CASPAR (Alliance A031902): A randomized, phase III trial of enzalutamide (ENZ) with rucaparib (RUCA)/placebo (PBO) as a novel therapy in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS181-TPS181
Author(s):  
Arpit Rao ◽  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
David James VanderWeele ◽  
Glenn Heller ◽  
Lionel D Lewis ◽  
...  

TPS181 Background: Treatment with novel antiandrogens (NAA) and androgen deprivation therapy prolongs life in men with mCRPC but approximately 40% patients (pts) have radiographic progression within the first year. Inhibition of androgen receptor signaling results in increased double-strand DNA breaks and genomic instability. NAA+PARP inhibitor (PARPi) combinations have shown induction of synthetic lethality by this mechanism in multiple preclinical studies. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene aberrations do not appear to be necessary for this synergy and an NAA+PARPi combination has shown improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR-wild-type pts compared with NAA alone. Methods: CASPAR (A031902) is a randomized phase 3 study in which 984 pts will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to ENZ plus RUCA/PBO. A PK substudy will precede the phase 3 portion and enroll 6-18 pts to various doses of ENZ plus RUCA to establish safety and evaluate any clinically-significant drug-drug interactions (S-DDI). Treatment will be continued until disease progression and cross-over is not allowed. Co-primary endpoints are rPFS and overall survival (OS). The OS analysis will be undertaken as a primary endpoint if the rPFS endpoint is met. For a one-sided logrank test with a type 1 error rate equal to 0.025, the study has 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 in rPFS (median rPFS of 15 and 21 months in control and combination arms, respectively), and 80% power to detect an HR of 0.80 in OS (median OS of 32 and 40 months, respectively). Key secondary endpoints are rPFS and OS in pts with vs without pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 mutations; and differences in adverse events and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between the treatment arms. QOL assessments include Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF), and EQ-5D-5L. A key correlative endpoint is the concordance between tissue and plasma ctDNA-based HRR testing. Key eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2, biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma, progressive (PSA or radiographic) disease per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines, measurable or non-measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, no prior treatment for mCRPC (prior abiraterone, darolutamide, or apalutamide in non-mCRPC setting is allowed), no significant uncontrolled comorbidity, and no medications with S-DDI with ENZ/RUCA. HRR gene aberration is not required for enrollment. All pts will undergo next-generation targeted-exome sequencing from archival tumor tissue (new biopsy only required if no archival tissue available). CASPAR is available for participation to all US-NCTN sites starting in October 2020 with a projected enrollment of 3 years. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT04455750.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5087-TPS5087
Author(s):  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Simon Paul Watkins ◽  
Darrin Despain ◽  
Chris Alan Karlovich ◽  
Andrew Simmons ◽  
...  

TPS5087 Background: Pts with mCRPC often initially receive androgen receptor-targeted therapy (eg, abiraterone or enzalutamide), but they almost always progress. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (eg, olaparib) have demonstrated clinical activity in pts with mCRPC with a deleterious mutation in a homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair gene; 14 of 16 evaluable pts with mCRPC and a tumor alteration in an HR gene, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM, responded to olaparib (Mateo et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1697-708). The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the US for treatment of pts with ovarian carcinoma that harbors a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (germline and/or somatic) who have received ≥2 chemotherapies. These data support investigating rucaparib as a treatment option in pts with mCRPC with HRD. Methods: TRITON3 (NCT02975934)is a phase 3 study evaluating rucaparib (600 mg BID) vs physician’s choice (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel) in pts with mCRPC who have a deleterious germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM as determined by local and/or central testing. All pts must have progressed on abiraterone or enzalutamide in the mCRPC setting; pts who received prior chemotherapy for mCRPC or PARP inhibitor treatment are excluded. Pts will be randomized 2:1 to rucaparib or physician’s choice of comparator therapy; pts randomized to physician’s choice may cross over to rucaparib on radiographic progression confirmed by independent radiology review (IRR). The primary endpoint is IRR-confirmed radiographic progression-free survival (modified RECIST version 1.1/PCWG3 criteria). Secondary objectives include overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pt-reported outcomes, and safety. Pretreatment blood samples will be collected from all pts to enable development of a plasma-based companion diagnostic to identify pts who may benefit from rucaparib treatment. Pts (≈400) will be enrolled at > 100 sites worldwide. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS256-TPS256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Yi-Hsiu Huang ◽  
Mostefa Bennamoun ◽  
Lu Xu ◽  
...  

TPS256 Background: Pembro, a PD-1 inhibitor, and olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, have some single-agent antitumor activity in mCRPC. The phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) showed promising activity with pembro and olaparib in pts with mCRPC unselected for homologous recombination deficiency, warranting further investigation. Methods: KEYLYNK-010 (NCT03834519) is a phase 3 trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of pembro + olaparib in molecularly unselected enza- or abi-pretreated pts with mCRPC who progressed with taxane chemotherapy. An estimated 780 pts will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembro 200 mg IV every 3 wk plus olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or abi 1000 mg orally once daily + prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg orally twice daily (enza-pretreated pts) or enza 160 mg/day orally (abi-pretreated pts). Stratification will be by prior treatment (abi/enza) and measurable disease (yes/no). Adults (≥18 y) with histologically confirmed mCRPC who progressed on androgen deprivation therapy ≤6 mo of screening, and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 are eligible. Pts previously received either abi or enza (but not both) as well as 1 docetaxel-based regimen. Pts are required to provide tumor tissue for biomarker analysis. Responses will be assessed by CT/MRI and radionuclide bone imaging per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3)–modified RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) every 9 wk during the first year and every 12 wk thereafter. Treatment will continue with up to 2 y of pembro (35 cycles) and olaparib or abi/enza until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary end points are OS and rPFS. Secondary end points are time to initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy; ORR, and DOR per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR; time to PSA progression; time to first symptomatic skeletal event; time to radiographic soft tissue progression; time to pain progression; and safety. Exploratory end points are identification of molecular (genomic, metabolic, or proteomic) biomarkers indicative of response. Accrual began May 2, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03834519.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS340-TPS340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel W. Clarke ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin ◽  
Mototsugu Oya ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
...  

TPS340 Background: A Phase II trial showed olaparib (tablets, 300 mg bid) in combination with abiraterone (1000 mg od plus prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid) significantly prolonged radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) compared with abiraterone alone (median 13.8 vs 8.2 months; hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44–0.97, P=0.034) in patients (pts) with mCRPC in the second-line metastatic setting who received prior docetaxel (Clarke et al. Lancet Oncol 2018). Treatment benefits were achieved irrespective of homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation status, suggesting potential synergy between the two treatments that could impact a broader patient population. PROpel (EudraCT: 2018-002011-10) is the follow-on study to this, and the first Phase III trial to assess a PARP inhibitor in combination with abiraterone as first-line treatment in a genetically unselected mCRPC pt population. Methods: PROpel is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter study of pts randomized (1:1), as for the Phase II trial, to abiraterone (1000 mg od plus prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid) plus either olaparib (tablets, 300 mg bid) or placebo. Pts must not have received prior chemotherapy, new hormonal agents or other systemic treatment at mCRPC stage (except docetaxel at metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer stage [mHSPC]). Randomization is stratified according to site of metastases (bone only vs visceral vs other) and docetaxel treatment at mHSPC stage (yes, no). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed rPFS (RECIST v1.1 [soft tissue] and Prostate Working Cancer Group 3 [PCWG-3 criteria; bone]). Secondary objectives include time to first subsequent therapy or death, time to pain progression, overall survival, and health-related quality of life. Safety and tolerability will also be described. Exploratory endpoints include HRR subgroup analyses to confirm that efficacy is independent of HRR status. Screening across ~200 sites in 20 countries is being conducted to identify a target sample of ~720 pts. Enrollment is expected to begin in October 2018. (Study 8, NCT01972217). Clinical trial information: NCT03732820.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5091-TPS5091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
...  

TPS5091 Background: The median overall survival for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is short. Available agents may offer limited therapeutic benefit, but no molecularly stratified treatment has yet been approved for this heterogeneous disease. A sizable percentage of pts with mCRPC has loss of function aberrations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR) in tumor tissue, such as BRCA1/2 and ATM. These aberrations can confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. A Phase II study indicated that the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza) had antitumor activity in 33% of mCRPC pts who had progressed after new hormonal agent (NHA) treatment and chemotherapy, with a strikingly higher composite response rate in pts with a deleterious HRR gene aberration (HRRa) (88%; 14/16) vs pts without a HRRa (6%; 2/33) (Mateo et al.2015). The PROfound study evaluates olaparib efficacy and safety versus physician’s choice of either abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in pts with mCRPC and a HRRa (NCT02987543). Methods: To be eligible for this multinational, open-label, Phase III study, mCRPC pts must have progressed on prior NHA treatment and have a tumor HRRa in one of 15 genes, as confirmed by an HRR Assay (Foundation Medicine, Inc.). Cohort A (n = 240 approx) includes pts with mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM, while pts with a mutation in 12 other HRR genes will be assigned to Cohort B (n = 100 approx). Pts will be randomized (2:1) to olaparib tablets (300 mg orally bid) or physician’s choice of either enzalutamide (160 mg orally od) or abiraterone acetate (1000 mg orally od with 5 mg bid prednisone) and treatment continued until radiographic progression (as assessed by blinded independent central review) or lack of treatment tolerability. The primary endpoint of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) will be assessed in Cohort A using RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) and PCWG3 (bone) criteria. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include confirmed objective response rate, time to pain progression, overall survival (all Cohort A) and rPFS (both cohorts combined). Clinical trial information: NCT02987543.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 2791-2798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Arturo Molina ◽  
Jinhui Li ◽  
Thian Kheoh ◽  
Eric J. Small ◽  
...  

Purpose In the phase III study COU-AA-301, abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel administration. In this article, we investigate the relationship between baseline serum androgen (SA) levels and OS. Patients and Methods COU-AA-301 is a randomized, double-blind study of AA (1,000 mg every day) plus P (5 mg by mouth twice daily; n = 797) versus P alone (n = 398). Randomization was stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 to 1 v 2), pain (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form over past 24 hours: 4 to 10, present; v 0 to 3, absent), prior chemotherapy (1 v 2), and progression (prostate-specific antigen v radiographic). Association of baseline SA (testosterone, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate), was measured by ultrasensitive liquid-liquid extraction or protein precipitation and two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, with OS determined by bivariate and multivariable Cox models. OS was examined with SA as greater than median and less than or equal to the median. Results Median survival increased with each quartile increase in testosterone level regardless of treatment arm. SA levels at baseline strongly associated with survival (P < .0001) in bivariate and multivariable analyses. Longer survival was observed for patients with SA above median compared with below median in both the AA and P arms (eg, testosterone, AA; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77; P < .0001). Treatment with AA led to longer survival versus P alone in the above- or below-median group for all androgens. Conclusion SA, measured with a novel ultrasensitive assay in COU-AA-301, is prognostic for OS and may be useful for risk stratification in mCRPC clinical trials.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Noguchi ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
Gaku Arai ◽  
Hiroji Uemura ◽  
Katsuyoshi Hashine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To develop a new treatment modality, we conducted a phase 3 randomized trial of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24-positive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) for whom docetaxel chemotherapy failed. Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 68 medical centers in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older, positive immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to at least 2 of 12 warehouse peptides, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, serum testosterone level of ≤ 50 ng/dl, and satisfactory bone marrow function, hepatic function, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive PPV or placebo. Four of 12 warehouse peptides selected based on pre-existing peptide-specific IgG levels or the corresponding placebo were subcutaneously injected in 6 doses weekly and then bi-weekly following the maximum of 30 doses until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analyses were by the full analysis set. Results Between August 2013 and April 2016, 310 patients were randomly assigned, and 306 patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The estimated median OS was 16.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13–18.2) with PPV and 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.1–20.4) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04, 95% CI, 0.80–1.37; p = 0.77). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 41% in both groups. The analysis of treatment arm effects among subgroups revealed lower HRs for OS in favor of the PPV arm in patients with < 64% neutrophils (HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.33–0.93; p = 0.03) or ≥ 26% lymphocytes (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.52–0.92; p = 0.02) at base line. Conclusions PPV did not prolong OS in HLA-A24-positive patients with CRPC progressing after docetaxel chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested that the patients with a lower proportion of neutrophils or a higher proportion of lymphocytes at base line can receive survival benefits from PPV treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS178-TPS178
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Daniel J. George ◽  
Maria De Santis ◽  
Noel Clarke ◽  
Andre P. Fay ◽  
...  

TPS178 Background: In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), abiraterone combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is highly effective in improving patient outcomes. However, around 20% of patients progress to castration-resistant disease within 12 months of treatment; these patients have shorter survival and limited treatment options. Aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, predominately due to PTEN loss, is common in prostate cancer, especially in later-stage disease. The androgen receptor signaling and AKT pathway are reciprocally cross-regulated such as that inhibition of one leads to upregulation of the other. Therefore, combining abiraterone therapy with AKT inhibition may be beneficial in patients with mHSPC who have PTEN deficiency. In preclinical studies, capivasertib, a selective oral pan-AKT inhibitor, inhibited proliferation of models of hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer with PTEN loss. The results of the IPATential150 phase 3 study (NCT03072238) demonstrated that another oral AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, prolonged radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) when combined with abiraterone compared with placebo plus abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, particularly among patients with PTEN loss. CAPItello-281 (NCT04493853) is a global, multicenter, phase 3 trial to evaluate capivasertib in combination with abiraterone, on a background of ADT, as a treatment for de novo mHSPC patients with PTEN-deficient tumors. Methods: Eligible patients for this double-blind, randomized trial are men aged 18 years or older with confirmed newly diagnosed previously untreated metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate adenocarcinoma with immunohistochemically confirmed PTEN deficiency and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1. Following screening, approximately 1000 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either capivasertib (400 mg) or placebo (twice daily; 4 days on, 3 days off) in combination with abiraterone (1000 mg once daily) and ADT until radiographic progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is rPFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, time to start of first subsequent therapy or death, symptomatic skeletal event-free survival, time to pain progression and safety profile. Enrolment started in July 2020. Acknowledgments: We thank Julia Grigorieva, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Philadelphia, USA, for providing medical writing assistance. Funding: The CAPItello-281 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT04493853.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
...  

Purpose Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor. This study examined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel therapy. Patients and Methods In our study, 1,099 men were randomly assigned in a 2:1 schedule to receive orteronel 400 mg plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, stratified by region (Europe, North America [NA], and non-Europe/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form worst pain score. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS], ≥ 50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen [PSA50], and pain response at 12 weeks) were to undergo statistical testing only if the primary end point analysis was significant. Results The study was unblinded after crossing a prespecified OS futility boundary. The median OS was 17.0 months versus 15.2 months with orteronel-prednisone versus placebo-prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.886; 95% CI, 0.739 to 1.062; P = .190). Improved rPFS was observed with orteronel-prednisone (median, 8.3 v 5.7 months; HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.653 to 0.885; P < .001). Orteronel-prednisone showed advantages over placebo-prednisone in PSA50 rate (25% v 10%, P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median, 5.5 v 2.9 months, P < .001) but not pain response rate (12% v 9%; P = .128). Adverse events (all grades) were generally more frequent with orteronel-prednisone, including nausea (42% v 26%), vomiting (36% v 17%), fatigue (29% v 23%), and increased amylase (14% v 2%). Conclusion Our study did not meet the primary end point of OS. Longer rPFS and a higher PSA50 rate with orteronel-prednisone indicate antitumor activity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Patrick ◽  
Charles S. Cleeland ◽  
Lesley Fallowfield ◽  
Matthew Raymond Smith ◽  
Laurence Klotz ◽  
...  

12 Background: Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases (BM) may experience debilitating pain that impacts daily functioning and diminishes the quality of life. Previous results from a phase III trial demonstrated superiority of denosumab to ZA in delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (pathological fracture, radiation or surgery to the bone, spinal cord compression) in CRPC patients with BM. In this ad-hoc analysis, we present the results of denosumab or ZA therapy on pain interference (PI) and cancer specific quality of life (CSQoL), focusing on the subgroup of CRPC patients with no/mild pain at baseline. Methods: Men with CRPC and BM (no prior IV bisphosphonate use) were randomized to receive either SC denosumab 120 mg+IV placebo or SC placebo+IV ZA 4mg (adjusted for creatinine clearance) every four weeks. Patients were instructed to take calcium and vitamin D supplements. The Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) was used to assess PI. The pre-specified clinically meaningful time of a greater than or equal to two point increase from baseline in PI score (overall, physical, and emotional subdomains) was determined for CRPC patients receiving denosumab or ZA therapy. Patients also completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at baseline and each monthly visit to determine CSQoL scores. Declining FACT-G scores points to worsening CSQoL, where a greater than or equal to five point decrease is clinically meaningful. Results: Of the 1,901 patients enrolled (n=950, denosumab; n=951, ZA), 1,045 (55%) had no/mild pain at baseline. Compared with ZA, denosumab therapy delayed the time to a greater than or equal to two point increase from baseline in PI for the overall score (HR=0.83 [0.71, 0.98]; P=0.023), physical (HR=0.87 [0.75, 1.02]; P=0.077) and emotional (HR=0.83 [0.71, 0.97]; P=0.020) subdomains. Over a period of 18 months, more ZA-treated patients than denosumab-treated patients experienced a greater than or equal to five point decrease in FACT-G total scores (average relative difference=6.8%, range -9.4 to 14.6%) or worsening of CSQoL. Conclusions: Denosumab therapy significantly delayed the time to worsening of pain interference and maintained a higher overall CSQoL (FACT-G) compared to ZA in CRPC patients with BM. Clinical trial information: NCT00321620.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
Won Kim ◽  
John Wilton ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Amy M. Lin ◽  
Lawrence Fong ◽  
...  

53 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA), like ketoconazole (keto), inhibits CYP17, the rate-limiting enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. Since patients (pts) with prior keto treatment were excluded from the pivotal phase III AA trials, the utility of AA after keto is not well understood. This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of AA in pts who had received prior keto. Methods: Pts with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), prior keto therapy 28 days or more, and normal baseline organ function (including ACTH stimulation) tests were treated with AA 1,000 mg PO daily and prednisone 5 mg PO BID. Pts with prior chemotherapy were excluded. Serum androgen levels, including dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) at baseline and during treatment for exploratory analyses. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was defined as freedom from: death, radiographic progression, or unequivocal clinical progression. Results: Forty two pts were enrolled. Median age was 71. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 47.5ng/dL. Median duration of prior keto was 38 weeks (range 5 to 207). Treatment with AA resulted in 30% or greater decline in PSA at 12 weeks in 20 pts (48%, 95% CI, 32-63%), and 50% or greater decline in PSA at 12 weeks in 16 pts (38%, 95% CI 24-54%). Median time to PSA progression (TTPP) was 16 weeks (range 4 to 64). Median rPFS was 24 weeks (range 1 to 88). Baseline serum DHEA levels were measured in 40 pts. Nine pts had DHEA less than the limit of quantitation (LOQ, 0.250ng/mL), and 31 pts had DHEA greater than or equal to LOQ. One pt with DHEA less than LOQ (1 out of 9, 11%, 95% CI 0.6-49%) had PSA decline 30% or more at 12 weeks, compared to 17 pts (17 out of 31, 55%, 95% CI 36-72%) with DHEA greater than or equal to LOQ (p=0.028). Median time to pain progression (TTPP) was 8 weeks (range 4 to 32) for pts with DHEA less than LOQ, compared to 18 weeks (range 4 to 64) for pts with DHEA greater than or equal to LOQ (p=0.012). Median rPFS was 12 weeks (range 4 to 24) for pts with DHEA less than LOQ, compared to 36 weeks (range 1 to 88) for pts with DHEA greater tha or equal to LOQ (p = 0.0006). Six pts remain on AA. Conclusions: A significant proportion of pts with prior keto exposure demonstrate clinical response to AA. DHEA levels via LC/MS merits further study as a predictive biomarker in pts treated with androgen synthesis inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT01199146.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document