The short- and long-term outcomes of pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients older than 75 years.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 470-470
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kazama ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Yosuke Atsumi ◽  
Masaaki Murakawa ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Group B

470 Background: The short- and long-term outcomes of pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma have not been evaluated in elderly patients. Methods: This retrospective study selected patients who underwent curative surgery for pancreatic cancer at our institution. Patients were categorized into two groups; non-elderly patients(age <75 years: group A) and non-elderly patients (age ≥75 years: group B). The surgical morbidity, motality, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 221 patients were evaluated in the study. The overall complication rates are 44.8% in Group A and 52.6% in Group B. Surgical mortality was observed in 2 patients due to an abdominal abcess and cardiovascular disease in Group A (1.1%) and in 1 patient due to postoperative bleeding in Group B (2.6%). There were no significant differences (p=0.379 and p=0.456, respectively). Furthermore, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were similar between the elderly patients and non-elderly patients (18.55% vs. 20.2%, p=0.946 and 13.1% vs. 16.0%, p=0.829 respectively). Conclusions: The short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes survival after pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were almost equal in the elderly and the non-elderly patients in this study. Therefore, it is unnecessary to avoid pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in elderly patients simply because of their age.

The Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Patients Older Than 75 Years

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 554-561
Author(s):  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Masaaki Murakawa ◽  
Yosuke Atsumi ◽  
Keisuke Kazama ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Surgical Mortality ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Group B

The short- and long-term outcomes of pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma have not been fully evaluated in elderly patients. This retrospective study selected patients who underwent curative surgery for pancreatic cancer at our institution. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: nonelderly patients (age &lt; 75 years; group A) and elderly patients (age ≥ 75 years; group B). The surgical morbidity, surgical mortality, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the 2 groups were compared. A total of 221 patients were evaluated in the study. The overall complication rates were 44.8% in group A and 52.6% in group B. Surgical mortality was observed in 2 patients due to an abdominal abscess and cardiovascular disease in group A (1.1%) and in 1 patient due to postoperative bleeding in group B (2.6%). There were no significant differences (P = 0.379 and P = 0.456, respectively). Furthermore, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were similar between the elderly patients and nonelderly patients (18.55 versus 20.2%, P = 0.946 and 13.1% versus 16.0%, P = 0.829, respectively). The short-term outcomes and long-term survival after pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were almost equal in the elderly and the nonelderly patients in this study. Therefore, it is unnecessary to avoid pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in elderly patients simply because of their age.

scholarly journals 439 Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Complicated Diverticulitis - A Retrospective Study of Long-Term Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Durity ◽  
G Elliott ◽  
T Gana
Keyword(s):  
Complicated Diverticulitis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Stoma Reversal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction Management of complicated diverticulitis has shifted towards a conservative approach over time. This study evaluates the feasibility and long-term outcomes of conservative management. Method We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of patients managed with perforated colonic diverticulitis from 2013-2017. Results Seventy-three (73) patients were included with a male to female ratio of 1:2. Thirty-one (31) underwent Hartmann’s procedure (Group A) and 42 patients were managed with antibiotics +/- radiological drainage (Group B). Mean follow-up was 64.9 months (range 3-7 years). CT Grade 3 and 4 disease was observed in 64.5% and 40.4% of Group A and Group B patients, respectively. During follow-up, 9 (21.4%) Group B patients required Hartmann’s. Group A had longer median length of stay compared to Group B (25.1 vs 9.2 days). Post-operative complications occurred in 80.6% with 40% being Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher in group A. Stoma reversal was performed in 8 patients (25.8%). Conclusions In carefully selected cases, complicated diverticulitis including CT grade 3 and 4 disease, can be managed conservatively with acceptable recurrence rates (16.7% at 30 days, 4.8% at 90 days, 19.0% at 5 years). Surgical intervention on the other hand, carries high post-operative complication rates and low stoma reversal rates.

PS01.229: SHORT- AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Yusuke Muneoka ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawachi ◽  
Shigeto Makino ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Chie Kitami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Transthoracic Esophagectomy ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background Recently, the number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer is increasing as the aging of population in Japan. Because of the benefit to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (MIE) is being increasingly implemented in surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, short- and long-term outcomes of MIE in elderly patients have not been fully investigated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 86 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent MIE between January 2010 and December 2014 at Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital. We classified the patients into two groups according to their age: the elderly group (≥ 75 years old, n = 19) and the non-elderly group (< 75 years old, n = 67). We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, comorbidity, the extent of lymphadenectomy, TNM status, or Stage (0/I/II/III/IVa/IVb: elderly group 1/1/9/8/0/0 vs. non-elderly group 5/12/26/21/2/1). Conversion rate to open esophagectomy is 10.5% in the elderly group and 6.0% in the non-elderly group (P = 0.610). The proportion of patients who received preoperative chemotherapy was significantly lower in the elderly group (21.1% vs. 67.2%, P < 0.01). With regard to surgical outcomes, there were no significant differences in operative time (301 vs. 343 min), the amount of blood loss (126 vs. 110 ml), or the median length of hospital stay (14 vs. 14 days) between the two groups. Overall morbidity was not significantly different between the two groups (47.4% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.885). The incidence of postoperative complications that were ≥  grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was higher in the elderly group, but the difference was not statistically significant (42.1% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.156). The 5-year overall survival rates were 56.8% and 62.9% (P = 0.449), and the 5-year disease specific survival rates were 67.4% and 69.3% in the elderly and non-elderly groups (P = 0.564), respectively. Conclusion MIE in elderly patients with esophageal cancer can be safely performed and the long-term outcome was acceptable. However, there is a possibility of selection bias in this retrospective single-institutional study. Further multi-institutional prospective study is necessary to establish the evidence for clinical benefit of MIE for this disease. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Aged Over 80 Years Old Versus Non-Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Takahide Kawasaki ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shigeo Ninomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Surgery In Elderly

Abstract Background Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear.Objective This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old.Methods Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups.Results The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p<.01 and 14% vs. 32%, p<.05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p<.01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p<.01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups.Conclusions Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly.

scholarly journals Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Takahide Kawasaki ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shigeo Ninomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Surgery In Elderly

Abstract Background Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear. This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old. Methods Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Results The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p < .01 and 14% vs. 32%, p < .05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p < .01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p < .01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly.

scholarly journals Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Kryzauskas ◽  
Augustinas Bausys ◽  
Justas Kuliavas ◽  
Klaudija Bickaite ◽  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Colorectal Resection ◽  
Primary Anastomosis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background The proportion of elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients requiring surgery is increasing. Colorectal resection for left-sided cancers is the most controversial as the primary anastomosis or end-colostomy and open or minimally invasive approaches are available. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. Methods The cohort study included left-sided colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection with primary anastomosis. The participants were divided into non-elderly (≤75 years) and elderly (> 75 years) groups. Short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were investigated. Results In total 738 (82%) and 162 (18%) patients were allocated to non-elderly and elderly groups, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was less prevalent in the elderly (42.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.024) and a higher proportion of these suffered severe or lethal complications (15.4% vs 9.8%, p = 0.040). MIS decreased the odds for postoperative complications (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, p = 0.038). The rate of anastomotic leakage was similar (8.5% vs 11.7%, p = 0.201), although, in the case of leakage 21.1% of elderly patients died within 90-days after surgery. Overall- and disease-free survival was impaired in the elderly. MIS increased the odds for long-term survival. Conclusions Elderly patients suffer more severe complications after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. The risk of anastomotic leakage in the elderly and non-elderly is similar, although, leakages in the elderly seem to be associated with a higher 90-day mortality rate. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased morbidity in the elderly.

scholarly journals Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
Norio Shiraishi ◽  
Takahide Kawasaki ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shigeo Ninomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Surgery In Elderly

Abstract Background Recently, colorectal cancer has increased in elderly patients worldwide, with laparoscopic colorectal surgery increasing in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. However, whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly remains unclear. This study aimed to verify safety and curability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients ≥80 years old. Methods Patients undergoing curative colorectal surgery from 2006 to 2014 were enrolled and classified into the laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years (LAC-E) group, open surgery in elderly patients (OC-E) group, and laparoscopic surgery in non-elderly patients (LAC-NE) group. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Results The LAC-E, OC-E, and LAC-NE groups comprised 85, 25, and 358 patients, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the LAC-E versus OC-E group (97 vs. 440 mL, p<.01 and 14% vs. 32%, p<.05, respectively). Long-term outcomes were not different between these two groups. Operation time was significantly shorter in the LAC-E versus LAC-NE group (249 vs. 288 min, p<.01). Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Although the 5-year overall survival rate in the LAC-E group was lower than that in the LAC-NE group (64% vs. 80%, p<.01), there was no difference in 5-year disease-specific survival between the groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically and oncologically safe for colorectal cancer in the elderly as well as the non-elderly and can be an optimal procedure for colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair with Absorbable Tacks in a Long Term Follow-up: A Retrospective Control Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-146
Author(s):  
Simone Zanella ◽  
Enrico Lauro ◽  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Francesco Buccelletti ◽  
Annalisa Potenza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Absorbable Tacks

Background: Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair (LIVHR) is a safe and worldwide accepted procedure performed using absorbable tacks. The aim of the study was to evaluate recurrence rate in a long term follow-up and whether the results of laparoscopic IVH repair in the elderly (≥65 years old) are different with respect to results obtained in younger patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients (74 women and 55 men, median age 67 years, range = 30-87 years) with ventral (N = 42, 32.5%) or post incisional (N = 87, 67.5%) hernia were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: group A (N = 55, 42.6%) aged <65 years and group B (N = 74, 57.4%) aged ≥65 years. Results: The mean operative time was not significantly different between groups (66.7 ± 37 vs. 74 ± 48.4 min, p = 0.4). To the end of 2016, seven recurrences had occurred (group A = 3, group B = 4, p = 1). Complications occurred in 8 (16%) patients in group A and 21 (28.3%) patients in group B. Conclusion: In conclusion, our results confirm that the use of absorbable tacks does not increase recurrence frequency and laparoscopic incisional and ventral repair is a safety procedure also in elderly patients.

scholarly journals Reconstructive Approaches in Surgical Management of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4132
Author(s):  
Andrea Laufer ◽  
Adrien Frommer ◽  
Georg Gosheger ◽  
Robert Roedl ◽  
Frank Schiedel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Union Rate ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Primary Bone ◽  
Group B

Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia remains a major challenge in pediatric orthopedics. Ideal timing and preference of surgical procedures are discussed controversially. A variety of reconstructive treatment strategies have been described in literature, but so far none has proven its superiority. The aim of treatment is to obtain long-term bone union, to prevent refracture, and to correct angular deformities and leg length discrepancies. This study retrospectively evaluates the outcome of different reconstructive strategies. Sixty-nine patients were identified who presented to our outpatient department between 1997 and 2019. Twenty-six of these patients underwent reconstructive surgical treatment and were included in this study. The study cohort was divided into three groups. Excision of the pseudarthrosis was performed in all patients in Group A and B, and in two patients of Group C. Group A (six/26 patients) received subsequent bone transport through external fixation maintaining original length. In Group B (15/26 patients), patients underwent either previous, simultaneous, or subsequent extrafocal lengthening through external fixation to reconstitute length. In Group C (five/26 patients), internal fixation with intramedullary nails was applied. Radiological and clinical evaluation was performed to assess bone union and complication rates. Results varied considerably between the study groups. Overall, the primary bone fusion rate was 69.2%. There were four refractures, all occurring in Group B. The long-term bone union rate without refracture was 53.8%. The overall complication rate was 53.8% and 23.1% showed persistent pseudarthrosis. Two secondary amputations were performed due to failed bone fusion. In conclusion, excision of the pseudarthrosis and extrafocal lengthening achieves a satisfying bone union rate and limb reconstruction, while bone transport does not offer significant advantages but shows higher complication rates. Intramedullary stabilization should be applied to maintain bone union, but shows lower bone union rates when used as a stand-alone treatment regimen. Regardless of the primary bone fusion rates, the probability of long-term bone union remains unpredictable.

scholarly journals Liver and Pancreatic Resection in the Elderly

HPB Surgery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. J. Garden
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Resections

Background: Liver resection, or pancreaticoduodenectomy, has traditionally been thought to have a high morbidity and. mortality rate among the elderly. Recent improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, an increasing number of elderly patients, and an increasing need to justify use of limited health care resources prompted an assessment of recent surgical outcomes.Methods: Five hundred seventy-seven liver resections (July 1985–July 1994) performed for metastatic colorectal cancer and 488 pancreatic resections (October 1983–July 1994) performed for pancreatic malignancies were identified in departmental data bases. Outcomes of patients younger than age 70 years were compared with those of patients age 70 years or older.Results: Liver resection for 128 patients age 70 years or older resulted in a 4% perioperative. mortality rate and a 42% complication rate. Median hospital stay was 13 days, and 8% of the patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Median survival was 40 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 35%. No difference were found between results for the elderly and those for younger patients who had undergone liver resection, except for a minimally shorter hospital stay fortheyoungerpatients (median, 12 days vs. 13 days p=0.003). Pancreatic resection for 138 elderly patients resulted in a mortality rate of 6% and a complication rate of 45%. Median stay was 20 days, and 19% of the patients required ICU admission, results identical to those for the younger cohort. Long-term survival was poorer for the elderly patients, with a 5-year survival rate of 21% compared with 29% for the younger cohort (p=0.03).Conclusions: Major liver or pancreatic resections can be performed for the elderly with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and possible long-term survival. Chronologic age alone is not a contraindication to liver or pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document