Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 240-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Joshi ◽  
Mila B. Lazarova ◽  
Hui Liao
2012 ◽  
pp. 804-815
Author(s):  
Anne DiPardo ◽  
Mike DiPardo

This chapter presents a case study detailing how geographically dispersed software developers employ writing in the process of creating and troubleshooting products for use in the healthcare industry. It focuses particularly on their efforts to arrive at language that unambiguously reflects functional requirements and optimal design principles. After a brief history of the company and the evolution of its national and international virtual collaboration practices, the authors turn to the role of text across particular task cycles, exploring the uses of writing in generating, designing, and refining plans and products. Focusing on a series of three composing sequences, the authors highlight the incremental process by which the team moves toward a shared sense of understanding and linguistic precision. They argue that in contrast to common conceptions of texts as simple containers for preformed ideas, these episodes provide a more nuanced picture, as writing comes to play a central role in constituting and fine-tuning meaning and in maintaining strong working relationships throughout the processes of developing and refining products. They close with implications for preparing diverse virtual teams for participation in tasks that demand exacting uses of the written word.


2009 ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Andrew Wenn

Communities of practice (CoPs), by their nature, are social entities. Such communities may be large or small, geographically dispersed or located within a confined region. Essentially, communities of practice consist of members who chose to come together because they have a passionate dedication to sharing knowledge and a desire to develop their own and other’s capabilities (Wenger & Snyder, 2000). No matter what type of CoP (collocated or virtual; intra or interorganizational) communication is one of the prime desiderata. Thus, it is highly likely that technology of some form will be involved. For instance, a virtual community of practice may use e-mail or a more sophisticated groupware application to keep in touch. CoPs within a knowledge management environment will certainly have access to technology. To understand the workings of such communities requires a theory that enables us to deal at the levels of the individual, the group, and the larger world in which the community is embedded (Lave, 1988). Any such theory must be able to account for the role of technology within the community as well as its social aspects.


2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Polzer ◽  
C. Brad Crisp ◽  
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa ◽  
Jerry W. Kim

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Eisenberg ◽  
Corinne Post ◽  
Nancy DiTomaso

Organizations increasingly rely on virtual teams to access geographically dispersed expertise. Yet, team dispersion introduces challenges to team communication that may negatively influence team performance. Using a sample of 53 innovation teams representing a variety of geographic dispersion configurations from completely collocated to highly dispersed, we examined the moderating role of transformational leadership on the relationship between team dispersion, team communication, and team performance. Our findings suggest that while transformational leadership is effective in reducing the negative effects of dispersion in collocated teams or ones with low levels of geographic dispersion, it is less effective helping improve the performance of highly dispersed teams. This effect may be due to a transformational leader’s difficulty in facilitating team communication in highly dispersed teams, where his or her influence might actually have counterproductive effects. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory, future research, and practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Boyer O'Leary ◽  
Mark Mortensen

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Kossler ◽  
Sonya Prestridge

Youth Justice ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Gray ◽  
Hannah Smithson ◽  
Richard McHugh ◽  
Graham Smyth

As part of the government’s Transforming Youth Custody programme, in 2014 the Youth Justice Board (YJB) established four new resettlement consortia in four areas in England. This article presents the findings from a process evaluation of the new consortia, paying particular attention to the enablers and/or barriers that affected the implementation of an enhanced resettlement offer. We found that the consortia did appear to improve partnership working and collaboration between key agencies. Yet the delivery of an enhanced offer was often hampered by the geographically dispersed nature of the consortia, along with problems accessing suitable accommodation upon release.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document