scholarly journals Management of penetrating abdominal trauma in St Mary's Hospital Major Trauma Centre

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael C Fisher ◽  
Carina McGuire ◽  
Christopher J Aylwin
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Penetrating Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Major Trauma Centre

Laparotomy for Abdominal Stab Wound With Combined Omental and Organ Evisceration: 10-Year Experience From a Major Trauma Centre in South Africa

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110318
Author(s):  
Victor Kong ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
Nigel Rajaretnam ◽  
Rohit Sarvepalli ◽  
William Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Large Bowel ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Overall Mortality

Introduction Combined omental and organ evisceration following anterior abdominal stab wound (SW) is uncommon and there is a paucity of literature describing the management and spectrum of injuries encountered at laparotomy. Methods A retrospective study was undertaken on all patients who presented with anterior abdominal SW involving combined omental and organ evisceration who underwent laparotomy over a 10-year period from January 2008 to January 2018 at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Results A total of 61 patients were eligible for inclusion and all underwent laparotomy: 87% male, mean age: 29 years. Ninety-two percent (56/61) had a positive laparotomy whilst 8% (5/61) underwent a negative procedure. Of the 56 positive laparotomies, 91% (51/56) were considered therapeutic and 9% (5/56) were non-therapeutic. In addition to omental evisceration, 59% (36/61) had eviscerated small bowel, 28% (17/61) had eviscerated colon and 13% (8/61) had eviscerated stomach. A total of 92 organ injuries were identified. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach. The overall complication rate was 11%. Twelve percent (7/61) required intensive care unit admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. The overall mortality rate for all 61 patients was 2%. Conclusions The presence of combined omental and organ evisceration following abdominal SW mandates laparotomy. The small bowel, large bowel and stomach were the most commonly injured organs in this setting.

scholarly journals 592 Surgical Management of Open Tibia Fractures at A Major Trauma Centre: A Review of Cases Over A One-Year Period

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khajuria
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Open Fracture ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Internal Stabilization ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Tibia Fractures ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.

Thoracoabdominal impalement injury during pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e244463
Author(s):  
Charisse Anne F Aquino ◽  
Maria Jesusa B Banal-Silao
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Penetrating Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Penetrating Wound ◽  
Primigravid Woman ◽  
Thick Steel ◽  
Trauma In Pregnancy

Trauma has emerged as the leading cause of death during pregnancy. Penetrating abdominal trauma in pregnancy requires a rigorous clinical evaluation to establish a complete assessment of obstetric and non-obstetric lesions. In the case of major trauma, treatment is essentially carried out in a trauma centre with a multidisciplinary team to improve maternal and fetal prognosis. This is a case of a 20-year-old primigravid woman, 33 weeks and 4 days age of gestation, who was admitted for impaled foreign body. She was brought to the emergency department for a penetrating wound of the chest and abdomen after being accidentally impaled by a metre-long, inch-thick steel rod. Emergency laparotomy, caesarean section and thoracotomy were performed. The aim of this report is to discuss the assessment, management and role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of a pregnant trauma patient.

Comparison of routine blood alcohol tests and ICD-10-AM coding of alcohol involvement for major trauma patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 183335832110371
Author(s):  
Georgina Lau ◽  
Belinda J Gabbe ◽  
Biswadev Mitra ◽  
Paul M Dietze ◽  
Sandra Braaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Data ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Blood Alcohol Concentration ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Blood Alcohol ◽  
Alcohol Involvement ◽  
Preventable Risk Factor ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Icd 10

Background: Alcohol use is a key preventable risk factor for serious injury. To effectively prevent alcohol-related injuries, we rely on the accurate surveillance of alcohol involvement in injury events. This often involves the use of administrative data, such as International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) coding. Objective: To evaluate the completeness and accuracy of using administrative coding for the surveillance of alcohol involvement in major trauma injury events by comparing patient blood alcohol concentration (BAC) with ICD-10-AM coding. Method: This retrospective cohort study examined 2918 injury patients aged ≥18 years who presented to a major trauma centre in Victoria, Australia, over a 2-year period, of which 78% ( n = 2286) had BAC data available. Results: While 15% of patients had a non-zero BAC, only 4% had an ICD-10-AM code suggesting acute alcohol involvement. The agreement between blood alcohol test results and ICD-10-AM coding of acute alcohol involvement was fair ( κ = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.27–0.38). Of the 341 patients with a non-zero BAC, 82 (24.0%) had ICD-10-AM codes related to acute alcohol involvement. Supplementary factors Y90 Evidence of alcohol involvement determined by blood alcohol level codes, which specifically describe patient BAC, were assigned to just 29% of eligible patients with a non-zero BAC. Conclusion: ICD-10-AM coding underestimated the proportion of alcohol-related injuries compared to patient BAC. Implications: Given the current role of administrative data in the surveillance of alcohol-related injuries, these findings may have significant implications for the implementation of cost-effective strategies for preventing alcohol-related injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document