Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with XELOX in first-line gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GC/GEJC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4042-4042
Author(s):  
Nong Xu ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
Yulong Zheng ◽  
Jiong Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Phase 1B

4042 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical benefit in advanced GC/GEJC. This phase 1b study evaluates the efficacy and safety of sintilimab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody (PD-1 Ab) in combination with XELOX for GC/GEJC in first-line setting. Methods: This phase 1b study enrolled treatment-naïve unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC patients without HER2 amplification in cohort F. Patients received sintilimab 200mg IV q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death, in combination with XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 IV D1 and capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID D1-14) for up to 6 cycles. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination per RECIST v1.1 and safety and tolerability. Results: Totally 20 patients were enrolled in cohort F. As data cutoff (15 Jan 2019), median follow up was 5.8 months (range, 2.4 to 12.5). The median dose of sintilimab was 6.5 (range, 4 to 12). The objective response rate (ORR) was 85.0% (95%CI, 62.1 to 96.8) and disease control rate (DCR) was 100.0% (95%CI, 83.2 to 100.0). Among 17 patient with BOR of PR, two patients achieved a complete response (CR) of the target lesion. The median duration of response (DOR) and median progression free survival (PFS) had not been met. Three patients underwent resection of primary tumor after achieving a BOR of partial response (N=2) and stable disease (N=1). The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 85.0%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 14 (70.0%) patients. The incidence of TRAE ≥ Grade 3 was 15%. AEs of immune-related etiology, occurred in 6 patients (30.0%). There were no AEs that resulted in death. As data cutoff, 12 patients were still in treatment and 8 had discontinued treatment and were under survival follow up. The biomarker analysis including PD-L1 expression in tumor specimen was ongoing. Conclusions: Sintilimab in combination with XELOX in first-line GC/GEJC shows promising anti-tumor efficacy and a tolerable safety profile. The further randomized, phase 3 study of Sintilimab in combination with XELOX in this setting is ongoing (NCT03745170). Clinical trial information: NCT02937116.

Efficacy and safety of toripalimab combination with SOX regimen as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: Preliminary data from a single-armed, exploratory study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16015-e16015
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Lin ◽  
Qing Xia ◽  
Ting Han ◽  
Meng Zhuo ◽  
Haiyan Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
First Line Treatment

e16015 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies of the digestive system with a poor prognosis and limited treatment option. Currently immunotherapy is approved for the third-line treatment of GC, but there are limited data on first-line treatment. Therefore, this study will further explore the efficacy and safety of the domestic PD-1 antibody toripalimab combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen as the first-line treatment of unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods: A prospective, single-armed, exploratory, investigated initiated trial explores the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with SOX regimen as first-line treatment of unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. The primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), DOR, PFS, and OS. The dosage regimen is: Toripalimab, 240mg D1; oxaliplatin, 130mg/m2, D1 ; S-1, 40mg/m2, bid oral D1-14 days, every 21 days as a cycle and plan 6 cycles of treatment. Tumor responses were assessed radiologically every two cycles. Major eligibility requirements include: unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer with diagnoses confirmed histologically or cytologically, age 18 and 80 years, first-line treatment, at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1, ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function and HER-2 negative. Results: So far, 17 of planned 20 patients have been enrolled. 14 patients completed 2 cycles of treatment, the ORR rate was 57% (8/14) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 93% (13/14). 10 patients completed 4 cycles of treatment, the ORR rate was 60% (6/10) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90% (9/10). 7 patients completed 6 cycles of treatment, the ORR rate was 43% (3/7) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 57% (4/7). Common adverse reactions during treatment in 17 patients included rash 17.6% (3/17), diarrhea 41.2% (7/17), hypothyroidism 11.8% (2/17), elevated amylase 35.3% (6/17), decreased platelets 41.2% (7/17), mostly grade I-II. Conclusions: Toripalimab combination with SOX regimen as a first-line treatment demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with a good ORR and controllable safety. Clinical trial information: NCT04202484.

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TITAN-TCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
Bernd Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
Uwe Zimmermann ◽  
Barbara Grün ◽  
Gustavo Bruno Baretton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line

446 Background: Several PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors including Nivolumab (Nivo) are approved in urothelial cancer. Recently, in the front line setting, improved activity of combined PD-L1 and CTLA4 immune-checkpoint inhibition has been reported and a phase III trial with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) is ongoing. Here we report a response-based tailored approach starting treatment with Nivo monotherapy using Nivo+Ipi as immunotherapeutic “boost”. Methods: Between July 2017 and April 2019 86 patients were enrolled and treated according to protocol version 3 (cohort 1). Patients started with Nivo 240 mg Q2W induction. After 4 dosings and tumor assessment at week 8 (i) responders (PR/CR) to Nivo monotherapy continued with maintenance while (ii) patients with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received 2 cycles Nivo3+Ipi1 followed by another 2 cycles Nivo1+Ipi3 if not responding. Median follow-up is 8.7 months. The primary endpoint is confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints include activity of Nivo monotherapy at week 8, remission rate with Nivo+Ipi “boosts”, safety, overall survival and quality of life. Results: Of the patients 42, 39 and 5 were first, second and third line, respectively. Median age was 67 years (range 45-84), 61 patients (71 %) were male and 25 female. ORR with Nivo monotherapy at first assessment (week 8) was 29 % and 23 % in first and second/third line, respectively. Of the patients 41 received Nivo+Ipi “boosts” after week 8 while 12 received later “boosts”. Best overall response (BOR) rate with Nivo induction ± Nivo+Ipi “boosts” was 48 % and 27 % in first and second/third line, respectively. In first line 7/17 (41 %) patients receiving Nivo+Ipi after week 8 had an improved response compared to 2/24 (8.3 %) in second/third line. Of the patients who continued with Nivo maintenance after week 8 and received later “boosts” 2/12 (17 %) had a PR and 2/12 (17 %) improved to SD. Treatment-related AEs will be presented. Conclusions: TITAN–TCC explores a response-driven use of Nivo+Ipi as an immunotherapeutic “boost”. In first line, this significantly improved ORR compared to the expected response rate of Nivo monotherapy, providing further evidence to the added value of Ipi in combination with Nivo. Further follow-up is ongoing to characterize duration and depth of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03219775 . Research Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

scholarly journals 413 Toripalimab in combination with concurrent chemoradiation in patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal carcinoma: protocol for a single-arm, prospective, open-label, phase II clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A444-A444
Author(s):  
Lei Wu ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Gang Wan ◽  
Jiahua Lv ◽  
Qifeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

BackgroundEsophageal carcinoma is a disease with high morbidity and mortality in China and, recently, Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have shown good efficacy and safety for treatment; however, some patients still suffer from tumor progression or metastasis after treatment. Clinical studies have confirmed that immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer, but the efficacy and safety of adding radiotherapy to immunotherapy and chemotherapy have been less reported.MethodsThis is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase ll trial.Patients with unresectable stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) who had not received prior systemic therapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with two cycles of toripalimab (240 mg d1, Q3W) combined with induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m2, d1+carboplatin AUC=4–6, d1, Q3W), sequentially combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (30–50 Gy in 15–25 fractions, paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m2, d1+carboplatin AUC=4–6 d1, Q3W), followed by maintenance treatment with toripalimab (240 mg d1, Q3W) for 1 year. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of this combination therapy;and the secondary objective is related to the assessment of objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the duration of remission (DOR), the 1- and 2-year overall survival(OS) rates, the safety and tolerability of patients to treatment, and the identification of the changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients. Furthermore, we aimed to identify predictive biomarkers (such as the expression of PD-L1 ctDNA and cytokines) and to explore the relationship between these biomarkers and tumor response to the study treatment.AcknowledgementsWe thank all the participants and their advisors involving in this study. We owe thanks to the patients in our study and their family members.Trial RegistrationChiCTR(ChiCTR2100046715). Registered on the 27th of May 2021.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol is approved by Ethics Committee of Sichuan Cancer Hospital (SCCHEC-02-2021-021).Changes to the protocol will be communicated via protocol amendment by the study principal investigators. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus recombinant human endostatin in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective and multicenter phase 2 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21079-e21079
Author(s):  
Weize Lv ◽  
Beilong Zhong ◽  
Wenhua Zhao ◽  
Zhong Lin ◽  
Xiaofeng Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

e21079 Background: Although the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well established, evidence supporting the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic drugs in previous treatment patients with advanced NSCLC is insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with recombinant human endostatin (rh-Endostatin) as second-line or later treatment for advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this prospective and multicentre phase 2 trial we enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who had not responded to standardized first-line treatment regimen from two cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were those aged 18-75 years without ICIs in first-line treatment who received nivolumab (3mg/kg, intravenous drip, day 1) every 2 weeks and rh-Endostatin (30 mg, 24-hour continous intravenous infusion，day 1–7) every 4 weeks till disease progression or discontinuation. The primary end points were objective response rate and safety. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR1900023664. Results: A total of 35 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 37-72 years) received nivolumab and rh-Endostatin. Median previous treated line of eligible patients was 2 lines (range, 1-7 lines). Patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-14 cycles). Eleven of 33 evaluable patients achieved confirmed partial response with an objective response rate of 33.3% (11/33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.2% – 49.4%) and disease control rate of 60.6% (20/33,95%CI:43.9%–77.3%). Median follow-up was 8.2 months (range: 0.9 –17.1). Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 1.2m–13.0m), median overall survival was not reached and the 6-month overall survival rate was 54.5% (95% CI:37.6%–71.4%). The predominant grade 1-2 adverse events were thyroiditis, arrhythmia, hypertension. The grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were pneumonitis (3/35, 8.6%), hypertension (1/35, 2.9%) and atrial fibrillation (1/35, 2.9%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study that assessed nivolumab combined with rh-Endostatin as second-line or later treatment in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. In view of its encouraging efficacy and safety profile, nivolumab plus rh-Endostatin represents a promising treatment regimen in this patient population. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900023664.

A phase Ib/II, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) monotherapy and combinations in patients with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer (DESTINY-Gastric03).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS261-TPS261
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Natasha Viglianti ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo ◽  
Liz Croydon
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS261 Background: For patients (pts) with HER2-overexpressing metastatic gastric cancer, trastuzumab + chemotherapy is a standard first-line option but provides only a modest overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemotherapy. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Results from a phase 1 trial showed promising antitumor activity (confirmed objective response rate [ORR], 43.2%) in pts with heavily pretreated HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer who received T-DXd (5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg; Shitara K, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:827-836). Here we describe the phase 1b/2 DESTINY-Gastric03 trial (NCT04379596) evaluating T-DXd monotherapy and combinations in pts with HER2-overexpressing gastric cancer. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, 2-part, phase 1b/2 study in pts with HER2-overexpressing (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization positive) locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In part 1 (dose escalation), pts who had received prior trastuzumab-containing therapy will be assigned to 1 of 5 arms: (1) T-DXd + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (2) T-DXd + capecitabine (C); (3) T-DXd + durvalumab; (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + oxaliplatin (Ox); or (5) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2 (dose expansion), pts with no prior treatment for metastatic disease will be randomized across 4 arms: (1) T-DXd; (2) trastuzumab + 5-FU or C + Ox or cisplatin; (3) T-DXd + 5-FU or C ± Ox; or (4) T-DXd + 5-FU or C + durvalumab. In part 2, pts will be stratified by HER2 status. Primary endpoints are safety, determination of recommended phase 2 doses (part 1), and investigator-assessed confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 (part 2). Secondary endpoints include confirmed ORR (part 1), disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (all per investigator), OS, safety (part 2), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04379596.

Phase Ib study of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for 1L advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20546-e20546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nong Xu ◽  
Kejing Ying ◽  
Ziping Wang ◽  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e20546 Background: Anti-programmed death-1 antibodies (PD-1 Abs) have shown benefits in advanced NSCLC. The efficacy and safety of sintilimab, a PD-1 Ab, in combination with chemotherapy for 1L NSCLC is evaluated in this phase Ib study (NCT02937116). Methods: The study enrolled treatment-naïve unresectable locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous (nsq-) and squamous (sq-) NSCLC patients with neither EGFR mutations nor ALK rearrangements in cohort D and E respectively. Patients received sintilimab 200mg IV q3w in combination with pemetrexed 500mg/m2 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV q3w (4 cycles) in cohort D, or gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 D1,8 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 D1 IV q3W (6 cycles) in cohort E until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination. Results: As data cutoff (15 Jan 2019), 21 and 20 patients were enrolled in cohort D and E respectively. ORR in nsq- and sq-NSCLC were 68.4% (95%CI, 43.4 to 87.4) and 64.7% (95%CI, 38.3 to 85.8) respectively based on data of 19 and 17 patients with at least one radiological assessment. Median PFS was 11.4 months (95%CI, 3.1 to NA) and 6.5 months (95%CI, 5.3 to 8.0) respectively (Table). Totally 38 (92.7%) patients experienced at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 28 (68.3%) patients. TRAE ≥grade 3 occurred in 4 (9.8%) patients. Immune related AEs occurred in 10 patients (24.4%), the most common of which were skin rash (N = 5), pneumonitis (N = 3) and hypothyroidism (N = 2). There was no AEs leading to death. The biomarker analysis was ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of sintilimab and chemotherapy showed efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in 1L nsq- and sq-NSCLC. Two phase III trials are ongoing to evaluate the combination in 1L nsq- (NCT03607539) and sq-NSCLC (NCT03629925) respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT02937116. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Amin Nassar ◽  
John A. Steinharter ◽  
Xiao X. Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Logistic Regressions

66 Background: Patients with mRCC with S/R components tend to have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options available. Recent data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies may be especially effective for these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI-based therapies in patients with S/R mRCC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) & overall survival (OS) of patients with S/R mRCC treated at our institution with first-line ICI-based therapies and compared these to those of patients treated with first-line non-ICI-based therapies. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted for IMDC group) Cox and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 92 patients (70 S, 9 R, and 13 S&R) patients were included, of which 74 with a clear-cell component. For all patients (regardless of therapy), 74 (80.4%) patients experienced a PFS event (progression or death) and 52 (56.5%) died at 25.3 months (m) median follow-up. Overall median PFS was 5.3 m (95% CI= 3.4–7.2) and 24 m OS rate was 39.5% (27.4–51.7). Out of 78 patients in whom response was evaluable, ORR was 30.8% (20.4–41.2). Patients treated with ICI-based therapies had significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS on multivariable analysis (table). Conclusions: mRCC patients with S/R components have significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS with first-line ICI-based compared to non-ICI-based therapies. These data support the use of ICI-based therapies for patients with S/R mRCC. [Table: see text]

Phase Ib trial of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), or colorectal cancer (CRC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS478-TPS478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Renee Spencer ◽  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Nehal Mohamed ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Expansion Stage ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS478 Background: C is an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis, and immune regulation, including MET, VEGFR, and TAM family kinases (Tyro3, AXL, MER). Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that C promotes an immune-permissive tumor environment which may enhance response to checkpoint inhibitors such as the anti-PD-L1 mAb A. C significantly improved overall survival vs placebo in previously treated advanced HCC, and the combination of A and bevacizumab has shown synergistic activity in advanced HCC. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical activity in advanced CRC primarily in pts with high microsatellite instability (MSI); combination with immune-modulating agents may enhance activity in pts with stable or low MSI. Likewise, combination therapy may improve response in pts with GC/GEJC resistant to standard chemotherapy. Here, we present the study design of an ongoing phase 1b trial which includes cohorts with advanced HCC, GC/GEJC, or CRC. Methods: This global, phase 1b, open-label trial will assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of C in combination with A (NCT03170960). The study consists of a dose-escalation stage and an expansion stage. In the dose-escalation stage (3+3 design), a recommended C dose for combination with a standard dose of A will be established. In the expansion stage, 18 cohorts will be enrolled at the recommended dose of C + A including 3 cohorts with gastrointestinal cancers: (1) advanced HCC not previously treated with systemic therapy; (2) advanced GC/GEJC after progression on platinum- or fluoropyrimidine-containing therapy; and (3) advanced CRC after progression on fluoropyrimidine combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Pts will continue treatment as long as they experience clinical benefit as judged by the investigator or until unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of the expansion stage is the objective response rate for each cohort. Exploratory objectives include correlation of tumor and plasma biomarkers, immune cell profiles, and MSI status with clinical outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT03170960.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document