scholarly journals Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis with Aspirin for Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Thalidomide Combination As First-Line Treatment

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5764-5764
Author(s):  
Edvan de Queiroz Crusoe ◽  
Mariana Massarenti ◽  
Manuella Almeida ◽  
Priscilla Cury ◽  
Fabiana Higashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Despite the increase in overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade as a result of the use of new chemotherapeutic agents, the immunomodulators (thalidomide and lenalidomide) are associated with a higher rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE), principally when associated with other chemotherapeutic drugs and erythropoietin (EPO). The incidence of VTE with isolated thalidomide is 3 to 4%, similar to the risk of the disease itself. The association of thalidomide with corticoids or anthracycline agents has led to an increase in the incidence of VTE to 12 and 34%, respectively. The introduction of low-dose aspirin, vitamin K inhibitors or low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis, according to the risk factors present upon diagnosis reduced the risk of thrombosis to 3 to 7%. Objectives: The objectives were to evaluate thrombotic events during the use of thalidomide as first-line treatment in symptomatic MM patients and the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin prophylaxis. Casuistic and Methods: This is a descriptive study of thrombotic events by means of a retrospective survey of patient files for MM patients who had been followed up on at the gammopathies outpatient unit at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo from January 2009 to April 2014. The following induction therapy schedules with thalidomide for patients eligible or not for bone marrow transplantation were performed: thalidomide + dexamethasone (TD), cyclophosphamide + thalidomide + dexamethasone (CTD) and melphalan + prednisone + thalidomide (MPT). All of the patients received a dose of 100mg/day of the antiplatelet agent (aspirin) as prophylaxis. Results: In the aforementioned period, 219 patients had been diagnosed with symptomatic MM and of these, 149 patients had received thalidomide-based chemotherapy. The thalidomide group had a median age of 61 years (40 to 88). In the DS IIIA-IIIB stage, there were 131 (87.9%), 14 (9.4%) IIA-IIB, 1 (0.7%) IA and 3 (2%) had not been evaluated. According to the ISS Classification, 36 (24.2%) were ISS I, 41 (27.5%) II and 58 (38.9%) III, with 9.4% not evaluated. The most frequent isotope was IgG (56%). In relation to chemotherapy, 34 (22.8%) received TD, 98 (65.8%) CTD, 17 (11.4%) MPT. We identified 10 (6.7%) cases of thrombotic events in patients using thalidomide, thus distributed: 8 deep vein thrombosis (DVT), one case of DVT/ pulmonary embolism and one case of thrombophlebitis. Only one patient with thrombosis did not follow the prophylactic treatment at the service, which was 100mg/day of aspirin. The events occurred on average 72 days after initiating thalidomide use. Five cases were related to mobility reduction, 2 cases to obesity, 2 to smoking, 3 being ex-smokers, 3 to infection concomitant with the thrombotic event, 2 to diabetes and 1 case of previously treated breast cancer. All of the cases presented some associated risk factor. Conclusion and Discussion: The use of aspirin as prophylaxis in the group of MM patients being treated with thalidomide demonstrated efficacy in the control of risk for thrombosis. We observed 6.7% of VTE with the prophylactic use of low-dose aspirin in recently diagnosed MM patients without a history of thrombotic events, as described in the literature. Thalidomide is made available free of charge for MM treatment by the Brazilian public health system. Therefore, it is the main drug used in the MM treatment in Brazil. A better understanding of adequate thrombophylaxis according to the present risk factors is important for the optimization of the treatment of MM patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2012 ◽  
Vol 158 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Rabin ◽  
Laura Percy ◽  
Iftekhar Khan ◽  
John Quinn ◽  
Shirley D'Sa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072199648
Author(s):  
Matteo Franchi ◽  
Claudia Vener ◽  
Donatella Garau ◽  
Ursula Kirchmayer ◽  
Mirko Di Martino ◽  
...  

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation. The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative costs were estimated and compared between groups. Results: In the period 2010–2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9 and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71–0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from Western countries. Conclusions: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profile.


Author(s):  
Stewart Hunt ◽  
Jeremy Robertson ◽  
Jason Conn ◽  
John Casey ◽  
Jane Royle ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 690-699
Author(s):  
Susanne Ghandili ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Carsten Bokemeyer ◽  
Lisa Beatrice Leypoldt

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Multiple myeloma is a so far incurable malignant plasma cell disorder. During the past 2 decades, treatment paradigms substantially changed when novel drugs were introduced initially in treatment of relapsed disease and subsequently also in first-line treatment. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Up to now, first-line treatment differs between patients initially classified as transplant eligible and those who are considered as nontransplant eligible. Transplant-eligible patients receive a primary proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based induction which is being combined with an immunomodulating agent and a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody followed by high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation with subsequent maintenance treatment with lenalidomide. Patients who are considered as nontransplant eligible receive upfront treatment preferentially with a continuous combination treatment either with a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody in combination with the immunomodulating agent lenalidomide or a lenalidomide-PI combination followed by lenalidomide maintenance. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Primary goal of the initiated treatment is to induce a rapid and deep remission which ideally leads to an eradication of the residual plasma cell clone in sense of a minimal residual disease negativity. Achievement of long-term remission with limited toxicity despite continuous treatment strategies and maintenance or improvement of life-quality is key. Despite successful treatment options, specific difficult-to-treat subgroups, especially patients with high-risk myeloma remain with inferior prognosis and a clear unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Future concepts will evaluate cellular treatments and other innovative immunotherapies in first-line treatment in curative intention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document