A multicenter open-label phase 1 study evaluating the safety and tolerability of HMPL-306 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH mutations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3159-TPS3159
Author(s):  
Filip Janku ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
Christopher Tucci ◽  
Zhao Yang ◽  
Marek K. Kania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade Glioma ◽  
Statistical Hypothesis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Idh Mutations

TPS3159 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a rate-limiting tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme with 3 isoforms. Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 result in gain-of-function activity that can cause tumor formation and/or progression and have been associated with various tumor types. Therefore, selective, single mutant IDH (mIDH) isotype inhibitors (mIDH1 or mIDH2) can lead to insufficient efficacy and the potential for tumor resistance. HMPL-306 is an innovative, small-molecule, orally available, highly selective, potent inhibitor of both mIDH1 and mIDH2. Clinical development of a compound that concurrently targets, inhibits, and suppresses multiple mIDHs could lead to significant and durable clinical benefit for patients (pts) with solid tumors harboring IDH mutations. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, dose escalation (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HMPL-306 in pts ≥18 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with any IDH mutations. HMPL-306 will be administered orally, once daily in a 28-day continuous dosing treatment cycle. The HMPL-306 dose will be escalated in Part 1 according to the modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design in 4 cohorts in approximately 15-20 pts: 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg. Eligible pts must have locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and PK. Approximately 95 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D in Part 2 to further characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and preliminary anti-tumor activities of HMPL-306. Part 2 will include 5 dose expansion cohorts: cholangiocarcinoma (n = 20), skeletal chondrosarcoma (n = 20), low-grade glioma (n = 20), perioperative low-grade glioma (n = 15), any other solid tumor harboring an IDH1/2 mutation (n = 20). All pts will continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or at the investigator’s discretion. Safety will be assessed based on reports of adverse events including clinical laboratory testing, vital signs, physical examinations, and electrocardiograms. All pts who receive any study treatment will be included in safety and efficacy analyses. Antitumor activity based on investigator-assessed overall response will be evaluated using descriptive analyses. Objective response rate will be calculated with 95% confidence interval using the Clopper-Pearson method. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to summarize the time-to-event data such as progression-free survival and duration of response. No statistical hypothesis testing is planned. Enrollment started February 2021.

Antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability–high tumors: A combined analysis of two cohorts in the GARNET study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2564-2564
Author(s):  
Dominique Berton ◽  
Susana N. Banerjee ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Sara Cresta ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumor Types

2564 Background: Dostarlimab is an investigational, humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on the 2 expansion cohorts that enrolled mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) patients. Cohort A1 enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC), and cohort F enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H or POLε-hypermutated non-EC solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) tumors (99 [93.4%] had GI tumors, including 69 [65.1%] with colorectal cancer). Patients received 500 mg IV of dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1. Here we report ORR and DOR, by individual cohort and as an overall population, in patients with dMMR tumors identified by immunohistochemistry testing. Results: For this interim analysis, an efficacy analysis was performed for the patients who had baseline measurable disease and ≥6 months of follow-up in the study (N = 209). The ORR was 41.6% (95% CI, 34.9%–48.6%) for the combined A1+F dMMR cohorts (Table). Responses were durable, and median DOR has not been reached in either cohort (median follow-up: cohort A1, 16.3 months; cohort F, 12.4 months). A total of 267 patients were included in the safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose; cohort A1, N = 126; cohort F, N = 141). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were consistent across tumor types. Overall, the most frequently reported any-grade TRAEs were asthenia (13.9%), diarrhea (13.5%), and fatigue (11.2%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were anemia (2.2%), lipase increased (1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.1%), and diarrhea (1.1%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with dMMR solid tumors, with consistent antitumor activity seen across endometrial and nonendometrial tumor types. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals detected. Most TRAEs were low grade and were similar across cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]

Combination olaparib and durvalumab for patients with recurrent IDH-mutated gliomas.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14026-e14026
Author(s):  
Ronald Ramos ◽  
Seth Andrew Climans ◽  
Ashley Adile ◽  
Pegah Ghiassi ◽  
Stephanie Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Idh Mutations

e14026 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequently observed in low grade gliomas and secondary glioblastoma. Mutant IDH enzymes aberrantly convert α-ketoglutarate (αKG) to 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Accumulation of 2HG inhibits αKG-dependent dioxygenases, many of which are involved in epigenetic regulation. This can lead to cellular dedifferentiation and tumor formation. IDH-mutated cancer cells exhibit defective homologous recombination repair, providing the rationale for investigating poly (adenosine 5’-diphophate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in these tumors. Blockade of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) re‐sensitizes PARP inhibitor treated cancer cells to T‐cell killing. We report the preliminary results of the glioma arm of a clinical trial of a PARP inhibitor, olaparib plus PD-L1 inhibitor, durvalumab, for IDH-mutated solid cancer. Methods: This is a single arm phase II basket study (NCT03991832). Patients with IDH-mutated solid tumors are divided into three cohorts; A: glioma; B: cholangiocarcinoma; C: all other solid tumors. Major eligibility criteria include IDH mutation by immunohistochemistry or sequencing, progressive disease with maximum two prior systemic therapies, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) 0 –1 and adequate organ function. Patients were excluded if they had received prior PARP inhibitors or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Patients were treated with olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily continuously and durvalumab 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks. Each cycle was 4 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated by MRI after every 2 cycles of study treatments using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Results: As of Jan 2021, 9 patients were enrolled in Arm A, 7 men and 2 women. The median age was 42 years. Eight patients had IDH1 mutations and 1 had an IDH2 mutation. There were two patients with 1p/19q codeletion. Two patients had grade 2 tumors, four had grade 3, and three had grade 4 tumors. Median time since tumor diagnosis was 7 years. Objective response was seen in 1 patient with an IDH-mutated glioblastoma who remains on study treatments after 8 cycles. Six patients (67%) had tumor progression after two cycles. Two patients had stable disease as per RECIST but had clinical deterioration and did not continue the combined treatment. Common treatment emergent adverse events were all grade 1: fatigue (8 patients), nausea (6), abdominal pain (3), anemia (3), thrombocytopenia (3), and diarrhea (2). Median progression free survival was 2.5 months (range 1.9–8 months). Updated analysis and correlative studies will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Combination treatment with olaparib and durvalumab for patients with IDH-mutated glioma is well tolerated but appears to lack adequate antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03991832.

scholarly journals Ivosidenib in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1–Mutated Advanced Glioma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29) ◽  
pp. 3398-3406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo K. Mellinghoff ◽  
Benjamin M. Ellingson ◽  
Mehdi Touat ◽  
Elizabeth Maher ◽  
Macarena I. De La Fuente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1

PURPOSE Diffuse gliomas are malignant brain tumors that include lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastomas. Transformation of low-grade glioma into a higher tumor grade is typically associated with contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1) gene occur in most LGGs (> 70%). Ivosidenib is an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) under evaluation in patients with solid tumors. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with m IDH1 solid tumors. Ivosidenib was administered orally daily in 28-day cycles. RESULTS In 66 patients with advanced gliomas, ivosidenib was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 500 mg once per day was selected for the expansion cohort. The grade ≥ 3 adverse event rate was 19.7%; 3% (n = 2) were considered treatment related. In patients with nonenhancing glioma (n = 35), the objective response rate was 2.9%, with 1 partial response. Thirty of 35 patients (85.7%) with nonenhancing glioma achieved stable disease compared with 14 of 31 (45.2%) with enhancing glioma. Median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 33.2 months) and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9 months) for the nonenhancing and enhancing glioma cohorts, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, ivosidenib reduced the volume and growth rates of nonenhancing tumors. CONCLUSION In patients with m IDH1 advanced glioma, ivosidenib 500 mg once per day was associated with a favorable safety profile, prolonged disease control, and reduced growth of nonenhancing tumors.

Updated efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Anticancer Therapy ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

4525 Background: Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy shows promising clinical activity in UC. We report a planned update of the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic UC from a multicenter, phase 1/2 open-label study. Methods: Pts received durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to 12 months (mo) or until unacceptable toxicity, progression, or starting another anticancer therapy. Primary endpoints were safety and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1). Duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Tumor PD-L1 expression was assessed by Ventana SP263 assay (PD-L1 high = ≥25% PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells). Results: As of Oct 24, 2016 (data cutoff [DCO]), 191 pts had received treatment. Median follow-up was 5.78 mo (range, 0.4–25.9). All pts had Stage 4 disease and 99.5% had prior anticancer therapy (95.3% post-platinum). As of DCO, ORR was 17.8% (34/191), including 7 CRs, with responses observed regardless of PD-L1 status (Table). Responses occurred early (median time to response, 1.41 mo) and were durable (median DoR not reached [NR]). Median PFS and OS were 1.5 mo (95% CI, 1.4, 1.9) and 18.2 mo (95% CI, 8.1, not estimable [NE]), respectively; the 1-year OS rate was 55.0% (95% CI, 43.9%, 64.7%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 6.8% of pts; grade 3/4 immune-mediated (im)AEs occurred in 4 pts; 2 pts discontinued due to imAEs (acute kidney injury and autoimmune hepatitis). Conclusions: Durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W shows favorable clinical activity and an excellent safety profile in locally advanced/metastatic UC pts. Table. Antitumor activity in UC pts, including second-line or greater (≥2L) post-platinum pts Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

FUZE clinical trial: a phase 2 study of Debio 1347 in FGFR fusion-positive advanced solid tumors irrespectively of tumor histology.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3157-TPS3157 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Michael Hyman ◽  
Lipika Goyal ◽  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option

TPS3157 Background: Dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling by FGFR fusions is implicated in many cancers. Debio 1347 is a selective oral inhibitor of FGFR 1-3 tyrosine kinases. It exhibited high antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo tumor models with FGFR1-3 gene fusions. Preliminary data from an ongoing phase 1 trial show efficacy and tolerability in patients (pts) harboring FGFR 1-3 fusion irrespectively of tumor type. We present the design for a multicenter, basket, 2-stage, adaptive single arm Phase 2 trial investigating Debio 1347 in pts with solid tumors harboring FGFR1-3 fusion/rearrangement. Methods: Adults with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic tumors with documented FGFR1-3 gene fusion/rearrangement who require systemic therapy and have progression after ≥1 prior standard treatment or have no satisfactory alternative treatment option are eligible. Three cohorts are included: biliary tract cancer (cohort 1), urothelial cancer (cohort 2) and all other solid tumors (cohort 3). Primary brain tumors are excluded. Other key exclusion criteria include prior treatment with FGFR1-3 selective inhibitor; clinically significant corneal/retinal disorder; history of calcium/phosphate homeostasis disorder or systemic mineral imbalance with ectopic soft tissue calcification, and symptomatic/unstable brain metastases < 1 month before enrollment. Genomic screening of tumor tissue is done at local or central laboratory with post-hoc central confirmation by RNA sequencing. Eligible pts will receive Debio 1347, 80 mg PO once daily in 28-day cycles until occurrence of progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary Endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) based on independent central review using RECIST v.1.1. The targeted sample size (N=125) will provide approximately 90% power to reject H0: ORR ≤ 15% at an overall 5% significance level based on an expected ORR of 30% in at least one of the cohorts. Secondary endpoints are: duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, tolerability, and quality of life. An interim analysis for futility and homogeneity will be performed after 27 evaluable pts. PK sparse sampling is performed to assess exposure-response relationships with efficacy and safety. Biomarkers of response and resistance will be explored. Accrual is opened in US, EU, Asia and Australia. Clinical trial information: NCT03834220.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilotumumab in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Rui Tang ◽  
Yilong Zhang ◽  
Elwyn Loh ◽  
Richard Lizambri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

130 Background: Rilotumumab (R) is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, the only known MET receptor ligand. The MET pathway has been identified as a potentially useful target for therapeutic blockade in oncology. R has been studied in multiple phase 2 trials either as monotherapy or combination therapy, including a phase 2 trial in gastric cancer combining R with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine. A phase 1 study was done to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of R in Japanese pts. Methods: An open-label, dose-escalation study was performed with R at 10 mg/kg (Cohort 1A), escalating to 20 mg/kg (Cohort 1B) if no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Key eligibility criteria were Japanese pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma, age ≥ 20 yr, ECOG ≤ 1, and refractory to standard treatment (tx). Pts received R as an intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, except for cycle 1 in which the day 15 dose was skipped to facilitate PK analysis. DLTs were evaluated in cycle 1. Results: A total of 9 pts were enrolled (1A, n = 3; 1B, n = 6). No DLTs were noted. As of 17 April 13, tx-emergent AEs were reported in 89% of pts. Tx-emergent AEs occurring in > 1 pt overall were vomiting (33%), diarrhea (22%), decreased hemoglobin (22%), hypoalbuminemia (22%), and nausea (22%). One grade 3 tx-emergent AE was observed (decreased hemoglobin; 10 mg/kg). Tx-related AEs were reported in 56% of pts. One grade ≥ 2 tx-related AE was observed (hypoalbuminemia; 20 mg/kg). 8 pts discontinued R due to disease progression; 1 pt remained on the investigational product. Mean exposure of R (Cmax and AUC) appeared to be doubled as dose increased from 10 to 20 mg/kg. The estimated mean CL was approximately 0.2 mL/hr/kg in both cohorts, suggesting a linear PK from 10 to 20 mg/kg. The terminal half-life of R was about 15 days. Conclusions: R monotherapy had an acceptable safety profile in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors. These phase 1 safety and PK data support the further evaluation of R combined with chemotherapy in Japanese pts with MET-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01791374.

TROPHY-u-01: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS495-TPS495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS495 Background: Patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy and pts ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy who progress after CPI have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Trop-2 is an epithelial cell surface antigen that is overexpressed in UC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that targets Trop-2 and delivers the active metabolite (SN38) of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan to tumor cells. In a phase 1/2 single-arm trial, pts with advanced cancers received SG 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle; preliminary results in the cohort of 41 evaluable pts with mUC and a median of 3 (range 1–6) prior therapies showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 34%. Adverse events (AE) were mostly low grade, including diarrhea (63%), nausea (56%), and fatigue (49%). Neutropenia (all grades) occurred in 49% of pts (≥ grade 3/4, 39%; treatment-related serious AE of febrile neutropenia, 5%). Median overall survival was 16.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 7.1 months. These results warrant further investigation in a dedicated phase 2 trial. Methods: TROPHY-U-01 is a single-arm, open-label, global phase 2 trial evaluating the antitumor activity and safety of SG in 140 pts with advanced UC. The primary cohort (progression after platinum chemotherapy and CPI) will enroll 100 pts in a Simon 2-stage design with > 90% power accounting for dropouts to exclude the null hypothesis or ORR < 12%, while a second cohort (40 pts) will comprise cisplatin-ineligible pts who received prior CPI. The primary objective is ORR per RECIST 1.1, assessed by central review. Secondary objectives include response duration, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Enrollment began in August 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

The first report of pediatric patients with solid tumors treated with venetoclax.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10524-10524
Author(s):  
Kelly C. Goldsmith ◽  
Arnauld Verschuur ◽  
Daniel A. Morgenstern ◽  
Natasha van Eijkelenburg ◽  
Sara Michele Federico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Best Response

10524 Background: Dependence on the prosurvival protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) occurs in certain pediatric solid tumors, resulting in tumorigenesis and resistance to therapies. Venetoclax (VEN), an orally administered BCL-2-selective inhibitor, has preclinical anticancer activity in human-derived neuroblastoma models. Reported here are preliminary results from pediatric patients (pts) with recurrent or refractory (R/R) solid tumors treated with VEN monotherapy or VEN with cyclophosphamide and topotecan (Cy-Topo). Methods: This phase 1 open-label, 2-part study (NCT03236857) enrolled pts < 25 yr old with R/R malignancies; we report only on pts with solid tumors. Following a dose ramp-up, pts received 800 mg VEN (age/weight-adjusted adult equivalent) once daily for the first 8 wk; Cy-Topo was added optionally after wk 8. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first 21 days of VEN therapy or cycle 1 of VEN-Cy-Topo. Objectives included safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy. Results: As of Dec 17, 2019, 11 solid tumor pts were enrolled: neuroblastoma (n = 6), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2), Wilms’ tumor, Carney-Stratakis syndrome, and low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (n = 1 each). Median age was 11 yr (range 3–22); median time on study was 6.9 mo (range 1.2–17.8). All pts experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); vomiting (72%; all grades) was most common. Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 82% of pts; febrile neutropenia (64%), decreased blood cell count, and neutropenia (36% each) were the most common. Seven pts received 800-mg monotherapy for 8 wk; 3 of these pts did not receive Cy-Topo after monotherapy. Of the 7 pts who received VEN-Cy-Topo, 3 pts received 400 mg VEN with Cy-Topo. DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia with delayed count recovery occurred in 2 pts on 800 mg VEN-Cy-Topo, necessitating a dose de-escalation (to 400 mg VEN). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 2 pts on 400 mg VEN with Cy-Topo, leading to the addition of myeloid growth factor to the therapy regimen. The best response after 8 wk of VEN monotherapy was stable disease (SD). Six pts were evaluable for tumor response with VEN-Cy-Topo; 1 neuroblastoma pt had a complete response after 5 cycles of 400 mg VEN, 4 pts had SD (3 on 800 mg and 1 on 400 mg VEN) and 1 (800 mg VEN) had progressive disease as best response. Conclusions: Continuous dosing of VEN with Cy-Topo was not tolerated due to cytopenias in 4/7 pts with solid tumors. Discontinuous dosing of VEN with Cy-Topo is being explored. Clinical trial information: NCT03236857.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document