Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) retest rate in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) surgical excision specimens.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18524-e18524
Author(s):  
Lilit Karapetyan ◽  
Jailan Elayoubi ◽  
Seda Grigoryan ◽  
Gennady Kuzin ◽  
Deimante Tamkus
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision

Reflex Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) in Breast Needle Core Biopsy Specimens

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1090-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. VandenBussche ◽  
Ashley Cimino-Mathews ◽  
Ben Ho Park ◽  
Leisha A. Emens ◽  
Theodore N. Tsangaris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy ◽  
Biopsy Specimens

Mammary Paget’s Disease of the Male Breast: A Rare Case With an Unusual Immunohistochemical Profile

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha A. Moore ◽  
Hollis M. Notgrass ◽  
Travis W. Vandergriff ◽  
Sunati Sahoo
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Paget’S Disease ◽  
Paget's Disease ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Mammary Paget’S Disease

Mammary Paget’s disease is rare and comprises about 0.62% of all breast cancer cases, only 1.65% of which occur in male patients. This case report involves a 76-year-old man who presented to his primary care physician with an itching, scaly, unilateral lesion involving the nipple skin. He underwent wide local excision of the lesion for a diagnosis of Bowen’s disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ). Histologic examination of the specimen revealed mammary Paget’s disease with ductal carcinoma in situ in the underlying breast tissue. A panel of immunohistochemical stains revealed the Paget cells to be positive for cytokeratin 7, MUC1, GATA3, and androgen receptor and negative for cytokeratins 5/6, p63, SOX10, and MART-1/Melan-A. Paget cells were also negative for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and positive for HER2/neu. However, the underlying ductal carcinoma in situ was positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and negative for HER2/neu. This discordance, supported by the current literature, suggests an alternative etiology for Paget’s disease in certain cases that cannot be explained by the well-established epidermotropic and transformative theories of Paget’s disease evolution.

Low diffusion level within a fibroadenoma as the sole sign of ductal carcinoma in situ: A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Corrado Tagliati ◽  
Giuseppe Lanni ◽  
Federico Cerimele ◽  
Antonietta Di Martino ◽  
Valentina Calamita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Small Region ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value ◽  
Apparent Diffusion

We present a case of ductal carcinoma in situ within a fibroadenoma. Breast cancer arising within fibroadenoma incidence ranges from 0.125% to 0.02%, and ductal carcinoma in situ is not the most frequent malignancy that can be found within a fibroadenoma. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed an oval mass with circumscribed margins and dark internal septations, suspicious for fibroadenoma. According to European Society of Breast Radiology diffusion-weighted imaging consensus, mean apparent diffusion coefficient value obtained by drawing a small region of interest on the lesion apparent diffusion coefficient map showed a low diffusion level. Therefore, ductal carcinoma in situ within a fibroadenoma was diagnosed at final pathology after surgical excision.

scholarly journals High-grade ductal carcinoma in-situ detected by microcalcification within borderline phyllodes tumour: A report of a case and literature review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing Nam Yuen ◽  
Joshua Jing Xi Li ◽  
Man Yi Chan ◽  
Gary M Tse
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Total Mastectomy ◽  
Phyllodes Tumour ◽  
Phyllodes Tumours

Abstract BackgroundPhyllodes tumour is a rare biphasic neoplasm of the breast that mostly affects middle aged women. Ductal carcinoma in-situ and microcalcifications occurring within phyllodes tumours are documented but are rare findings. Primary surgical excision with adjuvant therapies remains the mainstay of treatment.Case presentationWe report a case of a 42-year-old woman with high-grade ductal carcinoma in-situ within a borderline phyllodes tumour. Radiologically, clumps of microcalcification were detected within the lesion. Local excision followed by total mastectomy with axillary dissection was then performed. No tumour recurrence was detected up to a period of 8 years.ConclusionPresence of microcalcifications within a phyllodes tumour should alert clinicians and pathologists of possible coexisting carcinoma components. Stromal and epithelial components of these lesions should be evaluated separately when formulating a management plan.

scholarly journals Outcome of long term active surveillance for estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ

The Breast ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna F. Meyerson ◽  
Juan N. Lessing ◽  
Kaoru Itakura ◽  
Nola M. Hylton ◽  
Dulcy E. Wolverton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive

scholarly journals Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Badan ◽  
Decio Roveda Júnior ◽  
Sebastião Piato ◽  
Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury ◽  
Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia ◽  
Underestimation Rate

Abstract Objective: To determine the rates of diagnostic underestimation at stereotactic percutaneous core needle biopsies (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABB) of nonpalpable breast lesions, with histopathological results of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subsequently submitted to surgical excision. As a secondary objective, the frequency of ADH and DCIS was determined for the cases submitted to biopsy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 40 cases with diagnosis of ADH or DCIS on the basis of biopsies performed between February 2011 and July 2013, subsequently submitted to surgery, whose histopathological reports were available in the internal information system. Biopsy results were compared with those observed at surgery and the underestimation rate was calculated by means of specific mathematical equations. Results: The underestimation rate at CNB was 50% for ADH and 28.57% for DCIS, and at VABB it was 25% for ADH and 14.28% for DCIS. ADH represented 10.25% of all cases undergoing biopsy, whereas DCIS accounted for 23.91%. Conclusion: The diagnostic underestimation rate at CNB is two times the rate at VABB. Certainty that the target has been achieved is not the sole determining factor for a reliable diagnosis. Removal of more than 50% of the target lesion should further reduce the risk of underestimation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document