scholarly journals Prevalence and factors associated with burnout among frontline primary health care providers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Dugani ◽  
Henrietta Afari ◽  
Lisa R. Hirschhorn ◽  
Hannah Ratcliffe ◽  
Jeremy Veillard ◽  
...  

Background: Primary health care (PHC) systems require motivated and well-trained frontline providers, but are increasingly challenged by the growing global shortage of health care workers. Burnout, defined as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal achievement, negatively impacts motivation and may further decrease productivity of already limited workforces. The objective of this review was to analyze the prevalence of and factors associated with provider burnout in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles on outpatient provider burnout in LMICs published up to 2016 in three electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CAB). Articles were reviewed to identify prevalence of and risk factors associated with provider burnout. Results: A total of 6,182 articles were identified, with 20 meeting eligibility criteria. We found heterogeneity in definition and prevalence of burnout. Most studies assessed burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. All three dimensions of burnout were seen across multiple cadres (physicians, nurses, community health workers, and pharmacists). Frontline nurses in South Africa had the highest prevalence of high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, while PHC providers in Lebanon had the highest reported prevalence of low personal achievement. Higher provider burnout was associated with high job stress, high time pressure and workload, and lack of organizational support. Conclusions: Our comprehensive review of published literature showed that provider burnout is an important problem across various health care providers in LMICs. Further studies are required to better measure the prevalence, causes and consequences of burnout, and guide the development of effective interventions to reduce or prevent burnout.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Dugani ◽  
Henrietta Afari ◽  
Lisa R. Hirschhorn ◽  
Hannah Ratcliffe ◽  
Jeremy Veillard ◽  
...  

Background: Primary health care (PHC) systems require motivated and well-trained frontline providers, but are increasingly challenged by the growing global shortage of health care workers. Burnout, defined as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal achievement, negatively impacts motivation and may further decrease productivity of already limited workforces. The objective of this review was to analyze the prevalence of and factors associated with provider burnout in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles on outpatient provider burnout in LMICs published up to 2016 in three electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CAB). Articles were reviewed to identify prevalence of factors associated with provider burnout. Results: A total of 6,182 articles were identified, with 20 meeting eligibility criteria. We found heterogeneity in definition and prevalence of burnout. Most studies assessed burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. All three dimensions of burnout were seen across multiple cadres (physicians, nurses, community health workers, midwives, and pharmacists). Frontline nurses in South Africa had the highest prevalence of high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, while PHC providers in Lebanon had the highest reported prevalence of low personal achievement. Higher provider burnout (for example, among nurses, pharmacists, and rural health workers) was associated with high job stress, high time pressure and workload, and lack of organizational support. Conclusions: Our comprehensive review of published literature showed that provider burnout is prevalent across various health care providers in LMICs. Further studies are required to better measure the causes and consequences of burnout and guide the development of effective interventions to reduce or prevent burnout.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Dugani ◽  
Henrietta Afari ◽  
Lisa R. Hirschhorn ◽  
Hannah Ratcliffe ◽  
Jeremy Veillard ◽  
...  

Background: Primary health care (PHC) systems require motivated and well-trained frontline providers, but are increasingly challenged by the growing global shortage of health care workers. Burnout, defined as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal achievement, negatively impacts motivation and may further decrease productivity of already limited workforces. The objective of this review was to analyze the prevalence of and factors associated with provider burnout in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We performed a systematic review of articles on outpatient provider burnout in LMICs published up to 2016 in three electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CAB). Articles were reviewed to identify prevalence of factors associated with provider burnout. Results: A total of 6,182 articles were identified, with 20 meeting eligibility criteria. We found heterogeneity in definition and prevalence of burnout. Most studies assessed burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. All three dimensions of burnout were seen across multiple cadres (physicians, nurses, community health workers, midwives, and pharmacists). Frontline nurses in South Africa had the highest prevalence of high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, while PHC providers in Lebanon had the highest reported prevalence of low personal achievement. Higher provider burnout (for example, among nurses, pharmacists, and rural health workers) was associated with high job stress, high time pressure and workload, and lack of organizational support. Conclusions: Our comprehensive review of published literature showed that provider burnout is prevalent across various health care providers in LMICs. Further studies are required to better measure the causes and consequences of burnout and guide the development of effective interventions to reduce or prevent burnout.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1070-1083
Author(s):  
Jae Kyoun Kim ◽  
Kyeong Han Kim ◽  
Yong Cheol Shin ◽  
Bo-Hyoung Jang ◽  
Seong-Gyu Ko

Abstract This paper reports the findings from the first systematic review of the utilization of traditional medicine (TM) in primary health care (PHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). PHC is an important component of health care and essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). For countries where there is a gap in PHC, TM plays a vital role. It is widely used and has the potential to increase the coverage of PHC and UHC. Hence in situations where TM is recognized in a considerable magnitude, there are scarce evidence and minimal regulation on it and TM practitioners (TMPs). This study aims to identify the current situation in the utilization of TM in PHC or UHC in LMICs. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted. A total of 56 articles met the criteria and were included in the review. In all, 14 analytic themes have been developed including the current use of TM in PHC, higher accessibility of TM, medical pluralism, national health system, national health policy and national health insurance to include TM, including TMPs in the referral system, utilizing TMPs as community health workers, the needs of scientific research on TM and the need for training both TMPs and conventional medical staffs for better collaboration. The study concluded that it is necessary to further focus on TM in the macro level on strengthening the referral system by including TM to establish a comprehensive service delivery network under UHC and in the micro level to focus on training the TMPs and conventional medicine health workers on both areas to attain more in-depth understanding of each other, which can lead to better collaboration and quality patient care.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Yao ◽  
Jia Yin ◽  
Qiang Sun ◽  
Ruiting Huo ◽  
Ding Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Irrational antibiotic use, especially at primary health care institutions accelerates the spread of antibiotic resistance (ABR). It is important to systematically review the effects of interventions at the primary health care to give evidence for future studies about interventions of providers’ antibiotic prescriptions. A systematic review was conducted to explore the effects of interventions targeted to the primary health care providers for improving the rational use of antibiotics. Methods: The literatures were searched in Ovid Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese databases with a time limit from January 1st, 1998 to December 1st, 2018. Only articles in the English and Chinese language were considered. Studies had to be the design of randomised control trial, controlled before-and-after studies or interrupted time series. Outcomes had to measure the change in providers’ behaviors. The Cochrane Collaboration criteria was used to assessed the risk of bias of the studies by two reviews. Narrative analysis was performed. Results: Of 4422 studies identified, we included 17studies. Most studies were conducted in the Europe or the United States and 4 of the studies were conducted in low-income and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Most studies had moderate to high risk of bias. There was moderate-strength evidence that interventions targeted at primary health care providers’ prescription behaviors were associated with decreases in antibiotic prescribing and promote the rational use of antibiotic.Conclusions: Provider-targeted interventions in primary health care could decrease the antibiotic prescription and promote the providers’ behaviours of irrational use of antibiotic However, we cannot compare the effects between different interventions because of heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas N.C. Pelegrini ◽  
Gabriela M.P. Mota ◽  
Caio F. Ramos ◽  
Edson Jesus ◽  
Francisco A.C. Vale

ABSTRACT. Dementia is a public health issue making the screening and diagnosing of dementia and its prodromal phases in all health settings imperative. Objective: using PRISMA, this systematic review aimed to identify how low-, middle-, and high-income countries establish dementia and cognitive dysfunction diagnoses in primary health care. Methods: studies from the past five years in English, Spanish, and Portuguese were retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Scielo, and Web of Science. Of 1987 articles, 33 were selected for analysis. Results: only three articles were from middle-income countries and there were no studies from low-income countries. The most used instrument was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia criteria were based on experts’ recommendation as well as on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), respectively. Conclusion: differences between these criteria among high- and middle-income countries were observed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002073142110412
Author(s):  
Qian Gao ◽  
A. Matthew Prina ◽  
Yuteng Ma ◽  
David Aceituno ◽  
Rosie Mayston

The objective of this research was to systematically review and synthesize quantitative studies that assessed the association between socioeconomic inequalities and primary health care (PHC) utilization among older people living in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). Six databases were searched, including Embase, Medline, Psych Info, Global Health, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CNKI, to identify eligible studies. A narrative synthesis approach was used for evidence synthesis. A total of 20 eligible cross-sectional studies were included in this systematic review. The indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) identified included income level, education, employment/occupation, and health insurance. Most studies reported that higher income, higher educational levels and enrollment in health insurance plans were associated with increased PHC utilization. Several studies suggested that people who were unemployed and economically inactive in older age or who had worked in formal sectors were more likely to use PHC. Our findings suggest a pro-rich phenomenon of PHC utilization in older people living in LMICs, with results varying by indicators of SES and study settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document