Phase III AXIS trial of axitinib versus sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Updated results among cytokine-treated patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4546-4546 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dror Michaelson ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
Joseph Clark ◽  
Bruce Redman ◽  
...  

4546 Background: Axitinib, a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the phase III AXIS trial. In patients previously treated with cytokines, median PFS (mPFS) was 12.1 mo. In a prior phase II study of axitinib for cytokine-refractory mRCC, mPFS was 13.7 mo and the 5-yr overall survival (OS) rate was 20.6%. We report updated PFS and OS for cytokine-treated patients from the AXIS trial. Methods: 723 patients with clear-cell mRCC and progressive disease after 1 systemic therapy were enrolled, of whom 251 received prior interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon-α (IFN-α). Patients were randomized 1:1 to axitinib (5 mg twice daily [BID] starting dose) or sorafenib (400 mg BID). Results: As of Jun 3, 2011, mPFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) for cytokine-treated patients was 12.0 mo (10.1, 13.9) with axitinib (n=126) vs 6.6 mo (6.4, 8.3) with sorafenib (n=125): hazard ratio [HR] (95% CI) 0.519 (0.375, 0.720); p<0.0001. For those treated with an IL-2-containing regimen, mPFS (95% CI) was 15.7 mo (8.3, 19.4) with axitinib (n=37) vs 8.3 mo (4.7, 15.7) with sorafenib (n=38). For those treated with IFN-α alone, mPFS (95% CI) was 12.0 mo (10.0, 13.8) with axitinib (n=89) vs 6.5 mo (6.4, 8.2) with sorafenib (n=87). As of Nov 1, 2011, median OS (95% CI) in the cytokine-treated subgroup was 29.4 mo (24.5, not estimable) with axitinib vs 27.8 mo (23.1, 34.5) with sorafenib: HR (95% CI) 0.813 (0.555, 1.191); p=0.144. Adverse event (AE) profiles were similar in both arms. Few cytokine-treated patients (5.6%) discontinued axitinib due to toxicity. AEs reported in >25% of cytokine-treated patients receiving axitinib were diarrhea (49.2%), hypertension (47.6%), fatigue (35.7%), dysphonia (29.4%), and hand–foot syndrome (28.6%). Conclusions: Axitinib showed median PFS and OS of 1 and 2.5 yr, respectively, in cytokine-treated patients, confirming prior phase II study results, and was well tolerated. PFS was superior to that of sorafenib in second-line mRCC and compares favorably with historical results of other agents in second-line mRCC.

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S608-S609
Author(s):  
L. Albiges ◽  
M. Schmidinger ◽  
N. Taguieva-Pioger ◽  
D. Perol ◽  
V. Gruenwald

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 490-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday B. Dandamudi ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Joseph I. Clark ◽  
David F. McDermott ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
P F Geertsen ◽  
G G Hermann ◽  
H von der Maase ◽  
K Steven

PURPOSE A single-center phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) administered by continuous infusion to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients with RCC were entered onto the study. rIL-2 (Proleukin; Eurocetus Corp, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was administered intravenously in a dose of 18 x 10(6) IU/m2 per 24 hours. A maximum of two induction cycles and four maintenance cycles were given. Each induction cycle consisted of two rIL-2 infusion periods of 120 hours and 108 hours duration, respectively; these were separated by a 6-day rest period. Each maintenance cycle consisted of a 120 hours rIL-2 infusion period. RESULTS Six of 30 assessable patients (20%) responded; two (7%) with a complete response (CR) and four (13%) with a partial response (PR). The response duration for patients with CR was 209 and 715+ days, and for those with PR 161, 197, 245, and 353 days. Seven patients had stable disease (SD) with a median duration of 261 days (range, 127 to 381 days). The overall median survival was 261 days (range, 13 to 905+ days). The most frequent toxicities requiring dose reductions of rIL-2 were: hypotension in 87% of patients, dyspnea in 32%, CNS toxicity in 55%, and an increase in serum creatinine levels in 48%. Septicemia occurred in 16% of patients. Toxicities usually reversed on interruption of rIL-2 infusion. One patient (3%) died as a result of the treatment from initial CNS toxicity followed by multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS The study confirmed the antitumor efficacy of rIL-2 administered by continuous infusion in patients with metastatic RCC. The response rate was similar to that obtained by high-dose bolus injections of rIL-2. Toxicity was substantial but manageable in a specialized oncology ward without routine use of an intensive care unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document