scholarly journals Individualized Chemotherapy Benefit Prediction by EndoPredict in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in an Indian Cohort

2020 ◽  
pp. 1363-1369
Author(s):  
S. P. Somashekhar ◽  
Shabber Zaveri ◽  
Devanhalli Govinda Vijay ◽  
Palanki Satya Dattatreya ◽  
Rajeev Kumar ◽  
...  

PURPOSE There are new advancements in the modulation of the treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer, including the use of several molecular profiling tests to identify or select those patients who require additional adjuvant chemotherapy together with hormonal therapy on the basis of a recurrence score. One such tool is EndoPredict (Myriad Genetics; Salt Lake City, UT), which provides support in clinical decision making. The objective of this analysis was to study the landscape of absolute chemotherapy benefit and the likelihood of recurrence within 5 to 15 years in Indian patients with breast cancer who are undergoing EndoPredict testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study included 308 patients with hormone-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative early breast cancer. Their postsurgical blocks were analyzed using the EndoPredict test. The MEDCALC statistical tool (Panum Education; Seoul, Republic of Korea) was used to estimate the correlation coefficient and to conduct multiple regression analysis. RESULTS On the basis of the EndoPredict EPclin Risk Score, 52.12% of patients were classified as being in the low-risk category and could safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy. For every unit increase in the EPclin Risk Score, the percentage increase in absolute chemotherapy benefit was 6.82%. Similarly, the correlation between the likelihood of recurrence within 5 to 15 years and the EPclin Risk Score suggested that there is a 10.34% increase in recurrence for each unit of EPclin Risk Score. CONCLUSION The EPclin Risk Score has good prognostic and predictive power; it also provides the range of chemotherapy benefit for Indian patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12032-e12032
Author(s):  
Feilin Qu ◽  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Xiaosong Chen ◽  
Ou Huang ◽  
Jianrong He ◽  
...  

e12032 Background: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay has been routinely used to guide systemic chemotherapy in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor positive, node-negative early breast cancer (EBC). However, there has been less clarity in recommendation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in pts with intermediate RS (IRS). According to the definitions of IRS in retrospective NSABP B14, B20 trials and prospective validation of TAILORx trial, we adopted the broaden cut-offs of 11-30 in our study. We sought to analyze the factors related to ACT decision in this subset of pts. Additionally, the role of Adjuvant!Online (AOL) was evaluated in ACT decision. Methods: A cohort of 564 pts with RS of 11-30 was retrospectively analyzed from January 2014 to October 2016 in Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. The Oncotype DX RS, a RT-PCR 21-gene assay, was performed on RNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. The AOL was used to determine pts’ clinical risk. Predictive factors of chemotherapy usage in different clinical risk catogories were also assessed. Results: 267 (47.3%) pts received chemotherapy. Age, tumor grade, pathologic type, pT, pN, molecular subtype and RS were significantly correlated with ACT decision ( p <0.05). These factors were all independent predictors of ACT usage ( p<0.05) in mutivariable model. AOL was successfully measured in 504 (89.4%) pts, of whom 279 (49.5%) were at low clinical risk and 225 (39.9%) had high clinical risk. The distribution of RS correlated significantly with AOL clinical risk catogories. The predictive factors of ACT administration in high and low clinical risk subgroups were highly consistent with the overall population, except pT in high clinical risk pts. Discordances between clinical risk and ACT decision were found in 158 pts (28.0%), probably due to different age, molecular subtype and RS. Conclusions: Age, tumor grade, pathologic type, pT, pN, molecular subtype and RS were independent predictors of ACT administration in EBC pts with IRS. AOL should not be used alone to aid chemotherapy decision in this subset of pts.


Author(s):  
Paolo Giorgi Rossi ◽  
◽  
Annette Lebeau ◽  
Carlos Canelo-Aybar ◽  
Zuleika Saz-Parkinson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Predicting the risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer is crucial to optimise adjuvant treatment. Despite the common practice of using multigene tests to predict recurrence, existing recommendations are inconsistent. Our aim was to formulate healthcare recommendations for the question “Should multigene tests be used in women who have early invasive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy?” Methods The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guidelines Development Group (GDG), a multidisciplinary guideline panel including experts and three patients, developed recommendations informed by systematic reviews of the evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Four multigene tests were evaluated: the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS), the 70-gene signature (70-GS), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (PAM50-RORS), and the 12-gene molecular score (12-MS). Results Five studies (2 marker-based design RCTs, two treatment interaction design RCTs and 1 pooled individual data analysis from observational studies) were included; no eligible studies on PAM50-RORS or 12-MS were identified and the GDG did not formulate recommendations for these tests. Conclusions The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 21-RS for lymph node-negative women (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence), recognising that benefits are probably larger in women at high risk of recurrence based on clinical characteristics. The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 70-GS for women at high clinical risk (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and recommends not using 70-GS in women at low clinical risk (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sparano ◽  
Robert J. Gray ◽  
Della F. Makower ◽  
Kathy S. Albain ◽  
Thomas J. Saphner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document