EXTRA Trial-Evaluation of capecitabine treatment with radiotherapy (RT) in anal cancer: Preliminary results on toxicity and outcome

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14085-14085
Author(s):  
R. Glynne-Jones ◽  
H. Meadows ◽  
S. Wan
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Anal Carcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

14085 Background: Phase III trials have shown RT + 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) + mitomycinC (MMC) as the standard treatment for patients with epidermoid anal carcinoma. The objective of this trial is to determine if capecitabine in combination with MMC has a similar outcome in terms of complete response (CR) rate and toxicity to a 5-day infusion of 5-FU. Capecitabine is a rational alternative to 5-FU as these cancers express high levels of thymidine phosphoralase. Methods: Main eligibility criteria are histologically proven anal carcinoma (epidermoid, squamous, basaloid), fit to receive capecitabine and MMC and ineligible for the ongoing phase III UK trial, ACT II. Exclusion criteria include complete local excision, prior chemoradiation, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease and known HIV+ve. All patients receive: 50.4Gy in 28F(RT) and capecitabine 1650mg/m2/day on each RT treatment day (M-F) over 6 weeks. In addition patients receive MMC 12mg/m2, day 1 only. Assessment of response is by CT scan at 4 wks post chemoradiation. Results: To date 18/30 patients have been registered. Pre-treatment characteristics are: median age 59 yrs (44–85); 7 male, 11 female; 13 Canal, 5 Margin; 5T1, 4T2, 6T3, 2T4, 1Tx; 4N+ve, 13N-ve, 1Nx. Data on 14 evaluable pts are presented here. RT compliance: 12 pts completed planned treatment, treatment was interrupted in 2 cases (chest pain 1; machine breakdown 1). Chemotherapy compliance: 10 pts completed protocol treatment, in 3 pts chemotherapy was affected due to toxicity (1 dose reduced, 2 stopped early 1 due to chest pain and 1 due to grade 3 skin and diarrhoea). One patient decided to stop treatment. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in 2 pts during treatment: dyspnoea 1, diarrhoea 1. Four weeks post chemoradition, 10 had CR, 3 had partial response and 1 pt was not assessable. Thirteen pts are alive and disease free at a median follow-up of 6 months (range 1 -13). One pt has relapsed in an inguinal node 9 months after the end of treatment following a previous CR. Conclusions: This early information suggests that this regimen can be given without interruption and with acceptable toxicity. The early response data is encouraging and the trial aims to reach target accrual by Summer 2006. Educational grant provided by Roche pharmaceuticals. [Table: see text]

Phase III randomized trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with FOLFOX or cisplatin and fluorouracil in esophageal cancer (EC): Final results of the PRODIGE 5/ACCORD 17 trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4003-LBA4003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Conroy ◽  
Marie-Pierre Galais ◽  
Jean Luc Raoul ◽  
Olivier Bouche ◽  
Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

LBA4003 Background: CRT is one of the best treatment options for localized EC. As new combinations are required to improve safety and survival, we launched a randomized phase II study to assess the complete response (CR) rate of CRT with FOLFOX versus 5FU/cisplatin in 97 pts with localized EC (Conroy 2010). The trial having met its objectives, it has been pursued as a phase III trial. Stratified randomization was performed centrally in a 1:1 ratio according to histological type, pretreatment weight loss in the prior 6 months (<10% vs ≥10%), ECOG PS (0 vs 1 vs 2), and center. Methods: Pts with technically unresectable cancer or those with surgical contraindications or who refused to undergo surgery were eligible. Eligibility criteria also included age >18 years (y), PS ≤ 2, previously untreated adenocarcinoma or squamous cell EC (any T, N0 or N1, M0 or M1a). The radiation dose was 50 Gy (2Gy/fr) 5 d/wk for 5 wks in both arms. In Arm A, pts received 6 bimonthly cycles (cy): oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 d1 and leucovorin 200 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus d1 then 1,600 mg/m2 46h continuous infusion (ci) ; the first 3 cy were delivered during RT, the 3 other after. In Arm B, pts received 4 cy: cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d1 followed by 5FU 1,000 mg/m2/d ci d1-4, the first 2 cy during RT and 2 other after. The primary endpoint was PFS. Main secondary endpoints were OS, grade 3-4 toxicities, and quality of life. A total of 266 pts would provide 90% power to detect a 20% 3y-PFS difference (α=0.05). Results: 267 pts were enrolled between 10/2004 and 08/2011. Treatment cohorts were well balanced: male 81%; median age 61 y; PS 0 53%, squamous cell 85.8%, stage III 52%, IVA 6.0% and IVB 3.0%. Full treatment was delivered to 67.9% and 72.2% of pts in arms A/B, respectively. 7 toxic deaths occurred in each arm. Grade 3/4 toxicities per pt (%) in arms A/B were neutropenia 30.6/31.3, febrile neutropenia 5.3/7.0, anemia 5.4/11.0, asthenia 17.6/10.2, respectively. The median FU time was 25.3 mos. 3y-PFS was 18.2/17.4 % (HR=1.07; 95%CI =0.80-1.43) and median OS was 20.2 /17.5 m (HR=1.06; 95%CI =0.77-1.46). Conclusions: CRT with FOLFOX does not improve PFS compared to cisplatin and 5-FU and has similar toxicities.

Phase II trial of intraperitoneal paclitaxel in carcinoma of the ovary, tube, and peritoneum: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2620-2624 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Markman ◽  
M F Brady ◽  
N M Spirtos ◽  
P Hanjani ◽  
S C Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

PURPOSE To determine the response rate of intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel in patients with small-volume residual carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility criteria included patients with one of the cancers noted above, with the largest residual disease 0.5 cm or less in maximum diameter at the end of second-look surgery, and prior treatment with systemic paclitaxel was permitted. The treatment plan was paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 i.p. weekly for 16 weeks, followed by surgical evaluation in patients without evidence of disease progression. RESULTS Of 80 patients entered onto the study, 76 were eligible, of whom 86% were considered to be potentially cisplatin-sensitive. Although five patients (7%) did not complete the first course of therapy because of catheter leakage or blockade, 53 patients (70%) received all 16 planned courses. Only 14 patients (18%) received fewer than 11 courses. Treatment was well tolerated, which included only moderate abdominal pain (grade 2, 12 patients; grade 3, one patient) and minimal neutropenia (grade 2, three patients; grade 3, one patient). Of 28 assessable patients with microscopic disease at the start of i.p. therapy, 17 patients (61%) achieved a surgically defined complete response (CR). Only one of 31 patients (3%) with any macroscopic disease achieved a CR. Of the eligible patients, 18 of 76 (24%) achieved a CR. CONCLUSION Salvage i.p. paclitaxel is tolerable and active in patients with microscopic residual disease. The impact of this treatment strategy on survival remains to be assessed in a phase III trial.

Neoadjuvant epirubicyn, oxaliplatin, capecitabine and radiation therapy (NEOX-RT) followed by surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC): A phase II multicentric study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4066-4066
Author(s):  
Antonino De Paoli ◽  
Federico Navarria ◽  
Elena Torrisi ◽  
Jerry Polesel ◽  
Eleonora Fort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

4066 Background: This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a trimodality treatment, with surgery postponed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), in LAGC. Methods: Patients (pts) with cT3-4 and/or N+ LAGC were eligible. Staging included endoscopic ultrasound, PET-CT and laparoscopy. Three cycles of EOX (Epirubicyn 50mg/m2,q21 days, Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,q21 days, and Capecitabine 625mg/m2 bid, by continuous oral administration (c.a.), followed by IMRT with 45Gy/25 frs, concurrent Capecitabine 625mg/m2 bid c.a. and weekly Oxaliplatin 30mg/m2 for 5 wks, was planned. Early PET-CT was performed after the 2nd EOX cycle to assess response or disease progression. Restaging was repeated after CT and CRT. Surgery was planned 4-6 wks after CRT, 22 wks from the start of NEOX-RT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was the primary endpoint. Results: From November 2008 to March 2016, 51 pts (5 G-E Junction, 17 Cardia, 15 Corpus, 14 Antrum) entered the study. The NEOX-RT program was completed in 46 pts (90%) who proceeded to surgery and are assessable. Grade 3-4 toxicity (NCI-CTC criteria v.3) occurred in 13/51 pts (25%) during EOX, including 1 toxic death, and 9.5% CT cycles required dose modification, resulting in a CT compliance of 90%. No pts had progression during CT. Persistent G2-G3 toxicity occurred in 32/46 pts (69%) during CRT. However, 41/46 pts (89%) received the planned 45Gy with Capecitabine at dose ≥75% and 4-5 cycles of weekly Oxaliplatin in 52% pts. Curative resection (R0) rate was 89%; 4 pts (8.7%) had peritoneal carcinomatosis at surgery done after a median of 23 wks. pCR was reported in 9/46 pts (19.6%). Major postop complications occurred in 5 pts (11%). At median f-up of 62 mos (23-109), 5-yr OS and DFS in all and pCR pts were 58%, 100% and 51%, 75%, respectively. Conclusions: This trimodality program was feasible and safe. Most pts completed the planned treatment. The pCR rate of 19.6% was remarkable and met the hypothesis of pCR = 20%. A high R0 rate was also reported and delayed surgery didn’t increase complications. The notable survival rates are available to be compared with ongoing phase III trials. Clinical trial information: 2008-002715-40.

Up-Front Window Trial of Topotecan in Previously Untreated Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto S. Pappo ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
John Breneman ◽  
Eugene Wiener ◽  
Lisa Teot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Continuation Therapy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Front Window ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To investigate the antitumor activity and toxicity of topotecan, used alone and in combination with conventional therapy, in patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients younger than 21 years of age with newly diagnosed metastatic RMS received 2.0 to 2.4 mg/m2 of topotecan intravenously daily for 5 days every 21 days before standard therapy. Two courses were given in the absence of progressive disease or excessive toxicity and response was assessed. Patients with at least a partial response (PR) to topotecan proceeded to therapy with alternating courses of vincristine 1.5 mg/m2, dactinomycin 1.5 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 2.2 g/m2 (VAC) and vincristine 1.5 mg/m2, topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily × 5, and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 daily × 5. Patients who did not respond to topotecan received continuation therapy with VAC alone. RESULTS: The overall response rate to topotecan was 46% (complete response, 4%; partial response 42%). Unexpectedly, patients with alveolar RMS had a higher rate of response (65%) than those with embryonal RMS (28%; P = .08). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (67%), anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and infection (21%). Two-year failure-free survival and survival estimates were 24% and 46%, respectively. Response to window therapy did not correlate with survival. CONCLUSION: The high response rate and acceptable toxicity profile of topotecan in children with advanced RMS support further evaluation of this agent in phase III trials. The superior responses in alveolar RMS are of interest.

Randomized phase II trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin plus etoposide (IPE) every three weeks in patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7087-7087
Author(s):  
I. Sekine ◽  
H. Nokihara ◽  
K. Takeda ◽  
Y. Nishiwaki ◽  
K. Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Body Weight Loss ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Pilot Studies ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

7087 Background: A promising complete response rate and median survival time were obtained in our previous phase II study of IPE chemotherapy repeated every 4 weeks in patients with ED-SCLC, but the infusion of irinotecan on day 15 was omitted in 77% of patients. Methods: The objective was to evaluate toxicities and antitumor effects of IP and IPE regimens every 3 weeks and to select the arm for subsequent phase III trials. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Previously untreated ED-SCLC patients aged between 20 and 70 years old with a performance status (PS) of 0–2 were randomized to receive either IP (I 60 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and P 60 mg/m2 day 1) or IPE (the same dose of IP and E 50 mg/m2 days 1–3 with G-CSF support) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. The projected sample size was 110 patients (Liu’s Selection design for pilot studies on survival). Results: From March 2003 to May 2005, 53 patients (43 males/10 females, median age 63) were randomized to IP and 57 patients (48 males/9 females, median age 62) to IPE. Body weight loss and PS were well balanced between the arms. Full cycles were administered in 75% of patients in the IP and in 67% in the IPE arm. Dose reduction was required in 17% of patients in the IP and 28% in the IPE arm. Grade 3–4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 53%, 34% and 4% of patients in the IP, and 93%, 45%, and 23% of patients in the IPE arm, respectively. Grade 3–4 infection, malaise, anorexia, and diarrhea were noted in 15%, 2%, 0%, and 15% of patients in the IP, and 30%, 11%, 15%, and 24% of patients in the IPE arm, respectively. No treatment related death occurred. Complete and partial responses were noted in 8% and 68% of patients in the IP, and 11% and 75% of patients in the IPE arm, respectively. Conclusion: Toxicity was more severe, but tumor responses seemed better in the IPE arm. The survival analysis will be carried out in April 2006. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Cancer Patients: A Single Centre Experience

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3573
Author(s):  
Alfred Chung Pui So ◽  
Harriet McGrath ◽  
Jonathan Ting ◽  
Krishnie Srikandarajah ◽  
Styliani Germanou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Vaccine Safety ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oncology Centre

Emergency approval of vaccines against COVID-19 provides an opportunity for us to return to pre-pandemic oncology care. However, safety data in cancer patients is lacking due to their exclusion from most phase III trials. We included all patients aged less than 65 years who received a COVID-19 vaccine from 8 December 2020 to 28 February 2021 at our London tertiary oncology centre. Solicited and unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) were collected using telephone or face-to-face consultation. Within the study period, 373 patients received their first dose of vaccine: Pfizer/BioNTech (75.1%), Oxford/AstraZeneca (23.6%), Moderna (0.3%), and unknown (1.1%). Median follow-up was 25 days (5–85). Median age was 56 years (19–65). Of the patients, 94.9% had a solid malignancy and 76.7% were stage 3–4. The most common cancers were breast (34.0%), lung (13.4%), colorectal (10.2%), and gynaecological (10.2%). Of the patients, 88.5% were receiving anti-cancer treatment (36.2% parenteral chemotherapy and 15.3% immunotherapy), 76.1% developed any grade VRAE of which 2.1% were grade 3. No grade 4/5 or anaphylaxis were observed. The most common VRAEs within 7 days post-vaccination were sore arm (61.7%), fatigue (18.2%), and headaches (12.1%). Most common grade 3 VRAE was fatigue (1.1%). Our results demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccines in oncology patients have mild reactogenicity.

Olaparib maintenance monotherapy for non-germline BRCA1/2-mutated (non-gBRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) patients (pts): Phase IIIb OPINION primary analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5545-5545
Author(s):  
Andres Poveda ◽  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Kristina Lindemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Grade 3

5545 Background: In the Phase II Study 19 trial (NCT00753545; Ledermann et al Lancet Oncol 2014), maintenance olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in PSR OC pts, including non-BRCAm pts. A significant PFS benefit was also seen with maintenance olaparib vs placebo in gBRCAm PSR OC pts in the Phase III SOLO2 trial (NCT01874353; Pujade-Lauraine et al Lancet Oncol 2017). To investigate olaparib maintenance monotherapy in non-gBRCAm PSR OC pts who had received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), we performed the Phase IIIb, single-arm, OPINION study (NCT03402841). Methods: Pts had high-grade serous or endometrioid OC and were in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to PBC. Pts received maintenance olaparib (tablets; 300 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (modified RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included PFS by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCA mutation (sBRCAm) status determined by central Myriad tumor and germline testing; and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST). The primary analysis was planned for 18 months (mo) after the last patient was enrolled. Results: 279 pts were enrolled from 17 countries (mean age: 64 years); 253 pts (90.7%) were confirmed non-gBRCAm. At data cut-off (Oct 2, 2020), median PFS was 9.2 mo (95% CI 7.6–10.9), with 210 PFS events (75.3% maturity). 65.3%, 38.5% and 24.3% of pts were progression-free (PF) at 6, 12 and 18 mo, respectively. The Table shows PFS in key subgroups. Median TFST was 13.9 mo (95% CI 11.5–16.4). Median exposure to olaparib was 9.4 mo (range 0.0–31.9). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 29.0% of pts and serious TEAEs in 19.7% of pts. TEAEs led to dose interruption, dose reduction and treatment discontinuation in 47.0%, 22.6% and 7.5% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of olaparib maintenance therapy in non-gBRCAm PSR OC pts, consistent with our interim analysis and previous trials in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03402841. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: an effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 2296-2300 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pazdur ◽  
Y Lassere ◽  
V Rhodes ◽  
J A Ajani ◽  
S M Sugarman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Oral Regimen ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration (UFT; Taiho Pharmaceutical Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) plus oral calcium leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-five patients with advanced, bidimensionally measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled onto the trial. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for advanced disease. Patients received either 350 or 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 150 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided daily doses every 8 hours for 28 days followed by a 7-day rest period. Response was evaluated after two courses of therapy. RESULTS Eighteen patients (three treated at 350 mg/m2/d and 15 at 300 mg/m2/d) had partial responses, and one patient had a complete response (response rate, 42.2%; 95% confidence interval, 28% to 58%). Responses were observed in sites that included liver (n = 18), lung (n = 6), and bone (n = 1). Of seven patients who received 350 mg/m2 UFT, prolonged grade 3 diarrhea developed in five; this resulted in a reduction in the UFT starting dose to 300 mg/m2/d in the remaining 38 patients. Grade 1 or 2 toxic effects included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, anorexia, fatigue, oral mucositis, excessive lacrimation, and rash. Among 38 patients who received the 300-mg/m2/d dose, grade 3 toxic reactions included diarrhea (n = 4), vomiting (n = 2), abdominal cramping (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 2). CONCLUSION UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 150 mg/d administered for 28 days demonstrated significant activity against metastatic colorectal carcinoma. This oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of the neutropenia or significant oral mucositis that complicates intravenous schedules of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin. The results of this clinical trial will serve as the basis for a randomized phase III study to compare this oral schedule of UFT plus leucovorin with intravenous 5-FU plus leucovorin to determine the relative efficacy, impact on quality of life, and cost of the two regimens.

Phase II Window of Idarubicin in Children With Extraocular Retinoblastoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1847-1847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo L. Chantada ◽  
Adriana Fandiño ◽  
Gabriel Mato ◽  
Sandra Casak
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate in an upfront phase II study the response to idarubicin in children with extraocular retinoblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The starting dose of idarubicin was 15 mg/m2/d (days 1 and 2) weeks 0 and 3. After an interim evaluation, the dose was reduced to 10 mg/m2/d (days 1 and 2) weeks 0 and 3 because of hematopoietic toxicity. Response was evaluated at week 6. RESULTS: At the Hospital JP Garrahan (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 10 patients (five bilateral) were entered onto the study from 1995 to 1998. A total of 19 cycles were administered. Extraocular sites included orbit (n = 10), bone marrow (n = 3), bone (n = 1), lymph node (n = 1), and CNS (n = 1). The response rate was 60% (95% confidence interval, 30% to 90%). One complete response was achieved, in addition to five partial responses, two cases of stable disease, and two cases of progressive disease. All patients with bone marrow involvement achieved complete clearance of tumor cells. The patient with CNS disease had progressive disease. All patients had severe hematopoietic toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia after most cycles). Other toxicities included grade 2 diarrhea in 30%. No echocardiographic changes were detected. CONCLUSION: Idarubicin is active in extraocular retinoblastoma. The activity of this drug should be explored in future phase III studies.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Fludarabine (F) in First Line Therapy of Younger Versus Elderly Patients (Pts) with Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Meta-Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Clemens M. Wendtner ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: F based regimen have become the standard treatment in CLL at least in younger pts. However, in elderly pts chlorambucil is still frequently used since it is easy to administer and has less side effects. Here we compare the efficacy and toxicity of F administered to younger pts and elderly pts treated between 1999 and 2004 within two phase III trials of GCLLSG. Patients: 362 pts (median age 59 [range 37–65] years) were randomized to F (n=182) or F plus cyclophosphamide (n=180) within the CLL4 trial. 191 elderly pts (median age 71 [range 65–79] years) were treated with F (92 pts) or chlorambucil (99 pts) within the CLL5 protocol. Inclusion criteria were identical in both trials except for age limits. All pts were previously untreated and in advanced stage Binet C or Binet B with symptoms which require therapy or Binet A with severe B-symptoms. In both studies the F regimen consisted of 30 mg/m2/day (d) IV for 5 consecutive days, every 28 d for up to 6 cycles. Anti-infective prophylaxis and growth factors were not given routinely in both trials. Results: Most of patients in both age groups were in Binet stage B (54% of the younger pts and 52% of the elderly), 35% in each age group were in Binet stage C, 11% and 13% respectively in Binet stage A. No significant difference in the main clinical features was observed except for a higher incidence of concomitant disease in the elderly (61% versus 36%, p=0.001). A mean number of 5.2 F courses was administered in the CLL4 trial and 4.9 courses in the CLL5 trial. The mean administered cumulative dose of F per pt was lower in the elderly pts (1076 mg vs. 1194 mg, p= 0.05). Overall response rates were similar in both arms, with 82.9% in the younger group and 85.7% in the elderly. The complete remission rate was 6.7% in the younger patients and 10.4% in the elderly (p= 0.3). After a follow up time of 24 months (mo) the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the elderly group with 18.7 mo compared to 19.8 mo in the younger group after 22 mo observation time (p=0.03). The overall survival (OS) was significantly impaired in elderly pts as well (29 mo versus median not reached, p&lt;0.001). Progressive disease was the main cause of death in both age groups. In each group 3 treatment related deaths occurred due to infection or hemolysis. The incidence of side effects was similar in both age groups. Severe, CTC grade 3 and 4, myelosuppression occurred in 39% of the younger and 41% of the elderly pts. No difference in the rate of leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or anemia was oberved as well. The incidence rate and severity of infections was similar in both groups (24% vs. 32% all and 8.7% vs. 6.9% CTC grade 3 and 4). The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts (2.2% vs. 12.2%, p=0.001). In comparison the prevalence rate of neoplasia in the U.S. population peaks at 11% in the age group of 70–79 (SEER cancer statistic review: 1972–2002). Conclusion: F is a well tolerated treatment regimen in first line therapy of elderly pts with CLL. Response rates were similar in both age groups. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in the elderly population. The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts, but is only slightly increased in comparison to the normal population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document