scholarly journals Relationship of Circulating Tumor Cells to Tumor Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3213-3221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt ◽  
Nicholas Iannotti ◽  
Bruce H. Saidman ◽  
Kert D. Sabbath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeAs treatment options expand for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a blood marker with a prognostic and predictive role could guide treatment. We tested the hypothesis that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC.Patients and MethodsIn a prospective multicenter study, CTCs were enumerated in the peripheral blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and after starting first-, second-, or third-line therapy. CTCs were measured using an immunomagnetic separation technique.ResultsPatients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of three or more or less than three CTCs/7.5 mL, respectively. Patients with unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.5 v 7.9 months; P = .0002) and overall survival (OS; 9.4 v 18.5 months; P < .0001). Differences persisted at 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 20 weeks after therapy. Conversion of baseline unfavorable CTCs to favorable at 3 to 5 weeks was associated with significantly longer PFS and OS compared with patients with unfavorable CTCs at both time points (PFS, 6.2 v 1.6 months; P = .02; OS, 11.0 v 3.7 months; P = .0002). Among nonprogressing patients, favorable compared with unfavorable CTCs within 1 month of imaging was associated with longer survival (18.8 v 7.1 months; P < .0001). Baseline and follow-up CTC levels remained strong predictors of PFS and OS after adjustment for clinically significant factors.ConclusionThe number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CTCs provide prognostic information in addition to that of imaging studies.

scholarly journals Isolation and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) as Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Post-Operative m-CRC

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Swaroop G
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Clinical Prognosis

Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) presents non-invasive, repeatable investigation of patient‘s disease. In metastatic Colorectal Cancer (m-CRC) patients, CTC enumerations have been comprehensively studied in evaluating metastatic disease. CTC analysis has been shifting from enumeration to more sophisticated molecular depiction of tumor cells, which is used for liquid biopsy of the tumor, reflecting cytological and molecular changes in metastatic patients over time. In this study, CTC enumeration in advanced and localized metastatic colorectal cancer, highlights the vital gains as well as the challenges posed by various approaches, and their implications for advancing disease management. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC‘s) or circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) to conduct chemotherapy and reporting prognosis is extremely important, In view of the detail CTC has the potential to offer multiple samples by way of sequential minimally-invasive liquid biopsies. In fastidious, there is escalating evidence for the efficacy of CTC‘s in the clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). With most studies confirming the association of elevated CTC counts with worse prognosis. CTC‘s were first identified by Ashworth in 1869. CTC research has been vulnerable by the failure to constantly detect these typical cells. While the normal range of WBCs in human blood is 4.5-119/L, there may only be a few CTC‘s. The most widely used CTC enumeration platform, Cell-Search (Veridex LLC, NJ, USA) was approved for clinical use. As treatment options expand for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a blood marker with a prognostic and predictive role could guide treatment. Investigations were carried out that Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) could predict clinical prognosis in patients with mCRC. This pilot study, demonstrates that CTCs can serve as both prognostic and predictive factor for patients with mCRC. The presence of at least three CTCs at baseline and follow-up is a strong independent prognostic factor for inferior PFS and OS. When utilized in combination with imaging studies, CTCs provide additional prognostic information. There are several studies for which CTCs could have efficacy inmetastatic colorectal cancer. The statistics suggests that CTCs may be used as a stratification feature in metastatic disease treatment trials. The current list of validated prognostic factors is short, with only routine status being universally recognized. Further study should prospectively deal with modification of regimens based on unfavorable CTCs early in the course of treatment will result in enhancement in PFS or OS. As treatment has become more effective for metastatic disease, decision making has become more complicated. Five classes of drugs are on hand for treatment. The most common initial chemotherapy is a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. CTC levels drawn at 3 to 5 weeks and 6 to 12 weeks, before PET imaging, may lead to prospective regimen choices and standby patients from unnecessary drug toxicity by suggesting that an early change in treatment is defensible.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Hak Bang ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Significant Disease

AbstractThere is an unmet medical need for later-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Considering that, beyond progression, co-treatment with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy showed less toxicity and a significant disease control rate, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and bevacizumab. This single-center retrospective study included 157 patients between May 2011 and February 2018, who received bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line chemotherapy after progressing with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The study treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 orally (PO) twice daily on day 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9–5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.3–11.1). The overall response rate was 14% (22/157). Patients who had not received prior targeted agents showed better survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.82, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.85, P = 0.004). Bevacizumab plus capecitabine could be a considerably efficacious option for patients with mCRC refractory to prior standard treatments.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Assessment of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood using flow cytometry in patients with surgery for colorectal cancer – review

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-379
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Muşină ◽  
Ionuţ Huţanu ◽  
Mihaela Zlei ◽  
Mădălina Ştefan ◽  
Mihaela Mentel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pubmed Database

AbstractIntroduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common neoplasia in the world. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have a prognostic value and can be useful in monitoring solid neoplasia. Only one method for CTC identification has received the approval and this is the CellSearch® system based on the immunomagnetic separation. Multiple markers are used in CTC identification, as epithelial markers and cytokeratines. CTC identification in peripheral blood is associated with a worse prognostic and reduced free survival in CRC.Material and methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed database for articles that reports the circulating tumor cells in CRC until July 2019. We selected studies in English and French and the main words used for search were ‘circulating tumor cells’, ‘colorectal cancer’, ‘colon cancer’, ‘rectal cancer’, ‘flow cytometry’, ‘peripheral blood’. We included studies with more than 10 patients, where samples were collected from the blood in relation with surgery and flow cytometry was used as analyzing technique.Results: We included 7 studies in final analysis, that showed in flow cytometry analysis a cut-off value of CTC that can vary from 2-4 CTC/ 7.5 ml peripheral blood with a sensitivity of 50.8% and specificity of 95%. Patients with positive CTC were associated with higher T stage and positive lymph nodes, with a worse overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) comparing with negative patients.Conclusion: CTC are considered to be a prognostic factor who needs more validation studies in order to be included in the clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document