Prognostic Model for Relapse After High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Stage IV Oligometastatic Breast Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yago Nieto ◽  
Samia Nawaz ◽  
Roy B. Jones ◽  
Elizabeth J. Shpall ◽  
Pablo J. Cagnoni ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To study prognostic factors after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) for patients with stage IV oligometastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with minimal metastatic disease amenable to local therapy enrolled onto a prospective HDC trial were analyzed for potential prognostic factors. Tumor blocks were retrospectively collected from referring institutions. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 62 months (range, 4 to 120 months). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 52 and 80 months, respectively. Five-year RFS and OS rates were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 64%) and 62% (95% CI, 49% to 74%), respectively. HER-2 expression, number of tumor sites, primary axillary nodal ratio (number of positive nodes divided by number of sampled nodes), number of positive axillary nodes, and delivery or omission of radiotherapy to metastases correlated with RFS. HER-2 overexpression and more than one site were independent adverse risk factors for RFS. HER-2 and the axillary nodal ratio were independent predictors of OS. The following prognostic categories for RFS were established (RFS rate, median RFS): good risk, no factors (77%, 80 months); intermediate risk, one factor (41%, 28 months); and poor risk, both factors (10%, 10 months). CONCLUSION: Long-term results in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer are encouraging but need validation in prospective randomized studies. HER-2 expression, number of sites, and primary nodal ratio are independent outcome predictors. Confirmation of these observations in this selected population would imply the need for reevaluation of the current tenet that early detection of metastatic breast cancer recurrence is of no benefit.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3171-3177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z U Rahman ◽  
D K Frye ◽  
A U Buzdar ◽  
T L Smith ◽  
L Asmar ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Most of the data about high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for metastatic breast cancer are derived from phase II studies. The interpretation of these data depends on comparisons with data from properly selected historical control patients treated with standard therapy under similar circumstances. We report the long-term results of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for HDCT but were treated with doxorubicin-containing standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively collected data from 18 successive doxorubicin-containing protocols for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer were evaluated. Using common eligibility criteria for HDCT, we identified patients who would have been candidates for HDCT. We analyzed response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for all patients, potential HDCT candidates, and noncandidates. RESULTS A total of 1,581 patients was enrolled onto the 18 studies. Six hundred forty-five were HDCT candidates, and 936 were noncandidates. The complete response rate was 27% for HDCT candidates and 7% for noncandidates; median PFS was 16 and 8 months and median OS was 30 and 17 months, respectively. Survival rates for HDCT candidates and noncandidates, respectively, were 21% and 6% at 5 years and 7% and 2% at 10 years. CONCLUSION This study suggests that encouraging results of single-arm trials of HDCT could partially be due to selection of patients with better prognoses and further stresses the importance of completing ongoing randomized trials of HDCT to assess the relative efficacy of HDCT in patients with metastatic breast cancer.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4460-4460
Author(s):  
Annette Von Drygalski ◽  
Thuy B Tran ◽  
Karen Messer ◽  
Minya Pu ◽  
Sue Corringham ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite the introduction of modern therapeutics, overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not changed in 20 ys. In the 1990s a major effort was made to improve the situation through the use of high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT). Although OS was not affected in randomized trials, which led to near abandonment of this therapy, some studies suggested that progression-free survival (PFS) can be improved with HD-ASCT. To identify distinct transplant-, disease- and patient-related characteristics predictive of survival in patients with MBC who received HD-ASCT, we reviewed records of all patients in the bone marrow transplant registry at UCSD treated with HD-ASCT for MBC between 1989 and 2000. METHODS: Age, race, stage at diagnosis, histology, estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal status, body mass index (BMI) in kg/m2, time to transplant and death, site of metastasis, disease status prior to and after transplant, and days in hospital were extracted from medical records. Brookmeyer & Crowley’s 95% confidence intervals were used for median survival times, Cox models for predictors of a time-to-event variable and Schoenfeld tests for proportional hazard assumptions, respectively. RESULTS: Of 96 patients with MBC 21, 43, 23, 8 and 1 had stage I, II, III, IV or unknown disease at diagnosis, respectively. Histologies were: infiltrating ductal, lobular, inflammatory or unknown in 79, 10, 6 and 1 of the cases, respectively. ER status was positive in 59.4% of patients and 29.2% of patients were post-menopausal. 84.4%, 4.2% and 11.5 % of patients were of caucasian, black or other ethnicity, respectively. Mean ages at diagnosis and at transplant were 43.7 ys (SD 8.6) and 47.4 ys (SD 8.7), respectively, with a median time to transplant of 29 months (range 3.8–180.8). When progression of disease (PD) was diagnosed, primary sites were visceral (39.6%), bone (29.2%), local (16.7%) or nodal (14.6%). Mean BMI at transplant was 26 (SD 5.9); 24% of patients were obese (BMI ≥ 30). Mean length of hospitalization after transplant was 17 days (SD 9.5 days); 33% of patients were hospitalized ≥ 18 days. Pre-transplant, 30.2% of patients were in complete remission; after HD-ASCT, this percentage increased to 41.7%. Median PFS and OS were 3.9 ys (CI 2.9–5.4) and 5.6 ys (CI 4.1–7.4) after initial diagnosis and 0.6 ys (CI 0.5–0.8) and 1.7 ys (CI 1.36–2.07) after transplant, respectively. As opposed to ER+ patients the rate of death events in ER− patients slowed down substantially after 5 ys from diagnosis. Although not statistically significant, at 12 ys, survival after HD-ASCT was 18.5% in ER− patients and 2.6% in ER+ patients. Stratified by ER status, stage at diagnosis was an independent predictor of length of PFS and OS. At diagnosis, stage I patients were at lowest risk of death when compared to stage II–IV patients with HRs of 2.7 (II vs I CI 1.4–5.2), 4.6 (III vs I CI 2.1–10) and 17 (IV vs I CI 6.1–47.8) disease; lower risk of death persisted for patients with initial stage I after PD was diagnosed with HRs of 2.4 (II vs I CI 1.3–4.6), 2.8 (III vs I CI 1.3–5.7) and 3.9 (IV vs I CI 1.6–9.9). Death risks were increased with infiltrating lobular carcinoma when compared with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (HR 2.5; CI 1.1–5.38) or when BMI was ≥ 30 (HR 3.1; CI 1.8–5.4); PFS in patients with a BMI ≥ 30 was significantly shorter after PD was diagnosed (death HR 3.1 [CI 1.8–5.5] when compared to BMI < 30). Visceral when compared to bone metastasis was a negative predictor of OS (HR 2.3; CI 1.3–4.1). Hospitalization ≥ 18 days after HD-ASCT was the strongest predictor of time to death after transplant (HR 2.2; CI 1.4–3.6). DISCUSSION: The survival rate at 12 ys after HD-ASCT was 8.2% for patients with MBC. Survival was higher for ER- compared to ER+ patients. Negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS were higher stages of disease at initial diagnosis, but also once PD was diagnosed, infiltrating lobular histology and obesity. Since all transplants were carried out prior to routine assessment of Her-2 neu receptor status, this information was not part of our analysis. At PD, visceral metastasis translated into poorer OS and after HD-ASCT, length of hospitalization became the most important outcome predictor. Although HD-ASCT in MBC has lost favor because of no improvement in global OS, our analysis may provide a rationale for selection criteria to determine which patients could benefit from future trials of HD-ASCT.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schmid ◽  
Walter Schippinger ◽  
Thorsten Nitsch ◽  
Gerdt Huebner ◽  
Volker Heilmann ◽  
...  

Purpose The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. Trials with late intensification HDCT have failed to show an advantage in overall survival. This study was initiated to compare up-front tandem HDCT and standard combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to standard combination therapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or double HDCT with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. HDCT was repeated after 6 weeks. Patients were stratified by menopausal and hormone-receptor status. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates. Results A total of 93 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Intent-to-treat CR rates for patients randomized to HDCT and AT were 12.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P = .84). Objective response rates were 66.7% for patients in the high-dose group and 64.4% for patients in the AT arm (P = .82). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two treatments in median time to progression (HDCT, 11.1 months; AT, 10.6 months; P = .67), duration of response (HDCT, 13.9 months; AT, 14.3 months; P = .98), and overall survival (HDCT, 26.9 months; AT, 23.4 months; P = .60). HDCT was associated with significantly more myelosuppression, infection, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea and vomiting, whereas patients treated with AT developed more neurotoxicity. Conclusion This trial failed to show a benefit for up-front tandem HDCT compared with standard combination therapy. HDCT was associated with more acute adverse effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document