Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Taiwo Adesoye ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Amanda Cuddy ◽  
Amanda B. Francescatti ◽  
Jessica R. Schumacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

533 Background: Although clinical guidelines recommend consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer, the impact on recurrence risk and cancer related survival is unclear. Furthermore, among Medicare patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. We examine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk and overall survival in a diverse cohort. Methods: 6,095 patients who underwent surgery for stage II-III colon cancer (2006-2007) were randomly selected from facilities reporting to the National Cancer Data Base for additional abstraction of tumor information, 5 year recurrence and survival. Death or second cancer within 6 months were excluded. Patients were classified as high or low risk using standard pathologic factors. Multivariate Cox regression with propensity score weighting was performed to compare recurrence risk and overall survival. Results: Of 3,423 patients with stage II colon cancer, 26.9% (n = 883) received chemotherapy compared to 76.2% (n = 1,839) of stage III patients. Among stage II patients, 47.8% (n = 1,636) had at least one high risk feature and 30.8% (n = 481) of these received chemotherapy. Five year recurrence rate in stage II patients was 13% (n = 392), greater in high risk compared to non-high risk patients (13.3% vs 9.3% p < 0.0001) and 24.4% (n = 874) in stage III patients. Chemotherapy did not improve recurrence risk in stage II patients regardless of risk status (High risk: hazard ratio [HR] 1.37; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.97; Non-high risk: HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.91 - 2.11). Chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence risk in stage III patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63 - 0.96). However, chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in both high (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.51 - 0.92) and non-high risk stage II patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.04), and also in stage III patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.54). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a lower recurrence rate among stage II colon cancer patients. The observed survival benefit associated with chemotherapy is likely attributable to non-oncologic factors such as patient selection. Decision-making regarding chemotherapy use in this cohort should be carefully approached.

A retrospective analysis on the impact of preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 794-794
Author(s):  
Deepna Jaiswal ◽  
Suparna Mantha ◽  
Lucas Wong ◽  
Luis Seija ◽  
Yolanda Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

794 Background: Inflammation has a critical role in tumor genesis and progression of cancer. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indication of balance between the immune systems pro and defense mechanism against cancer. Elevated NLR is of interest in many cancers, including colon cancer. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early stage colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer has remained debatable. We proposed to study the impact of the NLR in patients with stage II colon cancer and to identify high risk patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Three hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with Stage II colon cancer at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meir curves and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were calculated for overall survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed NLR was not statistically significant as predictor of mortality (p-value=0.0857). However, after adjusting for recurrence, chemotherapy, age, white blood cell count, the NLR was predictive for survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.05 and 95% confidence interval of (1.006 - 1.1). Recurrence and age were also significant predictors of survival (p-values of <0.0001 for both), and HR of 3.1 (2.0 – 4.6) and 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5), respectively. Conclusions: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio might be an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in stage II colon cancer patients. Given the retrospective nature of our study, further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.

Evaluating the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in stage II and III colon cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 685-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorotea Mutabdzic ◽  
Shalana BL O'Brien ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
Sanjay S. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Node Involvement

685 Background: Presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is known to be a predictor of lymph node involvement in colon adenocarcinoma (CA). Lymph node involvement is associated with poorer prognosis necessitating adjuvant therapy. While some studies have suggested that LVI is a predictor of worse overall survival in early stage colon cancer, the significance of LVI on prognosis has not been tested in a comprehensive North American data set. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CA with LVI data available and those who received predefined standard of care treatment were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2011 to 2015. The relationship between LVI and overall survival was tested using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after adjusting for relevant clinical and demographic variables. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported along with median overall survival (OS) where available. Results: The dataset included 93,070 patients with stage II and 66,701 patients with stage III CA. The proportion of patients with LVI was 13% in stage II and 47% in stage III CA. After adjusting for age, sex, gender, race, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, T, and N stage, LVI was associated with worse OS in stage II, HR 1.2 (1.15-1.25, p < 0.001), and in stage III, HR 1.25 (1.21-1.30, p < 0.001), CA. Median OS was 6.51 years with LVI versus. 6.85 years without LVI in stage II compared with 6.57 years with LVI versus not reached without LVI in stage III CA. Of the stage II patients with LVI, 20% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and median OS was 6.91 years for those who did versus 6.07 years for those who did not receive CT. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LVI is an important predictor of OS in stage II and III CA. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy improves OS in advanced CA but there remains uncertainty as to the benefit in stage II. Despite this uncertainty, guidelines suggest consideration of adjuvant CT in patients with high-risk stage II disease. Our data support the recommendation that LVI be considered a high-risk feature in stage II disease. Further studies are necessary to examine whether the type or duration of CT should differ for patients with CA and LVI.

The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy dose intensity on overall survival in resected colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Suganija Lakkunarajah ◽  
Daniel Adam Breadner ◽  
Hanbo Zhang ◽  
Jennifer L. Spratlin ◽  
Karen E. Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
N2 Disease

248 Background: Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. The benefit of using fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, such as FOLFOX (fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, oxaliplatin) and CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) is well established. The optimal dose intensity (DI) under which overall survival (OS) is inferior is not established. Methods: Patients (pts) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2011 for resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from four academic cancer centres in Canada were retrospectively analysed. Patients that received CAPOX and FOLFOX were examined for the relationship between DI and OS. Results: A total of 625 pts with resected high risk stage II or stage III CC that received adjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. The median age was 63. Pts with T4 and N2 disease comprised 35.4% and 29.9% of pts, respectively. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. There was available survival data for 319 pts. The median oxaliplatin DI was 70%. The frequency of pts reaching an oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was 43%, while 76.6% of pts had a dose intensity of > 80% for their FU component. An oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was associated with a significant improvement in survival, HR = 0.42 (95%CI 0.21 – 0.81, p < 0.01). Achieving a DI of > 80% for capecitabine or 5-FU did not improve OS. Other factors associated with inferior OS included T4 (HR = 3.5, p = 0.03) and N2 (HR = 5.27, p = 0.0005) subgroups. The improvement in OS was not significant when restricting the analysis to pts with non-T4 and non-N2 disease (n = 144), HR = 0.16 (0.02 – 1.26; p = 0.08). Conclusions: Oxaliplatin DI of > 80% is associated with improved OS in patients receiving chemotherapy for high risk stage II and stage III CC.

scholarly journals Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Meyers ◽  
R. Cosby ◽  
F. Quereshy ◽  
D. Jonker
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Background Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.Methods Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.Results Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.Conclusions Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)–based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without “high-risk” features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with “high-risk” features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

A retrospective analysis on the impact of preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15146-e15146
Author(s):  
Deepna Deepak Jaiswal ◽  
Suparna Mantha ◽  
Luis Seija ◽  
Yolanda Munoz ◽  
Lucas Wong
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

e15146 Background: Inflammation has a critical role in tumor genesis and progression of cancer. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indication of balance between the immune systems pro and defense mechanism against cancer. Elevated NLR is of interest in many cancers, including colon cancer. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early stage colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer has remained debatable. We proposed to study the impact of the NLR in patients with stage II colon cancer and to identify high risk patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Three hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with Stage II colon cancer at our institution were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meir curves and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were calculated for overall survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed NLR was not statistically significant as predictor of mortality (p-value = 0.0857). However, after adjusting for recurrence, chemotherapy, age, white blood cell count, the NLR was predictive for survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.05 and 95% confidence interval of (1.006 - 1.1). Recurrence and age were also significant predictors of survival (p-values of < 0.0001 for both), and HR of 3.1 (2.0 – 4.6) and 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5), respectively. Conclusions: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio might be an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in stage II colon cancer patients. Given the retrospective nature of our study, further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.

2103 Adjuvant chemotherapy associated with improved relative and overall survival for high risk pT4 stage II colon cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S363
Author(s):  
S.R. Verhoeff ◽  
F.N. Van Erning ◽  
V.E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
J.H.W. De Wilt ◽  
J.F.M. Pruijt
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 12-gene assay recurrence score on adjuvant chemotherapy treatment recommendations for stage II/III colon cancer in the post-IDEA era: SUNRISE-Decision Impact study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS868-TPS868
Author(s):  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Takeo Sato ◽  
Sayoko Nakashima ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Gene Assay ◽  
The Impact

TPS868 Background: The results of IDEA collaboration study in ASCO 2017 suggested that adjusting the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) for stage III colon cancer may be possible according to patient’s risk (T and N factors) and treatment regimen (FOLFOX and CAPOX) in order to balance the benefit and neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin-based CTx. The 12-Gene Assay Recurrence Score (12-gene RS), known as Oncotype DX, has been validated to predict the recurrence risk of stage II/III colon cancer patients through several studies, including our SUNRISE study (J Clin Oncol, 2016), and thus to personalize adjuvant CTx taking account of individual recurrence risk. The objective of this SUNRISE-DI study is to determine the impact of the 12-gene RS on adjuvant CTx treatment recommendations, including the decision for the duration of oxaliplatin-based CTx in stage III patients as well as that for oxaliplatin-based CTx versus 5FU-based monotherapy in stage II/III patients. This study enables us to evaluate how physicians employ the IDEA collaboration results combined with the 12-gene RS to determine the regimen. Methods: Patients who have a curatively resected Stage II/IIIA/IIIB colon cancer, an age of more than 20, and an ECOG PS of 0-1 are eligible. Treating physicians will formulate a treatment recommendation and complete a pre-assay questionnaire, and the 12-gene assay will be performed. Following receipt of the RS result, the treatment recommendation will be revised and a post-assay questionnaire completed. The primary endpoint is the proportion of changes in treatment recommendations between pre- and post-assay across all patients. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of changes by stage; the proportion of changes in the duration of oxaliplatin-based CTx (3 months vs 6 months); the proportion switched to observation only, 5-FU mono, or 5-FU plus oxaliplatin; and changes in expressed physician confidence level. The enrollment target is 200 patients with stage IIIA/IIIB and 100 patients with stage II from 15 centers in Japan. Clinical trial registry number: UMIN000028784

scholarly journals Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in High Risk Stage Ii Colon Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv197
Author(s):  
S.R. Verhoeff ◽  
F. van Erning ◽  
J. Pruijt ◽  
J. De Wilt ◽  
V. Lemmens
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

scholarly journals Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer With Poor Prognostic Features

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3381-3388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin S. O'Connor ◽  
David Yu Greenblatt ◽  
Noelle K. LoConte ◽  
Ronald E. Gangnon ◽  
Jinn-Ing Liou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Purpose Adjuvant chemotherapy is typically considered for patients with stage II colon cancer characterized by poor prognostic features, including obstruction, perforation, emergent admission, T4 stage, resection of fewer than 12 lymph nodes, and poor histology. Despite frequent use, the survival advantage conferred on patients with stage II disease by chemotherapy is yet unproven. We sought to determine the overall survival benefit of chemotherapy among patients with stage II colon cancer having poor prognostic features. Patients and Methods A total of 43,032 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent colectomy for stage II and III primary colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 1992 to 2005 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) –Medicare database. χ2 and two-way analysis of variance were used to assess differences in patient- and disease-related characteristics. Five-year overall survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression with propensity score weighting. Results Of the 24,847 patients with stage II cancer, 75% had one or more poor prognostic features. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 20% of patients with stage II disease and 57% of patients with stage III disease. After adjustment, 5-year survival benefit from chemotherapy was observed only for patients with stage III disease (hazard ratio[HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.67). No survival benefit was observed for patients with stage II cancer with no poor prognostic features (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.25) or stage II cancer with any poor prognostic features (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.13). Conclusion Among Medicare patients identified with stage II colon cancer, either with or without poor prognostic features, adjuvant chemotherapy did not substantially improve overall survival. This lack of benefit must be considered in treatment decisions for similar older adults with colon cancer.

scholarly journals Duration of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer With Deficient Mismatch Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Zehua Wu ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundWe evaluated the impact of 3 months of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of mFOLFOX6 on disease-free survival (DFS) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colon cancer (CC) patients.MethodsThis retrospective study identified a cohort of patients with high-risk stage II and III dMMR CC who underwent curative surgery between May 2011 and July 2019. DFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce imbalance in baseline characteristics.ResultsA total of 242 dMMR CC patients were identified; 66 patients received 6 months of mFOLFOX6, 87 patients received 3 months of mFOLFOX6, and 89 patients were treated with surgery alone. The 3-year DFS rate was 72.8% in 3-month therapy group and 86.1% in 6-month therapy group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.78 (95CI%, 1.18 to 6.47; P= 0.019). The difference in DFS between surgery alone group and 6-month therapy group was also observed but was nonsignificant (HR= 2.30, 95%CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P=0.054). The benefit of 6-month therapy in DFS compared with 3-month therapy group was pronounced for patients with stage III (HR=2.81, 95%CI, 1.03 to 7.67; P=0.044) but not for high-risk stage II patients. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed a DFS benefit in the 6-month therapy group.ConclusionThis study suggested that a 6-month duration of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR CC patients may be associated with improved DFS compared with 3-month therapy, particularly in patients with stage III. The observational nature of the study implies caution should be taken in the interpretation of these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document