Phase III, randomized study of first-line trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) ± pertuzumab (P) vs. trastuzumab + taxane (HT) treatment of HER2-positive MBC: Final overall survival (OS) and safety from MARIANNE.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Wolfgang Eiermann ◽  
Masakazu Toi ◽  
Young-Hyuck Im ◽  
...  

1003 Background: In MARIANNE (NCT01120184), patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer were randomized to trastuzumab + docetaxel or paclitaxel (HT; n=365), T-DM1 + placebo (T-DM1; n=367), or T-DM1 + P (T-DM1 + P; n=363) as first-line therapy. In the primary analysis, T-DM1–based treatment exhibited noninferior, but not superior, progression-free survival relative to HT (Perez EA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2016). OS was similar between treatments in the first interim analysis. Here we report OS from the final descriptive analysis. Methods: Enrolled patients had centrally assessed HER2-positive (IHC3+ or ISH+) progressive/recurrent locally advanced breast cancer or previously untreated MBC with a ≥6-month interval since (neo)adjuvant treatment with taxanes or vinca alkaloids. Results: At the clinical cutoff date of May 15, 2016, median follow-up was 54 months and 512 patients had died. Median OS was 50.9, 53.7, and 51.8 months with HT, T-DM1, and T-DM1 + P, respectively (Table). A sensitivity analysis in which HT-treated patients who received T-DM1 and/or P after disease progression (n=85) were censored prior to treatment switch found similar results. There were numerically fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) with T-DM1. Conclusions: With this longer follow-up, the T-DM1 safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis and prior experience. While OS was similar across treatment arms, a median OS of 53.7 months and fewer grade ≥3 AEs (vs other arms) supports T-DM1 as an effective and tolerable alternative first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01120184. [Table: see text]

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (32) ◽  
pp. 3781-3787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Ellis ◽  
Antonio Llombart-Cussac ◽  
David Feltl ◽  
John A. Dewar ◽  
Marek Jasiówka ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare overall survival (OS) for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods The Fulvestrant First-Line Study Comparing Endocrine Treatments (FIRST) was a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had no previous therapy for advanced disease received either fulvestrant 500 mg (days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole 1 mg (daily). The primary end point (clinical benefit rate [72.5% and 67.0%]) and a follow-up analysis (median time to progression [23.4 months and 13.1 months]) have been reported previously for fulvestrant 500 mg and anastrozole, respectively. Subsequently, the protocol was amended to assess OS by unadjusted log-rank test after approximately 65% of patients had died. Treatment effect on OS across several subgroups was examined. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse event monitoring. Results In total, 205 patients were randomly assigned (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 102; anastrozole, n = 103). At data cutoff, 61.8% (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 63) and 71.8% (anastrozole, n = 74) had died. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for OS with fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole was 0.70 (0.50 to 0.98; P = .04; median OS, 54.1 months v 48.4 months). Treatment effects seemed generally consistent across the subgroups analyzed. No new safety issues were observed. Conclusion There are several limitations of this OS analysis, including that it was not planned in the original protocol but instead was added after time-to-progression results were analyzed, and that not all patients participated in additional OS follow-up. However, the present results suggest fulvestrant 500 mg extends OS versus anastrozole. This finding now awaits prospective confirmation in the larger phase III FALCON (Fulvestrant and Anastrozole Compared in Hormonal Therapy Naïve Advanced Breast Cancer) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01602380).


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Wolff ◽  
Ann A. Lazar ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
August M. Garin ◽  
Stephen Brincat ◽  
...  

Purpose Recent data showed improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when adding everolimus to exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer experiencing recurrence/progression after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Here, we report clinical outcomes of combining the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus with letrozole in AI-naive patients. Patients and Methods This phase III randomized placebo-controlled study tested efficacy/safety of first-line oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily/temsirolimus 30 mg daily (5 days every 2 weeks) versus letrozole/placebo in 1,112 patients with AI-naive, hormone receptor–positive advanced disease. An independent data monitoring committee recommended study termination for futility at the second preplanned interim analysis (382 PFS events). Results Patients were balanced (median age, 63 years; 10% stage III, 40% had received adjuvant endocrine therapy). Those on letrozole/temsirolimus experienced more grade 3 to 4 events (37% v 24%). There was no overall improvement in primary end point PFS (median, 9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P = .25) nor in the 40% patient subset with prior adjuvant endocrine therapy. An exploratory analysis showed improved PFS favoring letrozole/temsirolimus in patients ≤ age 65 years (9.0 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93; P = .009), which was separately examined by an exploratory analysis of 5-month PFS using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology (P = .003). Conclusion Adding temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve PFS as first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer. Exploratory analyses of benefit in younger postmenopausal patients require external confirmation.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bartelink ◽  
R D Rubens ◽  
E van der Schueren ◽  
R Sylvester

PURPOSE To assess the long-term contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and hormonal therapy (HT) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer, and to evaluate the impact of time of analysis on the results during accrual and up to 8 years after closure of a randomized phase III trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a trial using a factorial design, 410 patients were randomized between radiotherapy (RT) alone, RT plus CT, RT plus HT, and RT plus HT plus CT. RESULTS CT and HT each produced a significant prolongation of the time to locoregional tumor recurrence and to distant progression of disease, with the combined treatments providing the greatest therapeutic effect. At the time of trial closure, a significant improvement of survival was observed in patients who received CT (P = .004); however, with a longer follow-up duration, this effect disappeared (P > .05). HT did not initially appear to improve survival (P = .16); however, in the latest analysis with a long-term follow-up duration, a significant improvement of survival was seen (P = .02). A consistent 25% reduction in the death hazards ratio has been seen at all evaluations since trial closure in patients who received HT. The best survival results were observed in patients who received RT, HT, and CT (P = .02), with a reduction of 35% in the death hazards ratio. CONCLUSION An improvement in survival attributable to HT has been shown in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The greatest therapeutic effect was seen in the treatment group that received both CT and HT. The improvement obtained with HT became apparent only after long-term follow-up evaluation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 532-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Gianni ◽  
V. Semiglazov ◽  
G. M. Manikhas ◽  
W. Eiermann ◽  
A. Lluch ◽  
...  

532 Background: NOAH (NeOAdjuvant Herceptin) is a Phase III trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab; H) in combination with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods: 228 pts with centrally confirmed HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH+) LABC received 3 cycles of doxorubicin-paclitaxel (AT: A 60 mg/m2, T 150 mg/m2 q3w), 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2 q3w) and 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF: C 600 mg/m2, M 40 mg/m2, F 600 mg/m2 q4w) on days 1 and 8, with (n=115) or without (n=113) concomitant H (8 mg/kg loading dose then 6 mg/kg q3w for 1 year) before surgery. Pts with HER2- negative disease (IHC 0/1+; n=99) were treated in parallel with AT/T/CMF. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced for randomised pts. Median tumour size was 5.5 cm (range 1.5–20.0). Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) was present in 40% of HER2-positive vs 14% of HER2-negative tumours, while 35% vs 65%, respectively, were hormone receptor positive. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was similar in all 3 groups. Adding H to AT/T/CMF improved ORR (81% vs 73%; p=0.18) and significantly increased pCR rate (43% vs 23%; p=0.002). This response pattern was also seen in IBC pts. ORR (66%) and pCR rate (17%) for pts with HER2-negative disease were similar to pt responses in the HER2-positive group who did not receive H. The most common serious adverse event was febrile neutropenia (8% with H vs 4% without). Only 11% of pts receiving H had absolute LVEF decreases of =10% and 1 pt treated with H experienced a cardiac event with an LVEF value of <45%. One pt with HER2-negative disease died after surgery due to pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant H plus AT/CMF-containing chemotherapy significantly improved the pCR rate of LABC vs chemotherapy alone. Treatment was well tolerated with acceptable cardiac safety. Follow-up is ongoing and EFS is maturing. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolei Wang ◽  
◽  
Chen Xu Meng ◽  
Jingjing LI ◽  
Yu SU ◽  
...  

Background: Pyrotinib is a molecular and irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor independently developed in China, and its efficacy against HER2- positive breast cancer in the real world is not clear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer based on real-world evidence. Materials and Methods: We designed a prospective observational study. Thirty-six patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer from a single medical center were included in the study from December 2018 to February 2021. All patients received the oral HER2 receptor inhibitor pyrotinib and received concurrent chemotherapy or endocrinotherapy. The follow-up endpoint is set as April 1, 2021. The primary endpoint is Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR), and the secondary endpoint is Progression- Free Survival (PFS) and related side effects. Results: By the end point of follow-up, a total of 17 patients had progressed (including 6 deaths), and the progression-free survival rate was 52.78%. The median PFS was 13months (PFS range: 3-22 months). As the best response, 4 patients achieved CR, 20 patients achieved PR, 9 patients achieved SD, and 3 patient developed PD. The ORR was 66.67% and DCR was 91.67%. In the analysis, first-line pyrotinib treatment appeared to have higher ORR (88.88% vs 59.26%), but there was no significant difference. In addition, pyrotinib showed significant efficacy in patients with brain metastases, with an ORR of 42.85%. In terms of safety, the incidence of diarrhea was 80.55%, but only 4 patients had grade 3 diarrhea, which was tolerable after the drug dose was reduced; 1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 and thrombocytopenia, which were considered to be related to the chemotherapy drugs. The incidence of other adverse reactions was low, and all were grade 1 to 2. Conclusion: Pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy has a significant effect on HER2-positive breast cancer, and there is still a high ORR in patients who fail multiple lines of treatment. Side effects are overall controllable and safe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document