Long-term cardiovascular risk and costs for myocardial infarction survivors in a US commercially insured population

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
Carl Mellström ◽  
Phillip R. Hunt ◽  
Ozgur Tunceli ◽  
Bingcao Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk

Preoperative assessment and optimization

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix van Lier ◽  
Robert Jan Stolker
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Myocardial Ischaemia ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Cardiac Risk ◽  
Risk Identification ◽  
Coronary Lesion

Perioperative cardiovascular complications (including myocardial ischaemia and myocardial infarction) are the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The pathophysiology of perioperative myocardial infarction is complex. Prolonged myocardial ischaemia due to the stress of surgery in the presence of a haemodynamically significant coronary lesion, leading to subendocardial ischaemia, and acute coronary artery occlusion after plaque rupture and thrombus formation contribute equally to these devastating events. Perioperative management aims at optimizing the patient’s condition by identification and modification of underlying cardiac risk factors and diseases. The first part of this chapter covers current knowledge on preoperative risk assessment. Current risk indices, the value of additional testing, and new preoperative cardiac risk makers are investigated. During recent decades there has been a shift from the assessment and treatment of the underlying culprit coronary lesion towards a systemic medical therapy aiming at prevention of myocardial oxygen supply–demand mismatch and coronary plaque stabilization. In the second part of this chapter, risk-reduction strategies are discussed, including β‎-blocker therapy, statins, and aspirins. A central theme in this chapter will focus on long-term cardiovascular risk reduction. Patients who undergo non-cardiac (vascular) surgery are particularly prone to long-term adverse cardiac outcomes. The goal of perioperative cardiovascular risk identification and modification should not be limited to the perioperative period, but should extend well into the postoperative period.

scholarly journals Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Ansuategui ◽  
Gabriela Ibarra ◽  
Carmen Romero ◽  
Alejandra Comanges ◽  
Jose A. Gonzalez-Fajardo
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background The aim of carotid interventions is to prevent cerebrovascular events. Endovascular treatment (carotid-artery-stenting/CAS) has become established as an alternative to open surgery in some cases. Historically, female sex has been considered as a perioperative risk factor, however, there are few studies regarding this hypothesis when it comes to CAS. Objectives To analyze the CAS results in our center adjusted by sex. Methods A retrospective cohort study was designed, including patients with carotid atheromatosis operated at a single center from January 2016 to June 2019. Our objective was to compare cardiovascular risk, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality, by sex. Follow-up rates of stent patency, restenosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death were reported. Results 71 interventions were performed in 50 men (70.42%) and 21 women (29.57%). Mean age was 70.50 ± 10.72 years for men and 73.62 ± 11.78 years for women. Cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between sexes. Mean follow-up was 11.28 ± 11.28 months. There were no significant differences in neurological events during follow-up. No adverse cardiological events were detected at any time. Regarding the mortality rate, during medium-term follow up there were 2 neurological related deaths with no significant differences between sexes (p=0.8432). Neither sex had higher rated of restenosis during long term follow-up (5.63% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.9693) or reoperation (1.41% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.4971). All procedures remained patent (<50% restenosis). Conclusions Despite the limitations of our study, CAS is a therapeutic option that is as effective and safe in women as in men. No sex differences were observed.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (19) ◽  
pp. 1163-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
Pål Hasvold ◽  
Martin Henriksson ◽  
Hans Hjelm ◽  
Marcus Thuresson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Real World ◽  
Post Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data

P819Post-procedural cholesterol and inflammatory risk in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chen ◽  
C Liu ◽  
P Zhou ◽  
Y Tan ◽  
Z Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
P Value ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract Objective This study sought to depict the combined association of post-procedural cholesterol and inflammatory risk with clinical outcomes among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and pick out patients with highest comprehensive risk. Methods A total of 4802 AMI-PCI patients were divided into quartiles according to post-procedural low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), C-reactive protein (CRP) level respectively and in combinations for risk analysis. Univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis with Cox model were performed. Hazard ratio (HR) for short-term (90 days) and long-term (1 year) were compared for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Results A significant change in the hazards of 90-day MACE was seen among patients in the highest quartile of post-procedural LDL-C [HR: 0.526 (0.291, 0.951), p=0.034] and highest quartile of CRP [HR: 2.119 (1.150, 3.920), p=0.016]. For 1-year outcomes, only a trend for increasing risk was seen in patients with higher post-procedural CRP (p-trend = 0.016). Combination analysis for cholesterol/inflammatory risk showed that patients lying simultaneously in the lowest quartile of LDL-C and highest quartile of CRP gained the highest risk in the 90-day [HR: 3.16 (1.124, 8.886), p=0.029] and 1-year [HR: 2.515 (1.153, 5.486), p=0.020] follow up. Hazard ratios (HR) for short-term (90 days) and long-term (1 year) primary outcomes according to cholesterol and inflammatory risk 90 days 1 year Type of risk Unadjusted HR (95% CI) P value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value P for trend Unadjusted HR (95% CI) P value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P value P for trend LDL, mmol/L   Quartile 2 0.742 (0.441, 1,248) 0.260 0.663 (0.390, 1.125) 0.128 0.033 0.722 (0.364, 1.125) 0.150 0.683 (0.435, 1.072) 0.097 0.251   Quartile 3 0.653 (0.381, 1.121) 0.122 0.597 (0.344, 1.038) 0.068 0.850 (0.557, 1.229) 0.453 0.850 (0.550, 1.312) 0.462   Quartile 4 0.517 (0.288, 0.928) 0.027 0.526 (0.291, 0.951) 0.034 0.673 (0.427, 1.061) 0.088 0.708 (0.444, 1.131) 0.149 CRP, mg/L   Quartile 2 1.365 (0.717, 2.599) 0.334 1.295 (0.654, 2.522) 0.448 0.007 1.063 (0.656, 1.722) 0.805 0.998 (0.608, 1.636) 0.992 0.016   Quartile 3 1.306 (0.681, 2.502) 0.442 1.279 (0.654, 2.499) 0.472 0.999 (0.612, 1.630) 0.996 0.968 (0.586, 1.597) 0.897   Quartile 4 2.354 (1.312, 4.221) 0.004 2.119 (1.150, 3.920) 0.016 1.657 (1.069, 2.570) 0.024 1.528 (0.967, 2.413) 0.069 Multivariate analysis was adjusted for age, sex and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Combined cholesterol/inflammatory risk Conclusion AMI-PCI patients with lower post-procedural LDL-C and higher CRP might encounter greater cardiovascular risk. Patients with the lowest LDL-C and highest CRP gained extremely high risk and required special attention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document