Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Women ≤ 40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing Size and Stage Disparity Compared With Older Women Over Time

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1072-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherina Zabicki ◽  
James A. Colbert ◽  
Francisco J. Dominguez ◽  
Michele A. Gadd ◽  
Kevin S. Hughes ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy Onega ◽  
Anna N.A. Tosteson ◽  
Julie Weiss ◽  
Jennifer Alford-Teaster ◽  
Rebecca A. Hubbard ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13081-e13081
Author(s):  
Rutika Jitesh Mehta ◽  
Adrienne Groman ◽  
Rohit K. Jain ◽  
Ellis Glenn Levine

e13081 Background: Synchronous breast cancers are uncommon and account for around 2% of all breast cancer diagnosis. Lobular histology is considered a risk factor for synchronous breast cancers. We sought to study the trends in synchronous breast cancer of ductal histology and influence of age by interrogating the SEER database. Methods: The SEER Research data 1973-2013 was interrogated for synchronous infiltrating ductal carcinoma diagnosis (2 diagnosis within 6 months of each other). Overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, was defined as the time (in months) from diagnosis to death from any cause. Univariate proportional hazards modeling results were used to assess the effect of age, race and stage on overall survival. All associations were considered statistically significant at an alpha error < 0.01. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. Results: 1469 cases were identified. Data was categorized by age group: ≤ 65 years or > 65 years. 60% were 65 years or younger. 85% were Caucasians, 9.6% African Americans and 5.2% others. Younger women (≤ 65 years) had a statistically higher proportion of Stage III/IV breast cancer diagnosis as compared to older women (33.4% vs 25.2%; p = 0.002). The incidence rate of synchronous breast cancers has been rising since 1973, more pronounced in the older age group. Incidence rates overall have risen from 0.09/100,000 persons in 1973-1980 to 0.29/100,000 persons in 2001-2013 (p < 0.001). Incidence rates for synchronous breast cancer in women > 65 years has increased from 0.30/100,000 persons in 1973-1980 to 1.03/100,000 persons in 2001-2013. The adjusted OS among older women is significantly worse than that of younger women (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04-1.05; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Better imaging techniques and breast cancer screening guidelines have likely improved breast cancer detection rates thus leading to a rise in the incidence of synchronous breast cancers. It can be speculated that underlying medical problems and advanced age result in more morbidity and subsequent mortality in older women with standard treatment. The finding of more advanced disease among younger women deserves scrutiny as to cause.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhua Luo ◽  
Stephen J. Carter ◽  
Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano ◽  
Michael Hendryx

Abstract PURPOSE: Aging associated with progressive declines in physical function is well-known; however, little is known about the trajectories of physical function before and after breast cancer diagnosis. The current study examined the trajectories in objective measures of physical function over 20 years for women with breast cancer and matched controls. METHODS: 2712 community-dwelling women (452 breast cancer cases and 1:5 matched cancer-free controls) aged 65 years or older at baseline (1986-1988) within the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures were followed for 20 years. Objective physical function was assessed up to 9 times, including hand-grip strength, timed chair stand, gait speed and quadriceps strength. Linear mixed models were used to model physical function changes in terms of secular time trend, group (cases or controls), period (pre-and post-diagnosis status), and their interaction terms. RESULTS: We observed all measures of physical function declined over time. While no differences in trends between cases and controls during the pre-diagnosis period were observed, after cancer diagnosis, grip strength and gait speed declined significantly faster in cases than controls. Quadriceps strength significantly decreased ~7 pounds shortly after breast cancer diagnosis, and then improved over time. CONCLUSION: Our prospective study revealed that older breast cancer survivors had significantly worse declines in grip strength and gait speed and a sharp, short-term drop followed by gradual improvement over time in quadriceps strength, compared to women without cancer. These findings suggest exercise training targeting muscle strength and mobility would be beneficial among older breast cancer survivors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M O’Brien ◽  
Dale P Sandler ◽  
Melissa House ◽  
Jack A Taylor ◽  
Clarice R Weinberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
C. E. Hill-Kayser ◽  
C. Vachani ◽  
M. K. Hampshire ◽  
G. A. Di Lullo ◽  
J. M. Metz

210 Background: Breast cancer survivors may be at risk for significant late effects after treatment. Understanding the patterns of change over time of patient reported outcomes (PRO) is often very challenging. Methods: Patient-reported data was gathered via a convenience sample frame from breast cancer survivors utilizing a publically available, free, Internet-based tool for creation of survivorship care plans. Available at www.livestrongcareplan.com and through the OncoLink website, the tool allows survivors to enter data regarding diagnosis, demographics, treatments received, and late effects experienced, and provides them with customized guidelines for future care. All data has been maintained anonymously with IRB approval. Results: 1,145 breast cancer survivors were queried with regard to PRO. Median age at diagnosis (dx) was 49 yrs, and median current age 52 yrs. Of users, 98% reported having had surgery; of these 56% underwent mastectomy and 49% lumpectomy (5% both). Similarly, 59% underwent sentinel LN biopsy, and 47% axilary dissection. Of the same cohort, 88% received chemotherapy and/or hormonal treatment, and 70% radiation therapy. The median time from dx until use of the care plan tool was 2 years (range 0-33 years). Late effects reported by survivors ≤ 2 and > 2 years from diagnosis are shown (see table). Overall, survivors ≤ 2 years from dx were more likely to note changes in skin color or texture; those > 2 years from diagnosis were more likely to note osteopenia, lymphedema, and sexual changes. Patient reported cognitive changes, arm pain/numbness/tingling, and loss of shoulder flexibility did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: This anonymous tool uses a convenience sample frame to gather PRO after breast cancer diagnosis/ treatment. PRO varied significantly with time since dx, with more late effects reported > 2 years from dx. This information may be of use during patient counseling and survivorship care delivery. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1570-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara A. Schonberg ◽  
Edward R. Marcantonio ◽  
Long Ngo ◽  
Donglin Li ◽  
Rebecca A. Silliman ◽  
...  

Purpose To understand the impact of breast cancer on older women's survival, we compared survival of older women diagnosed with breast cancer with matched controls. Methods Using the linked 1992 to 2003 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare data set, we identified women age 67 years or older who were newly diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer. We identified women not diagnosed with breast cancer from the 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries residing in SEER areas. We matched patient cases to controls by birth year and registry (99% or 66,039 patient cases matched successfully). We assigned the start of follow-up for controls as the patient cases' date of diagnosis. Mortality data were available through 2006. We compared survival of women with breast cancer by stage with survival of controls using multivariable proportional hazards models adjusting for age at diagnosis, comorbidity, prior mammography use, and sociodemographics. We repeated these analyses stratifying by age. Results Median follow-up time was 7.7 years. Differences between patient cases and controls in sociodemographics and comorbidities were small (< 4%). Women diagnosed with DCIS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.7 to 0.7) or stage I disease (aHR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.8 to 0.8) had slightly lower mortality than controls. Women diagnosed with stage II disease or higher had greater mortality than controls (stage II disease: aHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.2). The association of a breast cancer diagnosis with mortality declined with age among women with advanced disease. Conclusion Compared with matched controls, a diagnosis of DCIS or stage I breast cancer in older women is associated with better survival, whereas a diagnosis of stage II or higher breast cancer is associated with worse survival.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin J. Aiello Bowles ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
Jessica Chubak ◽  
Onchee Yu ◽  
Jeanene Johnson ◽  
...  

Differential initiation over time, as well as by age and tumor size, suggests patient preferences and provider recommendations for endocrine therapy vary, despite guideline recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document