A phase II trial of regorafenib for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) following prior chemotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 498-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurudatta Naik ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Lisle Nabell ◽  
Mollie R. De Shazo ◽  
Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

498 Background: Salvage therapy options for aUC following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modest activity. Regorafenib is a multitargeted TKI that targets VEGF and Tie2 receptors among others, which is approved for multiple malignancies. Both VEGF and Tie2 inhibitors have preliminarily exhibited activity in aUC. Hence, a rationale was made to evaluate regorafenib in aUC progressing following chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a single arm, non-randomized Phase II study (NCT02459119) of regorafenib for aUC following chemotherapy. All patients (pts) started at 120 mg po qd for one cycle (28 days) before escalating to 160 mg po qd in the absence of intolerable regorafenib related toxicities. Pts who had progressed after 1-3 prior chemotherapy regimens and exhibited measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 were selected. The primary objectives was progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and the secondary objectives were objective response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. PFS6 of ≥20% was considered of interest and the target accrual was 32 evaluable pts. The treatment was continued until progression or intolerable adverse events. Results: We enrolled 17 pts across 3 institutions (UAB, Wayne State and Cleveland Clinic) between May 2015 and May 2019. Of these, 14 patients were male (82%) and the median age was 67 years. Pts received a median of 2 prior therapies including chemotherapy. 9 pts had received a prior ICI. 13 pts (76.5%) experienced treatment related adverse events (AE), and 7 pts (41.2%) had grade 3 toxicities including–anemia, thrombocytopenia, myalgia, hypophosphatemia, abdominal pain and fatigue. Treatment was discontinued for patients who suffered grade 3 myalgia and abdominal pain. There were no treatment related deaths. 3 patients attained PFS6 (18%) who also displayed minor regressions and 1 of them had received a prior ICI. Conclusions: Although the trial was halted for slow accrual, regorafenib appeared to demonstrate activity in heavily pretreated pts with aUC who had received chemotherapy or ICI. Further evaluation may be warranted in less heavily pretreated pts and in combination with rational agents with non-overlapping toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02459119.

scholarly journals Pyrotinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (24) ◽  
pp. 2753-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xingya Li ◽  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Guanghui Gao ◽  
Yiping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Targeted therapies against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 mutations remain an unmet need. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/d for 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC). RESULTS Between October 20, 2016, and December 10, 2018, 60 patients received pyrotinib monotherapy. At baseline, 58 (96.7%) were stage IV, and 25 (41.7%) received at least 2 lines of prior chemotherapy. As of data cutoff on June 20, 2019, IRC-assessed objective response rate was 30.0% (95% CI, 18.8% to 43.2%). All subgroups of patients with different HER2 mutation types showed a favorable objective response rate. The objective response rates were similar between patients with and without brain metastases (25.0% v 31.3%). The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.1 months). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) per IRC. The median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 21.3 months). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28.3% of patients, with the most common being diarrhea (20.0%; all grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION Pyrotinib showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in chemotherapy-treated patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC.

Phase II Results of Bendamustine in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2710-2710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Van der Jagt ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Bruce D. Cheson ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Jordan A. Herst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bendamustine HCl (TREANDA®) in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Background: Bendamustine is a novel hybrid, alkylating agent with single-agent activity in multiple hematologic and solid tumors. It induces cell death via both apoptosis and the apoptosis-independent pathway of mitotic catastrophe. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has been shown to exhibit a synergistic antitumor effect on NHL cells. Methods: This Phase II, multicenter study enrolled adult patients with relapsed, indolent B-cell or mantle-cell NHL who were not refractory to rituximab (defined as progression ≤6 months of last rituximab dose). Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3 of a 28-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles. An additional dose of rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV was given 1 week before the first cycle of bendamustine and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 66 patients (59% men) with a median age of 60 years (range, 40–84). Indolent histologic phenotype was seen in 54 patients with the following histologic subtypes: follicular center cell (61%), small lymphocytic (15%), lymphoplasmacytic (3%), and marginal zone (3%); 18% had mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). A total of 85% of patients had stage III/IV disease. These patients relapsed from a median of 1 prior chemotherapy (range: 0–5), with 56% having had prior treatment with rituximab. Patients with no prior chemotherapy relapsed following biologic therapy. In the ITT population, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 94% (complete response [CR]/complete response unconfirmed [CRu], 41%; partial response [PR], 53%); 6% had stable disease. The ORR for the 12 MCL patients was 92% (CR/CRu, 42%; PR 50%). For all patients, the median duration of response and progression-free survival has not been reached after a median follow-up of 8.3 months (range, 0.14–31 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 41% of patients (7%, febrile neutropenia). Common nonhematologic toxicities (grade 1/2, grade 3, grade 4) were nausea (68%, 0%, 0%) and fatigue (53%, 5%, 0%); one patient had grade 3 sepsis. No alopecia was observed. Conclusions: Bendamustine administered in combination with rituximab produced a high objective response rate and was generally well tolerated in patients with relapsed indolent and mantle-cell NHL who were not refractory to rituximab. These results suggest that the combination of bendamustine and rituximab may be comparable in activity to R-CHOP, and further studies of this combination are warranted.

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Pilot study of NKTR214 and nivolumab in patients with sarcomas.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11010-11010
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Anthony Paul Conley ◽  
Ciara Marie Kelly ◽  
Mark Andrew Dickson ◽  
Mrinal M. Gounder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Soft Part ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

11010 Background: Monotherapy checkpoint inhibitors have minimal efficacy in most patients with metastatic sarcoma. NKTR-214 is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist that activates and expands natural killer and CD8+ T cells. Phase I/II data demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus NKTR-214 in multiple tumor types. A trial of NKTR-214 plus nivolumab was initiated in patients with selected sarcomas. Methods: This is a multi-center pilot study enrolling patients (pts) failing prior regimens within 9 cohorts: leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), chondrosarcoma (CS), osteosarcoma (OS), angiosarcoma (AS), alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), synovial sarcoma/small blue round cell and other. Pts received NKTR 0.006mg/kg with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression-free, overall survival (PFS,OS) and clinical benefit rate (CBR.) Pre/on treatment biopsies performed on patients for correlative studies including PD-L1 expression and TIL characterization by immunohistochemistry, whole exome sequencing and RNAseq. Results: Enrollment completed with 10 patients in cohorts below. 50 pts enrolled (median age 58, range 14-80), 54% female. Median follow-up time is 13m. 50% of patients were refractory ≥3 lines of therapy. Grade 3/4 treatment related adverse events occurred in 26% of patients. 2% of patients stopped due to AEs. Median time to response was 3.6m. Responses seen in LMS, UPS, dedifferentiated CS; on-going in UPS/CS. Prolonged disease stability in DDLPS. 6 patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: Nivolumab plus NKTR-214 was safe and tolerable in heavily pre-treated and refractory sarcoma patients. Responses were protracted overtime; on-going in UPS and dedifferentiated CS. Prolonged disease stability seen in DDLPS in patients. All correlative analyses are in progress and will be presented. Enrollment continues with plans to add a treatment naïve cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03282344. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of afatinib in patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) with genetic alterations in ERBB receptors 1-3 who failed on platinum-based chemotherapy (CT).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS540-TPS540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Font Pous ◽  
Javier Puente ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Francisco X. Real ◽  
Miguel A. Climent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Erbb Receptors ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Erbb Family ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

TPS540 Background: First-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic UC consists of platinum-based CT, with no well-established subsequent therapy for platinum-refractory disease. Although checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results recently, targeted agents have generally not demonstrated significant clinical activity in this setting. Around 20% of UC harbor ERBB family genetic alterations, as such it may be a suitable therapeutic target (Knowles, Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15:25–41). The irreversible ERBB family blocker, afatinib, has shown activity in a Phase II trial in a subset of pts with UC who had ERBB2/ERBB3 aberrations (Choudhury, J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2165–71). This Phase II trial will evaluate afatinib in pts with UC molecularly selected for ERBB receptor alterations. Methods: This single-arm trial will assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in pts with UC harboring ERBB2/ERBB3 mutations or ERBB2 amplification (Cohort A), or EGFR (ERBB1) amplification (Cohort B). Eligible pts are ≥18 years of age with ECOG PS 0–1, histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic UC of the bladder, upper tract or urethra, not amenable to surgery and progressing during or after platinum-based CT, with available archival tissue samples for pre-screening biomarker analysis. Pts will receive oral afatinib 40 mg/day until disease progression or discontinuation. Cohort A is enrolling in two stages, with Stage 2 enrollment based on anti-tumor activity observed. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months; secondary endpoints include objective response rate, PFS, overall survival, disease control rate, duration of response and tumor shrinkage. Trial objectives will be analyzed separately for the two cohorts. Safety and biomarker assessments will also be performed. The trial commenced in June 2016; as of October 4, 2017, 201 samples have been analyzed, with 24.3% and 8% of pts with genetic alterations potentially eligible for inclusion in Cohort A and B, respectively. To date, 12 pts have received study treatment in Cohort A and 6 in Cohort B; recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02780687.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival in patients with metastastic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4531-4531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Morales-Barrera ◽  
Cristina Suarez Rodriguez ◽  
Macarena Gonzalez ◽  
Javier Ros ◽  
Maria Eugenia Semidey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

4531 Background: Immune-checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) represents the standard of care for platinum-pretreated advanced urothelial cancer patients (pts). By enhancing T-cell activation, a unique spectrum of inflammatory side effects has emerged, also known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data regarding the association between irAEs and pts outcomes are conflicting. Here we conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the association between irAEs profile and disease outcome in metastastic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) pts. Methods: Medical records from pts with mUC included in clinical trials between July 2013 and June 2018 and treated with ICIs were reviewed. Pts previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or cisplatin ineligible pts who had not been previously treated with chemotherapy were included. Clinical responses were assessed as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded based CTCAE v4.03. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initiation of ICI to the date of death. X2 test was used to determine differences in rates. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Method and long rank test was used to assess differences between groups. All analyses were performed using SPSS v21. Results: From a total of 52 pts, 44 (84.6%) were treated with ICI monotherapy and 8 (15.3%) in combination (anti-CTLA4 or targeted therapy). Median age was 65 years, 42 pts (80.8%) were male, 44 patients (84.6%) had ECOG PS 0-1, 14 pts (26.9%) had liver metastasis. Overall irAEs were observed in 30 pts (57.7%) and 10 pts (19.2%) developed grade 3/4 irAES. Most common grade 3/4 irAEs were diarrhea (6.6%), rash (6.6%) and hepatitis (6.6%). Disease control rate (CR [26%]+PR[33%]+SD[20%]) was higher for patients with irAEs compared to those patients who did not developed irAEs (CR [13.6%]+PR[0%]+SD[22.7%], this difference was statically significant (P = 0.002). Median OS was 11.23 mo (CI 95%, 3.76-18.70) for the overall cohort, while median OS was 21.91 mo for those patients with irAEs compared to 6.47 mo in patients who did not developed irAEs (P = 0.004). Conclusions: In this analysis we found that the development of irAEs was a strong predictor of improved OS in mUC patients treated with ICI.

A phase II trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 619-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Suyu Liu ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
David R. Fogelman ◽  
Priya Bhosale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Pre Treatment

619 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and heterogeneous tumors arising throughout the aerodigestive tract, which are incurable and life-limiting when metastatic. Prior studies of checkpoint inhibitors in NET patients have yielded minimal evidence of efficacy. Historically, effective therapies for advanced, progressive NET yield response rates less than 10% and progression-free survival (PFS) durations of approximately 11 months, as compared to approximately 4.5 months with placebo. Methods: We undertook a phase II basket study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with rare cancers, and present here the data from the pancreatic NET (pNET) cohort and extrapancreatic NET (epNET) cohort, each of which included 20 patients with grade 1-2 NET that was progressive under any prior therapy. Patients received 1200mg of atezolizumab and 15mg/kg of bevacizumab IV q 21 days. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response by RECIST 1.1. Results: The confirmed objective response rate with this combination was 20% (95% CI 6-44%) in the pNET cohort and 15% (95% CI 3-38%) in the epNET cohort. The median PFS in the pNET cohort is 19.6 months (95% CI 10.6-NR), while it was 14.9 months (95% CI 6.1-NR) in the epNET cohort, 1-year PFS was 75% and 52%, respectively. The combination was well-tolerated in this patient population, with the most common related treatment-emergent adverse events being hypertension (47.5%), proteinuria (37.5%), and fatigue (35%). The most common related grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension (20%) and proteinuria (7.5%). Conclusions: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated moderate clinical activity in patients with advanced NETs. As pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for all patients, correlations with immune infiltration, mutations, and transcriptome alterations should provide additional insight into the mechanisms of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

scholarly journals RaPiDS (GOG-3028): randomized Phase II study of balstilimab alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in cervical cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M O’Malley ◽  
Leslie M Randall ◽  
Camille Gunderson Jackson ◽  
Robert L Coleman ◽  
John L Hays ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Investigational Agents

Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors that have emerged as promising investigational agents for the treatment of cervical cancer, particularly in the setting of previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of RaPiDS (NCT03894215), a two-arm Phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of balstilimab administered alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is objective response rate, and key secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life outcomes.

A phase II study of lapatinib in recurrent or metastatic EGFR and/or ErbB2 expressing adenoid cystic (ACC) and non-ACC malignant tumors of the salivary glands (MSGT)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5566-5566 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Agulnik ◽  
E. E. Cohen ◽  
R. B. Cohen ◽  
E. X. Chen ◽  
S. J. Hotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Dual Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Present Trial

5566 Background: The limited therapeutic index of chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic MSGT provides a strong rationale for the evaluation of molecularly targeted agents in this disease. Lapatinib is a dual inhibitor of EGFR and ErbB2 tyrosine kinase activity. Expression of ErbB2 and EGFR has been associated with biological aggressiveness and poor prognosis in MSGT, respectively. We conducted a phase II study to determine the antitumor activity of lapatinib in MSGT. Methods: The main study has a two-stage design in which patients (pts) with progressive, recurrent or metastatic ACC, and immunohistochemically expressing at least 1+ EGFR and/or 2+ ErbB2, were treated with lapatinib 1500 mg PO daily. Each cycle consists of 4 weeks of continuous dosing. Pts with non-ACC MSGT of other histologies, meeting identical eligibility criteria, were treated in this trial as a single-stage, separate cohort. Results: Of 57 pts screened for this study, 29/33 (88%) ACC and 22/24 (92%) non-ACC pts expressed EGFR and/or ErbB2. Thirty-eight pts have been accrued to the study to date (20 ACC/18 non-ACC). The remaining 13 pts who were screened positive either declined entry or were ineligible for other reasons. Baseline data on 34 pts are: M:F = 25:9, median age 56 (range 38–80), PS 0:1:2 = 16:17:1, prior radiation:chemotherapy = 30:18. After 92 cycles of therapy, the most frequent adverse events experienced (as % of cycles) were diarrhea (54%), pain (52%), fatigue (52%), lymphopenia (39%), anemia (38%), hyperglycemia (38%) and dyspnea (34%). No grade 4 adverse events have occurred and only 8 pts experienced a grade 3 adverse event, primarily pain and dyspnea. No significant cardiac toxicity has been observed. Among 14 ACC pts evaluable for response so far: 9 have SD (range 2–9 cycles), 3 PD, and 2 died prior to cycle 2. For 12 evaluable non-ACC pts: 8 have SD (range 2–9 cycles), and 4 PD. No pts have had an objective response. Conclusions: Although there are no objective responses to date, lapatinib is well tolerated, with tumor stabilization achieved by 64% of pts and 24/38 pts remain on treatment at present. Trial accrual of ACC pts into the first stage has been completed, the second stage will open if an objective response is seen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) trial of zalypsis (Z) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) progressing after a first-line platinum-based regimen.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15001-e15001
Author(s):  
Ismael Ghanem ◽  
Joan Carles ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt Molins ◽  
Cinthya Coronado ◽  
José Pablo Maroto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
First Line ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

e15001 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) is beneficial as first-line treatment of advanced UC. However, the majority of patients develop recurrent disease with poor long-term survival rates. Attempts to improve second-line treatments have evaluated single agents and multi-drug combinations, neither of which has managed to improve survival or achieve durable responses. Z is a cytotoxic agent that induces apoptosis by acting at cell cycle level, has DNA-binding properties and inhibits transcriptional responses. Z has shown anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo in xenograft models. Based on the activity observed in a phase I study (1PR and 2 SD) in advanced bladder cancer, we have designed a phase II study to explore the efficacy of Z in this setting. Methods: Patients with histologically-confirmed advanced or metastatic UC, who had failed one prior line of platinum-based CT, with proven progression or relapse before study entry, were included. Patients were treated with a Z intravenous infusion of 3 mg/m2 over 1-hour and every 3 weeks. A two-stage design was chosen; at least four (of 17) evaluable patients had to reach the primary endpoint during the first stage in order to progress into a second stage of up to 37 patients. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate (TCR): percentage of patients with objective response (OR) of any duration or patients alive and progression-free (PFS) at three months. Results: Twenty patients of a median age of 71 years (r: 54-83) were enrolled after a median of one prior treatment line (r:1-2). One patient was considered non-evaluable. No ORs were observed and only one patient had PFS ≥ 3 months. The median time on treatment was 1.68 months (r: 0.76-4.21). Toxicity consisted mostly of grade 1-2 fatigue, anorexia and nausea. Five patients had isolated troponin I increases (with no ECG or LVEF findings). Hematological toxicity was mild, one patient had grade 3 neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Only one patient reached the primary endpoint (TCR) during the first stage; consequently, the study was closed and no further development was considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document