Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of brinzolamide ophthalmic suspension 1% added to travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004% therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1643-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Franks ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ocular Hypertension ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmic Solution ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ophthalmic Suspension

Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution Once Daily for Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

2005 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 242.e1-242.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel S. Schuman ◽  
Gregory J. Katz ◽  
Richard A. Lewis ◽  
J. Charles Henry ◽  
Sushanta Mallick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ocular Hypertension ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmic Solution ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Once Daily

Comparison of Two Fixed Beta-Blocker-Pilocarpine Combinations

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
A. M. Bron ◽  
C. P. Garcher ◽  
D. Sirbat ◽  
C. M. Allaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ocular Hypertension ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmic Solution ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Group A

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of a newly developed ophthalmic solution containing carteolol 2% and pilocarpine (2% (CBS341A) with a timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 2% fixed combination. Patients and Methods. A randomized, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted in 209 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 21 mm Hg on bet-blocker twice a day alone. The test medications were administered twice daily for 4 months. IOP was measured at 9 and 11 a.m. at the beginning of the study (with beta-blocker alone) and after one and four months of treatment. Adverse effects were recorded. Results Both combinations caused a similar, statistically significant decrease in IOP. At four months, in the CBS341A group a 2.4 mm Hg (9%) reduction in IOP was achieved at 9 a.m. and 4.1 mm Hg (17.3%) at 11 a.m. compared with respectively 3 mm Hg (11%) and 4.5 mm Hg (19.5%) in the timolol-pilocarpine group. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in safety and efficacy. Conclusions The carteolol-pilocarpine combination appears as safe and as effective as the timolol-pilocarpine combination in the medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

scholarly journals Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Inder Paul Singh ◽  
Robert D. Fechtner ◽  
Jonathan S. Myers ◽  
Terry Kim ◽  
Dale W. Usner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ocular Hypertension ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmic Solution ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

scholarly journals Preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops for reducing intraocular pressure: a non-inferiority phase III randomized, multi-center, single-blind, parallel-group controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panos Theodosiadis ◽  
Anastasios Konstas ◽  
Ioannis Halkiadakis ◽  
Vasiliki Dimera ◽  
Dimitrios Koufakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Ocular Hypertension ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Ophthalmic Solution ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Preservative Free

Background: The aim of this study was to test the non-inferiority of preservative-free (PF) latanoprost 50 μg/mL multi-dose ophthalmic solution versus the marketed benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost 50 μg/mL ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma and patients with ocular hypertension. Methods: This was a prospective, national, randomized, multi-center, observer-blind, parallel-group controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive either PF or BAK-preserved latanoprost once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8:00 AM in the affected eye between the end of the treatment (week 12) and the baseline (week 0). Secondary measurements were taken at weeks 2 and 6, with IOP being recorded at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 4:00 PM. Results: A total of 158 patients were included in the per protocol (PP) population (77 in the PF latanoprost treatment arm and 81 patients in the BAK-preserved latanoprost treatment arm). PF latanoprost was non-inferior to BAK-preserved latanoprost in reducing IOP at 8:00 AM in the study eye from the baseline (week 0) to the end of the treatment (week 12). The point estimate of the between-treatment difference was 0.1 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -0.646, 0.847). Mean between-group differences in IOP reduction from the baseline to each of the secondary measurements were also similar between the two treatment arms. The two treatments were well tolerated and had comparable adverse event profiles. Conclusions: PF latanoprost was non-inferior to BAK-preserved latanoprost in reducing IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document