scholarly journals Measurement of proton-proton elastic scattering and total cross-section at \chem{\sqrt {s} = 7\,TeV}

2013 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 21002 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
G. Antchev ◽  
P. Aspell ◽  
I. Atanassov ◽  
V. Avati ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
G. Antchev ◽  
P. Aspell ◽  
I. Atanassov ◽  
V. Avati ◽  
J. Baechler ◽  
...  

Abstract The TOTEM experiment at the LHC has performed the first measurement at $$\sqrt{s} = 13\,\mathrm{TeV}$$s=13TeV of the $$\rho $$ρ parameter, the real to imaginary ratio of the nuclear elastic scattering amplitude at $$t=0$$t=0, obtaining the following results: $$\rho = 0.09 \pm 0.01$$ρ=0.09±0.01 and $$\rho = 0.10 \pm 0.01$$ρ=0.10±0.01, depending on different physics assumptions and mathematical modelling. The unprecedented precision of the $$\rho $$ρ measurement, combined with the TOTEM total cross-section measurements in an energy range larger than $$10\,\mathrm{TeV}$$10TeV (from 2.76 to $$13\,\mathrm{TeV}$$13TeV), has implied the exclusion of all the models classified and published by COMPETE. The $$\rho $$ρ results obtained by TOTEM are compatible with the predictions, from other theoretical models both in the Regge-like framework and in the QCD framework, of a crossing-odd colourless 3-gluon compound state exchange in the t-channel of the proton–proton elastic scattering. On the contrary, if shown that the crossing-odd 3-gluon compound state t-channel exchange is not of importance for the description of elastic scattering, the $$\rho $$ρ value determined by TOTEM would represent a first evidence of a slowing down of the total cross-section growth at higher energies. The very low-|t| reach allowed also to determine the absolute normalisation using the Coulomb amplitude for the first time at the LHC and obtain a new total proton–proton cross-section measurement $$\sigma _{\mathrm{tot}} = (110.3 \pm 3.5)\,\mathrm{mb}$$σtot=(110.3±3.5)mb, completely independent from the previous TOTEM determination. Combining the two TOTEM results yields $$\sigma _{\mathrm{tot}} = (110.5 \pm 2.4)\,\mathrm{mb}$$σtot=(110.5±2.4)mb.


1978 ◽  
Vol 141 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Baksay ◽  
L. Baum ◽  
A. Böhm ◽  
A. Derevshikov ◽  
G. de Zorzi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3 May-Jun) ◽  
pp. 491
Author(s):  
S. Zahra ◽  
B. Shafaq

Using  proton–proton elastic scattering data  at  TeV and squared four-momentum transfer 0.36 < -t <  0.76 (GeV/c)2 for 13 σBeam distance  and  0.07 < -t <  0.46 (GeV/c)2 for 4.3 σBeam distance, form factor of proton is predicted. Simplest version of Chou–Yang model is employed to extract the form factor by fitting experimental data of differential cross section from TOTEM experiment (for 13σBeamand 4.3 σBeam distance) to a single Gaussian. Root mean square (rms) charge radius of proton is calculated using this form factor.  It is found to be equal to 0.91 fm and 0.90 fm respectively. Which is in good agreement with experimental data and theoretically predicted values.


1984 ◽  
Vol 412 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ottewell ◽  
P. Walden ◽  
E.G. Auld ◽  
G. Giles ◽  
G. Jones ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 1450019 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. CSÖRGŐ ◽  
F. NEMES

The Bialas–Bzdak model of elastic proton–proton scattering is generalized to the case when the real part of the parton–parton level forward scattering amplitude is nonvanishing. Such a generalization enables the model to describe well the dip region of the differential cross-section of elastic scattering at the intersecting storage rings (ISR) energies, and improves significantly the ability of the model to describe also the recent TOTEM data at [Formula: see text] LHC energy. Within this framework, both the increase of the total cross-section, as well as the decrease of the location of the dip with increasing colliding energies, is related to the increase of the quark–diquark distance and to the increase of the "fragility" of the protons with increasing energies. In addition, we present and test the validity of two new phenomenological relations: one of them relates the total p+p cross-section to an effective, model-independent proton radius, while the other relates the position of the dip in the differential elastic cross-section to the measured value of the total cross-section.


1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1545-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. B. Willard ◽  
B. D. Anderson ◽  
H. W. Baer ◽  
R. J. Barrett ◽  
P. R. Bevington ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document