scholarly journals Biomarkers-based personalized follow-up in chronic heart failure improves patient’s outcomes and reduces care associate cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Leon-Justel ◽  
Jose I. Morgado Garcia-Polavieja ◽  
Ana Isabel Alvarez-Rios ◽  
Francisco Jose Caro Fernandez ◽  
Pedro Agustin Pajaro Merino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major and growing medical and economic problem, with high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide. Cardiac Biomarker is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods This is a before and after interventional study, that assesses the impact of a personalized follow-up procedure for HF on patient’s outcomes and care associated cost, based on a clinical model of risk stratification and personalized management according to that risk. A total of 192 patients were enrolled and studied before the intervention and again after the intervention. The primary objective was the rate of readmissions, due to a HF. Secondary outcome compared the rate of ED visits and quality of life improvement assessed by the number of patients who had reduced NYHA score. A cost-analysis was also performed on these data. Results Admission rates significantly decreased by 19.8% after the intervention (from 30.2 to 10.4), the total hospital admissions were reduced by 32 (from 78 to 46) and the total length of stay was reduced by 7 days (from 15 to 9 days). The rate of ED visits was reduced by 44% (from 64 to 20). Thirty-one percent of patients had an improved functional class score after the intervention, whereas only 7.8% got worse. The overall cost saving associated with the intervention was € 72,769 per patient (from € 201,189 to € 128,420) and €139,717.65 for the whole group over 1 year. Conclusions A personalized follow-up of HF patients led to important outcome benefits and resulted in cost savings, mainly due to the reduction of patient hospitalization readmissions and a significant reduction of care-associated costs, suggesting that greater attention should be given to this high-risk cohort to minimize the risk of hospitalization readmissions.

scholarly journals Biomarkers-based personalized follow-up in chronic  heart failure improves patient’s outcomes and reduces care associate cost.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Leon Justel ◽  
Jose Ignacio Morgado Garcia-Polavieja ◽  
Ana Isabel Alvarez Rios ◽  
Francisco Jose Caro Fernandez ◽  
Pedro Agustin Pajaro Merino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) is a major and growing medical and economic problem, with high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide. Cardiac Biomarker is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).METHODS This is a real-world, before and after interventional study, that assesses the impact of a personalized follow-up procedure for HF on patient’s outcomes and care associated cost, based on a clinical model of risk stratification and personalized management according to that risk. A total of 192 patients were enrolled and studied before the intervention and again after the intervention. The primary objective was the rate of readmissions, due to a HF. Secondary outcome compared the rate of ED visits and quality of life improvement assessed by the number of patients who had reduced NYHA score. A cost- analysis was also performed on these data. RESULTS Admission rates significantly decreased by 65,6% after the intervention, the total hospital admissions were reduced by 41% and the total length of stay was reduced by 46%. The rate of ED visits was reduced by 55%. Thirty-one percent of patients had an improved functional class score after the intervention, whereas only 7.8% got worse. The overall cost saving associated with the intervention was €139,717.65 for the whole group over 1 year.CONCLUSIONS A personalized follow-up of HF patients led to important outcome benefits and resulted in cost savings, mainly due to the reduction of patient hospitalization readmissions and a significant reduction of care- associated costs, suggesting that greater attention should be given to this high-risk cohort to minimize the risk of hospitalization readmissions.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic versus Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy after Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4989
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abumayyaleh ◽  
Christina Pilsinger ◽  
Ibrahim El-Battrawy ◽  
Marvin Kummer ◽  
Jürgen Kuschyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Background: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) decreases cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data regarding the impact of ARNI on the outcome in HFrEF patients according to heart failure etiology are limited. Methods and results: One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with HFrEF from the years 2016 to 2017 were included at the Medical Centre Mannheim Heidelberg University and treated with ARNI according to the current guidelines. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was numerically improved during the treatment with ARNI in both patient groups, that with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 61) (ICMP), and that with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 60) (NICMP); p = 0.25. Consistent with this data, the NT-proBNP decreased in both groups, more commonly in the NICMP patient group. In addition, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine changed before and after the treatment with ARNI in both groups. In a one-year follow-up, the rate of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) tended to be higher in the ICMP group compared with the NICMP group (ICMP 38.71% vs. NICMP 17.24%; p = 0.07). The rate of one-year all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (ICMP 6.5% vs. NICMP 6.6%; log-rank = 0.9947). Conclusions: This study shows that, although the treatment with ARNI improves the LVEF in ICMP and NICMP patients, the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains higher in ICMP patients in comparison with NICMP patients. Renal function is improved in the NICMP group after the treatment. Long-term mortality is similar over a one-year follow-up.

The use of peritoneal dialysis in heart failure: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Yin Chionh ◽  
Anna Clementi ◽  
Cheng Boon Poh ◽  
Fredric O Finkelstein ◽  
Dinna N Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Diuretic Therapy ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal (EC) therapy, including ultrafiltration (UF) and haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and peritoneal ultrafiltration (PUF) are potential therapeutic options in diuretic-resistant states. This systematic review assessed outcomes of PD and compared the effects of PD to EC. A comprehensive search of major databases from 1966 to 2017 for studies utilising PD (or PUF) in diuretic-resistant HF was conducted, excluding studies involving patients with end-stage kidney disease. Data were extracted and combined using a random-effects model, expressed as odds ratio (OR). Thirty-one studies ( n = 902) were identified from 3195 citations. None were randomised trials. Survival was variable (0–100%) with a wide follow-up duration (36 h–10 years). With follow-up > 1 year, the overall mortality was 48.3%. Only four studies compared PD with EC. Survival was 42.1% with PD and 45.0% with EC; the pooled effect did not favour either (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–2.69; p = 0.710). Studies on PD in patients with HF reported several benefits. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved after PD (OR 3.76, 95%CI: 2.24–5.27; p < 0.001). Seven of nine studies saw LVEF increase by > 10%. Twenty-one studies reported the New York Heart Association status and 40–100% of the patients improved by ≥ 1 grade. Nine of 10 studies reported reductions in hospitalisation frequency and/or duration. When treated with PD, HF patients had fewer symptoms, lower hospital admissions and duration compared to diuretic therapy. However, there is inadequate evidence comparing PD versus UF or HD. Further studies comparing these modalities in diuretic-resistant HF should be conducted.

Impact of left atrial appendage closure on left atrial hemodynamics: a prospective single center study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Mertens ◽  
N Bouziri ◽  
P Guedeney ◽  
G Duthoit ◽  
A Redheuil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Clinical Issue ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Percutaneous left atrial (LA) appendage closure is increasingly used to prevent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). While LA appendage plays a key role in LA physiology, data regarding the impact of LA appendage occlusion on LA hemodynamics are lacking. The alteration of LA compliance by LA appendage occlusion may represent a clinical issue in AF patients which are at high risk of heart failure. Purpose To describe the impact of LA appendage occlusion on LA hemodynamics. Material and methods From july 2015 to january 2020, all patients undergoing LA occlusion procedure at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) in whom LA pressure curves were recorded, before and immediately after device implantation, were included. The LA mean pressure was measured at baseline and after LA appendage occlusion during the same procedure. Abnormal LA mean pressure was defined as &gt;15mmHg. We also recorded cardiovascular death and hospitalization for congestive heart failure at longest follow-up. Results We enrolled 85 patients (78±8 years, 46 men), the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5±1 and the HAS-BLED score was 4±1. The mean LA volume index was 51±15mL/m2, the left ventricular ejection fraction was 60±7%. The LA mean pressure increased significatively after LA appendage closure from 12.6±3.9mmHg to 15.5±5.2mmHg (p&lt;0.0001, Figure). The prevalence of abnormal LA pressure was 20% (17/85) at baseline and 45% (38/85) after LA appendage closure (p=0.005). Post procedural LA pressure elevation was not related to procedure duration nor to fluid expansion volume. During a median follow-up of 364 [124–726] days, 3 (3.5%) patients died from a cardiovascular cause. Hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 6 (16%) of the 38 patients with abnormal postprocedural LA pressure, whereas no congestive episode was observed in the rest of the study population (p=0.006). Conclusion Catheter-based LA appendage occlusion induces an acute alteration of LA hemodynamics. Post procedural abnormal LA pressure may be linked to heart failure episodes in some patients. Further studies are warranted to investigate heart failure as a potential late complication of LA appendage closure. Variations of mean LA pressure Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Residual inflammation is a major determinant of myocardial recovery and cardiovascular outcome in takotsubo patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Lachmet-Thebaud ◽  
B Marchandot ◽  
K Matsushita ◽  
C Sato ◽  
C Dagrenat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Recent insights have emphasized the importance of myocardial and systemic inflammation in Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS). Objective In a large registry of unselected patients, we sought to evaluate whether residual high inflammatory response (RHIR) could impact cardiovascular outcome after TTS. Methods Patients with TTS were retrospectively included between 2008 and 2018 in three general hospitals. 385 patients with TTS were split into three subgroups, according to tertiles of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at discharge (CRP&lt;5.2 mg/l, CRP range 5.2 to 19 mg/l, and CRP&gt;19 mg/L). The primary endpoint was the impact of RHIR, defined as CRP&gt;19 mg/L at discharge, on cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure. Results Follow-up was obtained in 382 patients (99%) after a median of 747 days. RHIR patients were more likely to have a history of cancer or a physical trigger. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at admission and at discharge were comparable between groups. By contrast, RHIR was associated with lower LVEF at follow-up (61.7 vs. 60.7 vs. 57.9%; p=0.004) and increased cardiac late mortality (0% vs. 0% vs. 10%; p=0.001). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, RHIR was an independent predictor of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio: 1.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 3.49; p=0.02). Conclusions RHIR was associated with impaired LVEF recovery and was evidenced as an independent factor of cardiovascular events. All together these findings underline RHIR patients as a high-risk subgroup, to target in future clinical trials with specific therapies to attenuate RHIR. Main results Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): GERCA (Groupe pour l'Enseignement, la prévention et la Recherche Cardiovasculaire en Alsace)

P3554CMR Fast-SENC intramyocardial LV & RV segmental strain helps manage cardioprotective therapy in patients exhibiting cardiotoxicity during cancer treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Steen ◽  
M Montenbruck ◽  
P Wuelfing ◽  
S Esch ◽  
A K Schwarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cardiotoxicity during cancer treatment has become an acknowledged problem of chemotherapy medications and radiation therapy. Limitations of biomarkers and imaging tests such as echocardiography left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) hinder early detection of cardiotoxicity and proactive cardioprotective therapy. Once the heart is unable to compensate for subclinical dysfunction, systemic damage and remodeling occurs increasing the potential for heart failure. Fast-SENC segmental intramyocardial strain (fSENC) is a unique cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) test that regionally detects subclinical intramyocardial dysfunction in 1 heartbeat. This study evaluates the ability of fSENC to detect subclinical cardiotoxicity and manage cardioprotective therapy in cancer patients. Methods This single center, prospective Prefect Study was used to evaluate cardiotoxicity and the impact of cardioprotective therapy in Breast Cancer and Lymphoma patients (NCT03543228). fSENC was acquired with a 1.5T MRI and processed with the MyoStrain software to quantify intramyocardial strain. Segmental strain was measured in three short axis scans (basal, midventricular & apical) with 16LV/6RV longitudinal segments & three long axis scans (2-, 3-, 4-chamber) with 21LV/5RV circumferential segments. fSENC CMR was performed before chemotherapy, during and after anthracycline/taxan therapy, at 1 year follow-up, and as needed in between designated follow-up periods. Cardioprotective therapy was offered to patients meeting the definition of cardiotoxicity by the ESC Guidelines on Cardiotoxicity and/or ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines or those observing a substantial decline in cardiac function. Comparisons were made with paired t-Test with a 95% confidence interval. Results Two hundred eight (208) CMRs were performed in fifty-two (52) patients (44 female). Patients had an average (± stdev) age of 53 (15) yrs, BMI of 26 (5) kg/m2; 77% had breast cancer, 23% had Lymphoma. fSENC CMRs required 11 (2) min total exam time. Figure 1 shows bar graphs of the % of normal LV myocardium (e.g. % LV MyoStrain Segments <−17%) at baseline and sequential follow-ups for patients without cardiotoxicity and with cardiotoxicity requiring cardioprotective therapy. Patients observing cardiotoxicity had a statistically significant decline in cardiac function measured by segmental fSENC (p=0.0002) which resolved after cardioprotective therapy. Figure 1 Conclusion Segmental fSENC intramyocardial strain detects subclinical cardiotoxicity during chemotherapy and impact of cardioprotective therapy. The ability to serve as a surrogate safety endpoint for chemotherapy or other pharmacological agents, and aid management of cardiotoxicity by serving as a surrogate efficacy endpoint for cardioprotection agents, dosage, and patient compliance may help physicians detect subclinical cardiac dysfunction, and proactively manage cancer patients to avoid early or late heart failure.

scholarly journals 254 Impact of sacubitril/valsartan on implantable defibrillator eligibility in heart failure: a real-world experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Monzo ◽  
Ilaria Ferrari ◽  
Carlo Gaudio ◽  
Francesco Cicogna ◽  
Claudia Tota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reverse Remodelling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%] despite ≥3 months of optimal medical therapy. Recent observations demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse cardiac remodelling in eligible HFrEF patients. Given the pivotal role of LVEF in the selection of ICD candidates, we sought to assess the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on ICD eligibility and its predictors in HFrEF patients. Methods and results We retrospectively evaluated 48 chronic HFrEF patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan and previously implanted with an ICD in primary prevention. We assumed that ICD was no longer necessary if LVEF improved &gt;35% (or &gt; 30% in asymptomatics) at follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, sacubitril/valsartan induced a significant drop in LV end-systolic volume (−16.7 ml/m2, P = 0.023) and diameter (−6.8 mm, P = 0.022), resulting in a significant increase in LVEF (+3.9%, P &lt; 0.001). As a consequence, 40% of previously implanted patients resulted no more eligible for ICD at follow-up. NYHA class improved in the 50% of population. A dose-dependent effect was noted, with higher doses associated to more reverse remodelling. Among patients deemed no more eligible for ICD, lower NYHA class [odds ratio (OR): 3.73 (95% CI: 1.05–13.24), P = 0.041], better LVEF [OR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.01–1.48), P = 0.032], and the treatment with the intermediate or high dose of sacubitril/valsartan [OR: 5.60 (1.15–27.1), P = 0.032] were the most important predictors of status change. Conclusions In symptomatic HFrEF patients, sacubitril/valsartan induced beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and improved NYHA class. These effects resulted in a significant reduction of patients deemed eligible for ICD in primary prevention.

Outcome Benefits Seen With 1 Year of Optimized Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure Managed by Pharmacists in a Cardiology Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110361
Author(s):  
Lindsay E. Davis ◽  
Elizabeth K. Pogge
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
First Year ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pharmacist Clinic

Background: Pharmacists’ care in heart failure (HF) management has been shown to better clinical outcomes, including use of guideline-directed medical therapy and hospital readmission, although the impact observed has varied among studies. Objective: To investigate the rates of all-cause hospitalization and hospitalization from HF (hHF) and changes in surrogate markers (left-ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association Functional Classification [NYHA FC], diuretic requirements) for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) therapy optimized within a pharmacist clinic. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with HFrEF on sacubitril/valsartan from July 7, 2015, through January 1, 2018. Results: For the primary outcome analysis, 70 patients with pre/post hospitalization data had a reduction in the rate of all-cause hospitalization from 45.7% in the 12 months prior to ARNi therapy initiation to 24.3% during the first year on optimized ARNi therapy ( P = 0.004). The rate of hHF reduced from 24.3% to 8.6% ( P = 0.003). For the secondary outcome analyses at the 6-month assessment point, which included 104 patients, ejection fraction improved from 26% to 34% ( P < 0.001), NYHA FC improved or remained unchanged in 86.6% of patients, and weekly loop diuretic dosing requirements were significantly reduced. Conclusion and Relevance: Real-world use of sacubitril/valsartan optimized within a pharmacist clinic was associated with reduced prevalence of all-cause and hHF during the first year of ARNi therapy. This study corroborates pharmacist involvement in HF management, which could be used to support further research and expanded pharmacist services.

scholarly journals The relationship between diastolic blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Fushimi AF registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ikeda ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
H Ogawa ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Doi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Hypertension is one of the major risk factors of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, relationship between diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and cardiovascular events in AF patients remains unclear. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in Japan. Follow-up data were available in 4,466 patients, and 4,429 patients with available data of DBP were examined. We divided the patients into three groups; G1 (DBP&lt;70 mmHg, n=1,946), G2 (70≤DBP&lt;80, n=1,321) and G3 (80≤DBP, n=1,162), and compared the clinical background and outcomes between groups. Results The proportion of female was grater in G1 group, and the patients in G1 group were older and had higher prevalence of heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prescription of beta blockers was higher in G1 group, but that of renin-angiotensin system-inhibitors and calcium channel blocker was comparable. During the median follow-up of 1,589 days, in Kaplan-Meier analysis, the incidence rates of cardiovascular events (composite of cardiac death, ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding and HF hospitalization during follow up) were higher in G1 group and G3 group than G2 group (Figure 1). When we divided the patients based on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline (≥130 mmHg or &lt;130 mmHg), the incidence of rates of cardiovascular events were comparable among groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including female gender, age (≥75 years), higher SBP (≥130 mmHg), DM, pre-existing HF, CKD, low left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt;40%) and DBP (G1, G2, G3) revealed that DBP was an independent determinant of cardiovascular events (G1 group vs. G2 group; hazard ratio (HR): 1.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.19–1.64, G3 group vs. G2 group; HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01–1.49). When we examined the impact of DBP according to 10 mmHg increment, patients with very low DBP (&lt;60 mmHg) (HR: 1.50,95% CI:1.24–1.80) and very high DBP (≥90 mmHg) (HR: 1.51,95% CI:1.15–1.98) had higher incidence of cardiovascular events than patients with DBP of 70–79 mmHg (Figure 2). However, when we examined the impact of SBP according to 20 mmHg increment, SBP at baseline was not associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events (Figure 3). Conclusion In Japanese patients with AF, DBP exhibited J curve association with higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Profile of Hospitalized Hypertensives with Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinsanya Daniel Olusegun-Joseph ◽  
Kamilu M Karaye ◽  
Adeseye A Akintunde ◽  
Bolanle O Okunowo ◽  
Oladimeji G Opadijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
The Impact

Introduction The impact of preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been well studied in heart failure, but not in hypertension. We aimed to highlight the prevalence, clinical characteristics, comorbidities and outcomes of hospitalized hypertensives with preserved and reduced LVEF from three teaching hospitals in Nigeria. Methods: This is a retrospective study of hypertensives admitted in 2013 in three teaching hospitals in Lagos, Kano and Ogbomosho, who had echocardiography done while on admission. Medical records and echocardiography parameters of the patients were retrieved and analyzed. Results: 54 admitted hypertensive patients who had echocardiography were recruited, of which 30 (55.6%) had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (RLVEF), defined as ejection fraction <50%; while 24 (44.4%) had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (PLVEF). There were 37(61.5%) females and 17 (31.5%) males. Of the male patients 64.7% had RLVEF, while 35.3% had PLVEF. 19(51.4%) of females had RLVEF, while 48.6% had PLVEF. Mean age of patients with PLVEF was 58.83±12.09 vs 54.83± 18.78 of RLVEF; p-0.19. Commonest comorbidity was Heart failure (HF) followed by stroke (found among 59.3% and 27.8% of patients respectively). RLVEF was significantly commoner than PLVEF in HF patients (68.8% vs 31.3%; p- 0.019); no significant difference in stroke patients (46.7% vs 53.3%; p-0.44). Mortality occurred in 1 (1.85%) patient who had RLVEF.         Conclusion: RLVEF was more common than PLVEF among admitted hypertensive patients; they also have more comorbidities. In-hospital mortality is, however, very low in both groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document