A randomized double blind phase I-II study to determine the tolerability/efficacy of two different doses of lenalidomide (L), CC- 5013, in biochemically relapsed (BR) prostate cancer (PC) patients (pts) (M0) after local treatment (LT)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5130-5130
Author(s):  
V. J. Sinibaldi ◽  
M. A. Carducci ◽  
S. Moore-Cooper ◽  
B. George ◽  
S. Denmeade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pooled Data

5130 Background: BR following LT is common in PC with no defined standard treatment. Lenalidomide (L) is an immunomodulatory agent with anti-angiogenic and direct antitumor effects. Methods: This trial was designed to evaluate a dose-effect relationship of L in BR PC. Pts were randomized to either 5 or 25 mg/day(d), PO, d 1–21 (28-d cycles); then stratified by PSADT (< 3, 3–8.9, ≥ 9 mos), LT and prior ADT. Eligible pts had: rising PSA (≥1 ng/mL), M0 disease, testosterone > 150 ng/mL, adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. Baseline and Q 2 mos PSA's were processed after Q 6 mos of L, along with CT and bone scan. Toxicity exams were Q mo. Primary endpoints are safety and progression after 6 mo of L (defined by a confirmed ↑ in PSA > 25% over the baseline value or mets). Secondary endpoints are changes of slopes in PSA related to pharmacokinetics (pk). A sample size of 30 pts/arm provides an 85% power to detect a PSA progression rate of 40% (compared to 80% predicted ) with a Type I error = 0.05 (Fishers exact test). Results: 59 pts were entered July 20, 2006-December 31, 2008. Pooled data from the 2 arms: median: age 64 (50–81), ECOG PS 0, baseline PSA 9.3 ng/ml (1.3–92.8 ng/ml). 16 pts had PSADT <3 mos, 26 from 3–8.9 mos, and 17 ≥ 9 mos. Median: F/U on all 59 pts is 351 + d (9 +-887+d); # cycles = 6 (1–30). Thus far, 44/59 pts completed 6 cycles of L (1 had PD, 6 stopped L due to toxicity, 8 too early). 22 /44 who completed 6 mos of L remained on L > 6 mos ( 7+-30+ mos); including 7 pts ≥ 24 mos. Of 44 pts, blinded evaluation of PSA's at 6 mos: 4 pts had ≥ 50% ↓, 22 had stable PSA,17 had PD, 1 too early . Rash was DLT. Other Gr toxicities: appendicitis, abd pain, neck pain, venous thrombolic disease, fatigue, pruritus. Conclusions: Preliminary data prior to unblinding the study treatment arms, from pooled data, suggest that L may be administered > 6 mos with acceptable toxicity, and is associated with PSA declines and long term stabilization in pts with BR. Supported by a grant from Celgene Corporation. Data coordination infrastructure is supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation and The James Stine research fund. [Table: see text]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of first-line platinum/docetaxel with or without erlotinib (E) in patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6017-6017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Nassib William ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Merrill S. Kies ◽  
Salmaan Ahmed ◽  
George R. Blumenschein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

6017 Background: In a single-arm, phase 2 study, we previously demonstrated that in pts with R/M HNSCC, cisplatin, docetaxel and E improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to historical data (Kim et al., ASCO 2006). Herein, we evaluated this regimen in a single center, randomized, phase 2 trial. Methods: Pts with R/M HNSCC, with a performance status (PS) 0-2, were randomized (1:1) to receive up to 6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (or carboplatin AUC 6) and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 every 21 days, plus placebo (P) vs. E 150 mg p.o. daily, followed by maintenance P or E until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. With 120 pts, the study had 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 3.0 to 4.9 months with a two-sided type I error rate of 0.1. Results: From 05/2010 to 07/2015, 120 pts were randomized to the P (N = 60) or E (N = 60) groups. All pts but one initiated treatment and were eligible for evaluation of the primary endpoint – 92 males; median age 62 years; 52 oropharynx, 40 oral cavity, 19 larynx, 8 hypopharynx cancer pts; 86 current/former smokers; 43 with recurrence within 6 months of completion of local treatment; 27 with prior exposure to EGFR inhibitors. Median PFS was 4.4 vs. 6.1 months for the P and E groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.95 months, p = 0.026). Response rates were 44% vs. 56% for P vs. E (p = 0.21). Median overall survival (OS) for P- and E-treated pts was 13.7 vs. 17.0 months (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.04, p = 0.07). Benefits from E on PFS and OS were more pronounced in pts with oropharyngeal tumors (p≤0.05 for interaction). In the E group, first-cycle rash grade 2-4 (34% pts) was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.40, p = 0.02). E-treated pts experienced a higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (33.9 vs. 53.3%), including diarrhea (3 vs.17%), dehydration (5 vs. 15%), nausea (5 vs. 14%), rash (0 vs. 12%). Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint. Addition of E to first-line platinum/docetaxel improved PFS and OS. This regimen may warrant further evaluation in randomized, phase 3 trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01064479.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDAC), for first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NCI 7863)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8004-8004
Author(s):  
S. S. Ramalingam ◽  
M. Maitland ◽  
P. Frankel ◽  
A. E. Argiris ◽  
M. Koczywas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
Double Blind

8004 Background: Vorinostat, a HDAC inhibitor, enhances paclitaxel and platinum-mediated anti-cancer activity in preclinical studies by enhanced tubulin acetylation and DNA fragmentation respectively. Promising activity with carboplatin (C), paclitaxel (P), and vorinostat in patients with advanced NSCLC in the phase I study (Ramalingam et al, Clin Cancer Res, 2007) prompted this placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study. Methods: Pts. with stage IIIB (wet) or IV NSCLC, performance status (PS) 0/1, no prior therapy and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function were randomized (2:1) for therapy with PC with either vorinostat or placebo. Treatment consisted of C: AUC=6 mg/ml.min; and P 200 mg/m2 both given on day 3 along with either vorinostat (400 mg PO QD) or placebo on days 1–14 of each 3 wk cycle to a maximum of 6 cycles. The estimated sample size to demonstrate a 50% improvement in response rate for vorinostat over placebo was 93 pts. (one-sided P, type I error 10%). Results: Ninety-four pts. were enrolled (vorinostat-64; placebo-32). Pts. baseline characteristics were similar between the two arms (median age 64, male 60%, PS 0 40%, brain mets 16%). Median # cycles: vorinostat-3.5; placebo - 4. The confirmed response rate was superior with vorinostat over placebo (34% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.02). At the time of analysis, the preliminary median PFS for vorinostat and placebo were 5.75 and 4.1 m respectively (ITT). Follow up for survival is ongoing. Common grade 3/4 toxicities (vorinostat vs. placebo): neutropenia (44% vs. 47%); thrombocytopenia (33% vs. 16%); fatigue (13% vs. 3%); hyponatremia (21% vs. 6%); diarrhea (5% vs. 0). Discontinuation from study after cycle 1 was higher with vorinostat (27% vs. 16%). Biomarker studies on baseline tumor tissue and peripheral blood cells are ongoing. Conclusions: Administration of vorinostat with carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in a significantly superior response rate for pts.with advanced NSCLC. HDAC inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC. Supported by ASCO Career Development Award to S.S.Ramalingam, and NCI NO1-CM-62209, NO1-CM-62201, NO1-CM-62208. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals OS4.1 MEVITEM: A European, randomized, open-label, Phase I/II study of vismodegib in combination with temozolomide versus temozolomide alone in adult patients with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma presenting an activation of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii10-iii10
Author(s):  
D Frappaz ◽  
M Barritault ◽  
L Montané ◽  
F Laigle-Donadey ◽  
O Chinot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Type I ◽  
Filamin A ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Shh Pathway ◽  
Open Label Phase

Abstract BACKGROUND Vismodegib (V) suppresses sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling. We postulated that vismodegib together with chemotherapy may be more efficient than chemotherapy alone in patients (pts) relapsing of a SHH-activated medulloblastoma (MB). MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult pts with recurrent SHH-MB not previously exposed to temozolomide (T) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to Arm A (V daily 150mg/d, po) + T (D1-5: 150 mg/m2 for cycle 1 and 200 mg/m2 thereafter; n=up to 25pts) or Am B (T alone; n=up to 13pts). Identification of SHH activation was performed centrally by IHC (GAB1, β-catenin, filamin A, and YAP1). NGS analyses were performed to identify the mutations responsible for SHH activation. Primary objectives were to assess the incidence of severe toxicities (safety run-in based on a 3 + 3 design) and the 6-month non-progression rate (NPR-6m) according to WHO criteria and based on central read tumor assessment (Phase II). A Minimax Simon’s two-stage design was used to detect NPR-6m of 55% (p0: 30%, type I error rate of 5%, power of 80%). At first stage, ≥ 3/9 pts without progression at 6m were required for the accrual of 16 additional pts in Arm A. A 3rd independent and parallel arm with V as single agent (Arm C, n= up to15pts) was added for pts previously treated by T. RESULTS 24 SHH-MB pts were enrolled (Arm A: 10, Arm B: 5 and Arm C: 9; median age: 37 y [21–55]). At the end of the safety run-in; no major safety concerns were reported. At the end of Stage I: no objective response were reported and 2 pts among 10 were free of progression at 6m among in Arm A. According to statistical rules, the study was definitively closed to enrolment. NGS analyses showed a PTCH1 inactivating mutation in 6 pts (n=4 in arm A; n= 2 in arm B); a SMO activating mutation in 4 pts (n= 3 in Arm A; n=1 in Arm B). For 1 pt in each arm, no tumor sample was available for analysis, for 1 pt in Arm A DNA quality was insufficient, and for 1 patient in each arm no mutations of SMO, PTCH1, SUFU or SHH were found. Out of the 4 pts in Arm A with an inactivating PTCH1 mutation, only 1 was progression free at 6m. PFS and OS data will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION The combination of vismodegib with monthly T failed to demonstrate superior activity as compared with T alone. Further studies are warranted to refine therapeutic indication for vismodegib

Axitinib with or without dose titration for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Unblinded results from a randomized phase II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA349-LBA349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Viktor Gruenwald ◽  
Mayer N. Fishman ◽  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Takeshi Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Double Blind

LBA349 Background: Patients receiving the 5-mg twice daily (BID) axitinib starting dose exhibit variable drug exposure; prior pharmacokinetic analyses indicate higher exposure is associated with better outcomes in mRCC. Dose titration based on individual tolerability may optimize exposure and improve efficacy. Methods: Patients (N=213) with treatment-naïve mRCC received axitinib 5 mg BID for a 4-week lead-in period. Then, patients with 2 consecutive weeks of blood pressure ≤150/90 mmHg, no axitinib-related toxicities >grade 2, no dose reductions, and ≤2 antihypertensive medications were randomized (double-blind) to axitinib 5 mg BID + dose titration to 10 mg BID maximum with axitinib or placebo. Those not eligible for randomization continued axitinib 5 mg BID or lower. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in randomized arms. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety were secondary endpoints. Assuming response rate under the null hypothesis is 0.15, this study had ≥80% power (1-sided type I error 10%) to detect a ≥25% absolute improvement in ORR with active vs placebo titration. Results: In all, 56 patients each were randomized to active and placebo titration arms, 91 were not randomized, and 10 withdrew during the lead-in period. As of Oct 12, 2012, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 54% (40–67) in the active titration arm vs 34% (22–48) in the placebo titration arm (1-sided P=0.019), and 59% (49–70) in the non-randomized arm. Median PFS (95% CI) from first dose was 14.5 mo (9.2–24.5) in the active titration arm vs 15.7 mo (8.3–19.4) in the placebo titration arm (hazard ratio favored active titration, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54–1.35; 1-sided P=0.244), and 16.6 mo (11.2–22.5) in the non-randomized arm. Most frequent all-grade, all-causality adverse events in active titration, placebo titration, and non-randomized arms, respectively, were diarrhea (61% vs 63% vs 63%), hypertension (61% vs 43% vs 82%), and fatigue (45% vs 46% vs 54%). Conclusions: Axitinib is effective and well tolerated in first-line mRCC with prolonged median PFS in all treatment arms compared to historical controls. Axitinib dose titration significantly improved ORR vs placebo. Clinical trial information: NCT00835978.

Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk localized prostate cancer: Update of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0521.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
Howard M. Sandler ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
Mahul B. Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Type I ◽  
Group 1

333 Background: High-risk, localized prostate cancer has a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that adj docetaxel (D) and prednisone and long-term (24 mos) androgen suppression (AS) and radiation therapy (RT) would improve overall survival (OS) and tested this in NRG/RTOG 0521. Results with med follow-up of 5.7 yrs were reported (JCO 37:1159, 2019), showing a benefit of D (HR=0.69, 90% CI: 0.49-0.97, 1-sided p=0.034). Med follow-up is now 10.4 yrs and we report updated results for OS and metastasis (DM). Methods: NRG/RTOG 0521 opened 12/05 and closed 8/09 with targeted accrual of 600 and designed to detect a HR of 0.49, based on improvement in 4-yr OS from 86 to 93%. With 0.05 1-sided type I error and 90% power >78 deaths were required. Pts were stratified by predefined risk groups. Group 1: Gl 9-10, any T; Group 2: Gl 8, PSA<20, T≥T2; Group 3: Gl 8, PSA≥20, any T; Group 4: Gl 7, PSA≥20, any T. maxPSA ≤150. RT dose was 75.6 Gy. Chemo consisted of 6, 21-day cycles of D starting 28 days after RT. Results: Of 612 accrued, 563 were eligible/available for analysis. By risk group 1-4, there were 297, 116, 64, and 86 pts. Med PSA 15 ng/mL. 10-yr OS rates were 64% [95% CI: 58-70%] for AS+RT and 69% [95% CI: 63-75%] for AS+RT+CT (HR = 0.89, 90% CI: 0.70, 1.13, 1-sided p=0.22). However there was evidence of non-proportional hazards (Grambsch-Therneau test, p=0.016). Thus survival was alternatively evaluated with restricted mean survival time (RMST). The difference in RMST at 10 yrs was 0.42 yrs (90% CI: 0.07-0.77, 2-sided p=0.048). Cumulative incidence of DM at 10 yrs was 22% [95% CI: 17-27%] for AS+RT and 20% [95% CI: 15-25%] for AS+RT+CT (2-sided log-rank p=0.29). At 10 years most deaths occurred in risk group 1: 62 in AS+RT and 50 in AS+RT+CT (HR= 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66-1.32, 2-sided log-rank p=0.16). There was no new related Grade 5 toxicity. Conclusions: OS findings, reported after follow-up of 5.7 yrs, demonstrated a small beneficial effect of adding D to AS and RT. With longer follow-up the benefit of D remains, but the HR varies over time and the OS curves have converged. Support: U10CA180868 (NRG Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG SDMC), U24CA180803 (IROC) from the NCI and Sanofi-Synthelabo Int. Clinical trial information: NCT00288080.

Pilot study of veliparib (ABT-888) with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Michael Anthony Carducci ◽  
Susan F. Slovin ◽  
Jeremy Paul Cetnar ◽  
Jiang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Type I ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Clinically Significant

224 Background: Castration-resistant PC tumors exhibit increased PARP activity (critical enzymes for DNA damage repair). Veliparib is a novel, oral, potent inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2. Preclinically, resistance to oral TMZ treatment in the PC3-Luc prostate cancer mouse model was reversed when mice were treated with veliparib. Based on the synergistic interaction, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of veliparib + TMZ in mCRPC pts. Methods: Eligible pts had mCRPC, PSA>2 ng/mL, progressed on at least one docetaxel based therapy and adequate organ function. Pts received veliparib 40 mg BID Days (D) 1-7 and TMZ D1-5 in 28D cycle (C) until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicities. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. Primary objective: Efficacy based on rate of PSA decline of 30% or greater. Secondary objectives: safety, RECIST objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and biomarker analyses. A sample size of 25 pts provided 76% power to differentiate between PSA response rates of 5 and 20% at 1-sided type I error rate of 0.1. Results: 26 pts were enrolled; median age 67 years [55, 81]; median baseline PSA 107 ng/ml (6.9, 4584.4); 7/26 (27%) had 2 prior therapies. Median Cs of veliparib + TMZ received were 2 (range 1–9). Most frequent treatment related adverse events (AE) were fatigue (50%), nausea (38%) and constipation (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs in >10% of pts was thrombocytopenia (15%). All pts are off therapy. 25 pts were PSA response evaluable; 2 pts had a confirmed PSA response; 1 pt had a 37% decrease in PSA while the other pt had a 96% decrease in PSA and a 40% reduction in tumor size. 4/25 pts had stable disease for a minimum of 4 months (m). Median PFS was 2.1 m [95% CI: 1.8, 3.9]; 11/26 pts have died with median OS of 9.1 m [95% CI: 5.5, 11.7]. There was a negative correlation between change from baseline in circulating tumor cells and PFS. Conclusions: Veliparib + TMZ were well tolerated with evidence of some activity. Due to lack of activity of TMZ in CRPC,veliparib-induced potentiation of TMZ may not be clinically significant. Other combinations will be explored with higher doses of veliparib. Biomarker data will be presented.

Paracetamol and Pain Modulation by TRPV1, UGT2B15, SULT1A1 Genotypes: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisèle Pickering ◽  
Isabelle Creveaux ◽  
Nicolas Macian ◽  
Bruno Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphism ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Type I ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Paracetamol Metabolism

Abstract Background The influence of the genetic polymorphism of enzymes and receptors involved in paracetamol metabolism and mechanism of action has not been investigated. This trial in healthy volunteers investigated the link between paracetamol pain relief and the genetic polymorphism of 23 enzymes and receptors. Design This randomized double-blind crossover controlled pilot study took place in the Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Forty-seven Caucasian volunteers were recruited. The trial consisted of two randomized sessions one week apart with oral paracetamol or placebo, and pain changes were evaluated with mechanical pain stimuli. The genetic polymorphism of 23 enzymes and receptors was studied, and correlations were made with pain relief. All tests are two-sided with a type I error at 0.05. Results Paracetamol was antinociceptive compared with placebo (222 ± 482 kPaxmin vs 23 ± 431 kPaxmin; P = 0.0047), and the study showed 30 paracetamol responders and 17 paracetamol nonresponders. Responders were characterized by TRPV1rs224534 A allele, UGT2B15rs1902023 TT genotype, and SULT1A1rs9282861 GG genotype (P &lt; 0.05 for all). These findings confirm for the first time the involvement of a specific TRPV1 rs224534 variant in paracetamol antinociception. They also reveal a new antinociceptive role for specific variants of hepatic phase II enzymes associated with paracetamol metabolism. Conclusions The study warrants larger clinical trials on these potential genomic markers of paracetamol analgesia in patients. Confirmation of the present findings would open the way to effective individualized pain treatment with paracetamol, the most commonly used analgesic worldwide.

A phase 3 trial with a 2x2 factorial design of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and/or local radiotherapy in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): First results of PEACE-1.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5000-5000
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Xavier Maldonado ◽  
Stéphanie Foulon ◽  
Guilhem Roubaud ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Type I

5000 Background: Historically, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was the standard of care (SOC) for men with mCSPC. Since 2015, combining ADT with either docetaxel, novel hormonal therapies, or radiotherapy to the primary tumor (RXT) (for those with low burden metastases) was shown to improve overall survival (OS) and thus has become the new SOC. It is unknown whether combining these new treatments on top of ADT further increments outcomes. Methods: Men with de novo mCSPC were randomized to SOC, SOC + abiraterone acetate-prednisone (abiraterone), SOC + RXT, or SOC + abiraterone + RXT. SOC was initially ADT alone, then from Oct 2015 onwards the use of docetaxel was authorized as part of SOC (at the investigator’s discretion until 2017, then, following the publication of the LATITUDE and STAMPEDE trials, accrual was restricted to men receiving ADT+docetaxel). The trial has two co-primary endpoints of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS with type I error of 0.1% and 4.9%, respectively. The required number of rPFS events to achieve 80% power has been reached for the abiraterone question (not yet for the RXT question). The interaction between abiraterone and RXT was first tested using a Cox model adjusted for stratification factors (performance status, type of castration, metastatic burden, and when applicable, docetaxel). A hierarchical testing was used to test the effect of abiraterone: overall population, then ADT+docetaxel population. Results: From Nov 2013 to Dec 2018, 1173 men were enrolled (SOC was ADT+docetaxel in 710 pts and ADT alone in 463 pts), median age 67y (IQR: 60-72), high volume 57%, low volume 43%. The median follow-up is 3.5y. No interaction was detected between the effect of abiraterone and that of RXT (p = 0.64), allowing to pool abiraterone arms for comparisons. rPFS was significantly improved in the abiraterone arm in the overall population (HR: 0.54 (0.46-0.64), p < 0.0001; medians: 2.2 vs 4.5 years) and in the ADT+docetaxel population: (HR: 0.50 (0.40-0.62), p < 0.0001; medians: 2.0 vs 4.5 years). bPFS (PFS including PSA progression as an event) also significantly favored abiraterone in the overall population (HR: 0.40 (0.35-0.47), p < 0.0001; medians: 1.5 vs 3.8 years) and in the ADT+docetaxel population (HR: 0.38 (0.31-0.47), p < 0.0001; medians: 1.5 vs 3.2 years). OS is maturing. Grade 3-4 adverse events reported in > 5% of pts within the first 6 months in the ADT+docetaxel population included neutropenic fever (4.5% vs 5.4%), liver toxicity (19.7% vs 13%), and hypertension (12.2% vs 8.6%) in the abiraterone and control arms, respectively. Conclusion: Adding abiraterone to ADT + docetaxel significantly improves rPFS in men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer, with about 2.5 years of absolute benefit in medians, and no meaningful additional short-term toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT01957436.

scholarly journals A phase II randomized trial of observation versus stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer (ORIOLE).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5094-TPS5094
Author(s):  
Ryan Phillips ◽  
Noura Radwan ◽  
Ashley Ross ◽  
Steven P. Rowe ◽  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Type I ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

TPS5094 Background: ORIOLE is a randomized, non-blinded Phase II interventional study evaluating the safety and efficacy of SBRT in biochemically recurrent, oligometastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer at 3 centers in the US. Patients will be stratified by clinical characteristics and randomized 2:1 to SBRT or observation. The primary clinical endpoint is progression at 6 months defined by PSA increase, radiologic or clinical evidence, ADT initiation, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints include local control at 6 months, SBRT-associated toxicity and quality of life, and ADT-free survival. Imaging and laboratory correlates will characterize, in isolation, the effects of SBRT on oligometastatic disease. Methods: Eligible patients are hormone-sensitive, have undergone prior definitive treatment and recurred with 1-3 asymptomatic bone or soft tissue metastases diagnosed within 6 months, PSA doubling time (PSADT) < 15 months, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and normal organ and marrow function. Minimization will be used to balance assignment by primary intervention, prior ADT, and PSADT. Accrual of 54 patients provides 85% power to detect a decrease in progression rate from 80% to 40% with type I error = 0.05 using one-sided Fisher’s exact test. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival, ADT free survival, and time to locoregional and distant progression will be calculated based on intention-to-treat. Local control will be assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Withdrawal prior to 6 months will be counted as progression. Adverse events will be summarized and quality of life pre- and post-SBRT will be measured by Brief Pain Inventory. The investigational targeted imaging agent 18F-DCFPyL will be compared to bone scan and CT for identifying oligometastases before SBRT and monitoring disease response following SBRT. Biological alterations induced by SBRT will be investigated using circulating tumor cell analysis, deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA, and T-cell repertoire profiling. A hereditary cancer assay will inform efforts to advance personalized screening and therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02680587.

PACIFIC trial: A randomized phase II study of apatorsen and abiraterone in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have had PSA progression while receiving abiraterone (ABI).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Mark T. Fleming ◽  
Katherine Sunderland ◽  
Costantine Albany ◽  
Joel Gingerich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Type I ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Ecog Ps

146 Background: Heat Shock Protein 27 (Hsp27) is a multi-functional chaperone that regulates cell signaling and survival pathways implicated in cancer progression. In prostate cancer models, Hsp27 chaperones androgen receptor (AR) and enhances transactivation of AR-regulated genes. Apatorsen is a 2nd generation antisense that inhibits Hsp27 expression with clinical activity demonstrated in pts with mCRPC. Methods: mCRPC patients with PSA-only progression on ABI + prednisone (P) 10-20 mg daily were randomized to continuing ABI + P (Control Arm) or ABI + P with Apatorsen 600 mg IV x 3 loading doses then 800 mg IV weekly (Study Arm). Control Arm pts could cross over to receive apatorsen at time of progression. Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts progression free (PSA, clinical and radiologic) at day 60. Assuming a 25% increase in proportion of pts progression free and a null hypothesis of 5%, the planned sample size was 74 patients (type I error 20%, type II error 10%). Results: 72 pts were randomized: 36 to Control Arm, 36 to Study Arm. Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms: median age was 72 years (53-89); ECOG PS 0/1 in 44/56% of pts; median PSA of 29.4 (2.5-470.0); metastases to bone/lymph nodes/liver or lung occurred in 63/27/10%; elevated LDH and alkaline phosphatase in 26% and 26% ; 47% had ≥ 5 CTC/7.5 mL. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly grade 1-2 infusion reactions. 18 pts had grade 3/4 adverse events considered apatorsen related including: dyspnea (14%), fatigue (14%), increased ALT (9%), increased AST (9%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). Primary and secondary outcomes are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: Apatorsen may have activity when added to abiraterone for mCRPC patients progressing on abiraterone. Establishing predictors of response should be a priority for future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01681433. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document