scholarly journals Single-port VATS combined with non-indwelling drain in ERAS: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiantian Yang ◽  
Wencong Huang ◽  
Peijian Li ◽  
Huizhen Hu ◽  
Yongsheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Port ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Drain Group ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Background We investigated single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) combined with a postoperative non-indwelling drain in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Methods The clinical data of 127 patients who underwent double- and single-port VATS from January 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The groups constituted 71 cases undergoing double-port and 56 cases undergoing single-port VATS (30 cases in the indwelling drain group and 26 cases in the non-indwelling drain group). The incidence of postoperative complications, pain scores, and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the double-port group, the single-port group had shorter postoperative hospital stays and lower pain scores on the first and third postoperative days (P < 0.05). Pain scores on the first and third days were lower in the single-port non-indwelling drain group than in the single-port indwelling drain group (P < 0.05), and the postoperative hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the single-port group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups for operation time, incidence of complications, and pain scores 1 month after operation (P > 0.05). Conclusions The combination of single-port VATS with a non-indwelling drain can relieve postoperative pain, help patients recover quickly, and is in accordance with ERAS.

Which is the Best Minimal Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax? Uniport, Two, or Three Ports: A Prospective Randomized Trail

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (07) ◽  
pp. 589-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celalettin Kocaturk ◽  
Hasan Akin ◽  
Sertan Erdogan ◽  
Salih Bilen ◽  
Kemal Karapinar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Minimal Invasive Approach ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Objective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the standard treatment method for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Concerns about lesser pain and better cosmesis led to the evolution of uniportal access. This study prospectively compared the results of the uniportal, two-port, and three-port thoracoscopic surgery. Material and Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients were randomized into three groups according to the port numbers. The groups were compared regarding the operation time, hospital stay, amount of drainage, area of pleurectomy, complications, recurrences, and pain scores. Results Except for the amount of drainage (p = 0.03), no factors were found to be statistically significant. The overall recurrence rate was 5%. Although the first and second week pain scores were not statistically significant, the single-incision group patients had significantly less pain at 4, 24, and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Conclusion The study indicated that uniportal VATS approach is less painful and has better cosmetic results, besides it is as efficient as two- or three-port VATS approach.

scholarly journals Comparison of single- and triple-port VATS for lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Open Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1228-1239
Author(s):  
Yunfei Gao ◽  
Abulaiti Abulimiti ◽  
Dan He ◽  
Anpeng Ran ◽  
Dongbo Luo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Vats Lobectomy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective To compare the perioperative parameters between single- and triple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer. Methods The Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and the Web of Science databases were electronically searched from inception to September 2019 for all relevant studies. Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The results were pooled using the generic inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences or risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. Results Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ten cohort studies with 2,278 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Whether based on RCTs or cohort studies, the pooled results showed no significant difference in the operation time, chest tube duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, lymph node dissection number, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative complications between single- and triple-port VATS lobectomy (P > 0.05). Single-port VATS could relieve postoperative pain better than triple-port VATS, especially in the first day and fifth day (P < 0.05). No evidence of significant publication bias was found (P > 0.05). Conclusion Single-port VATS lobectomy can yield similar perioperative results to those of triple-port VATS lobectomy and is more effective in relieving postoperative pain.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Wound Pain in the Same Patients Following Thoracic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Wei Liu ◽  
Shah-Hwa Chou ◽  
Andre Chou ◽  
Chieh-Ni Kao ◽  
Hung-Hsing Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Postoperative Time ◽  
Wound Pain ◽  
Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Background: There is a lack of data comparing postoperative pain after subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pain is an individual's subjective experience and therefore difficult to compare between different individuals subjected to either procedure. This study assessed reported pain at six postoperative time points in the same patients receiving both subxiphoid and intercostal incisions for thoracic disease. Methods: Data from 26 patients who received simultaneous combined intercostal and subxiphoid VATS were retrospectively analyzed from August 2019 to April 2020. All patients received same length subxiphoid and intercostal incisions with or without drain placements. A numerical pain rating scale was administered on postoperative days (POD)-1, POD-2, POD-Discharge, POD-30, POD-90, and POD-180.Results: Bilateral uniportal VATS was performed in 11 patients and unilateral multiportal VATS in 15 patients. In the unilateral VATS group, there were no significant differences in pain reported for subxiphoid and intercostal incisions. However, in the bilateral VATS group, subxiphoid wounds resulted in significantly higher mean pain scores on POD-1, POD-2, and POD-Discharge (p = 0.0003, 0.001, and 0.03, respectively) but lower pain scores on POD-90 (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In the bilateral VATS group, higher late (3 and 6 months) postoperative pain was associated with intercostal incisions as have been reported by previous studies. Interestingly, subxiphoid incisions were found to have higher early (Day 1, 2, and Discharge) postoperative pain than intercostal incisions. More research is needed to better understand the cause of pain in a surgical area previously not thought to be prone to pain.

scholarly journals Incorporation of an intercostal catheter into a multimodal analgesic strategy for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Wei Tan ◽  
Jameelah Sheik Mohamed ◽  
John Kit Chung Tam
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Background Well-controlled postoperative pain is essential for early recovery after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS). Conventional analgesia like opioids and thoracic epidural anaesthesia have been associated with hypotension and urinary retention. Intercostal catheters are a regional analgesic alternative that can be inserted during UVATS to avoid these adverse effects. This feasibility study aims to evaluate the postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements with incorporation of an intercostal catheter into a multimodal analgesic strategy for UVATS. Methods In this observational study, 26 consecutive patients who underwent UVATS were administered a multilevel intercostal block and oral paracetamol. All of these patients received 0.2% ropivacaine continuously at 4 ml/h via an intercostal catheter at the level of the incision. Rescue analgesia including etoricoxib, gabapentin and opioids were prescribed using a pain ladder approach. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic usage were assessed. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, days to ambulation and length of stay. Results No technical difficulties were encountered during placement of the intercostal catheter. There was only one case of peri-catheter leakage. Mean pain score was 0.31 (range 0–2) on post-operative day 1 and was 0.00 by post-operative day 5. 16 patients (61.6%) required only oral rescue analgesia. The number of patients who required rescue non-opioids only increased from 1 in the first 7 months to 8 in the next 7 months. There were no cases of hypotension or urinary retention. Median time to ambulation was 1 day (range 1–2). Mean post-operative length of stay was 4.17 ± 2.50 days. Conclusions Incorporation of an intercostal catheter into a multimodal analgesia strategy for UVATS is feasible and may provide adequate pain control with decreased opioid usage.

An Audit of Pain Control Pathways following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Espeed Khoshbin ◽  
Ali N. Al-Jilaihawi ◽  
Nicholas B. Scott ◽  
Dhruva Prakash ◽  
Alan J. B. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Audit Commission ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Daily Pain

Objective To compare different modes of pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to our national standard. Methods This is an audit based on patient's experiences. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent VATS with or without pleurodesis were managed by one of the following pain relief pathways: (A) thoracic paravertebral block + morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), (B) percutaneous thoracic paravertebral catheter +/– morphine PCA, (C) thoracic epidural +/– morphine PCA, (D) morphine PCA alone, and (E) intravenous or subcutaneous morphine as required. Pain score was documented up to four times per day for each patient. The incidence of severe pain was defined as visual analog scale ≥7. The results were compared with the standard set by the audit commission for postoperative pain relief in the UK. The mean daily pain scores were calculated retrospectively for all patients. Results There were no statistically significant differences in mean daily pain scores irrespective of having a pleurodesis. The percentage of patients experiencing severe pain was 34% [mean visual analog scale = 8 (standard deviation = 1.0)]. This was almost seven times the standard. Among these pathways, B had the least percentage incidence of severe pain (16.7%) followed by A (25.0%) D (33.3%), C (35.7%), and E (52.4%). Conclusions We are not compliant with the standards set by the audit commission. Pain management in theater recovery needs to be targeted. In the light of these results, we recommend the use of percutaneous thoracic paravertebral catheter +/– morphine PCA for postoperative VATS pain relief.

scholarly journals Stepwise approaches to optimize strategy for holding thoracoscope during single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2960-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengwu Liu ◽  
Senyi Deng ◽  
Hu Liao ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
Qiang Pu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Port ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Gao ◽  
Chengshuo Wang ◽  
Guyan Wang ◽  
Xu Cui ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Self Rating ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Traditional Care ◽  
Eras Protocol

Background Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely applied during perioperative periods for different diseases, there are few reports of ERAS in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study therefore aimed to evaluate the benefits of ERAS protocol compared to traditional care following ESS. Methods A total of 55 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing ESS were prospectively assigned to 1 of 5 treatment groups; ERAS groups with postoperative intravenous Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump, traditional care with Flubiprofen Axetil or analgesia pump (NERAS groups), or traditional care without postoperative intravenous analgesia group (control). All patients completed the Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Self-rating Anxiety Scale at admission and before discharge. Pain scores were recorded at 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours postsurgery and adverse reactions to analgesics were noted. Results Patients in ERAS group demonstrated significantly higher general comfort scores and lower self-rating anxiety scores compared to patients in NERAS and control groups. Compared to control patients, patients in ERAS group reported significantly lower pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 hours. Moreover, pain alleviated from 6 hours postsurgery in ERAS group compared to 48 hours in NERAS group. Patients using opioids experienced more adverse nausea events than patients using only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Conclusions The use of patient-tailored ERAS programs following ESS may help to attain higher general comfort and to alleviate perioperative anxiety compared with traditional perioperative care. Adequate postoperative analgesia with NSAIDs in ERAS protocol may alleviate pain earlier with fewer adverse reactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document