses of tagraxofusp (7 or 9 mcg/kg). Patients received tagraxofusp as a daily IV infusion for days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle as a single agent for the initial run-in cycle (cycle 0) and in combination with standard doses/administration of POM and dexamethasone (DEX) in cycles 1 and beyond. Objectives included evaluation of safety and tolerability, identification of the maximum tolerated or tested dose, and efficacy. Results: 9 patients with r/r MM received tagraxofusp (7 mcg/kg, n=7; 9 mcg/kg, n=2). 5 males, median age 65 years (range: 57-70), median 3 prior therapies (range 2-6). Median follow-up was 12 months (range: 7 - 19). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were hypoalbuminemia 67% (6/9); chills, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and pyrexia each 56% (5/9); and dizziness, headache, hypophosphatemia, and thrombocytopenia each 44% (4/9). The most common grade 3 and 4 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia 44% (4/9) and neutropenia 33% (3/9). No grade 5 events reported. 5 patients treated with tagraxofusp and POM+DEX had a partial response (PR) after tumor evaluation. These patients demonstrated a rapid decrease in a set of myeloma-related laboratory values from pre-tagraxofusp treatment levels after the first combination cycle of tagraxofusp and POM+DEX. Additionally, these 5 patients demonstrated >50% decreases in peripheral blood pDC levels after both tagraxofusp monotherapy and combination therapy. Conclusions: Tagraxofusp was well-tolerated, with a predictable and manageable safety profile, when dosed in combination with POM+DEX in patients with r/r MM. Evidence of pDC suppression in peripheral blood and BM was observed in this patient population. 5 patients that received tagraxofusp and POM+DEX combination had PRs and decreases in pDC levels while on treatment with tagraxofusp. Given CD123 expression on pDCs in the tumor microenvironment and the potential synergy of tagraxofusp with certain MM agents including POM, tagraxofusp may offer a novel mechanism of action in MM. NCT02661022. Disclosures Richardson: Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Gasparetto:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Zonder:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Roche and Juno: Consultancy; Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Chen:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. McDonald:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rupprecht:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wysowskyj:Stemline Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chauhan:C4 Therapeutics.: Equity Ownership; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy. Anderson:Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board; OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder .

scholarly journals Deep and Durable Responses with Selinexor, Daratumumab, and Dexamethasome (SDd) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs: Results of Phase 1b Study of SDd

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 599-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina J Gasparetto ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
William Bensinger ◽  
Nizar Bahlis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates Exportin 1 (XPO1). Selinexor with low dose dexamethasone (Sd) or in with protesome inhibitors (PIs) or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), has shown anti-MM activity in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory MM. Daratumumab (Dara), an anti-CD38 mAb, is approved for the treatment of heavily pretreated MM is limited by short PFS and an ORR of ~21% in quad-refractory MM. Selinexor in combiniation with dara have shown preclinical synergistic killing of MM cells. Methods - Pts were eligible if they had received ≥ 3 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, including a PI and an IMiD. Selinexor was dose-escalated in 2 concurrent cohorts: once-weekly (QW, at 100 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, at 60 mg). Dara was 16 mg/kg IV (recommended schedule) and dexamethasone (dex) was 40 mg QW or 20 mg BIW. The objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of this SDd combination in pts with PI/IMiD refractory MM Results - As of Jul 20th2018, 25 pts (11 males / 14 females) have been enrolled. Three pts have been enrolled into the 60 mg BIW and 22 pts in the 100 mg QW cohorts. Pts have a median age of 68 years and a median of 3 (range, 2 - 10) prior treatment regimens. Common SDd treatment related adverse events included (all grades, grades 3/4): thrombocytopenia (58%, 42%), leukopenia (54%, 38%), anemia (46%, 29%), nausea (50%, 0%) and fatigue (46%, 8%). Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 60 mg BIW cohort: G3 thrombocytopenia and G2 fatigue requiring dose reduction in selinexor to 100 mg QW. In the 100 mg QW escalation cohort, 6 pts enrolled, 5 evaluable, with no DLTs. This cohort was expanded and enrollment is ongoing. A total of 21 pts were evaluable for response. In 19 dara-naïve pts, the ORR was 74% (5 VGPR, 9 PR, 2 MR, 2 SD, 1 PD), including 3 unconfirmed PRs, 1 unconfirmed MR. In the 2 pts with dara refractory MM, there was one PD and one SD. The longest duration of therapy is 13 months. Based on tolerability and efficacy, the RP2D of SDd is selinexor 100 mg, daratumumab 16 mg/kg and dex 40 mg, administered QW. Conclusions - Selinexor 100 mg QW can be combined safely with dara (per approved dosing) and dex. The preliminary ORR of 74% with SDd in patients with PI/IMiD refractory MM who are dara naïve is promising and compares favorably to 21% ORR of Dara and Sd in quad refractory myeloma. This once weekly regimen is well tolerated with no major organ toxicities to date. Data from the full phase 1 dose expansion will be presented. Disclosures Gasparetto: Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Bensinger:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Sebag:Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Leblanc:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Jeha:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lipe:Celgene: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Multicenter Study of Tazemetostat, an EZH2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 123-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Herve Tilly ◽  
Aristeidis Chaidos ◽  
Tycel J. Phillips ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Activating Mutations ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) remains a difficult-to-treat condition, with limited treatment options. New, tolerable treatments with unique mechanisms of action are needed, especially for high-risk patients whose disease progresses within 24 months of diagnosis (POD24). The epigenetic regulator EZH2 catalyzes the histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27m3) gene suppressive mark, which is essential for BCL6-driven germinal center (GC) formation. Conversely, a reduction in EZH2 catalytic activity is required for centroblast differentiation and initiation of the GC exit program. Activating mutations (MT) in EZH2, present in ~20% of FL patients, and enhanced H3K27me3 prevent GC exit, resulting in GC hyperplasia and lymphomagenesis. Tazemetostat, an investigational, selective, oral EZH2 inhibitor, has demonstrated durable, single-agent, antitumor activity in R/R FL patients with MT or wild-type (WT) EZH2. Herein, we report newly emerging interim efficacy and safety data from the MT and WT cohorts and the POD24 subgroup. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (NCT01897571) evaluated tazemetostat 800 mg administered orally twice daily in patients with MT or WT EZH2 R/R FL (Grade 1-3b). Key inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, ≥2 prior treatment regimens, and measurable disease per 2007 IWG-NHL criteria. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (complete response + partial response). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. The POD24 subgroup was composed of patients experiencing disease progression or relapse within 24 months of diagnosis or the start of frontline treatment with immunochemotherapy. Results: As of June 7, 2019, interim data were available for 99 patients (MT EZH2, n=45 [POD24, n=17; 38%]; WT EZH2, n=54 [POD24, n=30; 56%]). Of the 33 patients in the MT cohort with an objective response, 15 (45%) had a response at ≥6 months, 7 (21%) at ≥12 months, and 4 (12%) at ≥16 months. Of the 18 patients in the WT cohort with an objective response, 15 (83%) had a response at ≥6 months, 9 (50%) at ≥12 months, and 6 (33%) at ≥16 months. Data from the MT cohort continue to mature, with 11 (24%) patients enrolled in the past year and 17 (38%) patients still on treatment. Updated data from the fully enrolled MT cohort, and sub-group analyses from both WT and MT cohort, will be presented. Interim efficacy data from the response-evaluable population and POD24 subgroup of the MT and WT cohorts are presented in Table 1. These results demonstrate the potent, antitumor activity of tazemetostat regardless of the prognostic category of patients. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 17% of all patients and 15% of patients in the POD24 subgroup. The most frequently reported AEs were similar across the total population and the POD24 subgroup and included thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (2%), asthenia (2%), vomiting (1%), and fatigue (1%). Five percent of all patients discontinued treatment, and 9% had dose reductions due to treatment-related AEs. No treatment-related Grade 5 AE and deaths were reported. Conclusion: Tazemetostat was generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of treatment-related AEs. Tazemetostat demonstrated clinically meaningful, durable, single-agent activity across a spectrum of patients with FL, including the POD24 subgroup, and pronounced responses in patients with EZH2 activating mutations. Disclosures Morschhauser: BMS: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Tilly:servier: Honoraria; merck: Honoraria; roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy. Phillips:Bayer: Consultancy; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ribrag:Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArgenX: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses ; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses . Campbell:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Servier: Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celtrion: Research Funding; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; AstraZeneca/Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McKay:Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Opat:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Radford:GSK: Equity Ownership; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Whalen:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rajarethinam:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navia:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adib:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events.

A Phase I/II Trial of the KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1959-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Abstract 1959 Background: Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Inhibition of KSP induces mitotic arrest and cell death. ARRY-520 is a potent, selective KSP inhibitor. Cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM) which depend on the short-lived survival protein MCL-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520. ARRY-520 shows potent activity in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-520 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 2 q 2 weeks without/with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM with 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent, unless ineligible for or refusing to receive this therapy) were eligible. Cohorts of at least 3 pts were enrolled in a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Pts were treated for 2 cycles (4 weeks) to evaluate safety prior to dose escalation. Results: Twenty five pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 60 years (range 44–79) and a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received prior bortezomib or carfilzomib, 21 pts received prior lenalidomide, 17 pts prior thalidomide, and 18 pts had a prior stem cell transplant. Pts received ARRY-520 without G-CSF at 1 mg/m2/day (n = 3), and at 1.25 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at 1.25 mg/m2/day, and this was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the DLT, dose escalation with prophylactic G-CSF support was initiated, at doses of 1.5 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable), 2.0 mg/m2/day (n = 6) and 2.25 mg/m2/day (n = 2) with G-CSF. Both the 2.0 mg/m2/day and 2.25 mg/m2/day dose levels were determined to be non-tolerated, with DLTs of febrile neutropenia (FN) (2 pts at 2.0 mg/m2/day and both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day) and Grade 3 mucositis (both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day). One out of 6 evaluable pts at 1.5 mg/m2/day also developed a DLT of FN. In an attempt to optimize the Phase 2 dose, an intermediate dose level of 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF is currently being evaluated. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include those observed with other KSP inhibitors, such as hematological AEs (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia), fatigue, mucositis and other gastro-intestinal AEs. Pts displayed linear PK, a low clearance and a moderate volume of distribution, with moderate-to-high inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The median terminal elimination half life is 65 hours. The preliminary efficacy signal as a single agent is encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR) observed to date per IMWG and EBMT criteria in a heavily pretreated population (23 evaluable pts). A bortezomib-refractory pt with 8 prior lines of therapy, including a tandem transplant, treated at 1 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520 obtained a PR after Cycle 6, with urine protein and kappa light chain levels continuing to decline over time. He remains on-study after 15 months of ARRY-520 treatment. A pt with 2 prior lines of therapy, including prior carfilzomib, has obtained a PR after Cycle 8 at 2 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520, and she is currently ongoing after 4.5 months on therapy. Fifteen pts had a best response of stable disease (SD), including 1 pt with a thus far unconfirmed minimal response, and 6 had progressive disease. A total of 10 pts (43%) achieved a PR or SD lasting > 12 weeks. Several additional pts have shown other evidence of clinical activity, with decrease in paraproteins, increase in hemoglobin levels and regression of plasmacytomas. The median number of cycles is 4 (range 1–28+). Treatment activity has not correlated with any baseline characteristics or disease parameters to date. Conclusions: : The selective KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 has been well tolerated, and shows promising signs of single agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with RR MM. Prophylactic G-CSF has enabled higher doses to be tolerated. No cardiovascular or liver enzyme toxicity has been reported. Enrollment is ongoing at 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support, and a planned Phase 2 part of the study will be initiated as soon as the MTD is determined. Complete Phase 1 data will be disclosed at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Research Funding; Celgene:; Novartis:; Proteolix: . Weber:novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Walker:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Freeman:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rush:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ptaszynski:Array Biopharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 814-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Subset Analysis of Response to Treatment of Chronic Phase CML in a Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib in Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 602-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Neil Shah ◽  
Dale Bixby ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 602 Background: Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Initial findings of a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with refractory hematologic malignancies have been reported. The effect of duration of treatment, prior treatment, and mutation status on response to treatment was examined in CML chronic phase (CP) pts who responded to ponatinib. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation, phase 1 trial of ponatinib in pts with hematologic malignancies is ongoing. The primary aim is to assess the safety; anti-leukemic activity is also being investigated. Pts resistant to prior treatments or who had no standard treatment available were enrolled to receive a single daily oral dose of ponatinib (2 mg to 60 mg). Subset analyses of factors impacting cytogenetic and molecular response endpoints (MCyR and MMR) were performed for pts with CP-CML. Data are presented through April 15, 2011. Results: In total, 81 pts (54% male) received ponatinib. Overall, 43 pts had CP with 34 ongoing at analysis. MCyR was observed as best response in 31/43 (72%), 27 (63%) CCyR. The median time to MCyR was 12 (3 to 104) wks. Response rates were assessed by duration of treatment (1 pt in CCyR at entry was excluded; 6 pts in PCyR had to achieve CCyR). At the 3 month assessment, 22/42 (52%) CP pts achieved MCyR; at 6 months, 24/42 (57%); at 12 months, 29/42 (69%) had MCyR. The impact of prior treatment on response and time to response was assessed. 42 pts (98%) had >2 prior TKIs and 28 (65%) ≥3 prior TKIs, including investigational agents. Of approved TKIs, all pts were previously treated with imatinib, 19 dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib, and 21 both dasatinib and nilotinib after imatinib. MCyR rate decreased with number of prior TKIs (2 prior TKIs 13/14 [93%], ≥3 prior TKIs 17/28 [61%]) and number of approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 17/19 [90%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 12/21 [57%]). Time to response was prolonged in pts more heavily treated with prior TKIs. Median time to MCyR increased with the number of prior TKIs and approved TKIs (2 TKIs 12 wks, ≥3 TKIs 32 wks). The effect of mutation status on response and time to response was also evaluated. At entry, 12 pts had the T315I mutation, 15 had other BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, 12 had no mutations detected, 4 did not allow sequencing. MCyR response rate for CP pts with T315I was 11/12 (92%); for other mutations, 10/15 (67%); and no mutation, 7/12 (58%). Similarly, mutation status had an impact on time to response: median time to MCyR was 12 wks for those with T315I or other mutations and 32 wks in resistant pts with no mutation. All CP patients were evaluable for MMR. At analysis, MMR was 17/43 (40%). MMR rate was inversely related to number of prior TKIs (2 TKIs 10/14 [71%], ≥3 TKIs 6/28 [21%]), approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 12/19 [63%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 4/21 [19%]), and was higher for T315I pts (7/12, 58%) and those with other mutations (7/15, 47%) compared with no mutation (2/12, 17%). Median time to MMR for CP pts was 97 wks; median time to MMR was shorter for pts who were less heavily treated (2 prior TKIs 24 wks) and those with T315I or other mutations (63 wks). Conclusion: In this subset analysis of the phase 1 data, ponatinib had substantial activity in all subgroups analyzed. Time on treatment, less prior therapy and kinase domain mutations were associated with higher response rates and early responses in CP pts. Cytogenetic responses improved over the first 12 months of treatment and were higher in less heavily treated pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Shah:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Hu:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Druker:MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee and t. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding.

Ublituximab (TG-1101), a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination with Ibrutinib Is Highly Active in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory CLL and MCL; Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4679-4679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Charles M. Farber ◽  
Daruka Mahadevan ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Heather D. Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Efficacy Assessment ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity than rituximab and ofatumumab, particularly against cells that express low CD20 levels. Two Phase I trials of single agent UTX in relapsed/refractory CLL reported significant response rates with rapid and sustained lymphocyte depletion and a manageable safety profile. Ibrutinib, a novel oral BTK inhibitor approved for patients with previously treated CLL and MCL, displays high single agent activity and has reported increased activity in combination with non-glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAbs. Herein we report safety and efficacy data on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, from an ongoing Phase 2 trial. Methods: Eligible patients have relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL or MCL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. The study was designed to assess safety, tolerability, and early overall response rate, with an initial safety run-in period consisting of 6 patients followed by open enrollment. UTX (Cohorts of 600 and 900 mg for CLL and at 900 mg for MCL patients) is administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib is started on Day 1 and continues daily at 420 mg and 560 mg for CLL and MCL patients respectively. Following Cycle 6, patients come off study but remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoint for safety: Adverse Events and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) during safety run-in. Phase II primary efficacy endpoint: ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only. Results: 40 patients (33 CLL/ 7 MCL) have been enrolled to date with enrollment continuing. 23 M/17 F, median age 72 yr (range 52-86), ECOG 0/1/2: 20/19/1, median prior Tx = 2 (range 1-6), 38% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies; prior purine analog = 43%; prior alkylating agent = 68%; and prior purine and alkylating agent = 43%. No DLTs were observed during the safety run-in. Gr 3/4 AE’s occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, rash, leukocytosis, and infusion related reaction. There were no Grade 3/4 adverse events reported in ≥ 10% of patients. Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 2 patients (1 diarrhea, 1 rash) and discontinued in 2 patients due to ibrutinib related AE’s (diarrhea and rash). IRR’s were managed with infusion interruptions with no patient requiring an ublituximab dose reduction. As of July 2014, 24/40 patients are evaluable for response. Best response to treatment is as follows: TableTypePts (n)CR (n)PR (n)SD (n)ORR (%)CLL non 17p/11q10-9190%17p/11q817-100%Total CLL18116194%MCL632183% The one CLL patient who achieved stable disease had a 46% nodal reduction. UTX appears to control ibrutinib related lymphocytosis with more than half of the patients within normal range for ALC by first efficacy assessment. Conclusions: Data suggests ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and MCL. ORR was 94% in patients with CLL (100% in patients with high risk CLL: 17p, 11q del with 1 CR), with responses attained rapidly (median TTR: 8 weeks). In MCL, 83% of patients achieved a response at first efficacy assessment, with 50% of patients achieving a CR by week 20. For most patients, responses improved by the second efficacy assessment. The addition of ublituximab appears to mitigate ibrutinib related lymphocytosis producing earlier clinical responses than historically seen with ibrutinib monotherapy. Efficacy and safety will be updated on all enrolled patients. Disclosures Sharman: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Farber:Leukemia Lymphoma Society NJ Chapter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Stock ownership Other. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Kolibaba:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Glaxo Smithkline: Research Funding. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenwald:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Targeted MEK Inhibition in Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4775-4775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Heuck ◽  
Yogesh Jethava ◽  
Rashid Z Khan ◽  
Scott Miller ◽  
Alan Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genomic Profiling ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Diagnostic and therapeutic advances have significantly improved the outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, pts who are refractory to or relapse after therapy with immune modulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors remain a therapeutic challenge. Comprehensive genomic profiling via clinical next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays studies of MM cases have revealed multiple targetable mutations that were previously unexploited in MM. Methods: Between June 2013 and May 2014 we performed genomic profiling of 351 patients who had progressed after initial therapy to assist physicians in therapy planning. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using the FoundationOne¨ or FoundationOne Heme¨ assays. FoundationOne assays 374 cancer-related and 24 frequently rearranged genes via DNA-seq, and FoundationOneHeme assays 405 cancer-related and 31 frequently rearranged genes via DNA-seq as well as 265 frequently rearranged genes by RNA-seq. All samples were sequenced in a CLIA-certified CAP-accredited laboratory to an average depth >500x . Patients with activating alterations of KRAS, NRAS or BRAF were considered for therapy with the targeted agent trametinib (TMTB) as were patients who had a gene expression signature suggesting activation of the MAPK pathway. Retrospective review of this case series was approved by the UAMS institutional review board. Results: We identified 63 patients who underwent treatment with Trametinib. 60 were treated based on activating mutations of KRAS, NRAS or BRAF and 3 were treated based on a GEP signature. The median age was 65 and patients had a median of 5 lines of prior therapy (range 1-20). 38 of 63 patients had prior treatment with Total Therapy. 43 underwent salvage with chemotherapy prior to initiation of TMTB, 15 had salvage transplants, 33 patients were exposed to novel agents (Pomalidomide, Carfilzomib) and 33 had Metronomic therapy before TMTB. 25% of patients were ISS stage 3 and 37% had GEP70 defined high risk. 13 had PET defined extra medullary disease (EMD). 41 patients were administered TMTB monotherapy and 22 received TMTB treatment in combination with other agents. In general the treatment was well tolerated. 10 patients discontinued therapy because of toxicities, 29 discontinued because of disease progression or death. None of the deaths were attributed to TMTB, Best treatment responses were SD in 30, PR in 8, VGPR in 2 and CR in 3 of the 63 pts. For 25 patients with evaluable PET data, treatment resulted in complete resolution of FDG avid lesions in 9 patients and a better than 50% reduction in 15 (Figure 1). We will present updated data on clinical responses as well as toxicities. Conclusions: Treatment with targeted therapy guided by prospective comprehensive genomic profiling across all classes of genomic alterations in this heavily pretreated population of MM patients resulted in an unexpectedly high objective response rate. Observation of CR with TMTB monotherapy further supports continued investigation of this individualized approach to MM management. Disclosures Van Laar: Signal Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ali:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miller:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Employment. Zangari:Norvartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. van Rhee:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document