GEMOX as first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC): A monoinstitutional experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15179-15179
Author(s):  
M. Di Marco ◽  
E. Nobili ◽  
R. Di Cicilia ◽  
G. Brandi ◽  
S. Bertolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

15179 Background: To date, gemcitabine (GEM) remains the cornerstone of chemotherapy (CHT) for APC. According to GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trials the combination of GEM and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has proven superior to GEM alone in terms of response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 19 patients (pts) affected with histologically-confirmed APC, in order to determine the impact of GEMOX as first-line chemotherapy in terms of objective responses (OR) and TTP, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among the 19 pts considered there were 15 males and 4 females (median age at diagnosis of 60.84 yrs; ECOG 0–2). The staging, according to AJCC criteria, was: IIB in 1 case, III in 5 cases and IV in the 13 remaning cases. The only metastatic site was the liver (in 13/19 pts). Ten of the 19 pts underwent surgical treatment prior to CHT: 2 radically resected (R0) subsequently treated with GEMOX after recurrence, 4 with positive margins (R1) and 4 surgically palliated. All pts received GEM 1000 mg/m2/d1 + oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2/d2 every 2 weeks. The median number of cycles was 5.89. Results: Among the 19 pts, 3 had a partial response (PR, 15.69%), 6 had stable disease (SD, 31.57%); no complete response was observed and 10 pts had progressive disease (PD, 52.63%). The overall disease control rate (DCR: PR + SD) was 47.37% while the OR were 15.69%. The median survival observed was 9.03 months (95% C.I. 5.15–12.91) and the median TTP was 6.13 months (95% C.I. 2.81–9.46). The main toxicities were: leucopenia, piastrinopenia, diarrhoea, nausea, fever and peripheral neuropathy; 3 pts discontinued the treatment due to grade 3–4 neurotoxicity. Conclusions: In our experience GEMOX gives an improved control of APC in terms of OR and TTP, with acceptable toxicity. The OS is in accordance to literature as well as the other data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with docetaxel/prednisone for first-line treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from the multinational phase III trial (VENICE).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Tannock ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Sergei Ivanov ◽  
Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson ◽  
Aude Flechon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

13 Background: Docetaxel/prednisone is standard first-line chemotherapy for mCRPC. Aflibercept (known as ziv-aflibercept in the US) is a recombinant human fusion protein that binds VEGF-A, VEGF-B and Placental Growth Factor (PlGF), thereby inhibiting angiogenesis. Methods: VENICE was a double-blind, randomized phase III study with overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint. Men with mCRPC, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function and no prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with docetaxel (75 mg/m² iv q3w) and oral prednisone (5mg bid) and randomized double blind 1:1 to receive aflibercept (A) 6 mg/kg or placebo (Pbo), IV every 3 weeks. Pts were stratified by ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2). For final OS analysis, 873 deaths were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 with 90% power (overall 2-sided α = 0.05). Results: From Aug 2007 to Feb 2010, 1224 patients (median age 68 yr, PS 0-1 96%) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. Median number of cycles was 8 (A) and 9 (Pbo). Median relative dose intensity was >0.93 for A, Pbo and docetaxel. At final cut-off, median follow-up was 35.4 mos and 873 pts had died. Results for primary and key secondary endpoints with confidence intervals are in the table. Higher incidence of all grade hypertension, stomatitis, appetite disorders, diarrhea, dehydration, epistaxis, dysphonia, cough, headache and infections was observed in the aflibercept arm. Conclusions: Aflibercept in combination with docetaxel/prednisone given as first line chemotherapy for mCRPC did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS and added toxicity. (NCT00519285 sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Clinical trial information: NCT00519285. [Table: see text]

Irinotecan in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Overview

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1501-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
Andreas Harstrick ◽  
Wolf Achterrath ◽  
Shousong Cao ◽  
Siegfried Seeber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE AND METHODS: For more than three decades, the therapeutic options for patients with advanced colorectal cancer have almost exclusively been based on fluoropyrimidines. With the recognition that topoisomerase-I (TOP-I) is an important therapeutic target in cancer therapy, irinotecan, a semisynthetic TOP-I–interactive camptothecin derivative, has been clinically established in the treatment of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Irinotecan was investigated as second-line chemotherapy after prior treatment with fluorouracil (FU)-based regimens in two large randomized phase III trials comparing irinotecan with either best supportive care or an infusional FU/leucovorin (LV) regimen. The outcomes of these trials established irinotecan as the standard therapy in the second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. The therapeutic value of irinotecan in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer was investigated in two large randomized phase III trials comparing the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV with FU/LV alone. Both trials demonstrated significant superior efficacy for the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV in terms of response rate, median time to disease progression, and median survival time. Consequently, the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV has been approved as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and constitutes the reference therapy against which other treatment options must be tested in the future. CONCLUSION: In this review, the clinical rationale and update of the present clinical status of irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer and future prospects of irinotecan-based combinations are discussed.

Impact of first-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 216-216
Author(s):  
Aline Da Rocha Lino ◽  
Raphael Brandao Moreira ◽  
Jessica Ribeiro Gomes ◽  
Tarcia Tarciane Soares de Sousa ◽  
Carina Mina Abrahao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gastroesophageal Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
The Cost

216 Background: Despite a large number of randomized trials, there is no consensus as to the best regimen for advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU has shown increased response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), but at the cost of significant toxicity. Based on a small phase II study, FLOT has been adopted by some groups given its better toxicity profile. We aim at reporting our experience with this regimen Methods: Patients with unresectable advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who received FLOT (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 as a 24h infusion in combination with docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1 every 2 weeks) as first-line therapy at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 23 patients were reviewed, most of them with metastatic disease (60%). Median age was 56 years (range 26–76) and 74% were male. Median PFS and OS were 5,2 (95% CI 4,0-6,3) and 8,5 months (95% CI 4,4-12,6), respectively. Only 13%of the patients experienced prolonged PFS (>12 months). There were no deaths due to the treatment. Conclusions: Before FLOT could be adopted as a first-line regimen for metastatic gastroesophageal cancer, phase III trials are urgently needed comparing FLOT with more traditional regimens.

Genetic variations within the CD40L immune stimulating gene predict outcome for mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI/bevacizumab: Data from FIRE-3 and TRIBE.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 558-558
Author(s):  
Martin D. Berger ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Shu Cao ◽  
Yuji Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Cell Mediated Immune Response ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Validation Set ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Time

558 Background: The introduction of immunotherapy has significantly improved outcome in various tumors. Immune stimulating proteins exert an anti-tumor effect mainly through enhancing T-cell mediated immune response. Additionally, preliminary data suggest a major role of immune stimulating proteins in modulating angiogenesis. We therefore hypothesize that variations in genes involved in the immune activation pathway may predict outcome in pts with mCRC treated with first-line FOLFIRI/ bevacizumab (bev). Methods: The impact of 4 functional SNPs within the CD40L, Light, OX40L and ICOS genes on outcome was evaluated in 322 pts with mCRC treated with first-line FOLFIRI/bev in two randomized phase III trials. We used TRIBE as a discovery (n = 215) and FIRE-3 as a validation set (n = 107). One hundred twenty-nine pts treated with FOLFIRI/cetuximab (cet) served as a control cohort (FIRE-3). OncoArray, a custom array manufactured by Illumina was used for data extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood. Results: Baseline characteristics: FOLFIRI/bev, discovery set (TRIBE), median PFS/OS/FU 9.7/26.2/48.9 mo; FOLFIRI/bev, validation set (FIRE-3), PFS/OS/FU 11.5/32.4/71.1 mo; FOLFIRI/cet, control set (FIRE-3) PFS/OS/FU 12.8//23.9/70.7 mo. The CD40L rs1126535 SNP showed significant association with OS. Pts in the discovery cohort harboring any T allele and treated with FOLFIRI/bev had a longer median OS compared to C/C carriers (27.9 vs. 20.0 mo) in both univariate (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.81, p = 0.005) and multivariate analyses (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.56, p = 0.038). Similarly, any T allele carriers in the validation cohort had a significantly longer median OS than those harboring a C/C genotype (40 vs. 19.0 mo) in the multivariate analysis (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.05-7.50, p = 0.040). However, this association could not be shown in pts receiving FOLFIRI/cet (HR 0.60, 95% CI, 0.18-1.94, p = 0.38). Conclusions: We show for the first time that the CD40L polymorphism rs1126535 might serve as a predictive marker in pts with mCRC treated with FOLFIRI/bev. Targeting CD40L might be promising to further improve treatment against mCRC and to overcome resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Clinical outcomes of pancreas cancer patients with peritoneal spread: Results from the chord consortium.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19268-e19268
Author(s):  
Mehrnoosh Pauls ◽  
Abdulaziz AlJassim AlShareef ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Rachel Anne Goodwin ◽  
Brandon M. Meyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e19268 Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that clonal cells that give rise to pancreatic peritoneal metastases (PM) are geographically and genetically distinct from clonal cells, giving rise to lung and liver metastases. The objective of this study was to assess if there is a distinct difference in prognosis and therapeutic response among patients with pancreatic cancer with (PM compared to the lung/liver. Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design, medical records from adult patients diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas at five Canadian academic cancer centers (2014 - 2019) were reviewed. Prognostic variables including age, Charlson comorbidity index, ECOG, cigarette smoking, nodal status, sites of metastases, and first line chemotherapy were collected. Cox proportional hazards model (MVA) was used to examine the association between peritoneal involvement and survival, adjusted for measured confounders. Analyses were completed using SAS, where alpha of 0.05 was defined as the level of significance. Results: A total of 1161 patients were included. Metastatic sites included peritoneum (n = 170, 14.6%), lung (n = 145, 12.5%) and liver (n = 563, 48.5%). Patients with PM received first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX, n = 31), Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (G/N, n = 20), Gemcitabine (G, n = 18), and no treatment (n = 97). In univariate analyses, worse ECOG PS was associated with PM (p = 0.002). The majority of patients died (89%), with a median overall survival (OS) of 3 vs 7 months for patients with PM and those without PM (p < 0.001), respectively. The median OS in patient whom receive first-line chemotherapy was 7 months in FFX group (95% CI 1.66-12.33), 6 months in G/N (95% CI 4.54-7.45) and 2 months in G group (95% CI 1.42-2.57). Patients had significantly better OS when treated with FFX or G/N compared to G alone (p = 0.002). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter among patient treated with G alone compare to patients treated with FFX and G/N (P < 0.005). Conclusions: In the setting of combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer, patients with PM continue to have a poor prognosis. This may be due to the impact of PM on PS and the inability to administer palliative chemotherapy. For eligible patients, FFX or G/N results in a higher OS than G monotherapy.

Outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC) treated with first and second line chemotherapy at a multicenter cancer clinic

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13529-13529
Author(s):  
H. J. Lim ◽  
C. Lohrisch ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
S. Gill ◽  
H. Kennecke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Number ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Group B ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

13529 Background: In British Columbia (BC), FOLFIRI and FOLFOX were approved for the treatment of MCRC in 2002. The effect on survival of various treatment and patient related factors was determined for patients with MCRC treated with sequential doublet chemotherapy. Methods: Eligible patients received either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI first-line with a cross over to the alternative regimen for second-line therapy. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for patient and disease characteristics, treatment, toxicity and survival. Analysis of survival was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between March 2002 and June 2004, 106 new patients met the criteria above. Sixty five patients were treated with a sequence of FOLFOX-FOLFIRI (Group A): 67% M, median age 57y, rectal 20%. Forty-one were treated with the sequence FOLFIRI-FOLFOX (Group B): 64% M, median age 58y, 27% rectal. Survival was statistically similar in both groups. Progression requiring second line chemotherapy within 4 weeks of a first line treatment was associated with inferior survival (13 months vs. 21 months (p<0.018). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was experienced in 27.5% of the patients treated with FOLFOX and 22% of the patients treated with FOLFIRI. Conclusions: In the general population with MCRC, the median survival achieved with sequential doublet therapy is consistent with that reported in clinical trials. A superior sequence was not identified. The median number of first line chemotherapy cycles with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI was similar, reflecting the general clinical practice in BC to give 10 - 12 cycles of therapy followed by a planned break. Patients who required initiation of second line chemotherapy within 4 weeks of stopping the first line therapy experienced an inferior prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed no significance of sex, age, site (colon versus rectal), and ECOG status as predictive factors. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized second line trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic cancer - CONKO 003

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4517-4517 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Riess ◽  
U. Pelzer ◽  
J. Stieler ◽  
I. Schwaner ◽  
G. Heil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Impact

4517 Objective: For nearly ten years gemcitabine (G) was standard first line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). There is no consensus about second line therapy after disease progression while receiving G, but 5-FU-based regimens are considered. Results about randomized second line studies in APC are very rare. Our phase II study (ASCO 2002) showed activity of the OFF (oxaliplatin/folinic Acid (FA)/5-fluorouracil (FU) [24h] ) regimen in 23 pts. To examine the impact and the side effects of oxaliplatin we initiated a multicenter phase III study to compare OFF and FF in pts with G refractory APC. Methods: Pts with CT/ MRT confirmed failure with G in first line therapy, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >60%, controlled pain, adequate hematological, renal and liver functions were eligible. Pts were stratified according to duration of first line therapy, KPS and tumor stage. We randomized pts to outpatient treatment with FF (FU 2g/m2 (24h)/ FA 200 mg/m2 (30min) on d1, d8, d15 and d22) or OFF (FF+Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2, d8, d22). In both arms the next cycle started on day 43. Pts were followed with regular staging every 3 months or at any signs of disease progression. Results: Until now we randomized 161 of 165 (planned) pts between 02/2004 and 01/2007. So we expect to present first results (side effects, progression free survival, overall survival) at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Single institution experience with FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14534-e14534
Author(s):  
Krishna Soujanya Gunturu ◽  
Jaykumar Ranchodbhai Thumar ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Stacey Stein ◽  
Xiaopan Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Sample Proportion ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
The Impact

e14534 Background: FOLFIRINOX significantly increases survival in metastatic PC compared to gemcitabine (Conroy. New Engl J Med 2011;364). Despite superior efficacy, toxicities have tempered enthusiasm for FOLFIRINOX in full doses. To assess the impact of dose attenuations on toxicity and efficacy, we reviewed our experience with FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC pts. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of dose, toxicity, and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in all pts with locally advanced unresectable PC (LAPC) and metastatic PC (MPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX at Yale Cancer Center between 06/10 and 07/11. Dose attenuations were at the treating physician’s discretion. All pts received prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Pts were treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or surgical resection. Toxicities and RR were compared to Conroy’s data using one sample proportion test. Overall survival (OS) and progress free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 35 pts with ECOG PS 0/1 were treated. Pt characteristics: LAPC 16; MPC 19; median age 61 yrs (range 48-77); male 13; prior chemotherapy 5. Median (med) number of cycles was 10 (range 1-26). FOLFIRINOX was dose attenuated with the first cycle in 29 pts: IRI reduced in 27 and omitted in 1, OX reduced in 10, bFU reduced in 9 and omitted in 7, LV decreased in 11, FU infusion reduced in 3. Med doses of OX, IRI, bFU, and infusion FU were 90%, 68%, 68%, and 100%, respectively, compared to 78%, 81%, 82%, and 82%, respectively, in Conroy’s FOFIRINOX arm (control). We are following pts for PFS and OS. RRs were 50% and 47% in pts with LAPC and MPC. RR in MPC didnot differ significantly from the control (p=0.19). We observed significantly less grade 3/4 fatigue (p=0.008) and neutropenia (p<0.0001) compared to the control group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dose attenuation of FOLFIRINOX, esp IRI and bFU, with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is associated with improved tolerability and equivalent RR compared to full dose FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC. The impact of dose attenuations on toxicity and efficacy warrants further evaluation in both LAPC and MPC.

Survival post-progression (SPP) in phase III trials of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC: Its potentially different impact on OS in the first-line and salvage settings.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18027-e18027
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Hotta ◽  
Nagio Takigawa ◽  
Yoshiro Fujiwara ◽  
Akiko Hisamoto ◽  
Eiki Ichihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e18027 Background: We previously demonstrated that in advanced NSCLC, survival after progression to first-line chemotherapy (SPP-1) has significantly improved and has become more closely associated with OS after the initiation of first-line chemotherapy (OS-1), potentially because of the recent development of active agents even in salvage settings (Plos One 2011). We conducted a literature survey to examine time trend in survival after progression to second- or third-line chemotherapy (SPP-2/3) and its potential correlation with OS after the initiation of second- or third-line chemotherapy (OS-2/3). Methods: SPP-2/3 was pragmatically defined in each second- or third-line chemotherapy trial as the interval of MST (OS-2/3) minus median PFS time (PFS-2/3) (OS-2/3 = PFS-2/3 + SPP-2/3). The relationship between PFS-2/3 and OS-2/3 or SPP-2/3 and OS-2/3 was assessed in the regression analysis using the coefficient of determination (r2); higher r2 means a higher correlation. Results: Twenty trials of the second- or third-line chemotherapy initiated between 2001 and 2009, were defined (14,951 patients, 37 chemotherapy arms). Contrary to our previous findings regarding SPP-1, SPP-2/3 has not been significantly prolonged over the years (8.0-day increase per year; p = 0.161) despite a steady increase in OS-2/3 (17.2-dayincrease per year; p = 0.003) and PFS-2/3 (9.8-day increase per year; p = 0.005). Overall, a moderate association was observed between OS-2/3 and SPP-2/3 (r2 = 0.6755), suggesting SPP-2/3 could predict 68% of the variation in OS-2/3. Interestingly, the association between OS-2/3 and SPP-2/3 became less close over the years (r2 = 0.9849, 0.8280, and 0.5667 in 2001–2003, 2004–2006, and 2007–2009, respectively). Conclusions: During the period SPP-2/3 seemed stable, and the association between SPP-2/3 and OS-2/3 has become unclear probably because of recent survival improvement in PFS-2/3 rather than SPP-2/3. This seems in contrast with our previous report that SPP-1 has become more tightly associated with OS-1 over the year, potentially due to the establishment of active post-study treatments just in second- or third-line setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document