Breast cancer grade and clinical benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with an engineered whole tumor cell-targeted immunotherapy alone or in combination with checkpoint inhibition.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3033-3033
Author(s):  
William Williams ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Carmen Julia Calfa ◽  
Jarrod P. Holmes ◽  
Saveri Bhattacharya ◽  
...  

3033 Background: SV-BR-1 is a breast cancer cell line derived from a grade II (moderately differentiated) tumor. SV-BR-1 was transfected with the CSF2 gene (encoding GM-CSF) to form SV-BR-1-GM. SV-BR-1-GM expresses HLA class I & II antigens and has functional antigen-presenting cell activity, directly stimulating CD4+ T cells in an HLA-DR restricted fashion. The SV-BR-1-GM regimen consists of low-dose cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) to reduce immune suppression, intradermal inoculation with irradiated SV-BR-1-GM (20x106 cells divided into 4 sites) and interferon-α2b (10,000 IU into each inoculation site ~2 & 4 days later) to boost the response. Here, we evaluate the impact of tumor grade on clinical benefit following treatment with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen. Methods: Patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with either the SV-BR-1-GM regimen alone or with the SV-BR-1-GM regimen with pembrolizumab. For the SV-BR-1-GM regimen alone, cycles were administered every 2 weeks x 3 and then monthly, while combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg IV 1-5 days following SV-BR-1-GM inoculation) administered cycles every 3 weeks. Tumor restaging was every 6-12 weeks. Results: 33 patients were enrolled. The treatment was generally safe with inoculation site pruritis, erythema and induration the most common adverse events. 23 patients had grade III (poorly differentiated) tumors, 9 had grade II tumors and one had a grade I (well differentiated) tumor. None of the patients with grade III tumors exhibited clinical benefit. 7 patients with grade I/II tumors received the SV-BR-1-GM regimen alone, 2 received the SV-BR-1-GM regimen with pembrolizumab and 1 received both regimens. As noted in the Table, 7 patients experienced clinical benefit including all 3 patients treated in combination with pembrolizumab. This included 6 patients with stable disease and one with a partial response. Conclusions: The SV-BR-1-GM regimen with or without pembrolizumab appears safe and able to induce clinical benefit even in very heavily pre-treated patients with low or intermediate grade advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03328026 . [Table: see text]

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2094-2101 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Gasparini ◽  
O Caffo ◽  
S Barni ◽  
L Frontini ◽  
A Testolin ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent vinorelbine (VNB), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, in patients with breast cancer previously treated with other chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-seven of 70 patients with assessable disease entered onto the study were assessable. The main characteristics were as follows: median age, 60 years (range, 41 to 77); median performance status (PS; Karnofsky score), 90 (range, 60 to 100); and number of previous chemotherapeutic regimens given--one in 17, two in 27, three in eight, four in two, and five in one patient. The dominant sites of metastasis were viscera in 40, bone in 16, and soft tissues in 11 patients. VNB was administered beginning with the dose of 20 mg/m2 by 60-minute intravenous (iv) infusion weekly, with a dose escalation up to 25 mg/m2 if the first four courses were well tolerated. The treatment was continued until disease progression. RESULTS Overall, 845 courses of VNB were given (median, 10; range, eight to 33). Objective responses were as follows: complete response (CR) in three (4.5%), partial response (PR) in 21 (31.2%), stable disease (SD) in 20 (30%), and progressive disease (PD) in 23 patients (34.3%). Twenty-four of 67 assessable patients obtained a major objective response (CR or PR, 36%; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 24% to 47%). Thirty-three percent of patients had a > or = 33% reduction of dose-intensity (DI). The median time to progression was 18 weeks. The drug was active in patients pretreated with either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) or anthracyclines. The most relevant toxicity observed was myelosuppression: 17 (25%) and 19 patients (28%) had World Health Organization grade III, and six (9%) and six patients (9%) had grade IV leukopenia and granulocytopenia, respectively; two (3%) and two patients (3%) had grade III and IV anemia, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were phlebitis (grade II or III in 15 patients), alopecia (grade I or II in 16), nausea and vomiting (grade II or III in 15), diarrhea (grade II in two), constipation (grade II or III in 16), stomatitis (grade II or III in 13), peripheral neuropathy (grade II in seven), and asthenia (grade II in five). CONCLUSION This study shows that VNB is an effective and well-tolerated agent in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. This drug does not seem to present cross-resistance with previous CMF or anthracycline regimens. Future clinical trials should be designed to prove whether the inclusion of VNB in combination chemotherapy regimens, or whether an enhancement of its dose-intensity using bone marrow growth factors, is able to improve further the efficacy of this drug in breast carcinoma.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 2961-2968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Fribbens ◽  
Ben O’Leary ◽  
Lucy Kilburn ◽  
Sarah Hrebien ◽  
Isaac Garcia-Murillas ◽  
...  

Purpose ESR1 mutations are selected by prior aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in advanced breast cancer. We assessed the impact of ESR1 mutations on sensitivity to standard therapies in two phase III randomized trials that represent the development of the current standard therapy for estrogen receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. Materials and Methods In a prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed ESR1 mutations in available archived baseline plasma from the SoFEA (Study of Faslodex Versus Exemestane With or Without Arimidex) trial, which compared exemestane with fulvestrant-containing regimens in patients with prior sensitivity to nonsteroidal AI and in baseline plasma from the PALOMA3 (Palbociclib Combined With Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor–Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure) trial, which compared fulvestrant plus placebo with fulvestrant plus palbociclib in patients with progression after receiving prior endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed by multiplex digital polymerase chain reaction. Results In SoFEA, ESR1 mutations were found in 39.1% of patients (63 of 161), of whom 49.1% (27 of 55) were polyclonal, with rates of mutation detection unaffected by delays in processing of archival plasma. Patients with ESR1 mutations had improved progression-free survival (PFS) after taking fulvestrant (n = 45) compared with exemestane (n = 18; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.92; P = .02), whereas patients with wild-type ESR1 had similar PFS after receiving either treatment (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.67; P = .77). In PALOMA3, ESR1 mutations were found in the plasma of 25.3% of patients (91 of 360), of whom 28.6% (26 of 91) were polyclonal, with mutations associated with acquired resistance to prior AI. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib improved PFS compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in both ESR1 mutant (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74; P = .002) and ESR1 wild-type patients (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.70; P < .001). Conclusion ESR1 mutation analysis in plasma after progression after prior AI therapy may help direct choice of further endocrine-based therapy. Additional confirmatory studies are required.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. M. Broeders ◽  
P. Allgood ◽  
S. W. Duffy ◽  
S. Hofvind ◽  
I. D. Nagtegaal ◽  
...  

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Sousa ◽  
Mafalda Cruz ◽  
Ana Neto ◽  
Kayla Pereira ◽  
Marta Peixoto ◽  
...  

BackgroundApproximately 4% of European patients are diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), a clinical condition commonly associated with poorer prognosis. Systemic therapy is the recommended initial treatment and when inoperability criteria prevails, radiotherapy (RT) should be used for tumour downstaging. This study intends to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) in the treatment of inoperable LABC.MethodsA retrospective study of female patients, submitted to the NART between January 2014 and December 2018 at our institution. The evaluation of pathological response (pR) was made based on Pinder criteria. Primary endpoint: pR. Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between groups were compared using Student’s t-test, ANOVA (Analysis of variance) and χ2 test. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata (V.13).ResultsA total of 76 patients were included, 18% with breast complete response. The 5 years OS was 54% and PFS was 61%. Subgroup analysis showed that pR >90% is correlated with a better OS (p=0.004). Basal-like intrinsic subtype is correlated with worse OS and PFS (p<0.05). No relation was found between response and age, intrinsic subtype, treatment performed and clinical T stage.ConclusionOur study confirms that NART is an effective downsizing treatment in inoperable LABC, allowing for a surgical resection regardless of the systemic treatment performed. Response to NART is independent of the intrinsic subtype and pR >90% is correlated with a better OS. Prospective studies to explore predictive response biomarkers are necessary in order to improve patient selection and optimisation of the treatment.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis L. Carter ◽  
Lawrence B. Marks ◽  
Joseph M. Bean ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
Atif Hussein ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue (HDC) in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1994, 425 patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer received doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM) induction chemotherapy in a single-institution prospective trial. One hundred patients who achieved a complete response were randomized to receive HDC (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, carmustine), with autologous bone marrow rescue immediately after AFM, or to observation, with HDC to be administered at next relapse. Seventy-four of the 100 became eligible for RT; 53 received consolidation RT (HDC RT+ and 21 did not (HDC RT−). The assignment of RT was not randomized. The RT+ and RT− groups were similar with regard to number of involved sites, the fraction of patients with only local-regional disease, age, and interval since initial diagnosis. Local control at previously involved sites and distant sites was assessed with extensive radiologic and clinical evaluations at the time of first failure or most recent follow-up. The impact of RT on failure patterns, event-free survival, and overall survival was evaluated. RESULTS: Sites of first failure were located exclusively at previously involved sites in 28% of RT+ patients versus 62% of RT− patients (P < .01). Event-free survival at 4 years was 31% and 21% in the RT+ and RT− groups, respectively (P = .02). Overall survival at 4 years was 30% and 16% in the RT+ and RT− groups, respectively (P = .20). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced breast cancer who were treated with HDC without RT failed predominantly at the initial sites of disease. The addition of RT appeared to reduce the failure rate at initial disease sites and may improve event-free and overall survival. Our observations await verification in a trial in which assignment to RT is randomized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document