Quantitative seismic characterization of CO2 at the Sleipner storage site, North Sea
Reliable quantification of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) properties and saturation is crucial in the monitoring of [Formula: see text] underground storage projects. We have focused on quantitative seismic characterization of [Formula: see text] at the Sleipner storage pilot site. We evaluate a methodology combining high-resolution seismic waveform tomography, with uncertainty quantification and rock physics inversion. We use full-waveform inversion (FWI) to provide high-resolution estimates of P-wave velocity [Formula: see text] and perform an evaluation of the reliability of the derived model based on posterior covariance matrix analysis. To get realistic estimates of [Formula: see text] saturation, we implement advanced rock physics models taking into account effective fluid phase theory and patchy saturation. We determine through sensitivity tests that the estimation of [Formula: see text] saturation is possible even when using only the P-wave velocity as input. After a characterization of rock frame properties based on log data prior to the [Formula: see text] injection at Sleipner, we apply our two-step methodology. The FWI result provides clear indications of the injected [Formula: see text] plume being observed as low-velocity zones corresponding to thin [Formula: see text] filled layers. Several tests, varying the rock physics model and [Formula: see text] properties, are then performed to estimate [Formula: see text] saturation. The results suggest saturations reaching 30%–35% in the thin sand layers and up to 75% when patchy mixing is considered. We have carried out a joint estimation of saturation with distribution type and, even if the inversion is not well-constrained due to limited input data, we conclude that the [Formula: see text] has an intermediate pattern between uniform and patchy mixing, which leads to saturation levels of approximately [Formula: see text]. It is worth noting that the 2D section used in this work is located 533 m east of the injection point. We also conclude that the joint estimation of [Formula: see text] properties with saturation is not crucial and consequently that knowing the pressure and temperature state of the reservoir does not prevent reliable estimation of [Formula: see text] saturation.