scholarly journals Histological evaluation of the influence of magnetic field application in autogenous bone grafts in rats

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edela Puricelli ◽  
Nardier B Dutra ◽  
Deise Ponzoni
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flaviana Soares Rocha ◽  
Jonas Dantas Batista ◽  
Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa ◽  
Paula Dechichi

The success of autogenous bone graft is related to the graft cell viability. In bone-grafting procedures, harvested grafts are often maintained in extraoral media while the recipient site is prepared. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the effect of storage media over autogenous bone grafts during the transsurgical time. Two grafts were removed bilaterally from the calvaria of 18 rabbits. One graft was immediately fixed in the mandibular angle (control group), and the other was maintained in air exposure (dry group), 0.9% NaCl solution (saline group), or platelet-poor plasma (PPP group) during 30 minutes and stabilized in the symmetrical location of control grafts. After 28 days, the animals were euthanized and the bone fragments were removed, demineralized, and embedded in paraffin. Histological evaluation was performed under light microscope. Empty lacunae and bone graft area quantification were carried out for the sections. The histomorphometrical analysis revealed reduction of the graft area and increase of empty lacunae in the dry group when compared with control. No significant differences were found in the number of empty lacunae or bone graft area between the saline group and its control and also between the PPP group and its control. The dry group showed more empty lacunae and less graft area than the saline and PPP groups. In accordance with the results, PPP and physiologic solution demonstrated osteocyte preservation and bone graft area maintenance, being satisfactory storage media for autogenous bone grafts during the transsurgical period.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariza Akemi Matsumoto ◽  
Hugo Nary Filho ◽  
Luís Eduardo Marques Padovan ◽  
Roberto Yoshio Kawakami ◽  
Luís Antônio De Assis Taveira

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Leonardo de Oliveira Lima ◽  
Daniel Isaac Sendyk ◽  
Wilson Roberto Sendyk ◽  
Cristiane Ibanhes Polo ◽  
Luciana Correa ◽  
...  

Abstract Several techniques have been proposed for vertical bone regeneration, and many of them use bone autogenous and allogeneic grafts. The purpose of this study was to compare demineralised freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA), fresh-frozen (FF) allografts, autogenous bone grafts to find differences between volumetric and histological quantity of bone formation and vertical bone growth dynamic. A vertical tissue regeneration bone model was performed in rabbit calvarias under general anaesthesia. Four hollow cylinders of pure titanium were screwed onto external cortical bone calvarias in eight rabbits. Each one of the cylinders was randomly filled with one intervention: DFDBA, FF, autogenous bone, or left to be filled with blood clot (BC) as control. Allogeneic grafts were obtained from a ninth animal following international standardised protocols for the harvesting, processing, and cryopreservation of allografts. Autogenous graft was obtained from the host femur scraping before adapting hollow cylinders. Animals were euthanized at 13 weeks. Vertical volume was calculated after probe device measurements of the new formed tissue inside the cylinders and after titanium cylinders were removed. Histomorphometry and fluorochrome staining were used to analyse quantity and dynamic of bone formation, respectively. Results showed that DFDBA and fresh-frozen bone improved the velocity and the quantity of bone deposition in distant portions of the basal plane of grafting. Remaining material in allograft groups was more intense than in autogenous group. Both allografts can be indicated as reliable alternatives for volume gain and vertical bone augmentation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1074-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Chiapasco ◽  
Giacomo Colletti ◽  
Eugenio Romeo ◽  
Marco Zaniboni ◽  
Roberto Brusati

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document