Endocrinopathies associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Standard of care at veterans administration medical centers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14148-e14148
Author(s):  
Brett Johnson ◽  
David P. Tuck ◽  
Spyridon Ganas ◽  
Nicholas Bayless ◽  
Nikesh Kotecha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
The Impact

e14148 Background: Multiple different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have now received FDA approval for nearly 70 separate indications covering 14 different tumor types. Patients treated with these agents in clinical trials have an observed incidence of immune related adverse events (irAEs), including endocrinopathies, which may increase morbidity and mortality. Limited information describes the incidence and impact of these events outside of clinical trials. Methods: Retrospective data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) of patients treated with ICI has been aggregated to understand the impact of these events in a standard of care setting, with a goal of improving patient care through predictive models and contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms and response to treatment. Results: Between October 2015 and December 2018, 10,280 patients were prescribed ICI at VA medical centers, with an average age of 70 years (range 20-99). A total of 11098 ICI orders, allowing for combinations or sequential treatments. Overall, nivolumab was prescribed 6024 times (54.3%), pembrolizumab 3976 (35.8%), ipilimumab 565 (5.1%) and atezolizumab 519 (4.6%). Avelumab (13) and durvalumab (1) had limited use. A candidate set of potential endocrine adverse events was estimated based on selected ICD10 codes recorded for the first time after treatment with ICI (Table). Conclusions: The frequency of endocrine immune related adverse events has been reported to be 5-10%. Here we have identified a cohort of ICI treated patients who may have developed endocrine adverse events. This cohort will be used to evaluate phenotyping, potential biomarkers and models of predictive risk.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Management of rheumatic complications of ICI therapy: a rheumatology viewpoint

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_7) ◽  
pp. vii49-vii58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Leipe ◽  
Xavier Mariette
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Abstract Since immune checkpoint inhibitors became the standard of care for an increasing number of indications, more patients have been exposed to these drugs and physicians are more challenged with the management of a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Those irAEs of autoimmune or autoinflammatory origin, or both, can involve any organ or tissue, but most commonly affect the dermatological, gastrointestinal and endocrine systems. Rheumatic/systemic irAEs seem to be less frequent (although underreporting in clinical trials is probable), but information on their management is highly relevant given that they can persist longer than other irAEs. Their management consists of anti-inflammatory treatment including glucocorticoids, synthetic and biologic immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive drugs, symptomatic therapies as well as holding or, rarely, discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we summarize the management of rheumatic/systemic irAEs based on data from clinical trials but mainly from published case reports and series, contextualize them and propose perspectives for their treatment.

Metabolic disease and adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Leiter ◽  
Emily Carroll ◽  
Sonia De Alwis ◽  
Danielle Brooks ◽  
Jennifer Ben Shimol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metabolic Diseases ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Metabolic Risk ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Metabolic Comorbidities

Objective: Obese and overweight body mass index (BMI) categories have been associated with increased immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, the impact of being overweight in conjunction with related metabolic syndrome-associated factors on irAEs have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of overweight and obese BMI according to metabolic disease burden on the development of irAEs. Design and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients receiving ICIs at a cancer center. Our main study outcome was development of grade 2 (moderate) irAEs. Our main predictor was weight/metabolic disease risk category: (1) normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2)/low metabolic risk (<2 metabolic diseases [diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension] ), (2) normal weight/high metabolic risk (2 metabolic diseases), (3) overweight (BMI 25 kg/m2)/low metabolic risk, and (4) overweight/high metabolic risk. Results: Of 411 patients in our cohort, 374 were eligible for analysis. Overall, 111 (30%) patients developed grade 2 irAEs. In Cox analysis, overweight/low metabolic risk was significantly associated with grade 2 irAEs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.2-3.4) when compared to normal weight/low metabolic risk, while overweight/high metabolic risk (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.7-2.2) and normal weight/high metabolic risk (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.7-3.0) were not. Conclusions: Overweight patients with fewer metabolic comorbidities were at increased risk for irAEs. This study provides an important insight that BMI should be evaluated in the context of associated metabolic comorbidities in assessing risk of irAE development and ICI immune response.

scholarly journals Management of pulmonary toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (154) ◽  
pp. 190012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Delaunay ◽  
Grégoire Prévot ◽  
Samia Collot ◽  
Laurent Guilleminault ◽  
Alain Didier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Life Threatening

Immunotherapy has become a standard of care in oncology, following the recent approvals of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder, head and neck cancers. Besides their efficacy, these agents also generate specific immune-related adverse events. Due to the increasing prescription of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune toxicity will continue to rise. The awareness of immune-related adverse events is key to ensuring both diagnosis and management of the possible serious adverse events. Although severe immune-related adverse events remain rare, they can lead to discontinued treatment or to death if they are not forecasted and managed properly. Even if lung toxicity is not the most frequent adverse event, it remains critical as it can be life-threatening. Herein, the main aspects of pulmonary toxicity are reviewed and guidelines are also proposed in order to manage the possible side-effects.

scholarly journals Eosinophil Count as Predictive Biomarker of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) Therapies in Oncological Patients

Immuno ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-263
Author(s):  
Elisa Giommoni ◽  
Roberta Giorgione ◽  
Agnese Paderi ◽  
Elisa Pellegrini ◽  
Elisabetta Gambale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Eosinophil Count ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Analysis Model

Background: To date, no biomarkers are effective in predicting the risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to evaluate the association between basal absolute eosinophil count (AEC) and irAEs during treatment with ICIs for solid tumors. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 168 patients with metastatic melanoma (mM), renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) receiving ICIs at our medical oncology unit. By combining baseline AEC with other clinical factors, we developed a mathematical model for predicting the risk of irAEs, which we validated in an external cohort of patients. Results: Median baseline AEC was 135/µL and patients were stratified into two groups accordingly; patients with high baseline AEC (>135/µL) were more likely to experience toxicity (p = 0.043) and have a better objective response rate (ORR) (p = 0.003). By constructing a covariance analysis model, it emerged that basal AEC correlated with the risk of irAEs (p < 0.01). Finally, we validated the proposed model in an independent cohort of 43 patients. Conclusions: Baseline AEC could be a predictive biomarker of ICI-related toxicity, as well as of response to treatment. The use of a mathematical model able to predict the risk of developing irAEs could be useful for clinicians for monitoring patients receiving ICIs.

Enrollment of Racial Minorities in Clinical Trials: Old Problem Assumes New Urgency in the Age of Immunotherapy

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassel Nazha ◽  
Manoj Mishra ◽  
Rebecca Pentz ◽  
Taofeek K. Owonikoko
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Minority Ethnic Groups ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Minority U.S. populations are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This review appraises the impact of the disparity in clinical trial participation by minority patients in the current era of cancer immunotherapy. Enrollment on pivotal trials leading to U.S. regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors showed poor representation of minority ethnic groups. Specifically, we found that black patients constitute less than 4% of all patients enrolled across multiple trials that supported the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of lung cancer. Similar underrepresentation was observed for trials conducted in renal cell carcinoma and other tumor types. Since efficacy of immunotherapy is only observed in a subset of patients, the use of predictive biomarkers to identify responders along with new strategies to expand the benefit to a larger subset of patients are current areas of active investigation. The inadequate representation of minority patients on immunotherapy clinical trials could perpetuate outcome disparity because the unique biology of the host and the tumors from this subpopulation is not accounted for as new treatment algorithms to guide optimal use of immunotherapy are developed for use in the real world.

Oral adverse events in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15106-e15106
Author(s):  
Yuanming Xu ◽  
Stephen T. Sonis ◽  
Natalie Wen ◽  
Moaiad Salous ◽  
Alessandro Villa
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Oral Ulcers ◽  
Oral Mucosal Lesions ◽  
Mucosal Lesions ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Insight Into

e15106 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat a variety of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported. Oral manifestations of irAEs include stomatitis, oral ulcers, and xerostomia. However, the trajectory and frequency of oral irAEs remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, trajectory and nature of oral irAEs and their association with primary cancer diagnosis and other irAEs. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review using the Partners Research Patient Data was performed for all patients treated with ICIs at Partners Healthcare hospitals and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 12/2011 and 9/2019. Keywords specific to oral irAE such as oral mucositis, stomatitis or mouth sore were used. We collected data on demographics, cancer features, treatments, and characteristics of oral irAEs. Results: 822 of 4683 patients who received ICIs therapy were identified by keyword filtering. Lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and skin cancer (including melanoma) were the most common types of primary malignancies with a frequency of 35.5%, 12.4 % and 11.7%, respectively. Oral irAEs were identified in 106 patients with the median age of 69 (range: 29-92) years and the female to male ratio of 1:1. 57.5% (n = 61) presented with symptomatic oral mucosal lesions. 47.2% (n = 50) had xerostomia and 17.0% (n = 18) had dysgeusia. The median time from the date of ICIs initiation to the date of oral irAE onset was 105 days (range: 2-631 days) in patients presented with oral mucosal lesions, 103 days (2-860 days) in xerostomia patients, and 156 days (range: 5-836 days) in dysgeusia patients. Melanoma was the most common cancer seen in oral irAE patients (30.2%), followed by lung cancer (26.4%) and oral/oropharyngeal cancer (12.3%). 60, 42, and 12 patients received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. 86.8% of oral irAE patients received only one type of ICIs therapy. Concomitant cutaneous, intestinal, and rheumatological irAEs were commonly reported with a frequency of 19.4%, 15.3%, and 12.2%, respectively in those patients. Conclusions: Oral irAEs can present with both acute and chronic onset in patients with ICIs therapy but are not as common as oral AEs associated with conventional cytotoxic regimens. While data relative to capturing oral irAEs is still preliminary, the current provides insight into their nature and course. Prospective studies focused on assessing the impact of ICI on oral irAEs are likely to provide additional insight into the character, course and impact of these conditions.

Assessment of hospitalization rates for immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522096890
Author(s):  
Laura Nice ◽  
Ryan Bycroft ◽  
Xiaoyong Wu ◽  
Shesh N Rai ◽  
Lindsay Figg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care in many cancer types. As the number of patients receiving ICIs for various cancers continues to expand, patients and practitioners should be aware of potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Despite reports of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities, the proportion of patients whose symptoms were clinically severe enough to warrant hospitalization for adverse event management is unknown. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was designed to determine the impact of irAEs on patients and the hospital. Patients who started ICIs from May 2016 through May 2019 for melanoma or lung cancer were included. The primary outcome was incidence of hospitalization for irAE. Secondary outcomes included median length of hospitalization, time to onset of irAE, rates of hospitalization for irAE per each checkpoint inhibitor regimen, organ system affected, progression free survival, and overall survival. Results Of 384 patients with melanoma or lung cancer, 27 (7%) were hospitalized at our institution for an irAE. The most common irAE leading to hospitalization was colitis for patients with melanoma and pneumonitis for patients with lung cancer. The median length of stay across all hospitalizations was 10 days. Twenty-five patients required the use of corticosteroids while hospitalized, while eight of these patients required second line irAE treatment. For the total patient population, 34.7% experienced a grade 1/2 irAE and 13.1% experienced a grade 3/4 irAE. Conclusion Our cohort of patients experienced similar rates irAEs as reported in clinical trials and published reports.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document