Clay Soil Compaction Due to Wheel Slip

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 0646-0649 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.S.V. Raghavan ◽  
E. McKyes ◽  
B. Beaulieu
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.2) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
Tetyana Lvovska ◽  
Tetyana Lytvynenko ◽  
Alla Kariuk

A process of soil compaction methods development including new authors’ methodology is described. The importance of soil compaction for engineering purposes is substantiated. Preconditions for Proctor compaction test appearance are highlighted. Proctor’s approach and suggestions for the degree of soil compaction assessing are analyzed. Soviet version of Proctor’s equipment and Modified Proctor compaction test are given. Principal differences between Proctor test, Standard compaction test and Modified Proctor test are presented. The problems and disadvantages of existent soil compaction tests are revealed. New authors’ physical experiment methodology for patterns establishment of water migration in subgrade embankment depth, in the capacity factors of what it is accepted: clay soil type (its number plasticity); moisture, at what the soil was compacted; soil skeleton density; embankment height; «rest» time after subgrade erection and before it’s operation is developed and realized. By laboratory and field tests water migration patterns in compacted subgrade soils depth are established. As a result of statistical processing of research results, the empirical dependence of compacted clay soil stabilized moisture is obtained. Empirical dependence parameter corresponds to maximum molecular moisture capacity at what it is advisable to do the subgrade clay soils multilayer consolidation for their long-term strength ensuring. 


1973 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. DAVIES ◽  
J. B. FINNEY ◽  
S. J. RICHARDSON
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 2.17-2.22 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.G. Argaw ◽  
◽  
F. Saathoff ◽  
A. Woldemichael ◽  
A. Gebissa

1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.S.V. Raghavan ◽  
E. McKyes ◽  
B. Beaulieu
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.M. Salokhe ◽  
Nguyen The Ninh
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
T. Mahesh Babu ◽  
A. Ashok Kumar ◽  
K. V. S. Rami Reddy ◽  
H. V. Hema Kumar

Indian agriculture account for nearly 14.2% of the gross domestic product and involves over 58.2% of population. The biggest challenge before the agriculture sector of India is to meet the growing demands of food for its increasing population from 1.21 billion in the year 2011 to 1.6 billion by the year 2050. Since the cultivated area has remained nearly constant (142 Mha) over the years, the only option to increase food production is to increase the productivity of land. The developed combination tillage implement comprises of two passive tillage implement one as front passive tillage implements and other as second passive tillage implement. In case of passive implements, power losses are more at tire-soil interface and also a considerable weight is required on drive wheels of tractor to provide necessary traction that results into detrimental soil compaction. The developed tillage implements were evaluated under actual field condition at different depth and operating speeds. The tillage performance parameters such as draft force, fuel consumption, wheel slip, power requirement was measured. A digital dynamometer was used for measurement of draft force of the tillage implement at different operating depths under field evaluation. The draw bar power requirement of the combination tillage implement was calculated. During field evaluation it was observed that the draft force of the cultivator with disc harrow (C-DH) found to vary from 190 to 220 kgf. The power requirement of combination tillage implement was observed as, 5.32, 9.866, 18.48 and 2.42, 6.3, 3, 7.7 and 0.46, 1.7, 3.5 kW at forward speed of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 km h-1, respectively.


Ecosystems ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. van Klink ◽  
M. Schrama ◽  
S. Nolte ◽  
J. P. Bakker ◽  
M. F. WallisDeVries ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Saadat Kamgar ◽  
Ehsan Savand Roomi

<p>Machinery traffic on farm and forest caused to problems in environment and economics by Fossil fuel consumption and soil compaction. According to result of investigation, The GUTD (Gear Up and Throttle Down) method was recommended to decrease fuel consumption. But the wide range of machinery applications, soil conditions and experience of drivers or operators need to have index for ensuring the GUTD method is carried out properly. The purpose of this study was evaluation of GUTD method using MF 399 tractor on instantaneous fuel consumption and soil compaction. The tractor was equipped by sensors, a designed electronic circuit and a computer to measure and record parameters such as fuel consumption, forward speed and wheel slip. This field examination was carried out on tilled land with clay-loam soil and then data were analyzed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Considered factors were included four speed levels (1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8 km h<sup>-1</sup>), three levels of gear (first, second and third) and two levels of wheel drive (2WD and 4WD). Parameters of cone index and bulk density were used to determine soil compaction.Variations in compaction of before and after tractor passage were calculated in each plot. Statistical analysis in each speed showed that factor of gear in variations of soil compaction was significant at all speeds except 12.8 km h<sup>-1</sup> and instantaneous fuel consumption was reduced by GUTD at each of constant speed except the mentioned speed. This research showed that instantaneous fuel consumption can be considered as appropriate index for selecting the best gear and speed in terms of fuel consumption and soil compaction.<strong></strong></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document