Limb force and non-sagittal plane joint moments during maximum-effort curve sprint running in humans

2012 ◽  
Vol 215 (24) ◽  
pp. 4314-4321 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Luo ◽  
D. Stefanyshyn
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Sprint Running ◽  
Maximum Effort ◽  
Plane Joint

Patellar Tendinopathy Alters the Distribution of Lower Extremity Net Joint Moments during Hopping

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Souza ◽  
Shruti Arya ◽  
Christine D. Pollard ◽  
George Salem ◽  
Kornelia Kulig
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Patellar Tendinopathy ◽  
Current Investigation ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Plane Joint

The purpose of the current investigation was to test the hypothesis that subjects with patellar tendinopathy would demonstrate altered sagittal plane joint moment contributions during hopping tasks. Fourteen subjects (7 patellar tendinopathy, 7 controls) participated. Sagittal net joint moments of the lower extremity, total support moment, and joint contributions to the total support moment were calculated while subjects hopped continuously at a self-selected frequency and at 1.67 Hz. Significant differences were observed for contributions to the total support moment (p= .022). When averaged across hopping frequencies, subjects with patellar tendinopathy demonstrated greater hip contribution (p= .030) and lesser knee contribution (p= .006) compared with the control subjects. Shifting the workload away from the knee and toward the hip may result in a detrimental increase in hip demand and potentially harmful long-term effects on the articular cartilage of the hip.

Intralimb Joint Coordination Patterns of the Lower Extremity in Maximal Velocity Phase Sprint Running

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne J.R. Gittoes ◽  
Cassie Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Coordination Pattern ◽  
Maximal Velocity ◽  
Joint Coordination ◽  
Sprint Running ◽  
Joint Coupling ◽  
Plane Joint ◽  
Coordination Patterns ◽  
Coordinate Data

This study aimed to develop insight into the lower extremity joint coupling motions used in the maximal velocity phase of sprint running. Two-dimensional coordinate data were used to derive sagittal plane joint angle profiles of sprint running trials. Intralimb joint coupling motions were examined using a continuous relative phase (CRP) analysis. The knee-ankle (KA) coupling was more out of phase compared with the hip-knee (HK) coupling across the step phase (mean CRP: KA 89.9° HK 34.2°) and produced a lower within-athlete CRP variability (VCRP) in stance. Touchdown (TD) produced more out-of-phase motions and a larger VCRP than toe-off. A destabilization of the lower extremity coordination pattern was considered necessary at TD to allow for the swing-to-stance transition. The key role that the KA joint motion has in the movement patterns used by healthy athletes in the maximal velocity phase of sprint running was highlighted.

scholarly journals Effect of Previous Groin Pain on Sagittal Plane Joint Moments During Soccer Instep Kicks

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
Anna C. Severin ◽  
Daniel B. Mellifont ◽  
Mark GL Sayers
Keyword(s):  
Groin Pain ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Plane Joint

A NEURAL NETWORK MODEL FOR ESTIMATION OF NET JOINT MOMENTS DURING NORMAL GAIT

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 117-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Hahn ◽  
Kathryn B. O'Keefe
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Normal Gait ◽  
Gait Dysfunction ◽  
Moment Models ◽  
Plane Joint

The purpose of this study was to develop a model to estimate lower extremity joint moments during level gait. A three-layer artificial neural network was developed to map diverse inputs (demographics, anthropometrics, electromyography, kinematics) onto sagittal plane resultant joint moments for a sample of healthy young adults. Overall model performance and prediction accuracy were acceptable for the hip, knee, and ankle, with coefficients of determination (r2) reaching 0.90 for the hip and knee and 0.95 for the ankle. Estimates in the case-specific validation produced r2 values of 0.95, 0.94, and 0.99 for the hip, knee, and ankle, respectively. Absolute errors of estimation for peak data were within the ranges published previously for other joint moment models. The results indicated that the model used in this study is accurate in estimating sagittal plane joint moments about the hip, knee, and ankle. Furthermore, the model retained accuracy with a reduced list of inputs (kinematics and demographics). Future development will include clinical samples to determine the adaptability of this model to the diverse conditions of musculoskeletal gait dysfunction common in the clinical setting.

Joint-Level Analyses of the Back Squat With and Without Intraset Rest

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Stone ◽  
Adam C. King ◽  
Shiho Goto ◽  
John D. Mata ◽  
Joseph Hannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Movement Pattern ◽  
Joint Angles ◽  
Mean Power ◽  
Joint Power ◽  
Joint Level ◽  
Back Squat ◽  
Squat Exercise ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Plane Joint

Purpose: To provide a joint-level analysis of traditional (TS) and cluster (CS) set structure during the back-squat exercise. Methods: Eight men (24 [3] y, 177.3 [7.9] cm, 82.7 [11.0] kg, 11.9 [3.5] % body fat, and 150.3 [23.0] kg 1-repetition maximum [1RM]) performed the back-squat exercise (80%1RM) using TS (4 × 6, 2-min interset rest) and CS (4 × [2 × 3], 30-s intraset rest, 90-s interset rest), randomly. Lower-limb kinematics were collected by motion capture, as well as kinetic data by bilateral force platforms. Results: CS attenuated the loss in mean power (TS −21.6% [3.9%]; CS −12.4% [7.5%]; P = .042), although no differences in gross movement pattern (sagittal-plane joint angles) within and between conditions were observed (P ≥ .05). However, joint power produced at the hip increased from repetition (REP) 1 through REP 6 during TS, while a decrease was noted at the knee. A similar pattern was observed in the CS condition but was limited to the hip. Joint power produced at the hip increased from REP 1 through REP 3 but returned to REP 1 values before a similar increase through REP 6, resulting in differences between conditions (REP 4, P = .018; REP 5, P = .022). Conclusions: Sagittal-plane joint angles did not change in either condition, although CS elicited greater power. Differing joint power contributions (hip and knee) suggest potential central mechanism that may contribute to enhanced power output during CS and warrant further study. Practitioners should consider incorporating CS into training to promote greater power adaptations and to mitigate fatigue.

scholarly journals The effect of walking speed on the foot inter-segment kinematics, ground reaction forces and lower limb joint moments

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Sun ◽  
Gusztáv Fekete ◽  
Qichang Mei ◽  
Yaodong Gu
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Angle Variation ◽  
Foot Kinematics ◽  
Reaction Forces

Background Normative foot kinematic and kinetic data with different walking speeds will benefit rehabilitation programs and improving gait performance. The purpose of this study was to analyze foot kinematics and kinetics differences between slow walking (SW), normal walking (NW) and fast walking (FW) of healthy subjects. Methods A total of 10 healthy male subjects participated in this study; they were asked to carry out walks at a self-selected speed. After measuring and averaging the results of NW, the subjects were asked to perform a 25% slower and 25% faster walk, respectively. Temporal-spatial parameters, kinematics of the tibia (TB), hindfoot (HF), forefoot (FF) and hallux (HX), and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were recorded while the subjects walked at averaged speeds of 1.01 m/s (SW), 1.34 m/s (NW), and 1.68 m/s (FW). Results Hindfoot relative to tibia (HF/TB) and forefoot relative to hindfoot (FF/HF) dorsiflexion (DF) increased in FW, while hallux relative to forefoot (HX/FF) DF decreased. Increased peak eversion (EV) and peak external rotation (ER) in HF/TB were observed in FW with decreased peak supination (SP) in FF/HF. GRFs were increased significantly with walking speed. The peak values of the knee and ankle moments in the sagittal and frontal planes significantly increased during FW compared with SW and NW. Discussion Limited HF/TB and FF/HF motion of SW was likely compensated for increased HX/FF DF. Although small angle variation in HF/TB EV and FF/HF SP during FW may have profound effects for foot kinetics. Higher HF/TB ER contributed to the FF push-off the ground while the center of mass (COM) progresses forward in FW, therefore accompanied by higher FF/HF abduction in FW. Increased peak vertical GRF in FW may affected by decreased stance duration time, the biomechanical mechanism maybe the change in vertical COM height and increase leg stiffness. Walking speed changes accompanied with modulated sagittal plane ankle moments to alter the braking GRF during loading response. The findings of foot kinematics, GRFs, and lower limb joint moments among healthy males may set a reference to distinguish abnormal and pathological gait patterns.

The double-arch modified type-1b external skeletal fixator

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 374-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Nikolaou ◽  
M. Farrell ◽  
K. Perry ◽  
S. Girling ◽  
T. J. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Radiographic Images ◽  
Suboptimal Outcome ◽  
Limb Deformities ◽  
Acute Correction ◽  
Plane Joint ◽  
Centre Of Rotation

SummaryObjectives: To describe acute correction of antebrachial angular and rotational limb deformities (ARLD) using a new external skeletal fixator (ESF).Methods: Dogs that were presented with lameness caused by ARLD were treated by radial and ulnar osteotomies and acute realignment. A modified type-1b ESF incorporating double arches (DA-ESF) and a novel connecting configuration facilitated alignment with six degrees of freedom. Bilateral deformities were corrected surgically in the same session. Aseptic preparation of both antebrachii allowed comparison of limb alignment. Radiographic evaluation was performed using centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) methodology.Results: Thirty-five antebrachii (22 dogs) underwent surgery. Postoperative limb function was graded as good (n = 31), fair (n = 2), or poor (n = 2). Persistent medial carpal instability was associated with a suboptimal outcome. Postoperative radiographic images of the frontal and sagittal plane joint angles and elbow-to-carpus translation were compared with values that were reported in previous studies, and were within published reference ranges in most cases. Complications included delayed radial osteotomy union (n = 5), delayed ulnar osteotomy union (n = 2) and implant-associated morbidity (n = 3).Clinical relevance: A practical technique for acute correction of complex antebrachial ARLD is suggested, incorporating a new configuration of ESF. Putative limitations of radio-graphic planning using CORA may be compensated by careful attention to intra-operative visual and palpatory assessment.

Evaluation of inertial measurement units as a novel method for kinematic gait evaluation in dogs

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Pauls ◽  
Chris Kawcak ◽  
Kevin Haussler ◽  
Gina Bertocci ◽  
Valerie Moorman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Acquisition ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Plane Motion ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Hip Joints ◽  
Kinematic Data ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Plane Joint

Summary Objective: To evaluate the use of inertial measurement units (IMU) for quantification of canine limb kinematics. Methods: Sixteen clinically healthy, medium-sized dogs were enrolled. Baseline kinematic data were acquired using an optical motion capture system. Following this baseline data acquisition, a harness system was used for attachment of IMU to the animals. Optical kinematic data of dogs with and without the harness were compared to evaluate the influence of the harness on gait parameters. Sagittal plane joint kinematics acquired simultaneously with IMU and the optical system were compared for the carpal, tarsal, stifle and hip joints. Comparisons of data were made using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) test and evaluation of root mean squared errors (RMSE). Results: No significant differences were demonstrated in stance duration, swing duration or stride length between dogs instrumented with or without the harness, however, mean RMSE values ranged from 4.90° to 14.10° across the various joints. When comparing simultaneously acquired optical and IMU kinematic data, strong correlations were found for all four joints evaluated (CCC: carpus = 0.98, hock = 0.95, stifle = 0.98, hip = 0.96) and median RMSE values were similar across the joints ranging from 2.51° to 3.52°. Conclusions and Clinical relevance: Canine sagittal plane motion data acquisition with IMU is feasible, and optically acquired and IMU acquired sagittal plane kinematics had good correlation. This technology allows data acquisition outside the gait laboratory and may provide an alternative to optical kinematic gait analysis for the carpal, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints in the dog. Further investigation into this technology is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document