Right heart catheterisation: best practice and pitfalls in pulmonary hypertension

Right heart catheterisation (RHC) plays a central role in identifying pulmonary hypertension (PH) disorders, and is required to definitively diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite widespread acceptance, there is a lack of guidance regarding the best practice for performing RHC in clinical practice. In order to ensure the correct evaluation of haemodynamic parameters directly measured or calculated from RHC, attention should be drawn to standardising procedures such as the position of the pressure transducer and catheter balloon inflation volume. Measurement of pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, in particular, is vulnerable to over- or under-wedging, which can give rise to false readings. In turn, errors in RHC measurement and data interpretation can complicate the differentiation of PAH from other PH disorders and lead to misdiagnosis. In addition to diagnosis, the role of RHC in conjunction with noninvasive tests is widening rapidly to encompass monitoring of treatment response and establishing prognosis of patients diagnosed with PAH. However, further standardisation of RHC is warranted to ensure optimal use in routine clinical practice.

Download Full-text

P4689How is the impact of updated hemodynamic definitions on frequencies of overall pulmonary hypertension and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension as compared to those with previous criteria

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.1070 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

S Tanyeri ◽

B Keskin ◽

O Y Akbal ◽

A Hakgor ◽

A Karagoz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Critical Role ◽

Right Heart ◽

Right Heart Catheterisation ◽

Mean Pressure ◽

Pulmonary Arterial ◽

European Society Of Cardiology ◽

The Impact ◽

Wedge Pressure

Abstract Background and aim In this study we evaluated the impact of the updated pulmonary hypertension (PH) definitive criteria proposed in 6th World PH Symposium (WSPH) on numbers and frequencies of and pre- versus post-capillary PH as compared to those in European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2015 PH Guidelines. Methods Study group comprised the retrospectively evaluated 1299 patients (pts) (age 53.1±18.8 years, female 807, 62.1%) who underwent right heart catheterisation (RHC) with different indications between 2006 and 2018. For ESC and WSPH PH definitions, pulmonary arterial mean pressure (PAMP) ≥25 mmHg (definition-A) and PAMP >20 mmHg (definition-B) RHC criteria were used, respectively. For pre-capillary PH definitions, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤15 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥3 Wood units criteria were included in the both definitions. Results In RHC assessments, PAMP ≥25 mmHg and >20 mmHg were noted in 891 (68.6%) and 1051 (80.9%) of overall pts, respectively. Moreover, pre-capillary PH was diagnosed in 284 (21.8%) and 298 (22.9%) with definition-A and B, respectively. Although updated WSPH definition was associated with a net 12.3% and a relative 18% increase in the overall PH diagnosis, net and relative changes in the frequency of the pre-capillary PH were only 1% and 4.9%. Increase in the overall PH with updated WSPH criterias compared to previous ESC definitions was associated with increase in the number of pre-capillary PH (n=298, 22.9%) but not in the overall frequency of post-capillary PH (688, 52.9%). Because PVR was the product of the transpulmonary gradient (PAMP minus PAWP) divided by cardiac output, this measure was found to keep specificity for distinction between pre- versus post-capillary PH even after lowering thetreshold diagnostic for PAMP from 25 to 20 mmHg. Conclusions Although updated WSPH definition was associated with net 12.3% and relative 18% increase in the overall PH diagnosis, its impact on frequencies of pre- versus post-capillary PH within overall PH population was negligible.These seem to be due to critical role of PVR ensuring specificity in pre-capillary PH diagnosis even after lowering the definitive PAMP treshold to 20 mmHg.

Download Full-text

Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography

Echo Research and Practice ◽

10.1530/erp-17-0071 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (3) ◽

pp. G11-G24 ◽

Cited By ~ 30

Author(s):

Daniel X Augustine ◽

Lindsay D Coates-Bradshaw ◽

James Willis ◽

Allan Harkness ◽

Liam Ring ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Systolic Pressure ◽

British Society ◽

Right Heart ◽

Arterial Systolic Pressure ◽

Heart Catheterisation ◽

Pulmonary Arterial Systolic Pressure ◽

Right Heart Catheterisation ◽

Echocardiographic Assessment ◽

Pulmonary Arterial

Pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean arterial pressure of ≥25 mmHg as confirmed on right heart catheterisation. Traditionally, the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure has been estimated on echo by utilising the simplified Bernoulli equation from the peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity and adding this to an estimate of right atrial pressure. Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between this estimate of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure and that obtained from invasive measurement across a cohort of patients. However, for an individual patient significant overestimation and underestimation can occur and the levels of agreement between the two is poor. Recent guidance has suggested that echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension should be limited to determining the probability of pulmonary hypertension being present rather than estimating the pulmonary artery pressure. In those patients in whom the presence of pulmonary hypertension requires confirmation, this should be done with right heart catheterisation when indicated. This guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography aims to outline a practical approach to assessing the probability of pulmonary hypertension using echocardiography and should be used in conjunction with the previously published minimum dataset for a standard transthoracic echocardiogram.

Download Full-text

Thermodilution vs indirect fick cardiac output measurement in clinical practice: insights from a tertiary centre

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2252 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Pereira ◽

J.G Santos ◽

M.J Loureiro ◽

F Ferreira ◽

A.R Almeida ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Adverse Event ◽

Logistic Regression ◽

Cardiac Output ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Right Heart ◽

Output Measurement ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Pulmonary Arterial

Abstract Introduction Thermodilution (TD) and indirect Fick (IF) methods are widely used to measure cardiac output (CO). They are often used interchangeably to make critical clinical decisions, yet few studies have compared these approaches concerning agreement and comparative prognostic value as applied in medical practice. Purpose To assess agreement between TD and IF methods and to compare how well these methods predict mortality. Methods Retrospective cohort study including all consecutive right heart catheterizations performed in a referral pulmonary hypertension (PH) centre from 2010 to 2018. Cardiac index (CI) was calculated by indexed CO to body surface area. PH was classified according to the new definition of the 6st World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension 2018 [mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg]. Patients with cardiac or extra-cardiac shunts or significant (moderate to severe or severe) tricuspid regurgitation were excluded. All-cause mortality over 1 year after right heart catheterization was recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the adverse event. Results From a total of 569 procedures, 424 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: mean age 56.7±15.4 years, 67.3% female. Haemodynamic parameters were diagnosed of PH in 86.2% of cases: mPAP 35.3±15.3 mmHg, 83.6% pre-capillary subtype, 42.9% belonging to group 4 (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) and 26.6% to group 1 (pulmonary arterial hypertension). Mean values of CO and CI were, respectively, 4.5±2.8 L/min and 2.5±0.8 L/min/m2 measured by TD and 4.6±2.4 L/min and 2.6±1.3 L/min/m2 measured by IF method. There was a median difference (IF minus TD) of - 0.03 / min to CO and - 0.05 L/min/m2 to CI but both meausres correlated only modestly (r=0.6 to TD and r=0.5 to IF). One-year all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (median time to death was 50.5 days). Lower values of CO and CI assessed by TD were significantly associated with all-cause mortality occurrence (CO TD: 4.5±1.3 L/min versus 3.6±1.0 L/min, p<0.01; CI TD: 2.6±0.7 L/min/m2 versus 2.1±0.4 L/min/m2, p<0.01). No association was observed between CO (p=0.31) and CI (p=0.42) measured by IF method and the adverse event. Logistic regression identified 2 independent predictors of all-cause mortality: TD CO (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.79, p<0.01) and TD CI (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.67, p<0.01). Similar results were obtained when patients diagnosed with PH were independently analyzed. Conclusions There is only modest agreement between TD and IF CO and CI estimates. Despite being more time-consuming, TD measurements were predictors of all-cause mortality and present a highest prognostic value. These findings favored their used over IF in clinical practice. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Connective Tissue Disease

Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ◽

10.1055/s-0039-1685214 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (02) ◽

pp. 173-183 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Hossam Fayed ◽

J. Gerry Coghlan

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Connective Tissue ◽

Connective Tissue Disease ◽

Best Practice ◽

Reference Source ◽

History Of ◽

Pulmonary Arterial ◽

Primary Physicians

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in most forms of connective tissue disease (CTD); the prevalent type of PH depends on the particular CTD. Thus, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is dominantly associated with scleroderma, while postcapillary PH is most common in rheumatoid arthritis and lung disease-associated PH is typically found in myositis and sarcoidosis.Considerable expertise is required to identify, diagnose, and manage CTD-PH, as the primary physicians providing the majority of care for this population, rheumatologists, need a good working knowledge of CTD-PH, its rather subtle presentation, and how to access the necessary investigations to screen for and identify patients with PH. The role of the rheumatologist does not stop at diagnosis; in some conditions such as lupus, optimizing immunosuppression is key to the management of PH, and unlike simple idiopathic PAH, the natural history of CTD-PH is often punctuated by complications of the CTD rather than just events due to progression of PH or therapy-related adverse events.The aim of this article is to provide an overview of all forms of CTD-PH, and to provide an easy reference source on current best practice.

Download Full-text

Exercise right heart catheterisation before and after pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease

European Respiratory Journal ◽

10.1183/13993003.00458-2018 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 52 (3) ◽

pp. 1800458 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Stefan Guth ◽

Christoph B. Wiedenroth ◽

Andreas Rieth ◽

Manuel J. Richter ◽

Ekkehard Gruenig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Thromboembolic Disease ◽

Pulmonary Endarterectomy ◽

Right Heart ◽

Heart Catheterisation ◽

Right Heart Catheterisation ◽

Before And After ◽

The Mean ◽

Chronic Thromboembolic Disease ◽

The Impact

Symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) without pulmonary hypertension often show an excessive increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) during exercise.We report on the impact of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) on pulmonary haemodynamics in a prospective series of 32 consecutive CTED patients who underwent PEA. All patients had a comprehensive diagnostic work-up including right heart catheterisation at baseline and 12 months after PEA. Furthermore, in 12 patients exercise right heart catheterisation was performed before and after PEA.After PEA, MPAP was lower at rest (20±3 versus 17±3 mmHg; p=0.008) and during maximal exercise (39±8 versus 31±6 mmHg; p=0.016). The mean total pulmonary resistance (TPR) decreased from 3.6±0.8 Wood Units (WU) pre-operatively to 2.7±0.7 WU 1 year after PEA (p=0.004) and the mean slope of the MPAP/cardiac output (CO) relationship decreased from 3.6±1.0 to 2.3±0.8 WU (p=0.002). Peak oxygen uptake increased from 1.2±0.4 to 1.5±0.3 L·min−1 (p=0.014) and ventilatory equivalents of carbon dioxide decreased from 39±2 to 30±2 (p=0.002). There was a significant improvement in quality of life assessed by the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire.In CTED patients, PEA resulted in haemodynamic and clinical improvements. The means of TPR and MPAP/CO slopes decreased to <3.0 WU.

Download Full-text