Splenocystojejunostomy for the treatment of a symptomatic splenic pseudocyst

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. e202-e205
Author(s):  
SS Yatham ◽  
Y Perikleous ◽  
A Ezzat ◽  
N Chander ◽  
A Alsafi ◽  
...  

Pancreatic pseudocyst is a widely recognised local complication following acute pancreatitis. Typically occurring more than four weeks after acute pancreatitis, a pseudocyst is a mature, encapsulated collection found within the peripancreatic tissues manifesting as abdominal pain, structural compression, gastroparesis, sepsis and organ dysfunction. Therapeutic interventions include endoscopic transpapillary or transmural drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage and open surgery. We present our management of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis complicated by a pancreatic pseudocyst extending to the splenic capsule in a 38-year-old man. A trial of conservative management was sought, but later escalated to percutaneous fluoroscopic drainage. Despite a period of volume reduction of the pseudocyst, reaccumulation occurred. We describe successful surgical treatment via means of a splenocystojejunostomy and subsequent pain reduction.

Author(s):  
A. V. Shabunin ◽  
A. Yu. Lukin ◽  
D. V. Shikov ◽  
A. A. Kolotilshchikov

Aim. To clarify the indications for video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement at the late stage of pancreatic necrosis. Material and methods. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 1468 patients throughout 2012-2018. Severe destructive pancreatic necrosis occurred in 364 (24.8%) patients. Infected pancreatic necrosis needed for surgical treatment in 264 cases. We used video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement in 20 patients (8.1%).Results. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement was not associated with “open” surgery in 6 patients. There were 2-6 redo VARD procedures per patient. We diagnosed the “left-sided” and “right-sided” models of pancreas and peripancreatic space infiltrationin 4 and 2 patients, respectively. There were 14 patients who needed an “open” surgery besides video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement due to advanced inflammation. Bleeding was the only complication and occurred in 2 patients. There was 1 unfavorable outcome.Conclusion. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement is an effective minimally invasive approach of debridement. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement combined with percutaneous catheter drainage is preferable for “leftsided” and “right-sided” infiltration of pancreas and peripancreatic tissue. It is advisable to combine video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement with open surgery for “mixed model” of infiltration.


1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 777
Author(s):  
Kyoung Soo Lee ◽  
Seon Kwan Juhng ◽  
Byung Suk Roh ◽  
See Sung Choi ◽  
Chang Guhn Kim ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1247
Author(s):  
Jin Jong You ◽  
Goo Lee ◽  
In Oak Ahn ◽  
Hyeong Gon Lee ◽  
Sung Hoon Chung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document